Reply With QuoteI think the Neocons didn't get the memo.Originally Posted by SirMoby
Lady Mod
What does Iraq have to do with 9/11?
Even after the President had to admit that Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11 I still hear about the two as if they are linked together.
What's the connection?
'
'
$20,000,000 voter fraud that you will never hear about on Fox News.
Some numbers based on facts or liberal propaganda as some call it
Historical Tax Chart
People's Budget
Brain Washing In America
I think the Neocons didn't get the memo.
Lady Mod
The president "had to admit"? The president never said Iraq had anything to do with 9/11, as of course you already know.
Why are you bringing this up again Moby? We all know there was no deception here, and the reason we invaded Iraq was part of the war on terrorism. Iraq harbored known terrorists and financed terrorism, that's what made Saddam part of the war on terrorism.
What does Iraq have to do with 9/11? According to the President, nothing.
Video: http://movies.crooksandliars.com/Bus...-08-21-062.wmv
QUESTION: A lot of the consequences you mentioned for pulling out seem like maybe they never would have been there if we hadn’t gone in. How do you square all of that?
BUSH: I square it because imagine a world in which you had Saddam Hussein, who had the capacity to make a weapon of mass destruction, who was paying suiciders to kill innocent life, who had relations with Zarqawi. You know, I’ve heard this theory about, you know, everything was just fine until we arrived [in Iraq] and — you know, the stir-up-the-hornet’s- nest theory. It just doesn’t hold water, as far as I’m concerned. The terrorists attacked us and killed 3,000 of our citizens before we started the freedom agenda in the Middle East. They were …
QUESTION: What did Iraqi have to do with that?
BUSH: What did Iraq have to do with what?
QUESTION: The attacks upon the World Trade Center.
BUSH: Nothing. . . . .Except for it’s part of — and nobody’s ever suggested in this administration that Saddam Hussein ordered the attack. Iraq was a — Iraq — the lesson of September the 11th is: Take threats before they fully materialize…
http://www.crooksandliars.com/2006/0...o-do-with-911/
I guess Moby doesn't consider Obama, oops, I mean Osama, I get those mixed up all the time. They're kind of interchangable I guess. Anyway, I guess he doesn't consider him a terrorist. Therefore, he doesn't understand the link between the terrorists that were harbored in Iraq and Obama, Osama.
Still, denial!
Liberals like to pretend that the war on terrorism is only against those directly responsible for the attacks of 9/11, when it isn't. The president laid out what the war on terrorism was about, and who it was against on September 14, 2001, just 3 days after the attacks.
You seem to get mixed up a lot there Sharon. How you got that Moby doesn't consider Osama a terrorist from his post is beyond me. Did you know the Pentagon did an extensive review of over 600,000 documents captured after the invasion of Iraq and could find no link between Saddam and al Qaida?
Unfortunately we let Bush define terrorism and he was wrong on all counts. Just because he said so did not make it so.
They are all terrorists! One is a dead terrorist the others will be, hopefully soon. You don't recognize that as a commonality? WOW!
No he wasn't... Anyone who supports, finances, or provides safe haven for terrorists, and terrorist organizations, is the enemy in the war on terrorism...
There is nothing flawed or incorrect about that.
Posting Permissions