Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Why Ron Paul May Cut a Deal With Mitt Romney

  1. #1
    Administrator Bill Cosby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    State of Mind
    Posts
    49,422
    Blog Entries
    26

    Default Why Ron Paul May Cut a Deal With Mitt Romney

    For Ron Paul, victory is finally in sight. No, not a swearing-in ceremony next January 20, or even a single statewide win. Halfway through the primary season, Paul has won only a preference poll in the U.S. Virgin Islands, and he is running dead last in delegates among the four GOP candidates for President. He has spent a lot, if not always wisely: the $31.55 he has dropped per vote (more than even Mitt Romney) is a sum that might shock even a Democrat.
    But winning the presidency was never Paul's foremost goal, and as he nears the end of his last presidential crusade, he has one more chance to promote his ideas.


    The Republican race is a muddled mess. Even after his southern losses, only Romney has a real shot at amassing the 1,144 delegates required to wrap up the nomination, and he would then face the task of unifying the GOP's warring factions. Which is why Paul's campaign has sent discreet signals to Camp Romney that the keys to Paul's shop can be had for the right price.
    (PHOTOS: The Rich History of Mitt Romney)
    History suggests the two men are already in cahoots. Throughout the primary, Paul has been Romney's secret weapon. During the 20 GOP debates, Paul attacked Romney's rivals a total of 39 times while sparing Romney entirely, according to an analysis by the liberal group ThinkProgress. Paul leapt to Romney's defense when his tenure at Bain Capital and his taste for firing insurance companies came under attack, and skewered a series of Romney antagonists in TV ads. "He is our deputy campaign manager," jokes one Romney ally.
    Paul's advisers bristle at suggestions that the libertarian icon is in league the GOP frontrunner. They say Paul still has a shot at the nomination if he can hold Romney beneath the delegate threshold until Tampa and then force a floor fight that sends delegates fleeing to Paul on a secondary ballot. This may be the company line, but the scenario is improbable enough that even Paul has conceded his "chances are slim."
    (VIDEO: 10 Questions with Ron Paul)
    Even as they tamp down rumors of a pact, Paul's advisers concede that the friendship between Paul and Romney is the initial step toward a deal. And behind the scenes, discussions between the two campaigns -- as well as initial discussions with the Santorum and Gingrich camps, according to one Paul adviser -- are slowly taking shape.
    An alliance could benefit both camps. Paul's support would go a long way toward helping Romney with a bloc of young Republicans who have been turning out in huge numbers for Paul and who otherwise might stay home in November. It might also help Romney grab all of Paul's delegates. Such an arrangement would help Paul get what a Romney ally called "an important speaking role at the convention."
    Paul's camp contends he will exceed the 270 delegates Romney garnered in 2008, which earned him an undercard slot on the penultimate evening in St. Paul. Josh Putnam, a political scientist at Davidson College who studies delegate allocation, notes that Paul's campaign hasn't furnished evidence to back up those claims. But he says there is a chance Paul could "completely exploit the system and take delegates from caucus states where there's no written rule to how delegates are allocated." Paul's aides say they expect to win a plurality of delegates in a batch of blue-to-purple caucus states where it failed to win the popular vote, including Iowa, Minnesota, Maine, Nevada and Washington.
    (MORE: Ron Paul, The Prophet)
    Paul's acolytes insist their man cannot be bought. "Romney wants the ring of power. He wants it so bad," says Doug Wead, a Paul senior adviser. "Negotiating with Ron Paul is very difficult because he doesn't want anything. If he got the ring, he would throw it into Mount Doom."
    Maybe so, but at 76, Paul is understandably concerned about the future of his movement. Aides say if Paul can't win the nomination, four legislative priorities would top the Texas Representative's wish list: deep spending cuts that lead to a balanced budget; the restoration of civil liberties; a commitment to reclaim the legislative branch's right to declare war, which it abdicated to the executive branch in recent decades; and reforms that shore up the U.S. monetary system, such an audit of the Federal Reserve or competing-currency legislation. The Texas Representative might also be enticed, says campaign chairman Jesse Benton, by the prospect of serving as a presidential adviser, a Cabinet position for someone in his orbit or "perhaps a vice presidency."
    Not for himself, but rather his son. Rand Paul, the junior senator from Kentucky and a Tea Party icon, is expected to launch his own White House bid in 2016. Being on the ticket now -- or even being mentioned for it -- would be a helpful step. Says one Paul adviser: "If you're talking about putting Rand on the ticket, of course that would be worth delivering our people to Romney."
    (MORE: Swampland's Coverage of the 2012 Election)
    Romney is unlikely to go for that. At the same time, Paul's backers recognize that selling supporters on an alliance with Romney carries special risks, since Paul's bond with his backers is predicted on his record of principled stands. A pact would have to be done "very cautiously," says Benton. "We wouldn't ask our people to do that if we worried they were just being coopted or that we were in some way selling out."
    But it may soon be time for Paul's army to decide if it wants to win or lose in the fall. "There's clearly something going on between the two of them, and that's a very good thing," says David Adams, a Kentucky Tea Party strategist who helmed Rand Paul's Senate primary campaign. "The main goal is stopping this lurch to the left. Mitt Romney and Ron Paul can go a long way toward healing what ails our nation."
    We judge ourselves by our ideals; others by their actions.
    Howard Zinn

    We can have democracy in this country, or we can have great wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we can't have both.

    Louis D. Brandeis

  2. #2

    Default

    I mentioned this before and I think it's the only thing that makes sense for the two. Romney has to win 48% of the upcoming delegates, much of the South hasn't voted and it appears in many middle ground states, he needs to out spend his competitors by at least 4 to 1, if not 6 to 1.

    Romney may not avoid a brokered convention unless he cuts a deal with someone and without a deal he will go through many millions more than if he cuts a deal.

    1. Paul doesn't have a chance even though he won a county in Utah.
    2. Romney and Paul have not spent time attacking each other.
    3. Paul appeals to some independents at a time when the War on women is turning off rational voters.

    It's a ticket that could win.
    '
    '
    $20,000,000 voter fraud that you will never hear about on Fox News.

    Some numbers based on facts or liberal propaganda as some call it

    Historical Tax Chart

    People's Budget

    Brain Washing In America

  3. #3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Moby

    It's a ticket that could win.
    The guy who is made of money running with the guy who hates money?

  4. #4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Moby
    I mentioned this before and I think it's the only thing that makes sense for the two. Romney has to win 48% of the upcoming delegates, much of the South hasn't voted and it appears in many middle ground states, he needs to out spend his competitors by at least 4 to 1, if not 6 to 1.

    Romney may not avoid a brokered convention unless he cuts a deal with someone and without a deal he will go through many millions more than if he cuts a deal.

    1. Paul doesn't have a chance even though he won a county in Utah.
    2. Romney and Paul have not spent time attacking each other.
    3. Paul appeals to some independents at a time when the War on women is turning off rational voters.

    It's a ticket that could win.
    Which state could they win?


  5. #5

    Default

    I don't see it. Republicans seem to be favoring Mitt because he is a Moderate. If they want to carry the vote they need a southern Moderate.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •