PDA

View Full Version : Another poll shows 'public' support gov healthcare option


Bill Cosby
07-06-2009, 10:16 PM
From NBC's Domenico Montanaro
Another poll is out showing public support for a public/government option. A Quinnipiac poll today shows 69% support a public/government run option. Only 28%, though, say they'd opt into it. (http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2009/07/01/1984293.aspx)

This could be because most are happy with their current health insurance, as evidenced in NBC News/Wall Street Journal polling. (Hat tip: Roll Call.)

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- A national poll indicates that most Americans are receptive to having more government influence over their health care in return for lower costs and more coverage.
Congress may take up health care reform this year. (http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/05/29/health.care.poll/)

Congress may take up health care reform this year.

Sixty-three percent of people questioned in a CNN/Opinion Research Corp. survey released Friday said they would favor an increase in the federal government's influence over their own health care plans in an attempt to lower costs and provide coverage to more Americans; 36 percent were opposed.

The poll also suggests that slightly more than six out of 10 think the government should guarantee health care for all Americans, with 38 percent opposed.

But Americans appear to be split over raising taxes to increase coverage. Forty-seven percent of those questioned support raising taxes in order to provide health insurance to all Americans.

An equal amount back the idea of keeping taxes at current levels but not providing health insurance for all Americans.

"Will the health-care debate be different this time?" CNN Senior Political Analyst Bill Schneider asked. "It does look like public sentiment has shifted. But government does not seem to be the bugaboo it was 15 years ago, when a major push by the Clinton administration to reform and expand health care failed."

The poll indicates a partisan split. Democrats overwhelmingly support increased government influence over their health-care coverage in return for lower costs and great coverage for more Americans. Six out of 10 independents feel the same way, but only one in four Republicans agrees.

"Opposition to President Barack Obama's health-care plan is ideological. It comes from Republicans and conservatives. You are not hearing a lot of opposition right now from the business community and the health care industry," Schneider said.

The poll's release comes three days before Congress returns from a one-week break. Health care reform will be near the top of the agenda for lawmakers as they head back to Capitol Hill.

The poll also comes one day after Obama urged supporters to turn up the pressure on lawmakers regarding health care reform, telling them that "if we don't get it done this year, we're not going to get it done."

Health care reform didn't go very far under President Clinton. The current president thinks things will be different now.

"Something else is different this time," Schneider said. "A lot of businesses and insurance companies are working with the Obama administration on health-care reform. They don't want to pay the costs any more."

The CNN/Opinion Research Corp. poll was conducted May 14-17, with 1,010 adult Americans questioned by telephone. The survey's sampling error is plus or minus 3 percentage points.


>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

New York Times Poll Showing 72% Support for Obama's Health Care Plan Was Stacked With Obama Supporters (http://www.cnsnews.com/PUBLIC/Content/Article.aspx?rsrcid=49999)

Wednesday, June 24, 2009
By Christopher Neefus


President Barack Obama addressed the American Medical Association during their annual meeting in Chicago, Monday, June 15, 2009. (AP Photo/Charles Rex Arbogast)
(CNSNews.com) - A New York Times/CBS News poll released Saturday that showed broad bipartisan support for President Obama’s health care reform, over-sampled Obama voters compared to McCain voters, critics say.

The poll, administered June 12-16, found that 72 percent of respondents favored the creation of a government health-insurance plan that would compete with private insurers.

It also said 50 percent of respondents thought the government would do a better job providing medical coverage than private insurers, up from 30 percent in 2007; and that 59 percent thought the government would be better at holding down costs, up from 47 percent two years ago.

But critics including pollster Kellyanne Conway say the results are inaccurate because they are heavily skewed toward those who voted for Obama in the 2008 presidential election.

In addition, other indicators point toward a repeat of the defeat Hillary Clinton's proposed government-run faced in the early ‘90’s.

Out of 895 respondents, 24 percent were Republicans, 38 percent Democrats, and 38 percent were independents, according to a June 20 release from CBS News. While the release says the sampling was conducted at random, those numbers are significantly below the 32.6 percent who identify themselves as Republican according to a May survey from the nonpartisan Rasmussen Reports.

Similarly, the Times/CBS poll said 48 percent of respondents had voted for Obama, versus 25 percent for McCain, a nearly two-to-one advantage for Obama supporters.

Had those results been reflected in the November presidential election, Obama would have garnered 66 percent of the vote to McCain’s 34 percent, Conway, president & CEO of “the polling company,” told CNSNews.com.

“Was the vote 66-34? You tell me,” Conway said.

In 2008, Obama won 53 percent of the vote, McCain won 46 percent.

Conway said that the poll was skewed toward Democrats and Obama supporters because the Times and CBS made it so.

“Their original result was more in line (with other non-partisan polling for party identification) but they weighted those numbers,” Conway charged.

The random information gathered by the two media outlets originally saw fewer independents and Democrats, but their polling methodology saw those numbers shift at the expense of Republican representation. Conway called this a case of “a conclusion in search of evidence.”

Janet Elder, editor for news surveys and election analysis at The New York Times, defended the poll’s methodology.

“Although some polling organizations do, The New York Times/CBS News poll does not weight by party ID,” she told CNSNews.com. “We weight by characteristics that are known from census data.”

Scott Rasmussen, founder and CEO of Rasmussen Reports, a nonpartisan pollster, defended the veracity of the Times/CBS News poll -- but found it difficult.

“We have absolutely no idea what their weighting process is and what their technique is,” he told CNSNews.com. “I believe that they did not make adjustments based on party (identification). I believe they go on other factors and simply report what comes out of that.”

Elder said in 19 out of every 20 cases, the results using their technique “will differ by no more than 3 percentage points in either direction” of the outcome they would have had if they’d sought to interview “all American adults.”

But Conway says the over-sampling of Democrats was consistent throughout the poll.

“Show me the other polls that are that low," she said. "If you look at the way Scott (Rasmussen) reports things, they’re very different from The New York Times. The Census is taken every 10 years, so what are they looking at? The 2000 Census?”

“Almost nobody ever takes them to task for this, because they are CBS and the New York Times,” Conway added. “It is true that more Americans are identifying themselves as Independents, but everyone is doing polling; no one (else) is getting these numbers,” Conway said.

The Times ran an accompanying story on the front page of the Sunday edition with the headline “In Poll, Wide Support for Government Run Health.” The findings were also reported by most other major outlets.

The Times article interpreted the poll results as indicating broad, bipartisan support for government involvement in health care.

“Americans overwhelmingly support substantial changes to the health care system,” the article began, “and (they) are strongly behind one of the most contentious proposals Congress is considering, a government-run insurance plan to compete with private insurers.”

But other key findings in the poll suggest, on the other hand, that Americans have not significantly changed their positions since the last time health-care reform was seriously considered by Congress, according to Conway.

“We are identical to where we were in 1993-94,” she told CNSNews.com, “with only 51 percent of respondents even in the Democrat-skewing poll saying the health-care system needs fundamental changes, versus 52 percent in January 1994. When the question becomes whether the system needs to be completely rebuilt, 34 percent say yes in the NYT/CBS poll, versus 38 percent in 1994.

Additionally, the vast majority of Americans are satisfied with their own insurance coverage, as they were at the beginning of the Clinton administration. Approximately 77 percent in the current poll say they are at least somewhat satisfied.

Rasmussen points out that, in these areas, the Times/CBS poll was consistent with other polls.

“CBS, like everybody else, found that most people are satisfied with their health-care coverage,” he said. “But they have qualms about the overall system. And that is the biggest single obstacle to reform: people do not want to change their own coverage.”

Conway agreed. Because of their satisfaction with their own coverage, Americans are unlikely to rock the boat.

“The difference this year could be that Barack Obama is a more compelling messenger than Hillary Clinton.” But, she added: “Americans can do the math.”

They are hesitant to support the record expenditure it would take to pass sweeping health-care reform. Conway says.

"As they are deciding whether to take a vacation this summer or keep their child in private elementary school . . . they are asking to take a look at the ledger book now,” she added.

Americans like the words “change” and “reform,” she says, “but then they find out that you can’t define those.” When they see the possibility of their own healthcare options changing, “(T)hey discover that their reform is not someone else’s reform.”

Conway’s “the polling company,” in conjunction with Americans for Tax Reform, is performing an audit of all numbers released on health-care reform, to be issued on Wednesday.

The Times/CBS poll reports a margin of error of plus or minus 3 percentage points. CBS did not return calls for comment.

MintJulep
07-06-2009, 10:18 PM
:lmao2: :lmao2: :lmao2:

The Treason Times poll? You DO realize they polled about 68% of Bammy supporter in that sample, no? This isn't reality, it's moonbatic delusions.

Bill Cosby
07-06-2009, 10:21 PM
Yep...........

I am a bleeding heart lib I can't help myself.........lol

I think it fair to toss this around...........

There is always controversy w/ polls........... Not like we get to vote on this stuff. It is to important........

radioguy
07-06-2009, 10:45 PM
Take a look at who they polled... You will find that 2 of 3 voted for Obama.

.

Bill Cosby
07-06-2009, 11:03 PM
DOes it matter???

Good polls.. Bad polls. ugly polls..............

MintJulep
07-06-2009, 11:07 PM
Of course it matters. Would you take a Fox News poll as an objective poll? Same thing, only the opposite.

Bill Cosby
07-06-2009, 11:35 PM
Actually I find most polls suspect.......... That is w/ a + or - of 3%...

IMO the best thing to do is let us vote on this.........

DO you think the American ppl should make the call or someone else???

The Professor
07-07-2009, 12:11 AM
polls are silly, for dreamers

where rubber meets road, unfortunately, the "public option" is dead

this was announced loud and clear by bigears' point man in the senate, mr baucus, about 3 weeks ago

baucus' exact bawl was, back to the drawing board

http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oe-mcmanus21-2009jun21,0,4842819.column

but we all knew just what he meant

bigears knew what he meant

baucus said the cbo refused to cooperate---LOLOL!

ms pelosi got apoplectic over cbo intransigence

ex senator daschle who, but for a tax return woulda been medical missionary, released a report that declared, word for word in the headlines, "the public option is dead"

http://blogs.abcnews.com/thenote/2009/06/daschle-folds-on-federal-public-health-care-plan.html

bigears' own conduct since is that of a man shilling to get whatever he can

NOT demanding the moon anymore

and certainly in no huge hurry

LOLOL!

so there ya go

it's cuz maxie's measure came in at $1.6T

and still left 35 of 52 million uncovered

it forced 23 million to make changes in their existing coverage

and it did not explicitly exclude illegals

it also taxed YOUR medical benefits (the mccain plan)

but exempted unionists

http://www.irnnews.com/news.asp?action=detail&article=26340

allegedly because their med benefits were so BIG, the tax would be too HEAVY

irony

you can discuss your fantasies, anyone, all you want

but fairy tales are for kids

reality is mine, and---any med reform that includes illegals, in times like these, has no chance

bigears is too dumb to appreciate this

i guess he was in kenya or something 2 summers ago when congress' phone banks collapsed due to bush/mccain trying to push "amnesty"

and america did not perceive itself as dying at the time

i'm just rehearsing headlines, here

ie, this is all common knowledge

the public option is dead

he's said himself if he doesn't get it by AUGUST RECESS he's likely never to win it

i can write a poll question to get me any answer i desire

let alone by picking the people sampled

polls---height of silliness

which is cool

thanks, cliff

Mr. Blue
07-07-2009, 12:26 AM
But Americans appear to be split over raising taxes to increase coverage. Forty-seven percent of those questioned support raising taxes in order to provide health insurance to all Americans.

An equal amount back the idea of keeping taxes at current levels but not providing health insurance for all Americans.

See, this is where the wheels on the bus fall off.

The idea of "healthcare" for all...it's a nice an easy question to answer. Hey, would you like to see everyone have healthcare? Most people would say yes right off the bat.

Hey, would you like to see everyone have healthcare, but you have to increase taxes to do it?

Umm...lol, even in a poll, that may be biased to the left, you ask that question and suddenly it's a 50/50 discussion. If it were a national referendum topic that asked the second question...how do you think that vote would turn out?

You just have to look at what people say without any commitment on their own part vs. what they'd actually vote for...most people wouldn't vote for a tax increase to pay for universal healthcare.

bluejunk44
07-07-2009, 12:31 AM
that's the retarded thing about this entire argument. people are already paying for other's health care. the only difference now is you're paying a hell of a lot more for their ER visits that could be regular office visits instead.

so either you're for serious health care reform with a public option or you're for making all ERs refuse treatment to people who can't pay upfront.

which is it?

The Professor
07-07-2009, 12:33 AM
ask baucus

Mr. Blue
07-07-2009, 01:59 AM
that's the retarded thing about this entire argument. people are already paying for other's health care. the only difference now is you're paying a hell of a lot more for their ER visits that could be regular office visits instead.

so either you're for serious health care reform with a public option or you're for making all ERs refuse treatment to people who can't pay upfront.

which is it?

Well, that's the basic gist of it, lol.

The thing is...for me there's a middle ground between Universal Healthcare and no healthcare. I think we should just take a look at healthcare and the costs involved. To me there can't really be a discussion on healthcare until we look at why the hell it costs $40 for a set of Tylenol when you go to the hospital.

disrupter
07-07-2009, 02:39 AM
why the hell it costs $40 for a set of Tylenol when you go to the hospital.

Profiteers will charge whatever the marketplace of fools will pay.

"There is a sucker born every minute."

All the layers of disconnection help continue this nonsense.
Employee: I am not paying for it, so its not my money.
Employer: I am avoiding paying higher wages tax free, so i can't waste much time on it.
Insurer: I am riding the gravy train & these morons aren't holding me to account. My only problem is service providers padding bills & overcharging my profits, but i just pass any increases off to employers & premium payers.
Service Providers: I am just ripping off the insurance company which hurts no one really.

Lots of layers of disconnection & deniability for acres & acres of corruption to operate in.

GaGa Insurance Premium payer: "My insurance company tells me it is all those ER indigents causing my rates to skyrocket,
it isn't profiteering drug pushers & paying insurance CEOs 1.6 BILLION dollars in annual bonuses."

Binky
07-07-2009, 02:57 PM
Polls, smolls. Do any of you ever vote in a poll? Me neither. Their polls would go moldy if they waited for me to go and vote in one of them. They certainly don't refleck what the rest of the poplulation thinks on the subj. Only those, well, hmmm, being polled. :lmao2:

disrupter
07-07-2009, 05:49 PM
Binky, in case you were unaware,

democratic elections are a binding POLLs.

just a word to the wise, honey.

Binky
07-07-2009, 06:53 PM
Binky, in case you were unaware,

democratic elections are a binding POLLs.

just a word to the wise, honey.



:lmao2: :lmao2: Well duh....those are the only polls I poll in.........:lmao2:

foxbaron
07-07-2009, 08:39 PM
Has it ever occurred to anyone that maybe more folks would support national health care for Americans if it was just that, for Americans, not illegal aliens too?

Might even be affordable too.

foxbaron
07-07-2009, 08:39 PM
Has it ever occurred to anyone that maybe more folks would support national health care for Americans if it was just that, for Americans, not illegal aliens too?

Might even be affordable too.

Bill Cosby
07-07-2009, 09:42 PM
See, this is where the wheels on the bus fall off.

The idea of "healthcare" for all...it's a nice an easy question to answer. Hey, would you like to see everyone have healthcare? Most people would say yes right off the bat.

Hey, would you like to see everyone have healthcare, but you have to increase taxes to do it?

Umm...lol, even in a poll, that may be biased to the left, you ask that question and suddenly it's a 50/50 discussion. If it were a national referendum topic that asked the second question...how do you think that vote would turn out?

You just have to look at what people say without any commitment on their own part vs. what they'd actually vote for...most people wouldn't vote for a tax increase to pay for universal healthcare.

Certainly who you ask, what you ask & how you ask it are issues. Thus my post....

I am covered as well as my family... I want to see this as part of the "political debate".... During the elections this was hardly talked about...

IMO it will happen ~ sooner or later............

Mr. Blue
07-07-2009, 09:56 PM
Certainly who you ask, what you ask & how you ask it are issues. Thus my post....

I am covered as well as my family... I want to see this as part of the "political debate".... During the elections this was hardly talked about...

IMO it will happen ~ sooner or later............

In the most Presidential campaigns people promise the world. It always sickens me to some level because it runs like this:

Campaign promise: I want to improve education.
Reality: Well who the hell doesn't want to improve education. The problem happens when you actually start discussing the particulars in details that it all goes to hell.

Campaign promise: I want every American to have healthcare insurance
Reality: Again, most people are generous as long as it doesn't cost them anything. When you start getting into the actual details that's when it goes to hell.

...and the list goes on and on. I'd actually like to see one candidate come up to the podium with a complete comprehensive plan on most topics. Imagine that, they say, I want to provide medical insurance for everyone, and this is how we do it. If people don't like it, they don't vote for him, but I'm tired of the "promise them everything" campaign babble.

I think there's ways to improve America greatly without raising taxes...heck, could probably even lower taxes and still improve our lot in life...but we gotta keep the circus going.

Bill Cosby
07-07-2009, 10:34 PM
I agree............ IF they cut back on the wars there would be plenty of "our money" sitting here...............

I think most if not all of us would love for the politicO's to come out & state what they will & will not do.......... But ambiguity(amongst other things) is the life blood of American politics......

The same folks on madison ave selling us soap sell us our leaders...

First & foremost the corporations & ppl w/ money weedout the "unacceptable"...

Thus our remaining choices are packaged~ like all our "labels" & "brands" & sold to us........

We seem to vote based on a preconceived image rather than a set of facts...

He's a nice guy........... Someone you could talk to. SOmeone you could have a beer w/ etc........

Surfrider
07-07-2009, 11:22 PM
You gotta check this out again. Important news on health care!
From NBC's Domenico Montanaro
Another poll is out showing public support for a public/government option. A Quinnipiac poll today shows 69% support a public/government run option. Only 28%, though, say they'd opt into it. (http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2009/07/01/1984293.aspx)

This could be because most are happy with their current health insurance, as evidenced in NBC News/Wall Street Journal polling. (Hat tip: Roll Call.)

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- A national poll indicates that most Americans are receptive to having more government influence over their health care in return for lower costs and more coverage.
Congress may take up health care reform this year. (http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/05/29/health.care.poll/)

Congress may take up health care reform this year.

Sixty-three percent of people questioned in a CNN/Opinion Research Corp. survey released Friday said they would favor an increase in the federal government's influence over their own health care plans in an attempt to lower costs and provide coverage to more Americans; 36 percent were opposed.

The poll also suggests that slightly more than six out of 10 think the government should guarantee health care for all Americans, with 38 percent opposed.

But Americans appear to be split over raising taxes to increase coverage. Forty-seven percent of those questioned support raising taxes in order to provide health insurance to all Americans.

An equal amount back the idea of keeping taxes at current levels but not providing health insurance for all Americans.

"Will the health-care debate be different this time?" CNN Senior Political Analyst Bill Schneider asked. "It does look like public sentiment has shifted. But government does not seem to be the bugaboo it was 15 years ago, when a major push by the Clinton administration to reform and expand health care failed."

The poll indicates a partisan split. Democrats overwhelmingly support increased government influence over their health-care coverage in return for lower costs and great coverage for more Americans. Six out of 10 independents feel the same way, but only one in four Republicans agrees.

"Opposition to President Barack Obama's health-care plan is ideological. It comes from Republicans and conservatives. You are not hearing a lot of opposition right now from the business community and the health care industry," Schneider said.

The poll's release comes three days before Congress returns from a one-week break. Health care reform will be near the top of the agenda for lawmakers as they head back to Capitol Hill.

The poll also comes one day after Obama urged supporters to turn up the pressure on lawmakers regarding health care reform, telling them that "if we don't get it done this year, we're not going to get it done."

Health care reform didn't go very far under President Clinton. The current president thinks things will be different now.

"Something else is different this time," Schneider said. "A lot of businesses and insurance companies are working with the Obama administration on health-care reform. They don't want to pay the costs any more."

The CNN/Opinion Research Corp. poll was conducted May 14-17, with 1,010 adult Americans questioned by telephone. The survey's sampling error is plus or minus 3 percentage points.

http://www.caribpro.com/jscripts/tiny_mce/plugins/imagemanager/images/issue16/nicaraguahealthcare_2.jpg
[SIZE="4"][FONT="Arial Black"]

New York Times Poll Showing 72% Support for Obama's Health Care Plan Was Stacked With Obama Supporters (http://www.cnsnews.com/PUBLIC/Content/Article.aspx?rsrcid=49999)

Wednesday, June 24, 2009
By Christopher Neefus


President Barack Obama addressed the American Medical Association during their annual meeting in Chicago, Monday, June 15, 2009. (AP Photo/Charles Rex Arbogast)
(CNSNews.com) - A New York Times/CBS News poll released Saturday that showed broad bipartisan support for President Obama’s health care reform, over-sampled Obama voters compared to McCain voters, critics say.

The poll, administered June 12-16, found that 72 percent of respondents favored the creation of a government health-insurance plan that would compete with private insurers.

It also said 50 percent of respondents thought the government would do a better job providing medical coverage than private insurers, up from 30 percent in 2007; and that 59 percent thought the government would be better at holding down costs, up from 47 percent two years ago.

But critics including pollster Kellyanne Conway say the results are inaccurate because they are heavily skewed toward those who voted for Obama in the 2008 presidential election.

In addition, other indicators point toward a repeat of the defeat Hillary Clinton's proposed government-run faced in the early ‘90’s.

Out of 895 respondents, 24 percent were Republicans, 38 percent Democrats, and 38 percent were independents, according to a June 20 release from CBS News. While the release says the sampling was conducted at random, those numbers are significantly below the 32.6 percent who identify themselves as Republican according to a May survey from the nonpartisan Rasmussen Reports.

Similarly, the Times/CBS poll said 48 percent of respondents had voted for Obama, versus 25 percent for McCain, a nearly two-to-one advantage for Obama supporters.

Had those results been reflected in the November presidential election, Obama would have garnered 66 percent of the vote to McCain’s 34 percent, Conway, president & CEO of “the polling company,” told CNSNews.com.

“Was the vote 66-34? You tell me,” Conway said.

In 2008, Obama won 53 percent of the vote, McCain won 46 percent.

Conway said that the poll was skewed toward Democrats and Obama supporters because the Times and CBS made it so.

“Their original result was more in line (with other non-partisan polling for party identification) but they weighted those numbers,” Conway charged.

The random information gathered by the two media outlets originally saw fewer independents and Democrats, but their polling methodology saw those numbers shift at the expense of Republican representation. Conway called this a case of “a conclusion in search of evidence.”

Janet Elder, editor for news surveys and election analysis at The New York Times, defended the poll’s methodology.

“Although some polling organizations do, The New York Times/CBS News poll does not weight by party ID,” she told CNSNews.com. “We weight by characteristics that are known from census data.”

Scott Rasmussen, founder and CEO of Rasmussen Reports, a nonpartisan pollster, defended the veracity of the Times/CBS News poll -- but found it difficult.

“We have absolutely no idea what their weighting process is and what their technique is,” he told CNSNews.com. “I believe that they did not make adjustments based on party (identification). I believe they go on other factors and simply report what comes out of that.”

Elder said in 19 out of every 20 cases, the results using their technique “will differ by no more than 3 percentage points in either direction” of the outcome they would have had if they’d sought to interview “all American adults.”

But Conway says the over-sampling of Democrats was consistent throughout the poll.

“Show me the other polls that are that low," she said. "If you look at the way Scott (Rasmussen) reports things, they’re very different from The New York Times. The Census is taken every 10 years, so what are they looking at? The 2000 Census?”

“Almost nobody ever takes them to task for this, because they are CBS and the New York Times,” Conway added. “It is true that more Americans are identifying themselves as Independents, but everyone is doing polling; no one (else) is getting these numbers,” Conway said.

The Times ran an accompanying story on the front page of the Sunday edition with the headline “In Poll, Wide Support for Government Run Health.” The findings were also reported by most other major outlets.

The Times article interpreted the poll results as indicating broad, bipartisan support for government involvement in health care.

“Americans overwhelmingly support substantial changes to the health care system,” the article began, “and (they) are strongly behind one of the most contentious proposals Congress is considering, a government-run insurance plan to compete with private insurers.”

But other key findings in the poll suggest, on the other hand, that Americans have not significantly changed their positions since the last time health-care reform was seriously considered by Congress, according to Conway.

“We are identical to where we were in 1993-94,” she told CNSNews.com, “with only 51 percent of respondents even in the Democrat-skewing poll saying the health-care system needs fundamental changes, versus 52 percent in January 1994. When the question becomes whether the system needs to be completely rebuilt, 34 percent say yes in the NYT/CBS poll, versus 38 percent in 1994.

Additionally, the vast majority of Americans are satisfied with their own insurance coverage, as they were at the beginning of the Clinton administration. Approximately 77 percent in the current poll say they are at least somewhat satisfied.

Rasmussen points out that, in these areas, the Times/CBS poll was consistent with other polls.

“CBS, like everybody else, found that most people are satisfied with their health-care coverage,” he said. “But they have qualms about the overall system. And that is the biggest single obstacle to reform: people do not want to change their own coverage.”

Conway agreed. Because of their satisfaction with their own coverage, Americans are unlikely to rock the boat.

“The difference this year could be that Barack Obama is a more compelling messenger than Hillary Clinton.” But, she added: “Americans can do the math.”

They are hesitant to support the record expenditure it would take to pass sweeping health-care reform. Conway says.

"As they are deciding whether to take a vacation this summer or keep their child in private elementary school . . . they are asking to take a look at the ledger book now,” she added.

Americans like the words “change” and “reform,” she says, “but then they find out that you can’t define those.” When they see the possibility of their own healthcare options changing, “(T)hey discover that their reform is not someone else’s reform.”

Conway’s “the polling company,” in conjunction with Americans for Tax Reform, is performing an audit of all numbers released on health-care reform, to be issued on Wednesday.

The Times/CBS poll reports a margin of error of plus or minus 3 percentage points. CBS did not return calls for comment.