Bill
04-30-2007, 07:51 PM
Our visit with the face of red gave us some things to think about.
It was a great introduction into the current strategy and training of their ground forces.
One could wish for a more sophisticated example of red face strategy, but you work with what the opponent gives you.
It does raise several problems, to my mind.
They are always going to say if you support the troops, you have to support the war. It's an easy sound bite that appeals straight to the brain stem. Because it's primitive territorialism at it's most explicit, there's no non-emotional response that can rebut it.
It makes me understand better how people might have come to blame and mistreat vietnam vets. I've been studying this question for a while now.
(altho, I am not convinced that viet vets were actually msitreated - when I study it objectively, I can't find the evidence that supports the claim that there was a universal mistreatment.)
So, we have to come up with an answer to "support the troops = support the war".
It was a great introduction into the current strategy and training of their ground forces.
One could wish for a more sophisticated example of red face strategy, but you work with what the opponent gives you.
It does raise several problems, to my mind.
They are always going to say if you support the troops, you have to support the war. It's an easy sound bite that appeals straight to the brain stem. Because it's primitive territorialism at it's most explicit, there's no non-emotional response that can rebut it.
It makes me understand better how people might have come to blame and mistreat vietnam vets. I've been studying this question for a while now.
(altho, I am not convinced that viet vets were actually msitreated - when I study it objectively, I can't find the evidence that supports the claim that there was a universal mistreatment.)
So, we have to come up with an answer to "support the troops = support the war".