PDA

View Full Version : How Liberals Debate


red states rule
04-29-2007, 05:59 PM
Here is a list of tactics liberals use to debate. Ready them. Study them. Be ready the next time you debate a liberal

I have run into alot of this my first day here


1. Avoid factual arguments, they're usually against you anyway.

2. If for some obscure reason the facts actually fall your way (an extremely rare occurrence) then repeat them endlessly regardless of the reply of your conservative opponent. Remember time is limited, use this against him.

3. Get as personal and vicious as you can, maybe it will distract your opponent from his train of thought.

4. If you are unable to insult him with the usual insults such as 'racist', 'homophobe', or 'bigot', then insult someone else on his side (someone related to the subject under discussion is preferable but not required).

5. When you're losing, and you usually will be, abruptly change the subject. Again the object of this is to distract and deflect attention from your opponent's argument.

6. Talk loudly and rapidly, don't allow your opponent to get a word in. Remember the more time you consume, the less time your opponent will have.

7. Use hyperbole as an example of your opponent's argument and suggest that that is what they are suggesting.

8. Purposely misunderstand what is being said by your opponent and distort it into something you can use.

9. Make up 'facts' most people don't check them and anyway, you'll be long gone by the time the truth is known, and so will the audience.

10. Expect perfection. Focus on the slightest flaw in your opponent's argument, any kind of mistake, grammatical, spelling, contextual, anything no matter how slight is sufficient to deflect attention away from how vacuous your arguments are.

11. Act insulted. Take umbrage at the slightest contradiction and act as if it is a personal insult. This will make your personal attack seem warranted and just.

12. Mug the camera or audience while your opponent is speaking, make faces, sneering is good, head-shaking better, and looking toward the ceiling is best [notice the avoidance of the word Heaven, Liberals avoid words of a religious nature WM]. Let the audience know you disagree with your opponent (even if you’ve no idea what he’s saying)

13. Use condescending laughter as much as you can. It serves two purposes, first, it dismisses your opponent as being unworthy of your respect and second, it shows your contempt for his arguments. This is a very powerful tool and can really annoy your opponent and disrupt his train of thought.

14. You’re an arrogant Liberal; demonstrate your obvious intellectual superiority by acting in a condescending manner.

15. Forget how many of the wealthiest in this nation are Liberals, always beat the drum of “Rich Republicans” and “working class Democrats.”

16. Finally, always remember style trumps substance. Know it, Live it.
"

http://mongomutter.blogspot.com/2005...from-will.html

Mr. Blue
04-29-2007, 06:39 PM
You do realize how many of these rules you used today?

red states rule
04-29-2007, 06:43 PM
You do realize how many of these rules you used today?


I used none of them - I am not a liberal

You on the other hand...........

Mr. Blue
04-29-2007, 06:54 PM
You've used these tactics in a number of threads. You've ignored the substance of what was said, ignored facts, and made sure to make a beeline to your comfortable talking points because you're unable to think for yourself.

red states rule
04-29-2007, 07:00 PM
You are now using liberal debate tactics 1 and 5

Mr. Blue
04-29-2007, 07:17 PM
You completely changed the topic of this thread (http://www.dcjunkies.com/showthread.php?t=932) because you wanted to jump on Clinton.

The fact remains my point was that Clinton compared to Kerry/Gore was far more moderate. That was the point but you got stuck on Clinton and him being a fiscal conservative, which he was, and many Conservatives feel Clinton was good for big business (NAFTA, WOT, GATT, etc). Hell even the Wall Street Journal said about Clinton, "We have a great Republican president now."

Clinton is more moderate than Kerry and Gore. Do you disagree with that? That was the only point I was making in that thread, but you obviously had trouble grasping the nature of my argument and couldn't discuss it...so you changed the topic.