PDA

View Full Version : Democrats Know Their Cap & Trade Plan Will Obliterate Economy--and Don't Care


radioguy
05-20-2009, 03:25 PM
Democrats Know Their Cap & Trade Plan Will Obliterate Economy--and Don't Care
Tuesday, May 19, 2009
By: Jim Hoft


"Under my plan of a cap and trade system electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket. Businesses would have to retrofit their operations. That will cost money. They will pass that cost onto consumers."

That was Senator Barack Obama speaking about his cap and trade plans with The San Francisco Chronicle on Jan. 17, 2008.

The potential cost of the liberals' cap and trade policy is enormous. It will likely cost $700 to $1,400 dollars per family per year. The Department of Energy estimated that a similar bill, S. 2191, the Warner-Lieberman cap-and-trade proposal, will increase the cost of coal for power generation by between 161 percent and 413 percent. Human Events reported that the DOE estimated GDP losses [PDF] over the 21-year period they forecast, at between $444 billion and $1.308 trillion. There are estimates that the bill could increase unemployment by 2.7 percent or about 4 million jobs.

White House Budget Director Peter Orszag was on "This Week" with George Stephanopoulos in March. During his interview Orszag admitted that Obama's proposed cap and trade energy legislation will increase energy costs for everyone. The Heritage Foundation reported that cumulative GDP losses for 2010 to 2029 approach $7 trillion. Single-year losses exceed $600 billion in 2029, more than $5,000 per household. Job losses are expected to exceed 800,000 in some years, and exceed at least 500,000 from 2015 through 2026. In Missouri and the Midwest, where energy is "cheap," cap and trade legislation would cause electricity rates to double. Even the far Left Huffington Post admits that the approach taken by the Waxman-Markey bill does not alleviate the problem whereby household consumers will pay higher energy costs.

Democrats know that a cap and trade energy policy will be extremely expensive for American consumers. But, will this stop them from pushing ahead with their dangerous cap and trade legislation? No.

Reps. Henry Waxman (D-Calif.) and Edward Markey (D-Mass.) formally introduced the latest version of the American Clean Energy and Security Act [PDF] on Friday, May 15th, paving the way for the bill to move toward the markup stage Monday. The two congressional liberals are hoping for a committee vote on the dangerous bill by Friday before the Memorial Day weekend. The bill would then be tackled on the House floor sometime over the summer. The planned "cap" reduces greenhouse gas emissions to 20 percent below 2005 levels by 2020, and 83 percent below 2005 levels by 2050. GreenBiz has more on the bill's details and permit allocations.

And, you will never guess who helped craft this legislation-- Green activists, including one of Al Gore's environmental groups. Commerce Committee Chairman Henry A. Waxman (D-California) used USCAP's proposals as a blueprint for climate legislation. The Washington Times reported that the sweeping climate bill includes a provision that benefits Duke Energy Corp., a founding member of the U.S. Climate Action Partnership (USCAP), whose climate plan released in January the lawmakers have frequently called a "blueprint" for their climate legislation. The Times continued:

At the kickoff to hearings last week on the massive climate bill, Myron Ebell, climate and energy policy director for the Competitive Enterprise Institute, told lawmakers, "The authors of the draft bill have invited the beneficiaries of what could turn out to be the biggest transfer of wealth from consumers to special interests in American history to write the rules for this legalized plunder."

Al Gore's World Resources Institute is also one of the founding members of USCAP, the organization that helped construct the bill. The former VP has also invested heavily in green businesses that will benefit greatly by the liberals' cap and trade plans. Gore is the founder and chairman of Alliance for Climate Protection. You likely know the organization through its branch Repower America. This group has bombarded the airwaves with "We Can Solve It" ads that are pushing for cap and trade legislation.

So how will this affect Americans?

A study was released last week that claimed that one in five American homeowners were "under water," or owe more money on their house than it is currently worth. Average home prices fell 14.9 percent nationwide this past year. It is likely that many homeowners who took out ARMs during the 2000s were thinking that they would be able to sell or refinance their homes before the interest rate was scheduled to adjust. Now they will not be able to do that. These Americans are already facing a personal financial crisis. Now Democrats want to burden them with a new $700 to $1,400 tax. Does this make sense?

Democratic Congressman John Dingell admitted on April 24th at a Congressional hearing on global warming that cap and trade is a tax-- a Great Big Tax. He was right. And, this Great Big Tax is the last thing that America needs right now. The liberals' cap and trade plan will obliterate the economy.

Link (http://www.americanissuesproject.org/blogs/columns/archive/2009/05/19/liberals-know-their-cap-amp-trade-plan-will-obliterate-economy-and-don-t-care.aspx)

What I want to know... Is this something you Democrats/liberals/Obama supporters want? Is this the change you voted for?

.

Crist Ero
05-20-2009, 03:34 PM
wow, you got that from a conservative blog all by yourself

radioguy
05-20-2009, 03:37 PM
Typical liberal...

He can't dispute the facts in the story... Isn't capable of answering the questions... So he attacks the source of the story instead.

Liberal is, as liberal does.

SimonDavid
05-20-2009, 04:04 PM
We have as a nation, for thirty-six years, ignored the reality of our dependence on a dwindling, dangerous, polluting energy source, the majority of which is in the hands of foreign countries whose leaders do not always have our best interests in mind. We should have addressed this issue years ago, but lacked leadership which was not in league with those leaders and a populace willing or able to understand the changes which were going to be inevitable. Had we begun this process in 1973 we may have been in a completely different situation today. Now we approach critical mass.
No one has ever claimed these essential changes were going to be painless. However, what your Right-wing columnist leaves out is the new economy that will be created by green industries, from the creative level of searching out and/or originating new energy alternatives to the blue collar level of jobs both implementing and maintaining these new industries.

radioguy
05-20-2009, 04:48 PM
However, what your Right-wing columnist leaves out is the new economy that will be created by green industries...

Would that be the estimated 4 million jobs lost, or the trillion dollar loss in the GDP that was pointed out in that article?

The entire article is based on the future effects on the economy of these policies, and they used reputable sources for the estimates.

doctordog
05-20-2009, 05:34 PM
Typical liberal...

He can't dispute the facts in the story... Isn't capable of answering the questions... So he attacks the source of the story instead.

Liberal is, as liberal does.

Wrong RG, TYPICAL STUPID LIBERAL. This one is a cellar dweller that lives in his father's basement.

Dale escondido
05-20-2009, 05:39 PM
Green is the next bubble.
And we will wonder what happened when it pops.

SimonDavid
05-20-2009, 08:25 PM
Would that be the estimated 4 million jobs lost, or the trillion dollar loss in the GDP that was pointed out in that article?

The entire article is based on the future effects on the economy of these policies, and they used reputable sources for the estimates.
The article's reference to "4 million jobs" only states "there are estimates" of that number, not the sources of said estimates.
The Heritage Foundation, an conservative organization with its own agenda, is hardly a "reputable source" on the subject of GDP.

MintJulep
05-20-2009, 08:27 PM
Wrong RG, TYPICAL STUPID LIBERAL. This one is a cellar dweller that lives in his father's basement.Cellar dweller? Heretic? :D I don't see any writing similarities.

Cat slave
05-21-2009, 01:26 AM
Green is the next bubble.
And we will wonder what happened when it pops.

Yep! Been there done that...hugged those trees, wallowed in self righteousness as I viewed myself as "enlightened and all caring for the
environment", then watched as the world went right on and people took
up a new lance to tilt at new windmills.

Of course, back then we didnt have the bloated one, AlBore hawking his
epistle of gloom and doom as a vehicle to amass his own wealth. Thats
about the only difference between the two movements.


This bubble will burst as they all do.

disrupter
05-21-2009, 08:56 PM
Wait a minute,

the radical right deregulators have ALREADY crashed the global & national economy.

Damn! Those Democrats are always a day late & a dollar short of catastrophe.

ROdger Right
05-21-2009, 11:53 PM
Yea the only thing that can save debt is more debt fucking genius, idiots.

Cat slave
05-22-2009, 12:23 PM
Yea the only thing that can save debt is more debt fucking genius, idiots.

They seem unable to find their way out of a paper bag. Fools.:mad: