View Full Version : This Douchebag degenerate wanted the President to Fail too!!!
SeedyROM
03-12-2009, 11:06 PM
Carville the hypocrite. Caught red handed. Okay, go ahead, give me your best excuses, your best spin, your best justifications, in other words, just open your mouths and spew the normal horseshit that flies so easily out of your mouths every time you speak. If it was bad for Rush to say, then it is equally bad for Rush, right??? Even worse the liberal media covered it up!!
A Poll in 2006 showed there were Dems who wanted Bush to fail, very pathetic bunch of unAmerican degenerate losers!!
http://gatewaypundit.blogspot.com/2009/03/james-carville-wanted-bush-to-fail-on-9.html
Flashback: Carville Wanted Bush to Fail
The press never reported that Democratic strategist James Carville said he wanted President Bush to fail before the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks. But a feeding frenzy ensued when radio host Rush Limbaugh recently said he wanted President Obama to fail.
On the morning of Sept. 11, 2001, just minutes before learning of the terrorist attacks on America, Democratic strategist James Carville was hoping for President Bush to fail, telling a group of Washington reporters: "I certainly hope he doesn’t succeed."
Carville was joined by Democratic pollster Stanley Greenberg, who seemed encouraged by a survey he had just completed that revealed public misgivings about the newly minted president.
"We rush into these focus groups with these doubts that people have about him, and I’m wanting them to turn against him," Greenberg admitted.
The pollster added with a chuckle of disbelief: "They don’t want him to fail. I mean, they think it matters if the president of the United States fails."
Minutes later, as news of the terrorist attacks reached the hotel conference room where the Democrats were having breakfast with the reporters, Carville announced: "Disregard everything we just said! This changes everything!"
The press followed Carville’s orders, never reporting his or Greenberg’s desire for Bush to fail. The omission was understandable at first, as reporters were consumed with chronicling the new war on terror. But months and even years later, the mainstream media chose to never resurrect those controversial sentiments, voiced by the Democratic Party’s top strategists, that Bush should fail.
That omission stands in stark contrast to the feeding frenzy that ensued when radio host Rush Limbaugh recently said he wanted President Obama to fail. The press devoted wall-to-wall coverage to the remark, suggesting that Limbaugh and, by extension, conservative Republicans, were unpatriotic.
UPDATE: Liberal commentator Ellen Ratner hoped that Bush would mess up the war and fail in a 2003 interview. Rush Limbaugh may be against socialism but at least he didn't wish for American soldiers and marines to be killed.
Independent Harry
03-13-2009, 12:12 AM
He is an idiot, and he should have been thrown under the proverbial bus. But so what? It's not like all the democrats wanted Bush to fail. Most of the people on the left got behind him, until he started doing all the bullshit.
There's goes the insane false claim that this story is staying alive because of the imaginary "liberal media". :lmao2: Where's Smurf. He'll appreciate you and Fox being part of the liberal media :taunt:
So I wonder how many blind sheep Carville has following him? :D
The timing and the headline are brilliant too :thumbsup: No one can make of the Neocon media and blind sheep that follow them better then you Seedy.
MintJulep
03-13-2009, 01:05 AM
It's not like all the democrats wanted Bush to fail.Name the democrats who made it clear they wanted Bush to succeed.
Most of the people on the left got behind him, until he started doing all the bullshit.Say whaaa?
If you're talking about 9/11, well they had to "get behind him" for a couple of short months or commit political suicide.
foxbaron
03-13-2009, 01:51 AM
The Democrats have always wanted Bush to fail and fail in everything. They have never stood behind Bush in anything. The Democrats could care less about what is good for America they only care about regaining power, period.
Now they have it and they still can't get it right.
Independent Harry
03-13-2009, 04:11 AM
The Democrats have always wanted Bush to fail and fail in everything. They have never stood behind Bush in anything. The Democrats could care less about what is good for America they only care about regaining power, period.
Now they have it and they still can't get it right.
Do you have quotes to back that up?
Independent Harry
03-13-2009, 04:12 AM
Name the democrats who made it clear they wanted Bush to succeed.
Say whaaa?
If you're talking about 9/11, well they had to "get behind him" for a couple of short months or commit political suicide.
I swear to god you people are like cockroaches.
A lot of democrats made it clear. They made lots of speeches talking about success. That was the majority of them. The party that is trying to poison this country is led by the pundits...
GetAClue
03-13-2009, 09:56 AM
I swear to god you people are like cockroaches.
A lot of democrats made it clear. They made lots of speeches talking about success. That was the majority of them. The party that is trying to poison this country is led by the pundits...
Do you have any quotes to back that up?
MintJulep
03-13-2009, 10:01 AM
I swear to god you people are like cockroaches.
A lot of democrats made it clear. They made lots of speeches talking about success. That was the majority of them. The party that is trying to poison this country is led by the pundits...Name one.
If there were so many wishing for Bush to succeed, it should be easy.
The Democrats have always wanted Bush to fail and fail in everything. They have never stood behind Bush in anything. The Democrats could care less about what is good for America they only care about regaining power, period.
Now they have it and they still can't get it right.
Now you were told that was the case. Can you support such a claim or are you just blindly following the pundits that told you that?
SeedyROM
03-13-2009, 06:06 PM
He is an idiot, and he should have been thrown under the proverbial bus. But so what? It's not like all the democrats wanted Bush to fail. Most of the people on the left got behind him, until he started doing all the bullshit.
Yes he should!! But so what......there you go weakening your arguement suggesting bullshit got in the way of dems supporting Bush. Even though I shall disagree with Obama at times, I'll support him in disagreement and do so because I see a better less expensive way. The bullshit you speak of is exactly why dems refused to back Bush.
SeedyROM
03-13-2009, 06:13 PM
There's goes the insane false claim that this story is staying alive because of the imaginary "liberal media". :lmao2: Where's Smurf. He'll appreciate you and Fox being part of the liberal media :taunt:
So I wonder how many blind sheep Carville has following him? :D
The timing and the headline are brilliant too :thumbsup: No one can make of the Neocon media and blind sheep that follow them better then you Seedy.
Wrong again as usual, you can't marginalize Carville and demonize Rush and pretend anyone is going to believe your fucking bullshit fakeness! You need to get your shit together and stop lying like a insane stooge. You stupidity and lies are damn right pathetic, you can't even stay on subject nor can you honestly address the article. Like i said, the horseshit came in. You need to focus on the articles!!! Carville has many followers, but you already know that!
SeedyROM
03-13-2009, 06:16 PM
I swear to god you people are like cockroaches.
A lot of democrats made it clear. They made lots of speeches talking about success. That was the majority of them. The party that is trying to poison this country is led by the pundits...
you are right the liberal media are cockroaches who want to poison this country with thier liberal media pundits!!
SeedyROM
03-13-2009, 06:26 PM
As usual, Sirmoby and IndependantHarry sound of without researching the facts, thanks for falling into my SeedyTrap. I set traps in many threads, in yours too, when you step in something wonderful happens. Educating the ignorant is a favorite pastime of mine!! Exposing weak arguements with no facts in another. Sometimes the SeedyTraps are more deadly but I think you get the picture. I set 5 traps in 5 threads, 3 have sprung. Hehehehehe:taunt: :D :taunt:
32% of Dems wanted Bush to FAIL!!!!!!
Apparantly dems wanted Bush to fail, the surveys say it's so. What say you know SM and Harry??
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2009/03/09/most-democrats-wanted-bush-fail-2006-poll-will-media-care
If it's unpatriotic and supposedly treasonous for conservative talk radio host Rush Limbaugh to want Barack Obama's policies to fail in the middle of a serious recession, is it similarly so for Democrats who wished President Bush wouldn't succeed while the nation was at war?
In August 2006, a Fox News/Opinion Dynamics poll asked the following of 900 registered voters:
Regardless of how you voted in the presidential election, would you say you want President Bush to succeed or not?
Here are the stunning results (h/t Patterico via NB reader Thomas Stewart):
http://www.foxnews.com/projects/pdf/FOX_230_release_web.pdf
10. Regardless of how you voted in the presidential election, would you say you want President Bush to succeed or not?
SCALE:
1. Yes, want him to succeed
2. No, do not want him to succeed
3. (Don’t know)
Yes No (Don’t know)
8-9 Aug 06 63% 32 5
Democrats 40% 51 9
Republicans 90% 7 2
Independents 63% 34 3
SEEDYTRAPS ROCK!!!!!:thumbsup:
Wrong again as usual, you can't marginalize Carville and demonize Rush and pretend anyone is going to believe your fucking bullshit fakeness! You need to get your shit together and stop lying like a insane stooge. You stupidity and lies are damn right pathetic, you can't even stay on subject nor can you honestly address the article. Like i said, the horseshit came in. You need to focus on the articles!!! Carville has many followers, but you already know that!
Smurf made the claim that the story was only being kept alive by the liberal media.
However, Fox is keeping it alive and so are you :lmao2: That's why it's so funny. He tried to blame the invisible liberal media and you proved him wrong.
SeedyROM
03-13-2009, 06:31 PM
Smurf made the claim that the story was only being kept alive by the liberal media.
However, Fox is keeping it alive and so are you :lmao2: That's why it's so funny. He tried to blame the invisible liberal media and you proved him wrong.
The story just surfaced, again yo uhave failed to marginalize the Carville story, get over it SM. The story is fresh. Did the Rush story fade in 24 hours? Did the Rush story on this site fade in 24 hours? Nope nada chance. The liberal media got caught. :taunt:
As usual, Sirmoby and IndependantHarry sound of without researching the facts, thanks for falling into my SeedyTrap. I set traps in many threads, in yours too, when you step in something wonderful happens. Educating the ignorant is a favorite pastime of mine!! Exposing weak arguements with no facts in another. Sometimes the SeedyTraps are more deadly but I think you get the picture. I set 5 traps in 5 threads, 3 have sprung. Hehehehehe:taunt: :D :taunt:
[B]32% of Dems wanted Bush to FAIL!!!!!!
Seedy, we've already gone through this in another thread. Why are you so stuck on yourself? You're making a pundit talking point by using information from the pundits. It's like News Max declaring that McCain won the debates based on their own opinion polls.
Even 10% of reps in that survey didn't want Bush to succeed.
Now if you can point to some leading dems and those that supported those leading dems that made such claims that they wanted Bush to fail then please provide them.
Carville doesn't have a following. Who was he working for back then?
Sean Hannity said it so it must be true :lmao2:
SeedyROM
03-13-2009, 06:35 PM
From the comments section, notice that Hannity found 20 dem politicians who wanted Bush to fail. I guess we'll have to review that video now won't we.
http://patterico.com/2009/03/08/democrats-have-no-right-to-be-snooty-about-rush-not-wanting-the-president-to-succeed/
3.They were even worse than that: They (Dems) were saying things like we only bomb innocent civilians and we terrorize women and children in the dark of the night. Murtha called our own Marines Murderers before the frickin investigation into Haditha even started. The Dems were cheerleading for the “insurgents” hoping and wishing the surge would fail. The Dems are assholes and have no business trying to take the high ground on this. Hannity played a tape of all the Dem leaders wishing for Bush to fail on either Friday night or Thursday night. There must have been at least twenty (20) Dems on tape wishing for our U.S. failure.
If the Dems try to take the high road on this issue — fuck them! They are the fricken traitors; they are the ones guilty of treason. hey are guiltyy of giving aid and comfort to our enemies.
4. You must remember that Democrats and Liberals, specially, really believe that the old Roman adage “Quod licet Jovi non licet bovi” applies to them. The double standard is alive and well in Democratic politics as well as in the main stream media. For those not blessed with high school Latin, the adage means “What is legal for Jove (the chief Roman god) is not legal for a cow.
SeedyROM
03-13-2009, 06:39 PM
Seedy, we've already gone through this in another thread. Why are you so stuck on yourself? You're making a pundit talking point by using information from the pundits. It's like News Max declaring that McCain won the debates based on their own opinion polls.
Even 10% of reps in that survey didn't want Bush to succeed.
Now if you can point to some leading dems and those that supported those leading dems that made such claims that they wanted Bush to fail then please provide them.
Carville doesn't have a following. Who was he working for back then?
Sean Hannity said it so it must be true :lmao2:
I didn't see the other thread, what is the title? This is not a pundit talking point either, I'm pointing out that Dems did in fact want Bush to fail as did Carville.
I'll find the Hannity video see we can see who which politicians wanted Bush to fail, you can't marginalize Hannity just because you disagree with him at times. Hannity actually provides good commentary from time to time but not daily. The video will show who said what so I'll provide the names asap.
I set 5 traps in 5 threads, 3 have sprung.
Dude, you really need a hobby. You're becoming obsessed and it's sad :(
Do you care about facts any more or do you spend all this effort just so that you can feel that you're right about something?
I didn't see that before but I think you need help. This is a place for discussion, not a place to stroke you own ego no matter much it may need such things.
SeedyROM
03-13-2009, 07:08 PM
Dude, you really need a hobby. You're becoming obsessed and it's sad :(
Do you care about facts any more or do you spend all this effort just so that you can feel that you're right about something?
I didn't see that before but I think you need help. This is a place for discussion, not a place to stroke you own ego no matter much it may need such things.
Stop lying, I defend my words the same as you but you can't stand it when I'm right and you are wrong. Get over yourself. My facts are legitmate, threatening me with more harassment is a bad idea, you have been warned!!
This is not about ego, in fact you have the ego issue here because you continue to downplay the Carville story and you can't handle the truth that man DEMS wanted to see Bush fail!!!!! Get over it!!! You can't lie and disprove the negatives with more lies and spin!! Sto making up lies about me, I'm still documenting you!!!
Stop lying, I defend my words the same as you but you can't stand it when I'm right and you are wrong. Get over yourself. My facts are legitmate, threatening me with more harassment is a bad idea, you have been warned!!
I would be happy for you to be right. I know that it means so much to you but I think if you're setting traps for people then perhaps it's unhealthy for you.
You've made numerous false claims about me. You've claimed that I called Mac Bush 2.0. You claimed that I called Palin inexperienced. You've made many more claims that you can't support.
I remember how much time you spent trying to find all the liberal media masses that were attacking Sarah Palin's family. I felt terrible that you spent so much time on it only to come up with that one guy that no one ever heard of. Sure I laughed at you but that doesn't mean I didn't feel bad for you at the same time.
I know that you take things so seriously that you even want to get lawyers involved. And I hope that one day you do know your rights.
You are taking things way too seriously if you're entire process is to prove Harry and I wrong on such an issue as this.
What do you do for fun?
Smurf-Herder
03-13-2009, 08:06 PM
Smurf made the claim that the story was only being kept alive by the liberal media.
However, Fox is keeping it alive and so are you :lmao2: That's why it's so funny. He tried to blame the invisible liberal media and you proved him wrong.
Wrong, lipstick-pig breath.
I was talking about another story. Because I just heard about this one.
You twist everything ....... you demented tranny.
(I'm assuming you're sticking to the topic in this thread - Caville on Bush, not Rush)
you can't stand it when I'm right and you are wrong.
I must admit Seedy, for the first time ever you really have my curious.
Why do you think you being right or wrong is important enough to a man that you've never met "not be able to stand it"?
Really. Do you think you're that important to anyone much less people that you've never met?
I've mentioned my family and that I have other things in my life. Do you really think that you compare to a man's lovely wife and adorable daughter?
Seriously?
Cat slave
03-14-2009, 01:58 PM
The Democrats have always wanted Bush to fail and fail in everything. They have never stood behind Bush in anything. The Democrats could care less about what is good for America they only care about regaining power, period.
Now they have it and they still can't get it right.
They had their panties in a was when they lost the majority in congress and
now are like a wild runaway horse with the bit in its teeth. Just the situation
that can result in the horse running off a cliff.
That would be that vast open space on the horizon.
Anyone of either corrupt party (one more than the other) that puts an ideology ahead of the safety, welfare and constitution of our country
should be hated and removed.
Cat slave
03-14-2009, 01:59 PM
Wrong, lipstick-pig breath.
I was talking about another story. Because I just heard about this one.
You twist everything ....... you demented tranny.
(I'm assuming you're sticking to the topic in this thread - Caville on Bush, not Rush)
ROTFL.....SM, youve met your match!
Of course, SH, thats not a high bar, I admit.:D
SeedyROM
04-01-2009, 01:54 AM
I remember how much time you spent trying to find all the liberal media masses that were attacking Sarah Palin's family. I felt terrible that you spent so much time on it only to come up with that one guy that no one ever heard of. Sure I laughed at you but that doesn't mean I didn't feel bad for you at the same time.
I know that you take things so seriously that you even want to get lawyers involved. And I hope that one day you do know your rights.
You are taking things way too seriously if you're entire process is to prove Harry and I wrong on such an issue as this.
The proof about the Palin attacks is available online, a DVD is also for sale. As well I proved an Obama lawyer started the hatred towards Palin's family. I spent less than an hour looking. In fact I waited for the media to produce facts but they choose to concentrate on the election which was wise. After the election the facts have surfaced, too bad you lost but the Palin hate is real!!! fyi, I know my rights and I know the rules here, you will be held accountable, get you act together and keep it that way. You have destroyed this site with constant hatred and silly attak dog nonsense. I'm not taking things seriously as you mention above, I play on multiple levels and you don't understand my agenda.
vBulletin v3.5.4, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.