PDA

View Full Version : Obama overturns Bush policy on stem cells


Moby
03-09-2009, 02:59 PM
Back to science.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090309/ap_on_go_pr_wh/obama_stem_cells
By PHILIP ELLIOTT, Associated Press Writer Philip Elliott, Associated Press Writer – 32 mins ago

WASHINGTON – Reversing Bush policy, President Barack Obama on Monday cleared the way for a significant increase in federal dollars for embryonic stem cell research and promised no scientific data will be "distorted or concealed to serve a political agenda."

Obama signed the executive order on the divisive stem cell issue and a memo addressing what he called scientific integrity before an East Room audience packed with scientists. He laced his remarks with several jabs at the way science was handled by former President George W. Bush.

"Promoting science isn't just about providing resources, it is also about protecting free and open inquiry," Obama said. "It is about letting scientists like those here today do their jobs, free from manipulation or coercion, and listening to what they tell us, even when it's inconvenient especially when it's inconvenient. It is about ensuring that scientific data is never distorted or concealed to serve a political agenda and that we make scientific decisions based on facts, not ideology."

He said his memorandum is meant to restore "scientific integrity to government decision-making." He called it the beginning of a process of ensuring his administration bases its decision on sound science; appoints scientific advisers based on their credentials, not their politics; and is honest about the science behind its decisions.

Fulfilling a campaign promise, Obama signed the order that on stem cell research that supporters believe could uncover cures for serious ailments from diabetes to paralysis. Proponents from former first lady Nancy Reagan to the late actor Christopher Reeve had pushed for ending the restrictions on research.

Obama paid tribute to Reeve, calling him a tireless advocate who was dedicated to raising awareness to the promise of research.

Obama's action reverses Bush's stem cell policy by undoing his 2001 directive that banned federal funding for research into stem lines created after Aug. 9, 2001.

The president said his administration would work aggressively to make up for the ground he said was lost due to Bush's decision, though it can't be known how much more federal money will be spent on the research until grants are applied for and issued.

"Medical miracles do not happen simply by accident," Obama declared.

Embryonic stem cells are master cells that can morph into any cell of the body. Scientists hope to harness them so they can create replacement tissues to treat a variety of diseases — such as new insulin-producing cells for diabetics, cells that could help those with Parkinson's disease or maybe even Alzheimer's, or new nerve connections to restore movement after spinal injury.

House Minority Leader John Boehner, R-Ohio, criticized Obama, saying in a statement that the president had "rolled back important protections for innocent life, further dividing our nation at a time when we need greater unity to tackle the challenges before us."

Bush limited the use of taxpayer money to only the 21 stem cell lines that had been produced before his decision. He argued he was defending human life because days-old embryos — although typically from fertility clinics and already destined for destruction — are destroyed to create the stem cell lines.

The Obama order reverses that without addressing a separate legislative ban, which precludes any federal money for the development of stem cell lines. The legislation, however, does not prevent funds for research on those lines created without federal funding.

Researchers say the newer lines created with private money during the period of the Bush ban are healthier and better suited to creating treatment for diseases.

Obama called his decision a "difficult and delicate balance," an understatement of the intense emotions generated on both sides of the long, contentious debate. He said he came down on the side of the majority of Americans who support increased federal funding for the research, both because strict oversight would prevent problems and because of the great and lifesaving potential it holds.

"Rather than furthering discovery, our government has forced what I believe is a false choice between sound science and moral values," Obama said. "In this case, I believe the two are not inconsistent. As a person of faith, I believe we are called to care for each other and work to ease human suffering."

Obama warned against overstating the eventual benefits of the research, but he said his administration "will vigorously support scientists who pursue this research," taking another slap at Bush in the process.

"I cannot guarantee that we will find the treatments and cures we seek. No president can promise that. But I can promise that we will seek them actively, responsibly, and with the urgency required to make up for lost ground," he said.

It's a matter of competitive advantage globally as well, the president argued.

"When government fails to make these investments, opportunities are missed. Promising avenues go unexplored," Obama said.

But the president was insistent that his order would not open the door to human cloning.

"We will develop strict guidelines, which we will rigorously enforce, because we cannot ever tolerate misuse or abuse," Obama said. "And we will ensure that our government never opens the door to the use of cloning for human reproduction. It is dangerous, profoundly wrong, and has no place in our society, or any society."

GetAClue
03-09-2009, 03:19 PM
From what I have read, the need for embryonic stem cells is a moot point. Seems that adult stem cells promise to be more valuable. If that is the case, BHO's latest policy reversal has more to do with placating to the left than actually doing any good.

http://www.nationalpost.com/story.html?id=1342585

Smurf-Herder
03-09-2009, 03:19 PM
This whole thing is completely pointless:

Stem Cell Breakthrough: New Method For Creating Stem Cells

ScienceDaily (Mar. 2, 2009) — Mount Sinai Hospital's Dr. Andras Nagy discovered a new method of creating stem cells that could lead to possible cures for devastating diseases including spinal cord injury, macular degeneration, diabetes and Parkinson's disease. The study, published by Nature, accelerates stem cell technology and provides a road map for new clinical approaches to regenerative medicine.

"We hope that these stem cells will form the basis for treatment for many diseases and conditions that are currently considered incurable," said Dr. Nagy, Senior Investigator at the Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute of Mount Sinai Hospital, Investigator at the McEwen Centre for Regenerative Medicine, and Canada Research Chair in Stem Cells and Regeneration. "This new method of generating stem cells does not require embryos as starting points and could be used to generate cells from many adult tissues such as a patient's own skin cells."

Dr. Nagy discovered a new method to create pluripotent stem cells (cells that can develop into most other cell types) without disrupting healthy genes. Dr. Nagy's method uses a novel wrapping procedure to deliver specific genes to reprogram cells into stem cells. Previous approaches required the use of viruses to deliver the required genes, a method that carries the risk of damaging the DNA. Dr. Nagy's method does not require viruses, and so overcomes a major hurdle for the future of safe, personalized stem cell therapies in humans.

"This research is a huge step forward on the path to new stem cell-based therapies and indicates that researchers at the Lunenfeld are at the leading edge of regenerative medicine," said Dr. Jim Woodgett, Director of Research for the Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute of Mount Sinai Hospital. Regenerative medicine refers to enabling the human body to repair, replace, restore and regenerate its own damaged or diseased cells, tissues and organs.

The research was funded by the Canadian Stem Cell Network and the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation (United States).

Dr. Nagy joined Mount Sinai Hospital as a Principal investigator in 1994. In 2005, he created Canada's first embryonic stem cell lines from donated embryos no longer required for reproduction by couples undergoing fertility treatment. That research played a pivotal role in Dr. Nagy's current discovery.

One of the critical components reported in Nagy's paper was developed in the laboratory of Dr. Keisuke Kaji from the Medical Research Council (MRC) Centre for Regenerative Medicine at the University of Edinburgh. Dr. Kaji's findings are also published in the March 1, 2009 issue of Nature. The two papers are highly complementary and further extend Nagy's findings.

"I was very excited when I found stem cell-like cells in my culture dishes. Nobody, including me, thought it was really possible," said Dr. Kaji. "It is a step towards the practical use of reprogrammed cells in medicine."

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/03/090301181423.htm

GetAClue
03-09-2009, 03:20 PM
To quote the 3rd paragraph in SM's article:

"Promoting science isn't just about providing resources, it is also about protecting free and open inquiry," Obama said. "It is about letting scientists like those here today do their jobs, free from manipulation or coercion, and listening to what they tell us, even when it's inconvenient especially when it's inconvenient. It is about ensuring that scientific data is never distorted or concealed to serve a political agenda and that we make scientific decisions based on facts, not ideology."

What a disengenous jerk. There was never a ban on embryonic stem cell research. The scientists were free to pursue any research that they wanted. All Bush did was say that the Fed government would not fund it.

Smurf-Herder
03-09-2009, 03:28 PM
It makes the paranoid, hate-filled sheep happy.

Hog Trash
03-09-2009, 04:46 PM
Obama's decision was not based on morality, religion, medicine or science....Politics was his sole deciding factor.

I happen to agree with his decision but my reasons are purely scientific for medical purposes....Obama couldn't care less.

Binky
03-09-2009, 06:51 PM
It gives you people yet another item to bitch about.

Cat slave
03-10-2009, 01:51 AM
Somehow the issue seems pointless since health care is going to be rationed
and only the strong and young will survive!

Independent Harry
03-10-2009, 02:06 AM
It gives you people yet another item to bitch about.

im with you...

Cat slave
03-10-2009, 11:20 AM
I thought that is what we are here for...entertainment and venting regarding what we see. There seldom is any substance except from SH, HT, and a few other
"sheep".

Sheep are cute. Wonder what PETA would think if they observed the negative
and hurtful way SM uses "sheep" in derogatory epistles.:lmao2:

michiganFats
03-10-2009, 02:19 PM
since when is BHO focused on science? He's focused on whatever will make his case, scientific in nature or not.

GetAClue
03-10-2009, 05:06 PM
BHO is playing to the left wing of the Democratic party. He is consistant with his stance of abortion and anything having to do with personal responsibility and morality. He is against them.

ROdger Right
03-10-2009, 06:18 PM
Gotta keep the approval ratings up somehow.

disrupter
03-10-2009, 10:36 PM
A stem cell is an UNDIFFERENTIATED cell.

Meaning it is unidentifiable, other than its DNA, as being anything human.

A blastocyst, is a ball of UNDIFFERENTIATED cells in a placenta.

If a cell has started forming anything it is no longer a stem cell.
It would have lost its usefulness as a universally adaptable cell.

But as usually the wildly hysterical right wants to steer us into their program of voodoo & superstition,

just as they do with 'Creationism' & 'Intelligent Design'.

Willing to sacrifice the entirety of humanity & all of its dreams,

to their raving, barbarian, psychotic, demon 'god'.

Reject ignorance & step forward into the light & enlightenment of science & progress.

adult stem cells are differentiated. they only have a limited range of adaptations.
the cell lines Bush allowed were corrupted with mouse cells.

Smurf-Herder
03-10-2009, 10:51 PM
Obama completely missed the boat on the actual research on stem cells; just for the political praise. Otherwise he'd be mentioning "the No. 1 breakthrough of 2008."

Behind the Cell Curve
Why Is the President Ignoring a Scientific Gift?

By Kathleen Parker
Wednesday, March 11, 2009; Page A15

As he lifted the ban on federal funding for embryonic stem cell research Monday, President Obama proclaimed that scientific decisions now will be made "on facts, not ideology."

This sounds good, but what if there were other non-ideological facts that Obama seems to be ignoring? One fact is that since Obama began running for president, researchers have made some rather amazing strides in alternative stem cell research. Science and ethics finally fell in love, in other words, and Obama seems to have fallen asleep during the kiss. Either that, or he decided that keeping an old political promise was more important than acknowledging new developments. In the process, he missed an opportunity to prove that he is pro-science but also sensitive to the concerns of taxpayers who don't want to pay for research that requires embryo destruction.

Unfortunately, the stem cell debate has been characterized as a conflict between science (as though science is always right) and religious "kooks" (as though religious folk are never right). In choosing sides, it is, indeed, easier to imagine lunch with a researcher who wants to resurrect Christopher Reeve (whom Obama couldn't resist mentioning) and make him walk again, than with the corner protester holding a fetus in a jar.

Moreover, as Obama said, the majority of Americans have reached a consensus that we should pursue this research. Polling confirms as much, but most Americans, including most journalists and politicians, aren't fluent in stem cell research. It's complicated. If people "know" anything, it is that embryonic stem cells can cure diseases and that all stem cells come from fertility clinic embryos that will be discarded anyway. Neither belief is entirely true.

In fact, every single one of the successes in treating patients with stem cells thus far -- for spinal cord injuries and multiple sclerosis, for example -- have involved adult or umbilical cord blood stem cells, not embryonic stem cells. And though federal dollars still won't directly fund embryo destruction, federally funded researchers can obtain embryos privately created only for experimentation. Thus, taxpayers now are incentivizing a market for embryo creation and destruction.

The insistence on using embryonic stem cells always rested on the argument that they were pluripotent, capable of becoming any kind of cell. That superior claim no longer can be made with the spectacular discovery in 2007 of "induced pluripotent stem cells" (iPSs), which was the laboratory equivalent of the airplane. Very simply, iPS cells can be produced from skin cells by injecting genes that force the cells to revert to their primitive "blank slate" form with all the same pluripotent capabilities of embryonic stem cells.

But "induced pluripotent stem cells" doesn't trip easily off the tongue, nor have any celebrities stepped forward to expound their virtues. (If only Angelina Jolie would purse those pouty lips and say "pluripotent.") Even without such drama, Time magazine named iPS innovation No. 1 on its "Top 10 Scientific Discoveries" of 2007, and the journal Science rated it the No. 1 breakthrough of 2008.

The iPS discovery even prompted Ian Wilmut, who led the team that cloned Dolly the sheep, to abandon his license to attempt human cloning, saying that the researchers "may have achieved what no politician could: an end to the embryonic stem cell debate." And, just several days ago, Dr. Bernadine Healy, director of the National Institutes of Health under the first President Bush, wrote in U.S. News & World Report that these recent developments "reinforced the notion that embryonic stem cells . . . are obsolete."

Many scientists, of course, want to conduct embryonic stem cell research, as they have and always could with private funding. One may agree or disagree with their purposes, but one may also question why taxpayers should have to fund something so ethically charged when alternative methods are available.

Next comes a move to lift the unfortunately named Dickey-Wicker amendment in Congress, which prohibits using tax dollars to create human embryos for research purposes. If the amendment is rescinded, human embryos can be created and destroyed with federal tax dollars.

Good people can disagree on these things, but those who insist that this is "only about abortion" miss the point. The objectification of human life is never a trivial matter. And determining what role government plays in that objectification may be the ethical dilemma of the century.

In this case, science handed Obama a gift -- and he sent it back.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/03/10/AR2009031002842.html

Fuck Obama! It's all about charismatic propaganda.

disrupter
03-10-2009, 11:20 PM
I won't argue that hurdles often create refinement & precision of knowledge that might have otherwise taken longer,

but,

often at the expense of entire swaths of knowledge.

Religion is for those who don't want to learn anything.

ROdger Right
03-11-2009, 12:53 AM
Are those with morals that dont like to be shaken or ignored.

Religion is for those that wish to lead a good life for those that are strong enough to achieve such a thing.

disrupter
03-12-2009, 04:22 PM
Religion is for people who have given up on thinking,

which in those particular cases may be rationally justified.

For the rest of us, the fact that we [still] have minds, implies they are useful.

ROdger Right
03-12-2009, 04:47 PM
Were you molested as an alter boy or something?
Your mind isnt that useful , all you can come up with is anti religion.

Relgion seems to shape your life, they have an opinion so you line up on the other side.