PDA

View Full Version : One project is on track in Iraq, our fortified embassy, the worlds largest


Bill
03-25-2007, 01:50 AM
The Iraqis call it "George W's Palace". It's our permanent future home in Iraq - a huge fortified complex, 15 foot thick walls, with all it's own isolated water, power, fuel, and other amenities. Our tower, from which we will rule Iraq, or support it's democracy, which is the preferred expression.

The notes at the bottom of the article are very revealing - we've spent $22 billion on the reconstruction so far, but can't keep the electricity on in baghdad.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/multimedia/archive/00097/TTH032903001CM_97659a.jpg

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/iraq/article712424.ece

In the chaos of Iraq, one project is on target: a giant US embassy

From Daniel McGrory in Baghdad

THE question puzzles and enrages a city: how is it that the Americans cannot keep the electricity running in Baghdad for more than a couple of hours a day, yet still manage to build themselves the biggest embassy on Earth?

Irritation grows as residents deprived of air-conditioning and running water three years after the US-led invasion watch the massive US Embassy they call “George W’s palace” rising from the banks of the Tigris.

In the pavement cafés, people moan that the structure is bigger than anything Saddam Hussein built. They are not impressed by the architects’ claims that the diplomatic outpost will be visible from space and cover an area that is larger than the Vatican city and big enough to accommodate four Millennium Domes. They are more interested in knowing whether the US State Department paid for the prime real estate or simply took it.

While families in the capital suffer electricity cuts, queue all day to fuel their cars and wait for water pipes to be connected, the US mission due to open in June next year will have its own power and water plants to cater for a population the size of a small town.

Officially, the design of the compound is supposed to be a secret, but you cannot hide the giant construction cranes and the concrete contours of the 21 buildings that are taking shape. Looming over the skyline, the embassy has the distinction of being the only big US building project in Iraq that is on time and within budget.

In a week when Washington revealed a startling list of missed deadlines and overspending on building projects, Congress was told that the bill for the embassy was $592 million (£312 million).

The heavily guarded 42-hectare (104-acre) site — which will have a 15ft thick perimeter wall — has hundreds of workers swarming on scaffolding. Local residents are bitter that the Kuwaiti contractor has employed only foreign staff and is busing them in from a temporary camp nearby.

After roughing it in Saddam’s abandoned palaces, diplomats should have every comfort in their new home. There will be impressive residences for the Ambassador and his deputy, six apartments for senior officials, and two huge office blocks for 8,000 staff to work in. There will be what is rumoured to be the biggest swimming pool in Iraq, a state-of-the-art gymnasium, a cinema, restaurants offering delicacies from favourite US food chains, tennis courts and a swish American Club for evening functions.

The security measures being installed are described as extraordinary. US officials are preparing for the day when the so-called green zone, the fortified and sealed-off compound where international diplomats and Iraq’s leaders live and work, is reopened to the rest of the city’s residents, and American diplomats can retreat to their own secure area.

Iraqi politicians opposed to the US presence protest that the scale of the project suggests that America retains long-term ambitions here. The International Crisis Group, a think-tank, said the embassy’s size “is seen by Iraqis as an indication of who actually exercises power in their country”.

A State Department official said that the size reflected the “massive amount of work still facing the US and our commitment to see it through”.

BEHIND SCHEDULE

A US Inspector General’s report into reconstruction found that although $22 billion had been spent, water, sewage and electricity, infrastructure still operated at prewar levels

Despite “significant progress” in recent months, less than half the water and electricity projects have been completed

Only six of the 150 planned health centres have been completed

US officials spent $70 million on medical equipment for health clinics that are unlikely ever to be built. More than 75 per cent of the funds for the 150 planned clinics have been allocated

Task Force Shield, the $147 million programme to train Iraqi security units to protect key oil and electrical sites failed to meet its goals. A fraud investigation is under way

Oil production was 2.18 million barrels per day in the last week of March. Before the war it was 2.6 million

Linkster
03-25-2007, 12:21 PM
Quote: Task Force Shield, the $147 million programme to train Iraqi security units to protect key oil and electrical sites failed to meet its goals. A fraud investigation is under way

Why do you think Haliburton is moving to Dubai - freedom from fines and accountability :thumbsup:

Mr. Blue
03-26-2007, 02:44 AM
I wonder if it has a pool

Linkster
03-26-2007, 06:36 AM
Didnt read the post eh?
There will be what is rumoured to be the biggest swimming pool in Iraq, a state-of-the-art gymnasium, a cinema, restaurants offering delicacies from favourite US food chains, tennis courts and a swish American Club for evening functions

Mr. Blue
03-26-2007, 07:53 AM
lol, oops, that's what I get for a lazy moment

stefan segal
03-26-2007, 10:01 AM
Whats is the difference between Sadam's palaces and butch's forts and embassy?

Stefan

Bill
03-26-2007, 02:58 PM
George W's Palace is supposedly a military marvel, altho this is mostly rumors, as specs are secret.

But, it's thought to be as much a modern military base as an embassy.

We learned our lesson when the Iranians took our embassy there. No more wimpy compounds that angry students can overwhelm. This one can fight off an army.

I'd love to check out it's gun and missile installations.

stefan segal
03-26-2007, 03:33 PM
Bill...I also meant what is the difference between butch spending all Iraqui reconstruction money on forts and embassy(and his private army) and Sadam buillding palaces (and a private army) and keeping Iraquis in poverty.

I know Sadam was a better administrater...kept the streets safe...but then Sadam was at least of normal intelligence...so I guess it's not really a fair comparison.


Stefan

exarmyranger
03-26-2007, 10:10 PM
Whats is the difference between Sadam's palaces and butch's forts and embassy?

StefanBesides the fact the american taxpayer,did'nt foot the bill for Sadham's Personal residences,or thier maitenance...Not much I guess,:dunno: What do you think...:lmao2: t/c ex

Kinky Jones
03-27-2007, 05:02 AM
Whats is the difference between Sadam's palaces and butch's forts and embassy?

Stefan

alot of Sadams palaces were cheap ass poorly built and had un-tastefully done decorating like something out of an old American Ninja 7 movie, this place is gonna be nice :) I hope some day before I die that we will be able to freely travel to see it :)