View Full Version : What Did Couric Do That Was So Wrong?
Instead of anyone defending Palin's answers they've only been attacking the person sitting across from her. Couric has been accused of being stupid, dumb, blond, a hack and of course Hog called her ugly in his none sexist and intellectual way that he has about the world.
Exactly how did Couric frame these questions that made them so wrong.
Please, let's not fall back into false accusations. Provide a real example of the way the question was asked and why it was framed in such a one sided manner instead of just posting links to the GOP complaining about it.
asroc
10-01-2008, 04:51 PM
I've heard it was her body language, but this is from the same people that think McCain's body language was part of why he won the debate.
Her body language forced Sarah Palin to get her talking points all mixed up? What is Couric like a Voodoo Goddess or something? If a little leg cross is all it takes to throw this woman off then do we really want her talking to foreign leaders?
Hog Trash
10-01-2008, 11:36 PM
Instead of anyone defending Palin's answers they've only been attacking the person sitting across from her. Couric has been accused of being stupid, dumb, blond, a hack and of course Hog called her ugly in his none sexist and intellectual way that he has about the world.
Exactly how did Couric frame these questions that made them so wrong.
Please, let's not fall back into false accusations. Provide a real example of the way the question was asked and why it was framed in such a one sided manner instead of just posting links to the GOP complaining about it.
I will try even though I'm sure you're ether too stupid or too programed to see the obvious.
If this fails I will know you are to far gone and truely too blind to see the obvious and no longer worth my effort or time.
The following is from the thread "You are being programed". Couric actualy uses her interview with Biden to take a shot at Palin.
Watch these interviews. Don't half-ass watch them but watch good and pay attention to Couric's demeaner in each interview and you tell me???
The interviews are only 8 or 9 minutes long each and you started this thread like you are really interested, so watch and learn if that's possible.
I watched Courics interviews with Palin and Biden and her bias was obvious in her demeaner, mannerisms, tone of voice and facial expressions.
Watch these two interviews...If you don't see the bias you are blind...This is common practice in media journalism...It's sad, heartless and disgusting.
The interview with Biden looked more like two old friends sitting down for a discussion. Warm, smiling, fuzzy and friendly.
http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=4470093n%3fsource=search_video
Courics interview with Palin was strickly business, never a smile or a friendly moment at all. Couric actually appeared cold and angry.
http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=4479049n%3fsource=search_video
I will try even though I'm sure you're ether too stupid or too programed to see the obvious.
If this fails I will know you are to far gone and truely too blind to see the obvious and no longer worth my effort or time.
The following is from the thread "You are being programed". Couric actualy uses her interview with Biden to take a shot at Palin.
Watch these interviews. Don't half-ass watch them but watch good and pay attention to Couric's demeaner in each interview and you tell me???
The interviews are only 8 or 9 minutes long each and you started this thread like you are really interested, so watch and learn if that's possible.
So you can't mention one statement where she unfairly framed a questioned and it comes down to her demeanor made Palin answer the reading question, the foreign policy question and the bail out question in such a shocking way?
That's all it takes to throw this woman off guard?
Please post some actual questions that were framed in such a way to put Palin on the defensive. Don't tell me we can't put in front of people that don't like her.
Did you ever think that Sarah Palin not being able to gain rapport with people could be a major problem? Maybe the woman with "the looks" was looking down in the "ugly" one.
Most people on this board could have answered those questions in a hostile environment and if all you can do is complain that Couric and Palin didn't have strong rapport then you need to rethink your "Amazing" claim.
Please support your statement with facts and not more emotional mamby pamby immature bull shit.
Independent Harry
10-02-2008, 01:38 AM
They can't, its amazing. Once they see things the way they want to. They can justify their thought processes with the smallest non-existant fancies.
Hog Trash
10-02-2008, 02:23 AM
So you can't mention one statement where she unfairly framed a questioned and it comes down to her demeanor made Palin answer the reading question, the foreign policy question and the bail out question in such a shocking way?
That's all it takes to throw this woman off guard?
Please post some actual questions that were framed in such a way to put Palin on the defensive. Don't tell me we can't put in front of people that don't like her.
Did you ever think that Sarah Palin not being able to gain rapport with people could be a major problem? Maybe the woman with "the looks" was looking down in the "ugly" one.
Most people on this board could have answered those questions in a hostile environment and if all you can do is complain that Couric and Palin didn't have strong rapport then you need to rethink your "Amazing" claim.
Please support your statement with facts and not more emotional mamby pamby immature bull shit.I have never made an issue about inapropriate questions she may have asked. I commented on friendly with one and hostile to the other. Biased journalism.
You started this thread, wanting to know the problem with Couric's Interview. I provided links but it appears you didn't watch them.
You always demand links but it is obvious you don't want to view them, or you have and you don't want to comment on them.
It's just like I've always said. It's a waste of time providing links to you because you don't except anything negative to your programing.
You really don't want to know the truth. You are content in your ignorance and I accept that. You want to play "gotcha", not debate.
The next time you demand proof and I ignore you, I hope you will remember why. You have wasted my time and I won't let it happen again.
I have never made an issue about inapropriate questions she may have asked. I commented on friendly with one and hostile to the other. Biased journalism.
When the posts of Palin's silly statements came to this board you and Seedy attacked Couric being as low and sexist as calling her ugly. Should I provide that post for you to refresh your memory?
These attacks against the journalist all came in threads on the topic of Palin's answers and they were used to deflect away from Palin and to defend her rambling.
These emotional responses that you have are the basis of the Neuro linguistic Programming that you've been accepting. You weren't able to deal with Palin's responses so you lashed out like a spoiled child would when he's been caught in a lie.
This is what NLP does and if you take some time to study it you'll start t understand. Then if you take a look at the money behind the sources of "News" that you seem to read you'll see that most of it leads back to 3 people and it all leads back to supporters of 1 Think Tank and they are not for democracy in any way.
It's not your fault Hog. These 3 Billionaires are good at what they do and have been programming you for years. As your mind and liver deteriorate the programming of your emotions will become complete without you even noticing. At any time they'll be able to trigger your emotional responses in the exact same way that you lashed out at Couric.
Now that we calmly separate Couric away from Palin and ask why she deserved such attacks you can't explain it rationally. There's just some feeling that you get and of course you believe that the feeling is not programmed into you when that is exactly what has happened.
Look up Frank Luntz some time. You can hire him to exaplain how the programming he's done you works.
Hog Trash
10-02-2008, 01:15 PM
When the posts of Palin's silly statements came to this board you and Seedy attacked Couric being as low and sexist as calling her ugly. Should I provide that post for you to refresh your memory?
These attacks against the journalist all came in threads on the topic of Palin's answers and they were used to deflect away from Palin and to defend her rambling.
I have previously stated my reasons for my opinion of Katie Couric which I had long before the Palin interview...She is ugly which is unusual for TV journalist, which is the only reason I pointed it out when I was commenting on how she got her job with such poor journalism skills on top of being dog ugly...Yes, I'm aware their are other ugly journalist. [Poor Candy Crawley.] Personaly I don't give a shit what a journalist looks like...I prefer quality, unbiased, objective journalism above any other quality.
Katie Couric is about the dumbest ugliest bitch I've ever seen...............No doubt.
I've noticed this ever since she made her first appearance as a liberal mouth piece on a morning talk show years ago.
She damn sure never got her job because of looks or brains.....Hmmm?......Wonder what special talent she possesses??? :dunno: http://www.dcjunkies.com/newreply.php?do=newreply&p=66045
I did throw in a little Hog flare to keep up my reputation as an "attention whore".
Still no comment on my "interview links"???...Hmmm?....Kinda hard to deny the obvious without looking stupid...Huh SM?
Independent Harry
10-02-2008, 01:21 PM
I watched both videos, the only difference is, Biden seemed to be able to coehrently answer all the questions. It seemed like Couric was actually trying to help Palin, by quickly getting off that questions so she didn't look so retarded. Couric definately had the same demeanor towards both of them though...
Independent Harry
10-02-2008, 01:22 PM
I have previously stated my reasons for my opinion of Katie Couric which I had long before the Palin interview...She is ugly which is unusual for TV journalist, which is the only reason I pointed it out when I was commenting on how she got her job with such poor journalism skills on top of being dog ugly...Yes, I'm aware their are other ugly journalist. [Poor Candy Crawley.] Personaly I don't give a shit what a journalist looks like...I prefer quality, unbiased, objective journalism above any other quality.
http://www.dcjunkies.com/newreply.php?do=newreply&p=66045
I did throw in a little Hog flare to keep up my reputation as an "attention whore".
Still no comment on my "interview links"???...Hmmm?....Kinda hard to deny the obvious without looking stupid...Huh SM?
If you're the only person its obvious too, maye not so obvious, eh...
Hog Trash
10-02-2008, 01:33 PM
If you're the only person its obvious too, maye not so obvious, eh...So does that mean you watched both interviews on the links I provided, and you still didn't see the bias???
Independent Harry
10-02-2008, 02:43 PM
So does that mean you watched both interviews on the links I provided, and you still didn't see the bias???
yes, that's exactly what that means...
BlackAsCoal
10-02-2008, 02:57 PM
These are the death throes of a miserably failed and dying ideology.
What Couric did wrong was allow Palin to illustrate her lack of knowledge and critical thinking before the entire world.
Now they're whining like stuck pigs about Gwen Ifill.
Someone running to be a heartbeat away from the presidency can't handle talking to two American women.
The ignorance of this is astounding.
These are some really dumb people.
Hog Trash
10-02-2008, 03:17 PM
yes, that's exactly what that means...If we should bet on who will win the VP debate, and afterwords I claim Palin won but you provide links with
poll results showing Biden won, but I refuse to acknowledge your evidence, would that mean I win the bet???
asroc
10-02-2008, 04:03 PM
You can't bet on a debate, the winner is almost always open to subjective interpretation. Palin supporters will claim she won, Biden supporters will claim he won.
BlackAsCoal
10-02-2008, 04:23 PM
You can't bet on a debate, the winner is almost always open to subjective interpretation. Palin supporters will claim she won, Biden supporters will claim he won.
But then there is the obvious.
Who cares what anyone "claims"
The truth will be in the obvious
Independent Harry
10-02-2008, 04:53 PM
If we should bet on who will win the VP debate, and afterwords I claim Palin won but you provide links with
poll results showing Biden won, but I refuse to acknowledge your evidence, would that mean I win the bet???
The evidence you posetd is completely open to personal interpretation you fucktard.
That's like me showing a man who is blue green colorblind a blue piece of paper and a green piece of paper and asking him what color the paper is.
He says, blue, I laugh at his ass, and call him stupid because both colors look the same to him.
You can't say that the evidence shows what you say it does empiracally because it's open to pesonal interpretation...moron.
Hog Trash
10-02-2008, 05:26 PM
But then there is the obvious.
Who cares what anyone "claims"
The truth will be in the obviousWhich is exactly my point.
Independent Harry
10-02-2008, 11:15 PM
Which is exactly my point.
except no one but you can see the obvious in this one...which means its not so obvious there killa...
Personaly I don't give a shit what a journalist looks like
So you brought up Couric's looks because it doesn't matter to you?
You brought up Palin's looks because it doesn't matter to you either? :lmao2:
I asked what Couric did that was so wrong. You've yet to mention anything other then you programmed feelings. No phrases, no frames, no attacks.
If you haven't noticed, that is my comment on your links. You mention nothing.
Hog Trash
10-05-2008, 07:41 PM
So you brought up Couric's looks because it doesn't matter to you?
You brought up Palin's looks because it doesn't matter to you either? :lmao2:
I asked what Couric did that was so wrong. You've yet to mention anything other then you programmed feelings. No phrases, no frames, no attacks.
If you haven't noticed, that is my comment on your links. You mention nothing.If you had read my posts thoroughly, and are not to stupid to comprehend what you read, you would not have to ask these questions.
disrupter
10-05-2008, 10:43 PM
Couric had the nerve to ask probing follow up questions.
How dare she!
Who the fuck does she think she is? a journalist or something?
Doesn't she know that 'talk & chatter' barbie isn't designed for comprehension or depth of understanding?
You just record the things you want the barbie doll to say & she says them relentlessly & repeatedly without any relationship to context or reality.
And the 'talk & chatter' barbie says them with those nice sharp gnashing teeth.
Prettiest cannibal on the shelf.
Couric had the nerve to ask probing follow up questions.
How dare she!
Who the fuck does she think she is? a journalist or something?
Doesn't she know that 'talk & chatter' barbie isn't designed for comprehension or depth of understanding?
You just record the things you want the barbie doll to say & she says them relentlessly & repeatedly without any relationship to context or reality.
And the 'talk & chatter' barbie says them with those nice sharp gnashing teeth.
Prettiest cannibal on the shelf.
It's not often that I agree with Dis. However I think it's funny that Couric threw Palin off her game by simply asking her to answer the question instead of excepting a 90 second infomercial.
No one can point to anything that Couric did that was wrong and biased other then cross her arms. Fucking classic example of the Neoconservative programming and the over emotional outrage involved.
I'm not sure what is worse, peter Gutman's loan comments being considered a liberal media smear campaign or Couric crossing her arms making her ugly.
Either way it's a fine example of how the programming has worked.
disrupter
10-05-2008, 11:47 PM
Should shooting a brain-dead right winger be considered a crime?
Isn't it sort of removing a dead thing from sucking up more oxygen from the living?
Shouldn't it be considered of benefit to society?
Instead of a crime it should be considered a badge of honor that benefits the American community.
Hog Trash
10-06-2008, 11:13 PM
Couric had the nerve to ask probing follow up questions.
How dare she!
Who the fuck does she think she is? a journalist or something?
Doesn't she know that 'talk & chatter' barbie isn't designed for comprehension or depth of understanding?
You just record the things you want the barbie doll to say & she says them relentlessly & repeatedly without any relationship to context or reality.
And the 'talk & chatter' barbie says them with those nice sharp gnashing teeth.
Prettiest cannibal on the shelf.Hmmm???....Ever ask yourself why Katie didn't do the same thing to Joe Biden???....That's a tough one, better just deny it!
Independent Harry
10-07-2008, 12:53 AM
Hmmm???....Ever ask yourself why Katie didn't do the same thing to Joe Biden???....That's a tough one, better just deny it!
umm, the questioning was prett close. Biden didn't strugle to answer any of them.
Hmmm???....Ever ask yourself why Katie didn't do the same thing to Joe Biden???....That's a tough one, better just deny it!
What cross her arms or repeat a question that he kept dodging? Maybe he gave coherent answers. :taunt: Dude, let's face it. Sarah "wink, cutsie smile, crinkle nose" Palin can say you betcha, hockey mom and Joe six pack and you'll fall over in love.
The woman was clueless and couldn't even answer simple basic questions. It would seem that she doesn't subscribe to any national or international news sources because she's focus in a small town of 7k people.
Hog Trash
10-07-2008, 09:55 AM
umm, the questioning was prett close. Biden didn't strugle to answer any of them.What cross her arms or repeat a question that he kept dodging? Maybe he gave coherent answers. :taunt: Dude, let's face it. Sarah "wink, cutsie smile, crinkle nose" Palin can say you betcha, hockey mom and Joe six pack and you'll fall over in love.
The woman was clueless and couldn't even answer simple basic questions. It would seem that she doesn't subscribe to any national or international news sources because she's focus in a small town of 7k people.You know what?....I almost think you two idiots might just be stupid enough to believe this crap.
You are definately part of the loyal raptured sheep herd, that blindly follow Obama. Your motor is running, but your master is driving.
You know what?....I almost think you two idiots might just be stupid enough to believe this crap.
You are definately part of the loyal raptured sheep herd
Believe what crap? That an interviewer crossing her arms a lot was enough to make her forget what she reads? :lmao2:
Talk about following the media bias. :taunt:
Independent Harry
10-07-2008, 03:04 PM
You know what?....I almost think you two idiots might just be stupid enough to believe this crap.
You are definately part of the loyal raptured sheep herd, that blindly follow Obama. Your motor is running, but your master is driving.
Well you know there was some bias, I mean I can't reallly point any of it out to you. Its just the overall feeling i got watchign the whole thing. Its not really anything Couric did or said, it was more, you know, that way couric was. Again not any specific one thing...just the way she made me feel, after I listened to fox news...
vBulletin v3.5.4, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.