View Full Version : "It was really fun to cheat on my disabled first wife" - McCain
http://www.boingboing.net/mccain-lipstick.jpg
More Jill Greenburg fun from boingboing....
http://www.boingboing.net/2008/09/15/jill-greenbergs-phot.html
Much fuss about Greenberg's Photoshopped McCain out-takes on her web site. "Offensive" etc etc. I find them interesting because she's a respected photographer who was commissioned to photograph him for The Atlantic magazine cover. Also interesting in that the Photoshop work isn't that good.
Greenberg's web site is at www.manipulator.com Because of her use of Flash, you can't deep-link to the individual pictures. From her home page you have to follow these onscreen options:
1. Click Enter Manipulator
2. Click Names
3. Scroll to John McCain and click his name
4. Click thumbnails at the bottom of the screen.
Binky
09-15-2008, 04:49 PM
http://www.boingboing.net/mccain-lipstick.jpg
More Jill Greenburg fun from boingboing....
http://www.boingboing.net/2008/09/15/jill-greenbergs-phot.html
To me, he's just another man that couldn't keep his peter in his pants. His ex is better off without him, considering all the temper tantrums he displays. And his barbie doll wife is nothing less than a husband stealer that had no regard for his wife. What a pair they make. A tempermental man that's a bully and a woman who is filthy rich and stands beside or behind her man like a sheep going off to slaughter.
disrupter
09-15-2008, 05:36 PM
But Binky will be voting for him, because he managed to hook up with Palin.
Women have paved the way for McCain, throughout his life,
& when his former swimsuit model wife had the nerve to become disfigured in an auto accident he ran over her on his way out.
Then he married the local mobster's ultra-rich daughter, to continue his playboy lifestyle.
Yeap, McCain is all about integrity isn't he.
btw, he was involved in the original Savings & Loan crisis in the late 80s-early 90s. He was one of five senators involved in all THAT sleaze.
Isn't Palin an amazing distraction from McCain?
like the spokemodel who completely hides the lousy product people are actually buying.
Binky
09-15-2008, 06:56 PM
But Binky will be voting for him, because he managed to hook up with Palin.
Women have paved the way for McCain, throughout his life,
& when his former swimsuit model wife had the nerve to become disfigured in an auto accident he ran over her on his way out.
Then he married the local mobster's ultra-rich daughter, to continue his playboy lifestyle.
Yeap, McCain is all about integrity isn't he.
btw, he was involved in the original Savings & Loan crisis in the late 80s-early 90s. He was one of five senators involved in all THAT sleaze.
Isn't Palin an amazing distraction from McCain?
like the spokemodel who completely hides the lousy product people are actually buying.
Oh, and you have esp. and know for a fact that I plan on voting for him, do you? I've been saying all along how I dislike both candidates. I even said at one point that I do not intend to vote for either of them. Don't you pay attention?
And Obama is an amazing distraction from the issues. Go figure! Yehaw! We don't give a damn about any of those, do we?
hdmarketing
09-15-2008, 08:43 PM
http://www.boingboing.net/mccain-lipstick.jpg
More Jill Greenburg fun from boingboing....
http://www.boingboing.net/2008/09/15/jill-greenbergs-phot.html
Hey Bill,
Why don't you ask YOUR BOY Edwards if how much fun he had cheating on his Cancer stricken wife...
disrupter
09-16-2008, 10:45 PM
Binky, admit it you are buying the Sarah Palin lipstick on the McCain pig.
McCain integrity?
He married a mobster's daughter, who's money got him elected to congress.
McCain isn't a maverick, he is a soulless playboy who will do ANYTHING however low or dirty to get what he wants.
Binky
09-17-2008, 07:18 AM
Binky, admit it you are buying the Sarah Palin lipstick on the McCain pig.
McCain integrity?
He married a mobster's daughter, who's money got him elected to congress.
McCain isn't a maverick, he is a soulless playboy who will do ANYTHING however low or dirty to get what he wants.
Apparently you are blind, dis. Or maybe just a bonehead. Or both. Go back and read my post. I'm bored with this.
Mr. Blue
09-17-2008, 08:42 AM
Just like I didn't go after Bill Clinton for getting an intern to blow him, I'm not going after McCain for this...Sex is sex, relationships come and they go, and I don't believe someone should stay in a relationship that just doesn't do it for them.
disrupter
09-17-2008, 02:30 PM
Mobster money got him elected,
does THAT not 'matter'?
Binky
09-17-2008, 04:37 PM
Mobster money got him elected,
does THAT not 'matter'?
Dis, I was referring to the "Sarah Palin pig" thing you mentioned. I wasn't talking about anything else.
And of course it matters where he got his money from. That alone speaks volumns. Duh!
disrupter
09-17-2008, 08:35 PM
That was intended for Mr. Blue,
who seems to be discounting McCain marrying into mobsters.
Mr. Blue
09-17-2008, 09:27 PM
That was intended for Mr. Blue,
who seems to be discounting McCain marrying into mobsters.
Look, people can focus on the tripe, they can focus on the National Enquirer type stuff, or they can focus on the fact that neither of the candidates have the right stuff for the job.
I also discount the crap with Obama and Bill Ayres, etc, I'll even overlook the Rezko stuff, even though the right wants to jump the hell all over it.
Now, with everyone's lust for the sensationalism, they overlook the fact that both of these bozos are bozos, we have a fucked way of picking candidates if this is the best we can come up with...
Once again, Americans go into the voting booth and pick the lesser of two evils, which at the moment seems to be Obama.
PhoneMistress
09-18-2008, 12:06 AM
Who then would you consider a good candidate? What are the characteristics? I hear a lot about the lesser of two evils but you have to vote FOR someone not against. If one doesn't like the choices, then do something about it.
Mr. Blue
09-18-2008, 12:23 AM
Who then would you consider a good candidate? What are the characteristics? I hear a lot about the lesser of two evils but you have to vote FOR someone not against. If one doesn't like the choices, then do something about it.
I regularly vote for third party candidates...all of whom stand a snowball's chance in hell of winning.
If they said I could pick someone tomorrow for President and I had the final say...I'd pick Michael Bloomberg. He's really politically neutral, he was a democrat, became a rep to win the election, then eventually renounced them. Being a NYer though, the guy has been a surprisingly competent mayor. Giuliani before him did a decent job as well, but Bloomberg has the smarts to get America back on track.
Only problems I see is that he's Jewish and there'd be a lot of hate pointed his way because of it. I'm sure someone is going to come along and say how awful he'd be, but if you live near or around the city, you know that NYC from the time Dinkins was mayor (good lord was that bad) to now with Bloomberg is like a completely different place.
Mr. Blue
09-18-2008, 12:25 AM
I'll also add I kept hoping that Bloomberg would have made a third party run this year, it's probably the only election cycle that a third party with someone like Bloomberg, could have won.
disrupter
09-18-2008, 01:59 AM
Jewish is not a problem, blind support for the Iraq fiasco is.
He even links 911 with Iraq in his attempt to rationalize it.
"Don't forget that the war started not very many blocks from here"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Bloomberg
also his NYC police went crazy with aggression & lied about it in court during the 2004 GOP convention there. Police aggression & lies cost the city millions.
Mr. Blue
09-18-2008, 04:45 AM
Jewish is not a problem, blind support for the Iraq fiasco is.
He even links 911 with Iraq in his attempt to rationalize it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Bloomberg
also his NYC police went crazy with aggression & lied about it in court during the 2004 GOP convention there. Police aggression & lies cost the city millions.
Do you live in NYC? I have and still live a stones throw away from NYC. When Dinkins was mayor it was a cesspool. With Bloomberg at the helm the city is better than I've ever remembered it being. Hands down the guy knows how to govern to improve the overall quality of life.
He's run the toughest city in the country and he's a billionaire, he knows a little something about money, and he'd most likely set the country back on a sound financial footing.
He's one of the few Mayors that most New Yorkers would want to see run again despite the term limits. You can fish for blurbs about him online all day long, but when the people of NYC would vote the guy in repeatedly if they could, you know he's doing his job right.
PhoneMistress
09-18-2008, 08:02 AM
I agree. This would have been the year a 3rd party could have won.
I have only heard good things about Bloomberg but sadly the Jewish thing will not play well in the South. However, after this election I believe Senator Obama broke that ceiling.
I don't know the details of the police situation during the 2004 RNC. I know it was settled for ~$20M. Maybe Mr. Blue can enlightened us. I understand that many of the first responders including the rescue dogs are dying of mesothelioma. Has anyone ever gotten to the bottom of the air quality situation?
Mr. Blue
09-18-2008, 09:52 AM
I don't know the details of the police situation during the 2004 RNC.
It was the perfect storm. Bloomberg made one softball sized political mistake, he invited the Republicans to have their convention in NYC. The police handled the protests heavy handed for sure, it wasn't his best moment, but you also have to remember the NYC police generally handle things heavy handed, umm, it's kind of the ny way.
The thing is that Bloomberg really doesn't belong to any party...he got re-elected in a landslide. No matter how that one incident looks on paper, the people of NYC knows he's done a damn good job. You don't win running as a republican and get a 20% victory if you're not doing a good job.
He's unfortunately unelectable though...it's really unfortunate, but I just can't see the nation voting for a Jewish Billionaire, lol.
Binky
09-18-2008, 10:32 AM
What's really sad is that in this country, you have to be rich in order to run for president. I've not heard of anyone that wasn't, at least not in this day and age. It's too bad that an average person, with smarts, experience, likability and is a people person couldn't run and make it. Altho', only maybe if he or she had a vast amount of financial backing from outsiders. Now that would be a change.
disrupter
09-18-2008, 02:47 PM
You think it is harder to elect a Jewish billionaire than an African American from a single mother household?
I find that dubious.
While far from perfect, Americans seem much more open minded after the dire problems of Bush & the GOP neocons.
The real problem with Bloomberg is that at this point he is not different enough from the GOP neocons.
vBulletin v3.5.4, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.