PDA

View Full Version : Jewish Control Of The Media.


Zeb
09-12-2008, 09:34 PM
It is true many years ago when Thomas Edison first put forth his invention that gave motion to pictures the Jews stole it, and moved to California for at the time it was less likely they would be prosecuted for the theft being on the west coast. They could see underhanded value in an invention which could influence masses of people.

What the media has become today was started from what was stolen from Edison. We now have a group of people less than 3% of the population attempting to control all the information received by the masses of people.

The destruction of the American family through the media and economics has always been a major goal in their Anti-American crusade. Playing the Men against the Women, the Children against their parents, and families in general against Men as head if the household.

Their movies trains Women not listen to the Man and become rebellious. Their movies attempt to merge the Sexes by making the Female masculine and attempting to emasculate the Men. They confuse the roles of Men and Women, and brainwash spouses to resort to calling in law enforcement to quelling disputes that arise from confusing the roles of family members. The portrayal of children in the movies and television as being disrespectful to parents, and they highlight this behavior with much media air time.

Notice how they attempt to divide and conquer by using the gender of the Vice presidential candidate instead of focusing on the real issues. Deception always seeks to trick you, not inform you.

This is just the tip of the iceberg in terms of all the evil these people do with the media.
They use so-called polls in an attempt to tell us how to think in a very underhanded manipulative way. The “lemmings jumping of the cliff tactic” in an effort to brainwash people into falling for their abundant lies. They try and condition people away from thinking for themselves and following others/polls.

They attempt to define political campaigns and the thinking of people with the media, however despite the enormous amount of money and effort they have placed into covering their lies and controlling the media their wicked efforts have fell far short in some ways. However in creating destructive subcultures they are second to none….This is a long very revealing story in and of itself.

These are the people who invented Communism and brought Communism with all its evils creating the Soviet Union. With all the evil that they do, they hate your freedom of speech, they hate the internet, and are working hard to destroy this too. Comcast now says they will limit how much one can upload and download from the internet, and they can determine who will be denied internet service. If do allow them to do this expect things to get much worst for the internet.

Let’s just face it the international bankers/Jews hate the freedoms provided by the American Constitution, and are financing their corporate right arm to work against, bankrupt, and overthrown the American Government. They did the same thing in Russia when they destroyed the Russian monarchy, murdered the last Tsar, and financed Lenin, Trotsky, and Stalin.

New York Jews accomplished this just as they Accomplished 9-11. The False Flag operation called 9-11 along with the media has brainwashed far too many people into believing the enemies of the Israeli’s were responsible for the of murders of 9-11.
The true terrorist are the ones who wired the twin Towers and building 7 with explosives before the aircraft stunt.

The only difference between the Zionist take-over of Russia with the Soviet Union, and the take-over of the U.S. is here the Fabian approach is being utilized.

AVG_JOE
09-12-2008, 10:06 PM
... and the take-over of the U.S. is here the Fabian approach is being utilized.

The guy does have pretty hair... ya gotta give him that...

-Joe

Mr. Blue
09-12-2008, 10:27 PM
Umm, Mein Kampf much?

SeedyROM
09-13-2008, 04:58 AM
Neocons and the Project for the New American Century are dangerous groups that helped to manufacture the Iraq war. Both groups infest the media, lobby groups and political offices for power, control and the manipulation of our government. Jews want our blood and dollars to bomb Iran so they only have to provide the Pro-Rata share of soldiers instead of an invasion lead by the Jews. They can handle Iran, but why would they when money and power can buy them a war?

Post without the right story Friday evening

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=28157

Who is Randy Scheunemann?

He is the principal foreign policy adviser to John McCain and potential successor to Henry Kissinger and Zbigniew Brzezinski as national security adviser to the president of the United States.

But Randy Scheunemann has another identity, another role.

He is a dual loyalist, a foreign agent whose assignment is to get America committed to spilling the blood of her sons for client regimes who have made this moral mercenary a rich man.

From January 2007 to March 2008, the McCain campaign paid Scheunemann $70,000 -- pocket change compared to the $290,000 his Orion Strategies banked in those same 15 months from the Georgian regime of Mikheil Saakashvili.

What were Mikheil's marching orders to Tbilisi's man in Washington? Get Georgia a NATO war guarantee. Get America committed to fight Russia, if necessary, on behalf of Georgia.

Scheunemann came close to succeeding.

Had he done so, U.S. soldiers and Marines from Idaho and West Virginia would be killing Russians in the Caucasus, and dying to protect Scheunemann's client, who launched this idiotic war the night of Aug. 7. That people like Scheunemann hire themselves out to put American lives on the line for their clients is a classic corruption of American democracy.

U.S. backing for his campaign to retrieve his lost provinces is what Saakashvili paid Scheunemann to produce. But why should Americans fight Russians to force 70,000 South Ossetians back into the custody of a regime they detest? Why not let the South Ossetians decide their own future in free elections?

Not only is the folly of the Bush interventionist policy on display in the Caucasus, so, too, is its manifest incoherence.

Defense Secretary Robert Gates says we have sought for 45 years to stay out of a shooting war with Russia and we are not going to get into one now. President Bush assured us there will be no U.S. military response to the Russian move into Georgia.

That is a recognition of, and a bowing to, reality -- namely, that Russia's control of South Ossetia and Abkhazia and occupation of a strip of Georgia cannot be a casus belli for the United States. We may deplore it, but it cannot justify war with Russia.

If that be true, and it transparently is, what are McCain, Barack Obama, Bush, and German Chancellor Angela Merkel doing committing the United States and Germany to bringing Georgia into NATO? For that would commit us to war for a cause we have already conceded, by our paralysis, does not justify a war.

Not only did Scheunemann's two-man lobbying firm receive $730,000 since 2001 to get Georgia a NATO war guarantee, he was paid by Romania and Latvia to do the same. And he succeeded.

Latvia, a tiny Baltic republic annexed by Joseph Stalin in June 1940 during his pact with Adolf Hitler, was set free at the end of the Cold War. Yet hundreds of thousands of Russians had been moved into Latvia by Stalin, and as Riga served as a base of the Baltic Sea fleet, many Russian naval officers retired there.

The children and grandchildren of these Russians are Latvian citizens. They are a cause of constant tension with ethnic Letts and of strife with Moscow, which has assumed the role of protector of Russians left behind in the "near abroad" when the Soviet Union broke apart.

Thanks to the lobbying of Scheunemann and friends, Latvia has been brought into NATO and given a U.S. war guarantee. If Russia intervenes to halt some nasty ethnic violence in Riga, the United States is committed to come in and drive the Russians out.

This is the situation in which the interventionists have placed our country: committed to go to war for countries and causes that do not justify war, against a Russia that is re-emerging as a great power only to find NATO squatting on her doorstep.

Scheunemann's resume as a War Party apparatchik is lengthy. He signed the PNAC (Project for the New American Century) letter to President Clinton urging war on Iraq, four years before 9-11. He signed the PNAC ultimatum to Bush, nine days after 9-11, threatening him with political reprisal if he did not go to war against Iraq. He was executive director of the "Committee for the Liberation of Iraq," a propaganda front for Ahmad Chalabi and his pack of liars who deceived us into war.

Now Scheunemann is the neocon agent in place in McCain's camp.

The neocons got their war with Iraq. They are pushing for war on Iran. And they are now baiting the Russian Bear.

Is this what McCain has on offer? Endless war?

Why would McCain seek foreign policy counsel from the same discredited crowd that has all but destroyed the presidency of George Bush?

"Against the insidious wiles of foreign influence ... a free people ought to be constantly awake," Washington warned in his Farewell Address. Our Founding Father was warning against the Randy Scheunemanns among us, agents hired by foreign powers to deceive Americans into fighting their wars. And none dare call it treason.




Bat Buchanan's article on Scheunemann. Sometimes the man impresses me with his attacks and political satire. He's warning of the effects of the PNAC influence. In my opinion attacking PNAC is the equivelent of saying anything negative about Israel or Jewish person and have it taken out of context and the whole discussion devolves alleged racism. Scheunemann is Jewish and his lobby is a major influence throwing money at politicians, making threats and building a power base of defense contractors, lobbiests and some politiicians to further whose agenda?

Eisenhower warned of the influence of the military industrial complex, his speech was accurate and it reflects todays politics. Defense contractors, lobbiests and PAC's have become quite the fraternal group. Add in the Skull and Bones influence and the power base becomes quite effective. McCain is still hated and cricitized by many PNAC's, he's a strong and arrogant man, how much will they influence him versus the theories, hard to say. McCainhas proven he'll cross the iasle and listen to Dems and support thier bills and agendas. If he wins lets hope the 2 partys can foster a more cohesive and open government that. As for Scheunemann's influence, the more people write about him the greater likelihood that McCain will have to drop him. Scheunemann qualifies as an "Evil Jew" not a reflection on the majority of Jews, no pun intended.

SeedyROM
09-13-2008, 05:00 AM
This one is long so read. It's a neocon/PNAC 101 reading found by Sirmoby.

Another scary thought for ya. McCain and Obama have political advisers who are known neocons!!
Woosley, former CIA Director is Obama's neonutcom advisor. Obama has over 300 foreign policy advisors, no telling how many believe in diplomcay first, then bomb then into submission aka the spread of democracy. Swift and aggressive is not always the best option. Time and diplomacy work too.

http://www.logosjournal.com/dorrien.htm
Benevolent Global Hegemony" William Kristol and the Politics of American Empire

Smurf-Herder
09-13-2008, 10:56 AM
This one is long so read. It's a neocon/PNAC 101 reading found by Sirmoby.

Another scary thought for ya. McCain and Obama have political advisers who are known neocons!!
Woosley, former CIA Director is Obama's neonutcom advisor. Obama has over 300 foreign policy advisors, no telling how many believe in diplomcay first, then bomb then into submission aka the spread of democracy. Swift and aggressive is not always the best option. Time and diplomacy work too.

I didn't know Clinton's ex-CIA Director was a neocon.

BTW, Woolsey is McCain' advisor, not Obama's - unless he's advising both.

Smurf-Herder
09-13-2008, 10:59 AM
The guy does have pretty hair... ya gotta give him that...

-Joe

You do realize he's referring to a Roman General.

And I always thought Fabian Socialism was a liberal strategy, since I first heard of it back in the late eighties.

AVG_JOE
09-13-2008, 11:19 AM
You do realize he's referring to a Roman General.

And I always thought Fabian Socialism was a liberal strategy, since I first heard of it back in the late eighties.

The post was a bit hard to follow - I figured he was referring to the model with the pretty hair.

-J

SeedyROM
09-13-2008, 06:43 PM
I didn't know Clinton's ex-CIA Director was a neocon.

BTW, Woolsey is McCain' advisor, not Obama's - unless he's advising both.

You're right Woosley is advising McCain. Obama has a neocon, you mentioned he was a neo in another thread. Any chance you remember which one? I used the wrong name. He's on the list of Obama advisors. Can't think of his name, but I'll find the list and post it.