PDA

View Full Version : Charlie Gibson’s Interview. She Was Tense and Scripted.


PhoneMistress
09-12-2008, 11:45 AM
I am amazed that no one has posted or commented on the interview Charlie Gibson conducted yesterday. Anybody watch it?

Video and Transcript (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/09/11/sarah-palins-charlie-gibs_n_125772.html)

Feedback from Alaska (http://mudflats.wordpress.com/)

Hog Trash
09-12-2008, 12:45 PM
Every one's positions on issues are scripted. Some people are just better bullshitters, therefore they have better deliveries.

This is why Ronald Reagan was known as the "great communicator".

His career as an actor made him a master at delivering a "scripted speech" and making it sound like he was speaking from the heart.

Obama's greatest and only talent is "scripted delivery" and making it sound unscripted and sincere. In other words, a magnificent bullshitter.

Wake up suckers!!!

SeniorChief
09-12-2008, 12:50 PM
Charlie Gibson comes across again as a complete elitist ass. Why didn't he just say what he felt, "How dare you do this to Obama, you filthy bitch." That's what he was thinking the whole time.

It would have been refreshing to see Sarah reach across and knock those fucking glasses off his nose. The way he was looking over them, down his nose at her - kinda reminded me of some perverted old drunk uncle...

I personally think he did Sarah a favor angering millions more American women how these people treat women.....

disrupter
09-12-2008, 01:18 PM
Note: i haven't watched this particular interview.

Gibson & Stephanopolos aren't really worth a spit, IMO.
They really are sensationalists hiding behind their suits.

Tim Russert, we need you now,

Someone who poses [sometimes sharp] questions that come from real context.
Someone seeking wisdom & practical insight & not just tinsel-town sensations.

A really good interviewer comes with good, soundly based questions, has already researched likely avenues of response, but they listen in whole 3D to what the response is & probes the actual responses themselves to gain insight about the workings of the mind of the interviewee.

A really good interview is a conduit of insight that can very likely enlighten everyone, including the interviewer & interviewee as well as the viewing audience.
A really good interview should stimulate more thinking on the part of the audience, but that is probably a very rare thing indeed.

Hog Trash
09-12-2008, 02:03 PM
Note: i haven't watched this particular interview.

Gibson & Stephanopolos aren't really worth a spit, IMO.
They really are sensationalists hiding behind their suits.

Tim Russert, we need you now,

Someone who poses [sometimes sharp] questions that come from real context.
Someone seeking wisdom & practical insight & not just tinsel-town sensations.

A really good interviewer comes with good, soundly based questions, has already researched likely avenues of response, but they listen in whole 3D to what the response is & probes the actual responses themselves to gain insight about the workings of the mind of the interviewee.

A really good interview is a conduit of insight that can very likely enlighten everyone, including the interviewer & interviewee as well as the viewing audience.
A really good interview should stimulate more thinking on the part of the audience, but that is probably a very rare thing indeed.Gibson is just your average programed biased journalist, not worthy of my time, but when watching Stephanopoulos, I must keep my barf bag close at hand{courtesy of the airlines}.

He's such a weeny ass little liberal fuck, it's sickening to look at him. He has to be gay, cuz I can't imagine a real woman wanting to be with him unless he pays good.

asroc
09-13-2008, 12:09 AM
I foolishly turned on the Palin interview on ABC a few minutes ago, and she was talking about how the McCain administration will look for "efficiencies" in government to eliminate to cut down on federal spending. She repeated this at least 4 or 5 times.

She clearly meant "inefficiencies."

Jesse Hemingway
09-13-2008, 12:15 AM
Palian is a fucking idiot and even if you spray painted that pig you still have a painted fucking idiot pig.:lmao2: :lmao2: :lmao2:

Mr, gone
09-13-2008, 04:18 AM
Senior,

Yeah she was really giving her a hard time... NOT!! Shit, maybe Gibson should have just patted her on the head and said 'good doggy' and gave her a bone. :lmao2:

SeedyROM
09-13-2008, 04:50 AM
It didn't suprise me she didn't know what the Bush Doctrine is. The BD is just a term used to describe Bush's style of diplomacy in the wake of 9/11.

Gibson thought he sandbagged with something clever but the fact is if he had used Cowboy Diplomacy or Bush Diplomacy it would have been more professional and she would have Aced It! Idiot Dem media douchebags where chattering like woo hoo we got her on that one. Half the media are educated just enough to qualify for a job at Wal-Mart or McDonalds. Most of the media banter like they worked at a hair salon.

The media terms and the sterotypes with such language are not mainstream for everyone. The question was slick but unnecessary. The media have acted like low life scum towards this lady. Hillary got better treatment. Proof bias, hate, racism and sexism are prevelant in todays media.

George W Bush did not create such a writing or theory, nor did his cabinet.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_Doctrine
The Bush Doctrine is a term used to describe various related foreign policy principles of United States president George W. Bush, enunciated in the wake of the September 11, 2001 attacks. The phrase initially described the policy that the United States had the right to treat countries that harbor or give aid to terrorist groups as terrorists themselves, which was used to justify the invasion of Afghanistan.

The first usage of the term to refer to the policies of George W. Bush may have been when conservative commentator Charles Krauthammer used the term in February 2001 to refer to the president's unilateral approach to national missile defense

PhoneMistress
09-13-2008, 08:49 AM
The fact is they chose Gibson to give the interview. He was the only one to have a sit down interview with McCain. They chose the time. She had two weeks to prepare. They chose the place. Alaska. It didn't work.

LogicallyYours
09-13-2008, 08:58 AM
Charlie Gibson comes across again as a complete elitist ass. Why didn't he just say what he felt, "How dare you do this to Obama, you filthy bitch." That's what he was thinking the whole time.

It would have been refreshing to see Sarah reach across and knock those fucking glasses off his nose. The way he was looking over them, down his nose at her - kinda reminded me of some perverted old drunk uncle...

I personally think he did Sarah a favor angering millions more American women how these people treat women.....

Wow, so asking her truthful real questions and then holding her to answer makes him an asshole?

How about the idea that she is running for the 2nd highest office in the world and she should have to answer these questions!

While I think she may be a person no better or no worse than any other, she is in no way shape or form ready to be Vice President of the US.

Oh, and for the last fucking time......Sarah, it's pronounced "NU-CLEAR" not, "NUKE-U-LER"!!!!

Smurf-Herder
09-13-2008, 10:53 AM
Where is this same scrutiny of Obama - the head guy on the ticket?

Binky
09-13-2008, 11:03 AM
As speeches and such are all pre written by others or the politicians are more or less told what to say, then it certainly comes as no surprise that it's possible she was told how to comment.

As for being tense, if I were in her position, and the media has already blasted me with nasty remarks etc and inunendos, you can bet I'd be tense and "have my guard up." Why shouldn't she appear a bit tense, for crying out loud, she has every right to be since the media in all forms are having a feeding frenzy with her. They have proven they will stoop as low as they have to, to discredit her in any way they can. But then, that's the way it always is and it has only gotten worse as time went on.

Smurf-Herder
09-13-2008, 11:08 AM
As speeches and such are all pre written by others or the politicians are more or less told what to say, then it certainly comes as no surprise that it's possible she was how to comment.

As for being tense, if I were in her position, a newbie on the scene, and the media has already blasted me with nasty remarks etc and inunendos, you can bet I'd be tense and "have my guard up." Why shouldn't she appear a bit tense, for crying out loud, she has every right to be since the media in all forms are having a feeding frenzy with her. They have proven they will stoop as tho as they have to to discredit her in any way they can. But then, that's the way it always is and it has only gotten worse as time goes on.

Another thing. She was very direct and held to her positions - instead of being vague and generalizing, like Obama.

Smurf-Herder
09-13-2008, 11:15 AM
BTW, somebody should do this with Biden

We need to see him answer on his judgement - considering he was picked for his judgement experience.

He voted against the Guf War in 1991, but voted for this one. He wanted to split Iraq into three separate parts (which would have lead to ethnic cleaning on a massive scale). He was against the surge (which worked). He refused to vote against funding for the surge (which I respect his position on - but puts him at odds with his own party).

My position is - all four candidates need to be put under equal scrutiny.

Binky
09-13-2008, 11:31 AM
BTW, somebody should do this with Biden

We need to see him answer on his judgement - considering he was picked for his judgement experience.

He voted against the Guf War in 1991, but voted for this one. He wanted to split Iraq into three separate parts (which would have lead to ethnic cleaning on a massive scale). He was against the surge (which worked). He refused to vote against funding for the surge (which I respect his position on - but puts him at odds with his own party).

My position is - all four candidates need to be put under equal scrutiny.


Yep, sounds reasonable to me. They all need to be put under a microscope and picked apart.

bairdi
09-13-2008, 11:57 AM
BTW, somebody should do this with Biden

We need to see him answer on his judgement - considering he was picked for his judgement experience.

He voted against the Guf War in 1991, but voted for this one. He wanted to split Iraq into three separate parts (which would have lead to ethnic cleaning on a massive scale). He was against the surge (which worked). He refused to vote against funding for the surge (which I respect his position on - but puts him at odds with his own party).

My position is - all four candidates need to be put under equal scrutiny.
Biden has been on Meet The Press 42 times including last Sunday. He has never ducked an interview and his record on issues is well documented. Will we ever see Sarah Who? on Meet The Press or any other Sunday political show that is not on Faux news? I doubt it.

bairdi
09-13-2008, 11:59 AM
As speeches and such are all pre written by others or the politicians are more or less told what to say, then it certainly comes as no surprise that it's possible she was how to comment.

As for being tense, if I were in her position, and the media has already blasted me with nasty remarks etc and inunendos, you can bet I'd be tense and "have my guard up." Why shouldn't she appear a bit tense, for crying out loud, she has every right to be since the media in all forms are having a feeding frenzy with her. They have proven they will stoop as tho as they have to, to discredit her in any way they can. But then, that's the way it always is and it has only gotten worse as time goes on.
Sarah Who? is totally incompetent to be one heartbeat away from the presidency of this great country. Why do you keep apologizing for her?

SeniorChief
09-13-2008, 03:42 PM
All I see in this thread are a lot of shit-scared Liberals.

Scared of a woman? Or just jealous?

Perhaps if some of you Libs might consider removing your nose from Obama/Biden's ass for a moment... come up for some fresh air.

PhoneMistress
09-13-2008, 04:32 PM
Then you need to have your eyes checked.

LogicallyYours
09-13-2008, 04:36 PM
All I see in this thread are a lot of shit-scared Liberals.

Scared of a woman? Or just jealous?

Perhaps if some of you Libs might consider removing your nose from Obama/Biden's ass for a moment... come up for some fresh air.

Perhaps you should consider using a new image. Don Rickles is actually a pretty smart guy. I might want to use something more like Homer Simpson.

Please tell us what 4 more years of how the Bush Doctrine is "Fresh Air"?

SeniorChief
09-13-2008, 06:10 PM
Please tell us what 4 more years of how the Bush Doctrine is "Fresh Air"?

Define the Bush Doctrine, asswipe.
2-3 sentenced will suffice.
And don't cut and paste from Yahoo - Gomer.
Try it yourself.

SeniorChief
09-13-2008, 06:21 PM
I might want to use something more like Homer Simpson.




"I" might, eh professor?

You might want to consider someone dumber than Homer Simpson.

How about Tim Kaine or John Edwards - a-hole? They're both available. If you need help uploading an avatar, as you seem computer-stupid, drop me a PM and I'll whip out a crayola and help you along.

Idiot.

SeedyROM
09-13-2008, 06:51 PM
LOL, these people have no problem with Obama's lack of experience and he's running for Potus. So the Veep has more executive experience and thats a problem. You people love to play games with American politics and invent a story to describe how Pali lacks this and that but we all know Obama is equal or lesser depending on whom you ask and Dems are okay with Oabama.

I love how dumb the media are at times, thinking they've got the "Gotcha" and all they have is nothing significant. Experience and Palin chatter amoungst Dems does indeed blow right back in Obama's face!!! Biden has more experience and he thinks Hillary Clinton is more qualified than he is....................what a gas the Obama/Biden ticket has become.

And how many Dems praise The Govenator for running for office and winning??? Thousands!!! Hollywood loved Arnold for running!!!! Yippe yall, now we Got Obama/Biden, no experience just the fluff and tough talk. Wait till Obama meets Vladimir Putin....... man far smarter and more cunning and sophisticated than 10 Obama's!!!

SeedyROM
09-13-2008, 07:32 PM
Perhaps you should consider using a new image. Don Rickles is actually a pretty smart guy. I might want to use something more like Homer Simpson.

Please tell us what 4 more years of how the Bush Doctrine is "Fresh Air"?

No one has ever made an intelligent comparison that Bush and McCain have the same policies. Do you know how many Dems voted with Bush and McCain on the 90% of Bills McCain voted with Bush on??? Those sucker lines seen on TV and on this site are sucker lines with weak arguments. No Bill get passed without the support of both parties. Dems have to support the Bills too.

SeniorChief
09-13-2008, 10:13 PM
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/12/AR2008091202457_pf.html

Mr, gone
09-14-2008, 01:08 AM
Senior,

I think Forest Gump would best be suited for your avatar!! :lmao2: :lmao2: He was a Vietnam vet who got shot in the 'buttocks'!! :lmao2: He was also a war hero just like McCain!!

"Stupid is as stupid does"

Binky
09-14-2008, 01:30 AM
Another thing. She was very direct and held to her positions - instead of being vague and generalizing, like Obama.


This is true. She definitely wasn't vague.

Hog Trash
09-14-2008, 08:32 AM
This is true. She definitely wasn't vague.People are so use to bullshit and double talk from politicians, they freak when they hear a politician who talks like normal, average folks.

It's sad that people have gotten so accustomed to being scammed, that they no longer recognize honesty.

LogicallyYours
09-14-2008, 09:08 AM
Define the Bush Doctrine, asswipe.
2-3 sentenced will suffice.
And don't cut and paste from Yahoo - Gomer.
Try it yourself.

Simply, the Bush Doctrine is the right to a preemptive strike if we believe we are in danger of threat from another country.

I his case, a threat that didn't exist or was made up.

Did I miss anything, Homer?

LogicallyYours
09-14-2008, 09:16 AM
No one has ever made an intelligent comparison that Bush and McCain have the same policies. Do you know how many Dems voted with Bush and McCain on the 90% of Bills McCain voted with Bush on??? Those sucker lines seen on TV and on this site are sucker lines with weak arguments. No Bill get passed without the support of both parties. Dems have to support the Bills too.

Tru dat. My issue is the War. The War of Choice started by the Bush Administration. The War of Choice based on deception, false and made up information. The War of Choice that was sold to the US and Congress based on that phony information. The War of Choice that has taken the lives of over 4000 US Soldiers. The War of Choice that has enriched, beyond belief, the Oil Industry at the cost of those US Soldiers and 100,000s of dead Iraqi citizens.

John "I know how to win wars" and "I know how to capture Osama Bin Laden" McCain For President. I think not.

Binky
09-14-2008, 09:31 AM
People are so use to bullshit and double talk from politicians, they freak when they hear a politician who talks like normal, average folks.

It's sad that people have gotten so accustomed to being scammed, that they no longer recognize honesty.


Yeah, letting yourself get scammed seems to be normal anymore. People are sheeple and would rather believe what someone else tells them than to actually think for themselves. Heaven forbid they do that. Why....that would actually be a bit of work. Brain power. Tiring to have to think. :banghead:

Binky
09-14-2008, 09:40 AM
Biden has been on Meet The Press 42 times including last Sunday. He has never ducked an interview and his record on issues is well documented. Will we ever see Sarah Who? on Meet The Press or any other Sunday political show that is not on Faux news? I doubt it.


Nor Obama Who, as well. Since he only popped on the scene this last year, it would seem feasible he'd want to get more exposure too. He has that serious lack of experience to deal with so maybe he isn't willing to jump on anymore shows than necessary and keep trying to defend it.

While he has slept around with the creepy people, Sarah Who has thrown them out on their ears with the trash.

bairdi
09-14-2008, 10:29 AM
Nor Obama Who, as well. Since he only popped on the scene this last year, it would seem feasible he'd want to get more exposure too. He has that serious lack of experience to deal with so maybe he isn't willing to jump on anymore shows than necessary and keep trying to defend it.

While he has slept around with the creepy people, Sarah Who has thrown them out on their ears with the trash.
Here Binky......have another glass of kool aid. It's pretty tasty.

Smurf-Herder
09-14-2008, 10:56 AM
Simply, the Bush Doctrine is the right to a preemptive strike if we believe we are in danger of threat from another country.

I his case, a threat that didn't exist or was made up.

Did I miss anything, Homer?

Actually, there are multiple Bush Doctrines - because people have decided to label things "The Bush Doctrine".

PhoneMistress
09-14-2008, 12:48 PM
LogicallyYours is correct. The point is Sarah Who? had no clue. No clue. And that point is not lost on any thinking person with a sliver of objectivity who watched the interview.

SeedyROM
09-15-2008, 04:17 AM
Tru dat. My issue is the War. The War of Choice started by the Bush Administration. The War of Choice based on deception, false and made up information. The War of Choice that was sold to the US and Congress based on that phony information. The War of Choice that has taken the lives of over 4000 US Soldiers. The War of Choice that has enriched, beyond belief, the Oil Industry at the cost of those US Soldiers and 100,000s of dead Iraqi citizens.

John "I know how to win wars" and "I know how to capture Osama Bin Laden" McCain For President. I think not.

McCain had access to the same intelligence that Joe Biden had access too. So both men are guilty of following the lack of information, right. Bush and the Bushbots held all the cards, not all data was disseminated to the Senate & House. So McCain can't be blamed any more than Biden! McCain wants to finish Iraq, if elected he knows Dems want investigations on Iraq, that is not going away regardless of who wins.

Would you or anyone else reading this thread like to go back a third time???

SeedyROM
09-15-2008, 04:35 AM
There is concern by some that, at the young age of 44, Sarah Palin would be a heartbeat away from the presidency.

Think about it! No matter who wins in November, Nancy Pelosi is two heartbeats away from the presidency

Binky
09-15-2008, 07:19 AM
Here Binky......have another glass of kool aid. It's pretty tasty.


Thank you. Kool aid is cool and can be yummy!

Binky
09-15-2008, 05:04 PM
Sarah Who? is totally incompetent to be one heartbeat away from the presidency of this great country. Why do you keep apologizing for her?


I'm not trying to apoligize for her or anyone else, for that matter. What I'm doing is playing the "devils advocate" as it's clear that someone has to. Personally, I think both parties stink. And Obama and his sidekick stink to high heaven. As for McCain and Palin, well, they're reaching for the horse that Obama is on so they can toss him off and ride away on it. They are politicians and we all know pols are buttsniffs first and for the people second. There isn't a one of the four that's worth their weight in gold.

Binky
09-15-2008, 05:16 PM
There is concern by some that, at the young age of 44, Sarah Palin would be a heartbeat away from the presidency.

Think about it! No matter who wins in November, Nancy Pelosi is two heartbeats away from the presidency


Well, judging how Princess Di passed on, I would say that Obama could also meet his maker in the same way at any given point in time. Any of us are a heartbeat away from that moment and none of us know when it will happen. It's all about timing. When your time is up, it's up.

SeedyROM
09-15-2008, 05:45 PM
Well, judging how Princess Di passed on, I would say that Obama could also meet his maker in the same way at any given point in time. Any of us are a heartbeat away from that moment and none of us know when it will happen. It's all about timing. When your time is up, it's up.

That's true Binky. We all know blacks have a higher rate of heart disease and many tend to die younger than most Americans. More blacks die in thier fifties and sixties than whites. It's not just bad diet and lack of exercise, it is heredity too. And if Obama is a high risk, then were stuck with angry Joe Biden.

bairdi
09-15-2008, 06:38 PM
That's true Binky. We all know blacks have a higher rate of heart disease and many tend to die younger than most Americans. More blacks die in thier fifties and sixties than whites. It's not just bad diet and lack of exercise, it is heredity too. And if Obama is a high risk, then were stuck with angry Joe Biden.
That's really a reach. Heart disease is the least of Obama's worries over the next 8 1/2 years. If something were to happen to him though, I would sleep a whole lot better knowing that Joe Biden is the one with his finger on the button and not McCain or especially Sarah Who?.

SeedyROM
09-15-2008, 06:45 PM
That's really a reach. Heart disease is the least of Obama's worries over the next 8 1/2 years. If something were to happen to him though, I would sleep a whole lot better knowing that Joe Biden is the one with his finger on the button and not McCain or especially Sarah Who?.

Bairdi, I was not being cynical or spooking fear. The AMA statistics show that blacks do have a higher rate of heart disease. Research it, this has been talked about for many many years, long before Obama ever ran for the state Senate.

So you think angry Joe with his finger on the button would be safer? That man has a short fuse, that fact is not disputable. And Biden said Hillary was a better choice, imagine that.

PhoneMistress
09-15-2008, 07:40 PM
More blacks die in thier fifties and sixties than whites.

That simply is not true.

McCain has cancer and it's never going away. It's not a question of 'if" but 'when'.

After a fairly aggressive interview from Charlie Gibson that is drawing mixed reviews, Sarah Palin will next sit down with a far more friendly interlocutor: Sean Hannity.

Fox News will air the interview over two nights, next Tuesday and Wednesday, on Hannity and Colmes. - Politico (http://www.politico.com/blogs/jonathanmartin/0908/Next_up_for_Palin_Hannity.html)

Binky
09-16-2008, 12:57 PM
That's true Binky. We all know blacks have a higher rate of heart disease and many tend to die younger than most Americans. More blacks die in thier fifties and sixties than whites. It's not just bad diet and lack of exercise, it is heredity too. And if Obama is a high risk, then were stuck with angry Joe Biden.


I was not referring to heart desease or any other desease, for that matter. My point was that if it could happen to Princess Di, then it could happen to any of us via an accident or whatever.

Binky
09-16-2008, 01:00 PM
Bairdi, I was not being cynical or spooking fear. The AMA statistics show that blacks do have a higher rate of heart disease. Research it, this has been talked about for many many years, long before Obama ever ran for the state Senate.

So you think angry Joe with his finger on the button would be safer? That man has a short fuse, that fact is not disputable. And Biden said Hillary was a better choice, imagine that.



Apparently we have two men, McCain and Biden, both with short fuses. So it's a great thing they aren't running together on the same ticket, isn't it?

SeedyROM
09-16-2008, 04:12 PM
Apparently we have two men, McCain and Biden, both with short fuses. So it's a great thing they aren't running together on the same ticket, isn't it?

Yup, McCain is not as loud or rude as Biden. I'm hearing he has a history or arrogant comments. Obama is loud and angry himself. Lord knows he looks down on blue collar workers,union workers, small town citizens and so on.

PhoneMistress
09-16-2008, 04:37 PM
Biden’s aneurysm from 20 years ago is a non-issue. They were both removed. His health is fine.

McCain has a fatal disease and other issues.

McCain has had several surgeries for skin cancer, the first three in 1993 and the most serious (which included removal of a lymph node) in 2000….Recently he had another skin cancer growth removed from his leg (like the three he had removed in 1993) and polyps removed from his large intestine…Of course, Dr. Johnson also said that McCain has a 30 percent chance of developing dementia.

In the end, all we really know is that McCain isn't dead yet. And, apparently, he isn't dying as of right now.

Statistically speaking, he could live to be about 87. Of course, he could develop dementia or intestinal cancer before then, or another bout with a more serious form of skin cancer. Or he could be fine and not develop any more diseases at all. (Okay, the latter seems like a stretch but it's possible.)

I guess the question for American voters is this: Are you feeling lucky?

Military.com (http://electioncenter.military.com/2008/05/post-4.html)


People often ask if I was a Prisoner of War with John McCain. My answer is always "No - John McCain was a POW with me." The reason is I was there for 8 years and John got there 2 ½ years later, so he was a POW for 5 ½ years. And we have our own seniority system, based on time as a POW.

John's treatment as a POW:

1) Was he tortured for 5 years? No.

….Most of us who survived that experience are now in our late 60's and 70's. Sadly, we have died and are dying off at a greater rate than our non-POW contemporaries. We experienced injuries and malnutrition that are coming home to roost. So I believe John's age (73) and survival expectation are not good for being elected to serve as our President for 4 or more years…In short, I think John Sidney McCain, III is a good man, but not someone I will vote for in the upcoming election to be our President of the United States.

Doctor Phillip Butler is a 1961 graduate of the United States Naval Academy and a former light-attack carrier pilot. In 1965 he was shot down over North Vietnam where he spent eight years as a prisoner of war. He is a highly decorated combat veteran who was awarded two Silver Stars, two Legion of Merits, two Bronze Stars and two Purple Heart medals.
(http://www.military.com/opinion/0,15202,164859_1,00.html.dk)

It's about his age AND injuries AND illness.

SeedyROM
09-16-2008, 05:27 PM
Statistically speaking, he could live to be about 87. Skin cancer can be detected and maintained far easier than cancer in an Internal Organ. It's what you can't see that will kill you faster. McCain can afford the best medical care, heck his wife could flip the bill. As Potus, McCain's healthcare will be even far superior, presidents get the best care, that we all know.

Let's hope Obama's smoking years aren't going to kill him if elected, angry Joe Biden could die in office because of the stress of being Potus. Blacks do have a higher death rate than whites in the same age groups, but the highest social class of blacks are healthier than poor blacks. But we don't know what Obama's diet consists of?? Skinny people die from heart attacks too.

Hog Trash
09-16-2008, 06:04 PM
Statistically speaking, he could live to be about 87. Skin cancer can be detected and maintained far easier than cancer in an Internal Organ. It's what you can't see that will kill you faster. McCain can afford the best medical care, heck his wife could flip the bill. As Potus, McCain's healthcare will be even far superior, presidents get the best care, that we all know.

Let's hope Obama's smoking years are going to kill him if elected, angry Joe Biden might die in office because of the stress of being Potus. Blacks do have a higher death rate than whites in the same age groups, but the highest social class of blacks are healtheir than poor blacks. But we don't lnow what Obama's diet consists of?? Skinny people die from heart attacks too.You are going to be labeled a racist for this post I hope you know.

SeedyROM
09-16-2008, 06:38 PM
You are going to be labeled a racist for this post I hope you know.

I hope not but if I do, I will be visceral and attack. These people need to stop make such attacks where racism is not in question. I'm Greek/American I know more about racism than most. Dems love to pretend they see the boogeyman just to violate people and thier free speech.

Binky
09-16-2008, 08:55 PM
Biden’s aneurysm from 20 years ago is a non-issue. They were both removed. His health is fine.

McCain has a fatal disease and other issues.





It's about his age AND injuries AND illness.


Yep, I went online about three weeks ago and I also found this bit of news as well. Interesting stuff!

bairdi
09-16-2008, 10:41 PM
I hope not but if I do, I will be visceral and attack. These people need to stop make such attacks where racism is not in question. I'm Greek/American I know more about racism than most. Dems love to pretend they see the boogeyman just to violate people and thier free speech.
Nobody is going to label you a racist because what you posted was not racist. The problem with Hog is that he does not know the difference. Because of this, he does not realize how much of a racist he really is. Did it surprise you that the new guy, I can't recall his nick, picked up on this after only posting on this board seven times? I found that absolutely amazing.

asroc
09-17-2008, 02:05 AM
I think the whole "let's hope Obama dies" sentiment is offensive enough, HT and Seedy. You don't have to worry about any percieved racism on top of it.

Also, you need to be careful how you talk like that. I hear the Secret Service is absolutely humorless.

The same goes for wishing, or "let's hope" talk regarding McCain. Discussing the political reality of a candidate's health is one thing, but you guys are entering dangerous waters.

SeedyROM
09-17-2008, 04:03 AM
I think the whole "let's hope Obama dies" sentiment is offensive enough, HT and Seedy. You don't have to worry about any percieved racism on top of it.

Also, you need to be careful how you talk like that. I hear the Secret Service is absolutely humorless.

The same goes for wishing, or "let's hope" talk regarding McCain. Discussing the political reality of a candidate's health is one thing, but you guys are entering dangerous waters.

Okay nowAsroc, I know its hump day but it's too early to be spiking your kool aide with Wild Turkey 101.

I've said nothing along the lines of wishing anyone was dead. Discussing health and wellness sure, but I know for a fact all of you have mentioned McCains age many times.

You are way out of line suggesting I'm crossing the line.

Disrupter on the otherhand with his death wishes towards certain politicians is questionable, probalbly harmless but far from normal. But normal for Disrupter.

disrupter
09-17-2008, 03:21 PM
Death wishes are not unnatural or unhealthy.
I can also see how silly they are by themselves.
Tensely clinging to every single imagining of your mind as though that were 'reality' sounds incredibly unhealthy.

Paranoid? Is 'god' spying on your every move too?

Wow, what a burden it must be supporting your lethargic, imprisoned mind. Your imagination is its sacrifice.

You have an unarticulate imagination. You have no internal liberty. No wonder you seek it outside yourself rather than realizing the real liberty & freedom is something the healthy person has within.

No wonder you so insanely think the imperial invasion of Iraq is some short circuited way 'necessary' for the liberty of the domestic USA, while our southern border experiences an actual illegal invasion.

Honey, you are fucked up in the head. lol

Thank you Universe for leaving me with an almost unlimited imagination.
Wow, what a blessing.
I shall try to be humble & as careful as i can understand to be with it.