View Full Version : Please ban the asshat
Independent Harry
07-24-2008, 06:59 PM
Seriously, how much spam does this moron have to make before we just get rid of him?
asroc
07-24-2008, 07:00 PM
who, oneway?
Independent Harry
07-24-2008, 07:01 PM
who, oneway?
who else?...
asroc
07-24-2008, 07:02 PM
yeah, i mean if i were admin i would probably just ban him
it's not because of politics at all, it's just that it's all pointless trolls
asroc
07-24-2008, 07:03 PM
oneway is hdmarketing right
wasn't he banned already?
Independent Harry
07-24-2008, 07:04 PM
he offers nothing of value and just clutters up the board...
Independent Harry
07-24-2008, 07:04 PM
i dunno, i know Radio guy was banned, but radio guy was a cockroach, not a gnat...
asroc
07-24-2008, 07:05 PM
at least grim/radioguy threads had some sort of point, even when i disagreed with him
Scumbag
07-24-2008, 09:23 PM
he offers nothing of value and just clutters up the board...
You mean like this thread?
An email to the admin/mods would have sufficed!
:rant:
oneway
07-24-2008, 09:23 PM
harry, why do you hate the truth. All my posts are valid. You just disagree.
Why not counter with an argumant on why? I know why you cannot. I am right.
Smurf-Herder
07-24-2008, 10:53 PM
You mean like this thread?
An email to the admin/mods would have sufficed!
:rant:
I just did that.
It's like whack-a-mole on steroids.
(not on banning - but on cutting down the number of threads on the same basic subject)
Independent Harry
07-24-2008, 11:06 PM
harry, why do you hate the truth. All my posts are valid. You just disagree.
Why not counter with an argumant on why? I know why you cannot. I am right.
your arguments are from a delusioned mind, you have no factual basis, nor do you care to, arguing with you is like arguing with the guy on the street corner holding an apocolypse sign, yelling at jesus...
SeedyROM
07-25-2008, 04:29 AM
Ban him
Bash his posts or
ignore him
All 3 choices sound like a winner to me.
This turd threatens to spam the board using a different screen names and he's following thru with the threat. Tame him with censorship and force him to validate posts with threads that prove his post. Free speech is a privilage not a right.:D
Dale escondido
07-25-2008, 07:51 AM
If you all feel that strong just leave his posts with 0 replies until he gets bored.
In America he has a right to be what he wants and we still have the right to not respond.
Scumbag
07-25-2008, 01:09 PM
your arguments are from a delusioned mind, you have no factual basis, nor do you care to, arguing with you is like arguing with the guy on the street corner holding an apocolypse sign, yelling at jesus...
More or less dilusional than you, ya fruit cake?
Standing on a street corner holding a sign that says 9/11 was an inside job, yelling at the wind!
:lmao2: :lmao2: :lmao2:
Hog Trash
07-25-2008, 01:56 PM
I'm a little curious about this subject of banning members???
Is their any way that some one could post a list of
"banned members" with some indication of each ones
left/right political leanings or would this be classified information???
Could someone be using "Banning" as a form of censorship???
Maybe it's just my imagination but the powers that be,
seem to be a little uncomfortable with my membership at times.
SeedyROM
07-25-2008, 02:30 PM
We have a right to respond and bash regardless of of how stupid the moron becomes. Wrongway is a turd that should be flushed, screw him. Civil rights are not in question here. Appropriate relevant content is in question. This site is not an Elementary School site, so little boys need to be banished or censored.
Conform or fuck off. In America he does not have a right to anything, he only has the privilage and that privilage can be revoked at will!! Some people do not understand the difference, Wrongway is a prime example!!!!
bairdi
07-25-2008, 02:31 PM
I think banning around here is more like squishing a pesky mosquito that is annoying everyone than actually practicing any type of censorship.
Independent Harry
07-25-2008, 02:36 PM
More or less dilusional than you, ya fruit cake?
Standing on a street corner holding a sign that says 9/11 was an inside job, yelling at the wind!
:lmao2: :lmao2: :lmao2:
hey fucker, here's an idea, why don't you go live in your own litle world again, the place was better when you weren't around. We all know what type of persn you are, and how you think of yoruself just from your forum name. Asshat...
SeedyROM
07-25-2008, 02:53 PM
HT, the majority of your posts are okay especially in comparison to Wrongways posts. People may disagree with you at times but at least your posts are above 4th grade level reading. I've been reading this site since late October, it seems banning is equal regardless of party ideals.
Banning should be used more often in my opinion. It teaches members to post relevant information that is useful and educational and it is information we can debate and discuss without being annoyed. Deleting childish, worthless posts is a good idea.
I'd be glad to vote to delete crap once 3 or more members said the post is worthless crap. Maybe Bill and Sirmoby should discuss a Democratic form of banning posts ? If a post is stupid, childish or annoying, allow members to vote in the same post, if the majority agree the post should be deleted, then it is deleted.
I've just warned oneway about topic spamming, and noticed that while I've mentioned the issue of topic spamming ( or subject line or title spamming ) in the past, it wasn't a posted simple rule, so I've added it to the very short list of simple rules.
oneway is of course entitled to his opinion, but now that he has been warned, I expect the topic spamming to stop.
I won't ban him now, because the topic spamming convention was more an unwritten rule in the past.
I'm a little curious about this subject of banning members???
Is their any way that some one could post a list of
"banned members" with some indication of each ones
left/right political leanings or would this be classified information???
Could someone be using "Banning" as a form of censorship???
Maybe it's just my imagination but the powers that be,
seem to be a little uncomfortable with my membership at times.
Since most of the people on the banned list were banned as spammers, it wouldn't be easy or relevant to generate a banned list from the mod information.
I've only banned one person, to my memory, for reasons other than spamming, and that was radioguy. It should be easy to find the final thread in which I gave him his third and permanent ban.
SirMoby may have banned more - I don't keep track. I mostly recall one, because it was for my primary concern - see below.
The big thing I will ban for is threats and threatening behavior. However, my tendency is to ban for a short period in hopes that the poster will modify his or her behavior.
Also, please remember i don't read everything here, so sending me a private message to inform me of spam or possible board abuses or threats is always welcome.
SeedyROM
07-25-2008, 06:28 PM
Bill what do you and Sirmoby think about voting to delete crap threads that members find annoying? Using a Democratic form of banning posts.
If a new thread is stupid, childish or annoying, allow members to vote in the same post, if the majority agree the post should be deleted, then it is deleted.
Hog Trash
07-25-2008, 06:58 PM
HT, the majority of your posts are okay especially in comparison to Wrongways posts. People may disagree with you at times but at least your posts are above 4th grade level reading. I've been reading this site since late October, it seems banning is equal regardless of party ideals.
Banning should be used more often in my opinion. It teaches members to post relevant information that is useful and educational and it is information we can debate and discuss without being annoyed. Deleting childish, worthless posts is a good idea.
I'd be glad to vote to delete crap once 3 or more members said the post is worthless crap. Maybe Bill and Sirmoby should discuss a Democratic form of banning posts ? If a post is stupid, childish or annoying, allow members to vote in the same post, if the majority agree the post should be deleted, then it is deleted.
I'm delighted that you think I'm on par with at least a 5th grader, but even the "not so bright people" have a right to express themselves, especially during an election year.
Exactly who decides what is "relevant information"? Do you not see the danger in this? If it's political, it's what we do, and relevant to at least the poster. We can choose to ignore, but do we really want to censor anyone?
Since the majority of this forum is liberal left to extremely left, allowing members to vote for censorship might not be a good idea.
If you've ever been to a college event, hosting a conservative speaker, you will know what I mean.
Free speech and open debate does not seem to be a priority for many liberals. Sad but true.
To me these far left liberal progressives believe and say the most outrageous and ridiculous things I have ever heard, but I don't wish to silence them. Mainly because no matter how dumb some body's ideals may be, in a nation of 300 million people, their has to be others who share their beliefs.
We must learn to listen to the idiots because they are also registered voters and have the power to affect our lives. Our only hope is to identify them and and un-fuck their minds.
SeedyROM
07-25-2008, 07:08 PM
I'm delighted that you think I'm on par with at least a 5th grader, but even the "not so bright people" have a right to express themselves, especially during an election year.
Exactly who decides what is "relevant information"? Do you not see the danger in this? If it's political, it's what we do, and relevant to at least the poster. We can choose to ignore, but do we really want to censor anyone?
Since the majority of this forum is liberal left to extremely left, allowing members to vote for censorship might not be a good idea.
If you've ever been to a college event, hosting a conservative speaker, you will know what I mean.
Free speech and open debate does not seem to be a priority for many liberals. Sad but true.
To me these far left liberal progressives believe and say the most outrageous and ridiculous things I have ever heard, but I don't wish to silence them. Mainly because no matter how dumb somebody's ideals may be, in a nation of 300 million people, their has to be others who share their beliefs.
We must learn to listen to the idiots because they are also registered voters and have the power to affect our lives. Our only hope is to identify them and and un-fuck their minds.
I was saying Wrongway is posting like a 4th grader, not you HT.
This site need a few rules to contain morons who rant, Wrongway posts nonsense like a 4th grader for a reason and he doesn't belong here. There is no question of free speech, this site is about posting relevant content, not childish jibberish by an immature moron who makes threats and follows thru with them. This moron threatened to spam the board and he's doing it.
I think you know what relevant information is, you've posted some yourself even though some were reposts that others had posted already. No harm there. Censorship educates the ignorant and uninformed into conformity. I don't care if it offend this douchebag, he's been banned from other websites, this I know for sure. We all would rather not see 4th grade banter everyday.
fyi, we don't know if Wrongway is a registered voter no more than we know if he has a high school diploma or all his teeth for that matter. How do you un-fuck thier minds without rules? You can't because they will never learn.
Bill what do you and Sirmoby think about voting to delete crap threads that members find annoying? Using a Democratic form of banning posts.
Sorry, but there will be no such policy instituted while I am here.
Approval and disapproval is a dangerous standard.
And, in fact, as a standard it is responsible for much of the degradation of our country.
SeedyROM
07-25-2008, 07:17 PM
Well maybe Wrongway won't degrade the board or our country anymore.
oneway
07-25-2008, 07:36 PM
I have never seen a liberal banned anywhere. Look at the people who read my posts, the people that hate me most. look who responds to my posts, never with an argument always with name calling. I am not calling anyone names, I am stating facts about man crushes and love of a needy loser Barry Obama. Again the truth hurts the infected so much they need me to be banned because this truth is so painful to them. A man they invested $10 each month through the primaries has crept to the middle AND NOW TAKES BOTH SIDES OF EVERY ISSUE. bUT THE LOVE STILL CONTINUES, DESPITE HIS MISERABLE UPBRINGING, HIS SCREWING FELLOW DEMOCRATS TO HOLD POWER AND NOW THAT HE IS BLOWING HIS OWN CAMPAIGN UP ON HIS PRESIDENTIAL WORLD TOUR CAMPAIGNING ON THE WRONG CONTINENT, IT IS JUST TOO EMBARRASING. AND TO BE REMINDED BY ME HURTS SOOOOOOO BAD. i GUESS IF IHAD THAT DEEP OF MAN CRUSH I WOULD WANT ME BANNED AS WELL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
SeedyROM
07-25-2008, 07:49 PM
I have never seen a liberal banned anywhere. Look at the people who read my posts, the people that hate me most. look who responds to my posts, never with an argument always with name calling. I am not calling anyone names, I am stating facts about man crushes and love of a needy loser Barry Obama. Again the truth hurts the infected so much they need me to be banned because this truth is so painful to them. A man they invested $10 each month through the primaries has crept to the middle AND NOW TAKES BOTH SIDES OF EVERY ISSUE. bUT THE LOVE STILL CONTINUES, DESPITE HIS MISERABLE UPBRINGING, HIS SCREWING FELLOW DEMOCRATS TO HOLD POWER AND NOW THAT HE IS BLOWING HIS OWN CAMPAIGN UP ON HIS PRESIDENTIAL WORLD TOUR CAMPAIGNING ON THE WRONG CONTINENT, IT IS JUST TOO EMBARRASING. AND TO BE REMINDED BY ME HURTS SOOOOOOO BAD. i GUESS IF IHAD THAT DEEP OF MAN CRUSH I WOULD WANT ME BANNED AS WELL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
You really are a dumb fuck? You can't even keep up? Ladymod is a Lib, as are others that were banned. You belong on a Romper Room site, you dumb fuck. No one respects you here,no one cares for ignorant rants of girliemen!
Kanadesaga
07-26-2008, 01:56 AM
LadyMod got banned? :confused:
SeedyROM
07-26-2008, 04:37 AM
WTG IndependantHarry, the asshat is banned!!!:happy:
Hog Trash
07-26-2008, 07:05 AM
Sorry, but there will be no such policy instituted while I am here.
Approval and disapproval is a dangerous standard.
And, in fact, as a standard it is responsible for much of the degradation of our country.
I'm very happy to hear this Bill, but you need to have a long talk with SirMoby concerning this.
If it was 'left up to him', I believe he would ban everyone who is any where to the right of Karl Marx.
He's very emotional and what you might call a bit irrational at times.
His decisions and judgements seem to be based solely on his obvious political biases.
He uses threats and warnings in an attempt to silence those who disagree with him.
A demotion to 'senior member' might be something that should be considered.
Fairness should be the number one consideration for a replacement Administrator.:reading:
Hog Trash
07-26-2008, 07:30 AM
fyi, we don't know if Wrongway is a registered voter no more than we know if he has a high school diploma or all his teeth for that matter. How do you un-fuck thier minds without rules? You can't because they will never learn.
Correct, you don't know if he is a 'registered voter', but to be on the safe side you should always assume your adversary is armed and dangerous.
Like playing Black Jack, you always assume the dealer has a 'paint' in the hole.
Being of mostly Libertarian values, IMEO, to many rules just seems to get in the way of progress.
Independent Harry
07-26-2008, 11:23 AM
I'm very happy to hear this Bill, but you need to have a long talk with SirMoby concerning this.
If it was 'left up to him', I believe he would ban everyone who is any where to the right of Karl Marx.
He's very emotional and what you might call a bit irrational at times.
His decisions and judgements seem to be based solely on his obvious political biases.
He uses threats and warnings in an attempt to silence those who disagree with him.
A demotion to 'senior member' might be something that should be considered.
Fairness should be the number one consideration for a replacement Administrator.:reading:
LOL, wow, SirMoby is one of the more rational people on this board, that cna actually put together a coherent argument based from facts. I've never really ever seen him come bck with an emotional outburst....you really do live in a fantasy land...
Hog Trash
07-26-2008, 01:51 PM
LOL, wow, SirMoby is one of the more rational people on this board, that cna actually put together a coherent argument based from facts. I've never really ever seen him come bck with an emotional outburst....you really do live in a fantasy land...
Apparently you have not read the exchanges him an I have had, especialy lately.
Their has even been other members who have called SM down on this.
Or do you only read your own posts, princess???
By the way, sheep, by nature, are not Independent-----------Harry.
Independent Harry
07-26-2008, 03:23 PM
Apparently you have not read the exchanges him an I have had, especialy lately.
Their has even been other members who have called SM down on this.
Or do you only read your own posts, princess???
By the way, sheep, by nature, are not Independent-----------Harry.
that's the best you got..lather, rinse and repeat, that's your rhetoric...
SeedyROM
07-26-2008, 05:07 PM
Correct, you don't know if he is a 'registered voter', but to be on the safe side you should always assume your adversary is armed and dangerous.
Like playing Black Jack, you always assume the dealer has a 'paint' in the hole.
Being of mostly Libertarian values, IMEO, to many rules just seems to get in the way of progress.
This site doesn't have too many rules, but people should respect them instead of acting like an rebelious punks. Spamming is one of them and it is necessary to keep order to the site so you and all other members don't have your time wasted reading childish jibberish. Oneway was emotional and irrational, I used various tactics on him after I realized he wasn't going to stop. He'll never learn.
LadyMod got banned? :confused:
I banned her for ten days once.
She wasn't being as threatening as radioguy in the fight they were having, but I had asked her to stop.
I tend to hold dems to a tighter standard than repubs.
Naturally, repubs fantasize they are the ones being held to a tighter standard.
Thats why majority-rule approval and disapproval aren't going to be used as the control system here. It's too easily abused.
Fairness should be the number one consideration for a replacement Administrator.:reading:
That also won't be happening.
I figure it balances out - I protect the interests of the reds, he protects the interests of the blues.
Even tho i'm not a red, I've taken on the thankless task of being the red mediator.
Think of us as the good cop bad cop - who take turns playing each role.
Hog Trash
07-26-2008, 05:35 PM
that's the best you got
Well, it's better than yours......I'll bet it's even bigger than yours.:winkwink:
SeedyROM
08-08-2008, 06:36 PM
Hooray, the AssHat was banned again! Now he's on triple secret probation!!
http://www.dcjunkies.com/showthread.php?t=5593
Bill
Administrator
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,646
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You appear to believe that I can't count or read.
10 more days.
Next time, be more circumspect in your line crossing please. There are plenty of ways to make your case without topic spamming.
For example, it should be easy to switch to another lapdoggy topic. All you have to do is apply a little thought.
Thank you.
Frankg
08-08-2008, 08:03 PM
Might as well rename this forum moonbats.com
Binky
08-08-2008, 08:11 PM
Ban him
Bash his posts or
ignore him
All 3 choices sound like a winner to me.
This turd threatens to spam the board using a different screen names and he's following thru with the threat. Tame him with censorship and force him to validate posts with threads that prove his post. Free speech is a privilage not a right.:D
Amen! He definitely has a psychological problem since he obviously spends way too much time spamming. He surely needs help!
SeedyROM
08-09-2008, 03:42 AM
Amen! He definitely has a psychological problem since he obviously spends way too much time spamming. He surely needs help!
No doubt, if he had something to contribute that wasn't childish it wouldn't be so bad. I don't mind people bashing politicians, but please save the chatroom banter for the chatrooms.
disrupter
08-09-2008, 03:34 PM
oneway at least has literate & sometimes artful posts.
sancot123 on the otherhand is little more than an illiterate, rabid dog.
his posts are a waste of computer memory, energy & forum participants time.
his posts have no art, no content, they are completely empty rants,
and everyone knows just what an expert i am on those. ;)
hdmarketing
08-09-2008, 03:41 PM
oneway is hdmarketing right
wasn't he banned already?
No Dip Shit, I am not oneway.
I am hdmarketing. I am only registered here as hdmarketing. Admin can easily verrify this by looking at ip addresses.
It's really not hard for them to figure that one out.
hdmarketing is all I am, and no one else.
I don't need to register as multiple names to speak my mind.
I am not intrested in getting anyone to sign up for any Ponzi Bull Shit program.
I am not intrested in stalking any of you.
I really don't give a shit about any of you.
I post my "opinions" just like the rest you you loosers, and I don't need any other username to do that with.
So Mr. ASS, opps I mean asroc, with all due respect, Fuck Off.
disrupter
08-09-2008, 03:58 PM
don't include me with a 'bunch of losers',
i am in a class of my own,
the category of 'elite', breathtaking, losers.
thank you for your time & attention in the matter.
vBulletin v3.5.4, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.