View Full Version : If You Are Anti-Racist You Do Not Want The Obama's In The White House!
Hog Trash
07-06-2008, 11:01 PM
http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/thesis.asp
Princeton was requested to put a 'restriction' on distribution of any
copies of the thesis of Michelle Obama (a/k/a/ Michelle laVaughn Robinson) saying it could not be made available until November 5, 2008 but when itwas published on a political website they decided they would lift the restriction.
Subj:
Thesis - Michele Obama aka Michelle LaVaughn Robinson
OBAMA'S MILITANT RACISM REVEALED
In her senior thesis at Princeton, Michele Obama, the wife of Barack Obama stated that America was a nation founded on 'crime and hatred'.
Moreover, she stated that whites in America were 'ineradicably racist'.
The 1985 thesis, titled 'Princeton-Educated Blacks and the Black Community' was written under her maiden name, Michelle LaVaughn Robinson.
Michelle Obama stated in her thesis that to 'Whites at Princeton , it often seems as if, to them, she will always be Black first...' However, it was reported by a fellow black classmate, 'If those 'Whites at Princeton ' really saw Michelle as one who always would 'be Black first,' it seems that she gave them that impression'. Most alarming is Michele Obama's use of the terms 'separationist' and 'integrationist' when describing the views of black people. Mrs. Obama clearly identifies herself with a 'separationist' view of race.
'By actually working with the Black lower class or within their communities as a result of their ideologies, a separationist may better understand the desperation of their situation and feel more hopeless about a resolution as opposed to an integrationist who is ignorant to their plight.'
Obama writes that the path she chose by attending Princeton would likely lead to her 'further integration and/or assimilation into a white cultural and social structure that will only allow me to remain on the periphery of society; never becoming a full participant.' Michele Obama clearly has a chip on her shoulder. Not only does she see separate black and white societies in America , but she elevates black over white in her world.
Here is another passage that is uncomfortable and ominous in meaning: 'There was no doubt in my mind that as a member of the black community, I am obligated to this community and will utilize all of my present and future resources to benefit the black community first and foremost.' What is Michelle Obama planning to do with her future resources if she's first lady that will elevate black over white in A merica ?
The following passage appears to be a call to arms for affirmative action
policies that could be the hallmark of an Obama administration.
'Predominately white universities like Princeton are socially and academically designed to cater to the needs of the white students comprising the bulk of their enrollments.'
The conclusion of her thesis is alarming.
Michelle Obama's poll of black alumni concludes that other black students at Princeton do not share her obsession with blackness. But rather than celebrate, she is horrified that black alumni identify with our common American culture more than they value the color of their skin. 'I hoped that these findings would help me conclude that despite the high degree of identification with whites as a result of the educational and occupational path that black Princeton alumni follow, the alumni would still maintain a certain level of identification with the black community.
However, these findings do not support this possibility.'
Is it no wonder that most black alumni ignored her racist questionnaire? Only 89 students responded out of 400 who were asked for input.
Michelle Obama does not look into a crowd of Obama supporters and see Americans. She sees black people and white people eternally conflicted with one another.
The thesis provides a trove of Mrs. Obama's thoughts and world view seen through a race-based prism. This is a very divisive view for a potential first lady that would do untold damage to race relations in this country in a Barack Obama administration.
Michelle Obama's intellectually refined racism should give all Americans pause for deep concern. Now maybe she's changed, but she sure sounds like someone with an axe to grind with America . Will the press let Michelle get a free pass over her obviously racist comment about American whites? I am sure that it will..
PS: We
paid for her scholarship.
Independent Harry
07-06-2008, 11:13 PM
wow, you're talking about a paper written in college...my god, you should see some of the crap i wrote for school. And to that point, I'm so tired of everyoen bringing up the points of black people making claims like this. Hey guess what, racism exists and still exists today, and there were segregated fountains in the 1960's.
So we are not talking hundreds of years ago people, we are talking that racism was a very big part of life even in the 70's and 80's into the 90's and guess what, still today. Get over this shit...god
Hog Trash
07-06-2008, 11:46 PM
wow, you're talking about a paper written in college...my god, you should see some of the crap i wrote for school. And to that point, I'm so tired of everyone bringing up the points of black people making claims like this. Hey guess what, racism exists and still exists today, and there were segregated fountains in the 1960's.
So we are not talking hundreds of years ago people, we are talking that racism was a very big part of life even in the 70's and 80's into the 90's and guess what, still today. Get over this shit...god
So I'm guessing you're saying she has changed and no longer feels this way?..... Are you assuming this or do you know this for sure?
If she has made an official withdrawal of her thesis which shows a change of position and a formal apology to non-blacks could you please post a link to share it with the rest of us?
Are you privy to any insider information as to whether her husband, Barack, knew she was a racist when he married her or has he been kept in the dark about this also?
Assuming Barack doesn't already know, I wonder if she will join the Reverend Wright under the bus now that her thesis has been made public, and her husband reads it?
SeedyROM
07-07-2008, 03:49 AM
She might have to recant this thesis if it becomes a major talking point in the media. Even though this is small time for media play and we all know the first lady has no say in the oval office, so like I said, this is small. It's not that bad! But she was an black living in the middle of rich predominatley white students. The paper is not a smoking gun, but if a white attending a predominatley black school said it, the all hell would break lose. So it's fair game, with the exception that blacks were and still are classified as minorities. I can tell you from chats I've had with black friends that school and college life is hard when you have a stigma attached to color and physical differences and the perception thereof.
LadyMod at scam.com
07-07-2008, 08:16 AM
When did Michelle start running for president?
I wrote something similar in highschool when I was front page editor of the school paper. I got the superintendant as well as principal in an uproar over my observations that despite bussing, despite being politically correct, that black kids mainly hung out with other black kids and white kids mainly hung out with other white kids.
It was true. Not saying so didn't make it less true. Every kid on campus agreed. It's human nature.
The story ran and was a big eye opener for many people. It also started bringing about some changes that needed to be brought about.
I would write the same article today but it's not as true as it once was. I'm sure Michelle feels the same way about her thesis.
You guys need to grow up and smell the coffee.
Lady Mod
Oh look, another "I'm scared" Anti-Obama thread from the Independent Hog. We get it. You don't like facts based on important issues that deal with silly things like numbers and you hate Obama, the democrats, liberal thinking but you're not on the right even though you repost the same stuff from the Neoconservative media.
We get it.
I'm going to lock all my doors and live in fear now.
Hog Trash
07-07-2008, 08:53 AM
She might have to recant this thesis if it becomes a major talking point in the media. Even though this is small time for media play and we all know the first lady has no say in the oval office, so like I said, this is small. It's not that bad! But she was an black living in the middle of rich predominatley white students. The paper is not a smoking gun, but if a white attending a predominatley black school said it, the all hell would break lose. So it's fair game, with the exception that blacks were and still are classified as minorities. I can tell you from chats I've had with black friends that school and college life is hard when you have a stigma attached to color and physical differences and the perception thereof.
College, if anything, is an extremely excepting place for minorities. My experiences tell me their is very little, if any stigmatism, especialy for blacks. In fact I would guess she wrote her thesis because she felt very comfortable doing so in the campus atmosphere. IMO support for her thesis was probably excepted by some fellow students.
College in general is a very liberal place where Whites are fair game for hatred and criticism, even by many white students. It's kind of the cool thing to do and many of the professors love and encourage it. It takes very special people not to get caught up in the "blame whitey" campus mentality. I would prefer my president and his wife be of the character of these "special people".
Did Barack fall in love and marry Michelle simply because she was beautiful, or because they were like-minded soul-mates? Keep in mind, a month ago, Barack and Michelle were 20+ year members of a church, headed by Reverend Jeremiah Wright, that preached and promoted Black Liberation Theology which is a racist based ideology. All this and countless little things she has said in some of her speeches indicate that she is in deed a racist.
These are strong indications that Barack and Michelle are life-long racist. Why do people keep supporting and defending them? Because they have become "Loyal Raptured Sheep Who Blindly Follow Obama" and have lost their objectivity. They believe what they want rather than the obvious.
Assuming you are not a racist , would you knowingly marry one or upon finding out would you remain married to one??? Unless you were one yourself. See my point?
It's easy to spot the "Loyal Raptured Sheep". They defend the Obama's no matter what.
SeedyROM
07-07-2008, 01:58 PM
College, if anything, is an extremely excepting place for minorities. My experiences tell me their is very little, if any stigmatism, especialy for blacks. In fact I would guess she wrote her thesis because she felt very comfortable doing so in the campus atmosphere. IMO support for her thesis was probably excepted by some fellow students.
College in general is a very liberal place where Whites are fair game for hatred and criticism, even by many white students. It's kind of the cool thing to do and many of the professors love and encourage it. It takes very special people not to get caught up in the "blame whitey" campus mentality. I would prefer my president and his wife be of the character of these "special people".
Did Barack fall in love and marry Michelle simply because she was beautiful, or because they were like-minded soul-mates? Keep in mind, a month ago, Barack and Michelle were 20+ year members of a church, headed by Reverend Jeremiah Wright, that preached and promoted Black Liberation Theology which is a racist based ideology. All this and countless little things she has said in some of her speeches indicate that she is in deed a racist.
These are strong indications that Barack and Michelle are life-long racist. Why do people keep supporting and defending them? Because they have become "Loyal Raptured Sheep Who Blindly Follow Obama" and have lost their objectivity. They believe what they want rather than the obvious.
Assuming you are not a racist , would you knowingly marry one or upon finding out would you remain married to one??? Unless you were one yourself. See my point?
It's easy to spot the "Loyal Raptured Sheep". They defend the Obama's no matter what.
Maybe you turned a blind eye to racism in school. College is quieter but there are campuses where protesting is encouraged. DC jerkoffs document protesters on ivy leauge campuses, it could be tommorrows dirt or the best leverage in a well planned blackmail sceme. I see no major issue with a mild paper that conveys a womans thoughts and feelings.
You have no credibilty on Rev. Wright anymore, no one does. One weekend sermon ocurring post 6 days after 9/11, big fucking deal! You were afraid to address McCain's pastors and their post 9/11 speeches? Don't bother with the rhetorical excuse, this is politics for real so grow some balls or go buy some makeup and tampons!
I see no proof of life long racism, all I see is your opinion based of flimsy facts that have little relevance in the campaign. More like total hypocracy since you are afraid to debate the election and the merits of candidate policy. Hell you don't have the balls to answer questions because you are afraid we'll see right through you. Maybe you should convert to the muslim faith, you seem so fearful of a man accused of being muslim, maybe you are a closet muslim beging to come out and beat down on the world?
SeedyROM
07-07-2008, 02:00 PM
HG who would you vote for, do yo have the balls to speak up or are you gonna dodge the question? Which candidate or who would you like to see on the ballot? Don't be afraid! I have other choices too!
asroc
07-07-2008, 02:03 PM
College, if anything, is an extremely excepting place for minorities.
Ah, a good old Freudian slip.
doctordog
07-07-2008, 02:04 PM
Maybe you turned a blind eye to racism in school. College is quieter but there are campuses where protesting is encouraged. DC jerkoffs document protesters on ivy leauge campuses, it could be tommorrows dirt or the best leverage in a well planned blackmail sceme. I see no major issue with a mild paper that conveys a womans thoughts and feelings.
You have no credibilty on Rev. Wright anymore, no one does. One weekend sermon ocurring post 6 days after 9/11, big fucking deal! You were afraid to address McCain's pastors and their post 9/11 speeches? Don't bother with the rhetorical excuse, this is politics for real so grow some balls or go buy some makeup and tampons!
I see no proof of life long racism, all I see is your opinion based of flimsy facts that have little relevance in the campaign. More like total hypocracy since you are afraid to debate the election and the merits of candidate policy. Hell you don't have the balls to answer questions because you are afraid we'll see right through you. Maybe you should convert to the muslim faith, you seem so fearful of a man accused of being muslim, maybe you are a closet muslim beging to come out and beat down on the world?
Association with Bill Ayers is enough.
Association with Bill Ayers is enough.
What about borrowing money from the Bin Laden family? That's OK?
Hog Trash
07-07-2008, 03:54 PM
HG who would you vote for, do yo have the balls to speak up or are you gonna dodge the question? Which candidate or who would you like to see on the ballot? Don't be afraid! I have other choices too!
As of right now their are 3 other candidates in the race. Ralph Nader-Green Party, Bob Barr-Libertarian Party and Alan Keyes-Constitution Party. My plan at the present is to vote for which ever one of these candidates is polling better at election time, the most important criteria being to assure neither McCain nor Obama win. The corrupt Demopublican strangle hold on American Politics must be broken, hopefully in my lifetime.
I do have my core political beliefs but at this time dethroning the Demopublicans is the number one priority and take the front burner.
I don't comment much on McCain because I don't perceive him as a threat. He doesn't have a rock-star, sheep-mentality following.
And I want you to know that I don't say things I don't believe are true. I believe with all my heart that the Obama's are racist, America haters and would destroy this nation which they believe is a nation of evil white people. They feel no guilt when deceiving the enemy which is America and the white oppressors. Their goal is destruction from within, power and wealth.
doctordog
07-07-2008, 04:44 PM
What about borrowing money from the Bin Laden family? That's OK?
It's not ok, so why screw up twice in a row?:confused:
SeedyROM
07-07-2008, 05:20 PM
As of right now their are 3 other candidates in the race. Ralph Nader-Green Party, Bob Barr-Libertarian Party and Alan Keyes-Constitution Party. My plan at the present is to vote for which ever one of these candidates is polling better at election time, the most important criteria being to assure neither McCain nor Obama win. The corrupt Demopublican strangle hold on American Politics must be broken, hopefully in my lifetime.
I do have my core political beliefs but at this time dethroning the Demopublicans is the number one priority and take the front burner.
I don't comment much on McCain because I don't perceive him as a threat. He doesn't have a rock-star, sheep-mentality following.
And I want you to know that I don't say things I don't believe are true. I believe with all my heart that the Obama's are racist, America haters and would destroy this nation which they believe is a nation of evil white people. They feel no guilt when deceiving the enemy which is America and the white oppressors. Their goal is destruction from within, power and wealth.
Well I was expecting you to lean toward McCain or Ron Paul, I guess Paul's still out there. Maybe he dropped out and forgot to tell anyone, lol!
Forget Bob Barr, he started too late, even later than Fred Dalton Thompson who would have been a good President. Nader has too many enemies in DC and in corporations because he's a do gooder. Always being positive and consumer friendly is not on the agenda with the demopublicans who hate Nader for wanting improvement at a cost to their corporate buddies.
Smurf-Herder
07-07-2008, 06:43 PM
I'm not surprised one bit about Michelle.
After all, Barry met her in that church.
And her views seemed to be the prevailing mindset; from the way so many cheered the bigoted comments in Wright's sermons.
SeedyROM
07-07-2008, 06:59 PM
If somebody could show me a second Rev. Wright sermon that's as bad as the first and only one that was in the news. I know there was mention of other videos on the church website and we all know http://www.alexa.com/ stores every webpage ever uploaded t the internet including the ones that have been deleted. Even the govt. stores all webpages. Google too!
So where is the second sermon? 52 weeks times 20 is?
Smurf-Herder
07-07-2008, 07:35 PM
If somebody could show me a second Rev. Wright sermon that's as bad as the first and only one that was in the news. I know there was mention of other videos on the church website and we all know http://www.alexa.com/ stores every webpage ever uploaded t the internet including the ones that have been deleted. Even the govt. stores all webpages. Google too!
So where is the second sermon? 52 weeks times 20 is?
Actually, I believe the tapes shown were from two or three different sermons. And Glenn Beck played a full half hour of one sermon on his radio show - to show it all in context. And it sounded worse in context than taken as a sound bite.
Buy their DVDs. They sell them. That's how ABC News originally found out about the Rev.
SeedyROM
07-07-2008, 07:59 PM
Actually, I believe the tapes shown were from two or three different sermons. And Glenn Beck played a full half hour of one sermon on his radio show - to show it all in context. And it sounded worse in context than taken as a sound bite.
Buy their DVDs. They sell them. That's how ABC News originally found out about the Rev.
I'll look for those tapes online, I'm not paying for crap when I know someone will Youtube it for free. So were talking about 2 or is it 3, not that I'm questioning you but Glenn Beck is known for his Pinocchio routine even here in the islands. Never understood that creepy 2 tone hairstyle either. Let's say for argument there are 2 weekends of a raving lunatic, did anyone see Obama there? I know there are many weekends on tape but no smoking gun with Barry in the background screamin hell yea brutha!!
Hog Trash
07-07-2008, 08:00 PM
Actually, I believe the tapes shown were from two or three different sermons. And Glenn Beck played a full half hour of one sermon on his radio show - to show it all in context. And it sounded worse in context than taken as a sound bite.
Buy their DVDs. They sell them. That's how ABC News originally found out about the Rev.
Wont happen Smurf.
People who don't know nothin bout Obama don't wanna Know nothin bout Obama.
That's the only way to keep their bubble intact. Ignorance is bliss.
bairdi
07-07-2008, 08:36 PM
As of right now their are 3 other candidates in the race. Ralph Nader-Green Party, Bob Barr-Libertarian Party and Alan Keyes-Constitution Party. My plan at the present is to vote for which ever one of these candidates is polling better at election time, the most important criteria being to assure neither McCain nor Obama win. The corrupt Demopublican strangle hold on American Politics must be broken, hopefully in my lifetime.
I do have my core political beliefs but at this time dethroning the Demopublicans is the number one priority and take the front burner.
I don't comment much on McCain because I don't perceive him as a threat. He doesn't have a rock-star, sheep-mentality following.
And I want you to know that I don't say things I don't believe are true. I believe with all my heart that the Obama's are racist, America haters and would destroy this nation which they believe is a nation of evil white people. They feel no guilt when deceiving the enemy which is America and the white oppressors. Their goal is destruction from within, power and wealth.
Actually Chuck Baldwin is the candidate for the Constitutional Party. I heard him speak on POTUS 08 today on XM radio. Tell you what Hogbreath, he's your man!! You and Kres should investigate this guy and jump on the bandwagon. He spews forth the same rhetoric that you two do.
LadyMod at scam.com
07-07-2008, 08:41 PM
Actually Chuck Baldwin is the candidate for the Constitutional Party. I heard him speak on POTUS 08 today on XM radio. Tell you what Hogbreath, he's your man!! You and Kres should investigate this guy and jump on the bandwagon. He spews forth the same rhetoric that you two do.
Wont happen bairdi.
People who don't know nothin bout Baldwin don't wanna Know nothin bout Baldwin.
That's the only way to keep their bubble intact. Ignorance is bliss.
:D :D :D
Hog Trash
07-07-2008, 08:46 PM
Actually Chuck Baldwin is the candidate for the Constitutional Party. I heard him speak on POTUS 08 today on XM radio. Tell you what Hogbreath, he's your man!! You and Kres should investigate this guy and jump on the bandwagon. He spews forth the same rhetoric that you two do.
Thank you for your correction and if you read my post you know that policy takes backseat to voting Demopublicans out of power. If my only option is a chimpanzee, then the ape gets my vote.
bairdi
07-07-2008, 09:36 PM
:D :D :D
I got a good chuckle out of that LM. :thumbsup:
bairdi
07-07-2008, 09:38 PM
Thank you for your correction and if you read my post you know that policy takes backseat to voting Demopublicans out of power. If my only option is a chimpanzee, then the ape gets my vote.
I am telling you Hog, this guy is your godsend. Check him out and then you can start telling everyone why they should vote for him instead of constantly running down 95% of the country.
SeedyROM
07-08-2008, 03:35 AM
Thank you for your correction and if you read my post you know that policy takes backseat to voting Demopublicans out of power. If my only option is a chimpanzee, then the ape gets my vote.
Dempublicans out of power, too bad it will never happen. Both parties piss me off at times. Vote one party out of power and build a new party. Guess who will be running on those tickets? A DemoPublican or someone who will be a one term candidate. They ignore us and thier poll ratings because they can.
Hog Trash
07-08-2008, 09:49 AM
Dempublicans out of power, too bad it will never happen. Both parties piss me off at times. Vote one party out of power and build a new party. Guess who will be running on those tickets? A DemoPublican or someone who will be a one term candidate. They ignore us and thier poll ratings because they can.
So you believe we should just give up?
If you care not of your own future, what of your children and grandchildrens future?
Don't you feel you owe them something more than Lie's, deceit and corruption?
You have a 'defeatist' attitude.
Binky
07-08-2008, 11:00 AM
Actually Chuck Baldwin is the candidate for the Constitutional Party. I heard him speak on POTUS 08 today on XM radio. Tell you what Hogbreath, he's your man!! You and Kres should investigate this guy and jump on the bandwagon. He spews forth the same rhetoric that you two do.
www.americasrevival.com/ Here's a link about Alan Keyes. Go check him out. At one time he was a repug but switched over to the constitutional party. This man sounds like what America needs. The info is vast, but very interesting.
Binky
07-08-2008, 11:51 AM
www.americasrevival.com/ Here's a link about Alan Keyes. Go check him out. At one time he was a repug but switched over to the constitutional party. This man sounds like what America needs. The info is vast, but very interesting.
Please disregard this info as I checked on Mr. Keyes a month or so ago and since then Chuck Baldwin has won the majority votes of the Constitution Party over Mr. Keyes. Here's the link about Mr. Baldwin. Go and check him out. He sounds like a good candidate for president. I would be happy if either of these men were able to have become president.
If I Were PresidentMay 2, 2008 ... Because this campaign is not about Chuck Baldwin. It is not about a political party. It is about freedom. It is about constitutional ...
www.chuckbaldwinlive.com/c2008/cbarchive_20080502.html - 18k
bairdi
07-08-2008, 12:23 PM
www.americasrevival.com/ Here's a link about Alan Keyes. Go check him out. At one time he was a repug but switched over to the constitutional party. This man sounds like what America needs. The info is vast, but very interesting.
Alan Keyes is a joke. I wouldn't vote this guy for dogcatcher.
Binky
07-08-2008, 01:56 PM
Alan Keyes is a joke. I wouldn't vote this guy for dogcatcher.
ANd these two idiots aren't? you've got to be kidding! You're a joke!
:lmao2: :lmao2: :talktothehand:
Binky
07-08-2008, 01:56 PM
Alan Keyes is a joke. I wouldn't vote this guy for dogcatcher.
And these two idiots aren't? you've got to be kidding! You're a joke!
:lmao2: :lmao2: :talktothehand:
Binky
07-08-2008, 01:57 PM
:lmao2: :lmao2: Sorry for the last post. My mind wandered and I resent it.
SeedyROM
07-08-2008, 02:56 PM
So you believe we should just give up?
If you care not of your own future, what of your children and grandchildrens future?
Don't you feel you owe them something more than Lie's, deceit and corruption?
You have a 'defeatist' attitude.
No you continue to second guess me and get it wrong.
I never said give up.
I happen to agree that the 2 party system is a failure, but I did
point out what these crooks in the legislature would do. Remember
when congressmen and senators were changing parties? They thought
it would change things......led to more gridlock and infighting.
Hog Trash
07-08-2008, 03:30 PM
No you continue to second guess me and get it wrong.
I never said give up.
I happen to agree that the 2 party system is a failure, but I did
point out what these crooks in the legislature would do. Remember
when congressmen and senators were changing parties? They thought
it would change things......led to more gridlock and infighting.
Here I go, repeating myself again.
A criminal among criminals is an effective criminal. A criminal among the police is an ineffective criminal and will eventually end up where he belongs.
The Demopublican party is corrupt and will not tolerate party members who are not corrupt. Honest people are a threat to corrupt people.
Criminals will root out the honest from their ranks. The honest will root out the criminals from their ranks.
A non-corrupt third party would not tolerate a corrupt member and would police themselves but only when the voters begin demanding honesty and accountability.
SeedyROM
07-08-2008, 03:39 PM
Here I go, repeating myself again.
A criminal among criminals is an effective criminal. A criminal among the police is an ineffective criminal and will eventually end up where he belongs.
The Demopublican party is corrupt and will not tolerate party members who are not corrupt. Honest people are a threat to corrupt people.
Criminals will root out the honest from their ranks. The honest will root out the criminals from their ranks.
A non-corrupt third party would not tolerate a corrupt member and would police themselves but only when the voters begin demanding honesty and accountability.
That works for me!!
vBulletin v3.5.4, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.