Congratulatins President Bush

[LadyMod at scam.com]

I just heard on the radio that you now have the highest disapproval rating in history. 71%.


You lucky guy! :winkwink:




:lmao2:

[kres24GT]

Why is it funny our president is such a colossal failure? Personally I hate it. I wish we had a competent leader, I don't find it funny that we do not. Our country is suffering due to Bus and the other politcians actions, hardly a laughing matter.

[disrupter]

Our problem is that we expect democracy to work simply by casting votes.

Two presidential elections have been sequentially stolen,
obviously it takes more work than we have offered to have actual democracy,
instead of corporate fraud & fascism.

If we care about democracy expressing our popular collective will we need to step up to the plate & take some action.

btw, maybe one [of several] the reasons he is unpopular is because he is a SELF-CONFESSED war criminal torturer.

[Moby]

I just heard on the radio that you now have the highest disapproval rating in history. 71%.
It's shocking that 25% of Americans are so weak minded that they've been completely programmed into thinking Bush is doing a good job.

[LadyMod at scam.com]

It's shocking that 25% of Americans are so weak minded that they've been completely programmed into thinking Bush is doing a good job.


And just think, two out of that 25% are regulars here.


LOL

[Frankg]

No terrorist attacks since 9/11

Thankyou Geroge Walker Bush , President of the United States of America!!

[LadyMod at scam.com]

No terrorist attacks since 9/11

Thankyou Geroge Walker Bush , President of the United States of America!!

There's the first one Moby. Dare we hope the other will respond too?



:lmao2:

[Mr, gone]

Frankie, as Iv'e said before, has had his mental balls hanging on Bushco's oval office wall for the past 7+ years!!!

I am convinced that if he were a German back in the thirties, Hitler would have been his Idol :)

[Mr, gone]

Frankie, And from 1994-2000, when Clinton was prsident and no foreign terrorist attacked occured on US soil, that must have been pure luck in you myopic view of things?

Franks logic and ration is about as solid as diarrhea!!!

[Frankg]

Originally posted by MrGone
Frankie, And from 1994-2000, when Clinton was prsident
Biil Clinton was president from 1993 to 2001

Originally posted by MrGone
no foreign terrorist attacked occured on US soil, that must have been pure luck in you myopic view of things?
Bill Clinton had 3 chances to take Bin Laden into custody but he had his hands full with Monica Lewinsky and getting impeached .

Bill Clinton by not taking out Bin Laden when he had the chance made the worst Presidential decision ever. Bin Laden went on to write the Jihad and eventually kill 3000 americans for which Clinton is to blame

Originally posted by MrGone
Franks logic and ration is about as solid as diarrhea!!!
That would be "Frank's logic and rationale are about as solid as diarrhea"

[Moby]

Biil Clinton was president from 1993 to 2001


Bill Clinton had 3 chances to take Bin Laden into custody but he had his hands full with Monica Lewinsky and getting impeached .

Bill Clinton by not taking out Bin Laden when he had the chance made the worst Presidential decision ever. Bin Laden went on to write the Jihad and eventually kill 3000 americans for which Clinton is to blame


That would be "Frank's logic and rationale are about as solid as diarrhea"
What were those three chances Frankie? Remember, Newt had control of congress for a few of those years and was very much against any thing that Clinton did including the missile launch but we all forget how the Republicans were against hitting Bin Laden then.

[Frankg]

What were those three chances Frankie? Remember, Newt had control of congress for a few of those years and was very much against any thing that Clinton did including the missile launch but we all forget how the Republicans were against hitting Bin Laden then.

US missed three chances to seize Bin Laden (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/fr/602402/posts)
The Sunday Times (U.K.)
01/06/2002

PRESIDENT Bill Clinton turned down at least three offers involving foreign governments to help to seize Osama Bin Laden after he was identified as a terrorist who was threatening America, according to sources in Washington and the Middle East.

Clinton himself, according to one Washington source, has described the refusal to accept the first of the offers as "the biggest mistake" of his presidency.

The main reasons were legal: there was no evidence that could be brought against Bin Laden in an American court. But former senior intelligence sources accuse the administration of a lack of commitment to the fight against terrorism.

When Sudanese officials claimed late last year that Washington had spurned Bin Laden's secret extradition from Khartoum in 1996, former White House officials said they had no recollection of the offer. Senior sources in the former administration now confirm that it was true.

An Insight investigation has revealed that far from being an isolated incident this was the first in a series of missed opportunities right up to Clinton's last year in office. One of these involved a Gulf state; another would have relied on the assistance of Saudi Arabia.

In early 1996 America was putting strong pressure on Sudan's Islamic government to expel Bin Laden, who had been living there since 1991. Sources now reveal that Khartoum sent a former intelligence officer with Central Intelligence Agency connections to Washington with an offer to hand over Bin Laden — just as it had put another terrorist, Carlos the Jackal, into French hands in 1994.

At the time the State Department was describing Bin Laden as "the greatest single financier of terrorist projects in the world" and was accusing Sudan of harbouring terrorists. The extradition offer was turned down, however. A former senior White House source said: "There simply was not the evidence to prosecute Osama Bin Laden. He could not be indicted, so it would serve no purpose for him to have been brought into US custody."

A former figure in American counterterrorist intelligence claims, however, that there was "clear and convincing" proof of Bin Laden's conspiracy against America.

In May, 1996, American diplomats were informed in a Sudanese government fax that Bin Laden was about to be expelled — giving Washington another chance to seize him. The decision not to do so went to the very top of the White House, according to former administration sources.

They say that the clear focus of American policy was to discourage the state sponsorship of terrorism. So persuading Khartoum to expel Bin Laden was in itself counted as a clear victory. The administration was "delighted".

Bin Laden took off from Khartoum on May 18 in a chartered C-130 plane with 150 of his followers, including his wives. He was bound for Jalalabad in eastern Afghanistan. On the way the plane refuelled in the Gulf state of Qatar, which has friendly relations with Washington, but he was allowed to proceed unhindered.

Barely a month later, on June 25, a 5,000lb truck bomb ripped apart the front of Khobar Towers, a US military housing complex in Dhahran, Saudi Arabia. The explosion killed 19 American servicemen. Bin Laden was immediately suspected.

Clinton is reported to have admitted how things went wrong in Sudan at a private dinner at a Manhattan restaurant shortly after September 11 last year. According to a witness, Clinton told a dinner companion that the decision to let Bin Laden go was probably "the biggest mistake of my presidency".

Clinton could not be reached for comment yesterday, but a
former senior White House official acknowledged that the Sudan episode had been a "screw-up".

A second offer to get Bin Laden came unofficially from Mansoor Ijaz, a Pakistani-American millionaire who was a donor to Clinton's election campaign in 1996. On July 6, 2000, he visited John Podesta, then the president's chief of staff, to say that intelligence officers from a Gulf state were offering to help to extract Bin Laden.

Details of the meeting are confirmed in an exchange of e-mails between the White House and Ijaz, which have been seen by The Sunday Times. According to Ijaz, the offer involved setting up an Islamic relief fund to aid Afghanistan in return for the Taliban handing over Bin Laden to the Gulf state. America could then extract Bin Laden from there.

The Sunday Times has established that after a fierce internal row about the sincerity of the offer, the White House responded by sending Richard Clarke, Clinton's most senior counterterrorism adviser, to meet the rulers of the United Arab Emirates.

They denied there was any such offer.

Ijaz, however, maintained that the White House had thereby destroyed the deal, which was to have been arranged only through unofficial channels. Ijaz said that weeks later on a return trip to the Gulf he was taken on a late-night ride into the desert by his contact who told him that Clarke's front-door approach had upset a delicate internal balance and blown the deal. "Your government has missed a major opportunity," he recalls being told.

Senior former government sources said that Ijaz's offer had been treated in good faith but, with the denial of the UAE government, there was nothing to suggest it had credibility.

A third more mysterious offer to help came from the intelligence services of Saudi Arabia, then led by Prince Turki al-Faisal, according to Washington sources. Details of the offer are still unclear although, by one account, Turki offered to help to place a tracking device in the luggage of Bin Laden's mother, who was seeking to make a trip to Afghanistan to see her son. The CIA did not take up the offer.

Richard Shelby, the leading Republican on the Senate intelligence committee, said he was aware of a Saudi offer to help although, under rules protecting classified information, he was unable to discuss the details of any offer. Commenting generally, he said: "I don't believe that the fight against terrorism was the number one goal of the Clinton administration. I believe there were some lost opportunities."
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/fr/602402/posts

[Moby]

No Frank. I'm not looking for blog posts from the Internet. Don't you have some news sources to support your claim?

Here are some other insane headlines from the blog today.

Earth 'Noise' Could Attract Alien Invaders
Don't Stop Hurricanes, Guide Them
An Anatomy of Surrender... CREEPING SHARIA
Coconut-cracking tips for Hillary Clinton
"My immigrant vagina is angry" and other militant May Day moments
THE DEATH OF A MUSLIM WOMAN : "The Whore Lived Like a German"
Picked Up My First .30 Cal Today (Gun Vanity)