PDA

View Full Version : In Economic Drama, Bush Is Largely Offstage


LadyMod at scam.com
04-03-2008, 06:47 AM
The first hint? Have these guys been sleeping the last 8 years?


http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/03/washington/03bush.html?th&emc=th

WASHINGTON — The first hint that President Bush might be detached from the nation’s economic woes was in February, when he conceded that he had not heard about predictions of $4-a-gallon gasoline.

Then Mr. Bush went to Wall Street to warn against “massive government intervention in the housing markets,” two days before his administration helped broker the takeover of the investment bank Bear Stearns.

Now Mr. Bush is in Eastern Europe, one of eight foreign trips he is taking this year. As he delivered his farewell address to NATO on Wednesday, Senate Democrats and Republicans were holed up in the Capitol, scrambling to produce a bill to help struggling homeowners, the kind of government intervention Mr. Bush had cautioned against.

For a man who came into office as the nation’s first M.B.A. president, Mr. Bush has sometimes seemed invisible during the housing and credit crunch. As the economy eclipses Iraq as the top issue on voters’ minds, even some Republican allies of the president say Mr. Bush is being eclipsed and is in danger of looking out of touch.

“He’s over there arguing about who should get into NATO, and the American people are focused on what’s in their pocketbooks,” said Kenneth M. Duberstein, who was chief of staff to President Ronald Reagan in his second term. “He has talked about the economy, but it is not viewed as being a satisfactory response. Unfortunately, the lasting image is of not knowing of $4-a-gallon gas.”

With the nation riveted by the race to succeed Mr. Bush, it is growing increasingly difficult for him to command the national stage. In addition to being upstaged by the candidates, Mr. Bush has ceded his bully pulpit on the economy to other Washington figures, including Congressional leaders, Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson, and Ben S. Bernanke, chairman of the Federal Reserve.

While Mr. Bush was in Romania on Wednesday, Mr. Bernanke was on Capitol Hill delivering a far more pessimistic vision of the economy than the president — who has said the country faces “a rough patch” — has allowed.

When the White House announced its plan to overhaul the financial regulatory system, it was Mr. Paulson, not Mr. Bush, who did the talking. And the Paulson plan, by the secretary’s own account, is not aimed at offering immediate assistance to homeowners facing foreclosure.

....................

disrupter
04-03-2008, 09:08 AM
he's rich,
his friends are rich,

he could give a fuck.

He wasn't elected by Americans, so he doesn't owe them a damn thing.

Democratic Socialist
04-03-2008, 01:27 PM
Not only is George W. Bush politically and militarily incompetent, he’s economically incompetent, as well.

“Aw, hell, just sit back and let it go. It’ll be all right.”

Nice call, you jackass. :lmao2:

bigfootzx
04-04-2008, 05:46 PM
It's perfectly understandable that Bush was no up to speed with gas price predictions............ it takes time to reprint reports in the Dr. Suess format!!

Cat slave
04-05-2008, 01:11 PM
I still say he is mentally unbalanced and sees nothing but his illusions of a NWO
and being the father of the SPP.

psikeyhackr
04-07-2008, 11:08 AM
Did running up the national debt from FIVE TRILLION to EIGHT TRILLION affect anything?

It's like the Vorlon says:

"The avalanche has already started. It is too late for the pebbles to vote."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1zJsrjOytG8 :banghead:

psik

Moby
04-07-2008, 12:00 PM
Did running up the national debt from FIVE TRILLION to EIGHT TRILLION affect anything?

It's like the Vorlon says:

"The avalanche has already started. It is too late for the pebbles to vote."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1zJsrjOytG8 :banghead:

psik
It's already at $9 Trillion.

Bill Clinton showed that we can stop borrowing and create a strong and stable currency. Unfortunately it will require Americans to pay instead of borrow. Bush's economic plans have hurt the economic standing of the US far worse then before but we might still recover. It's a long shot.

LadyMod at scam.com
04-07-2008, 02:23 PM
but we might still recover. It's a long shot.


Until the next Republican gets voted into office.



;)

bigfootzx
04-07-2008, 07:09 PM
It's already at $9 Trillion.

Bill Clinton showed that we can stop borrowing and create a strong and stable currency. Unfortunately it will require Americans to pay instead of borrow. Bush's economic plans have hurt the economic standing of the US far worse then before but we might still recover. It's a long shot.

True Clinton balanced the budget and he repealed the glass stegal act and put the govt in debt with the foolish plan. Sometimes corporations are smarter than the president and all the presidents men. The last 2 presidents and the incumbent are responsible for shifting wealth way from the people to their greedy friends. The Dems were slicker than the Reps, but the game is the same, turn a blind eye to corruption.

At least Clinton didn't the country in debt, but he did little to control wall street and put the people in debt and a subsequent recession that actually began under Bush but we all know the catlyst that started to downfall of personal wealth.................tech/internet pump and dump manipulation based on false infromation.

Moby
04-07-2008, 09:53 PM
True Clinton balanced the budget and he repealed the glass stegal act and put the govt in debt with the foolish plan. Sometimes corporations are smarter than the president and all the presidents men. The last 2 presidents and the incumbent are responsible for shifting wealth way from the people to their greedy friends. The Dems were slicker than the Reps, but the game is the same, turn a blind eye to corruption.

At least Clinton didn't the country in debt, but he did little to control wall street and put the people in debt and a subsequent recession that actually began under Bush but we all know the catlyst that started to downfall of personal wealth.................tech/internet pump and dump manipulation based on false infromation.
Three? I count 4. Reagan started the "Borrow and Spend" era.

During the Clinton years the median income rose 20%. That was good for everyone.

Bush will be the first to see a decline in the median income. That's only good for a special few.

Cat slave
04-08-2008, 03:10 PM
Bush is largely off his rocker! For real!