View Full Version : FBI says, “No hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11”
Linkster
07-29-2006, 02:57 PM
I about laughed out loud when I found this - I had seen the most wanted page at the FBI site before but never noticed:
http://www.teamliberty.net/id267.html
So I wonder what all those parents that lost their kids in Afghanistan are thinking now?
History is full of instances where governments/leaders create fear, then manipulate their people into acceptance of their actions in order to protect the people.
Hitler would never have invaded Poland if he had not organised the burning of a large building in Berlin, and then blamed this on the communists.
Linkster
07-29-2006, 03:30 PM
Referring to Reichstag? Wasnt that the incident where right after Hitler used fear to convince Hindenburg to issue a "Decree for the Protection of People and State" that gave his party sweeping power to deal with the so-called emergency - and led soon after that to a police state in Germany?
Hmm - Decree = Patriot Act :thumbsup:
Linkster
07-29-2006, 03:37 PM
BTW - for those that dont know the story - heres a good unbiased look at it:
http://www.historyplace.com/worldwar2/riseofhitler/burns.htm
Of course the real fun with that page is to do a search and replace with Hitler=Cheney , Hindenberg=Bush, Reichstag=Congress, Reichstag building=WTC, Communists=Muslims - how well everything fits
Referring to Reichstag?Absolutely. :)
Control by fear. It's an oldie, but a goodie.
SirMoby
07-29-2006, 07:01 PM
Absolutely. :)
Control by fear. It's an oldie, but a goodie.
Don't forget hate. Fear is a strong motivator but hate is much stronger.
And anyone who has a "Conspiracy Theory" must be just paranoid or something. :D
Also, there have been quite a few cases of aircraft hitting high rise buildings in the past. But not a single case of a building completely being destroyed by an aircraft.
So how come three buildings completely fell down that day?
The fire fighters have a theory.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fKdvl--1Dt0
One example is the Empire State, which got hit by a B-25 in 1945 and it didn't fall down.
The real hat trick has to be the World Trade Center Building 7 which didn't get hit by anything, but it fell down just as if someone had laid a long series of explosives.
How long does it take to set up a controlled explosion with a professional demolition crew?
Tommy
08-02-2006, 04:28 PM
I wanna make clear i dont buy in to consprircy theories
and I dont beleive this one
BUT I always did wonder about how they fell down
all the buildings fell down like it was planned
on discovery when ever they show a building being droped they go thru how much prep and expertise it takes to get the building to collapse in on itself
and like Urb mentioned building 7
building 7 was a compelty different design and it still collapsed in on itself
what are the chances of having all 3 buildings collapse in the same exact way
Which ever way you look at that day... there are things that don't add up.
I believe that genuine terrorists hit the building in hijacked planes. Those terrorists probably believed they were acting for the greater good of Islam.
I believe that the person(s) who masterminded the attacks were commissioned by someone unconnected with terrorism.
So who would that be? Someone who was able to ensure secondary explosions?
I'm sorry, but the whole thing screams "inside job". :(
SirMoby
08-02-2006, 05:58 PM
I'm sorry, but the whole thing screams "inside job". :(
This the same party of Richard Nixon and when Dubya took office the FBI had at least 2 of terrorists in their radar screen but for some reason just decided to stop paying attention to them.
Bin Laden didn't have take credit for the attacks at first. Don't you think he'd have a statement prepared?
No, I don't think the President had any involvement but it does seem strange that those around him have made grotesque amounts of money as a direct result from the attacks.
The FBI were not given a chance to interview members of Bin Laden's family, who were living in America at the time.
Most investigators would start by interviewing the family of any suspects. Asking the whereabouts of Bin Laden, as he was immediately a suspect.
But someone decided that it would be sensible to get members of Bin Laden's family out of the US asap. and the FBI were not given the opportunity.
So what organisation would be able to over-rule the FBI?
SirMoby
08-03-2006, 12:15 AM
Why would you interview a family in 2001 that was going to loan you more money then any other entity in the following years of your administration?
They're giving us enough money that we will become their indentured servants in the future. Isn't that what conservative Republicans have always wanted to be?
Maybe that's why I'm disappointed with those that always vote along party lines. Had a democratic administration done the same thing Anne Coulter and Bill Oreilly would be freaky out. Sine it was a Republican administration then suddenly it's the right thing to do.
I am not an American, and I apologise if this offends anyone... but from the outside looking in, one thing comes to mind, False Flag (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_flag).
docholly
08-03-2006, 06:56 AM
I am not an American, and I apologise if this offends anyone... but from the outside looking in, one thing comes to mind, False Flag (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_flag).
:thumbsup: never since 9/12/01 have i believed anything else except that our own government (read bush/cheney etc) planned and executed this providing them with the tools necessary to subjugate those who might otherwise question authority.
vBulletin v3.5.4, Copyright ©2000-2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.