Hillary Bloodies Barack Hussein Obama-- Lands a Huge Wright Uppercut!!

[Frankg]

Hillary Bloodies Barack Hussein Obama-- Lands a Huge Wright Uppercut!!
That's what I'm talking about...
MAKE IT HURT!
http://bp1.blogger.com/_L6pDyjqqsvY/R-lYGsRIgYI/AAAAAAAAMWc/c1WjY6Pai2k/s320/cage+rage.JPG (http://bp1.blogger.com/_L6pDyjqqsvY/R-lYGsRIgYI/AAAAAAAAMWc/c1WjY6Pai2k/s1600-h/cage+rage.JPG)
Grudge Match 8- The Return of the Bone Crusher
Hillary gave Barack Hussein Obama a huge Wright uppercut today:

"Wright would not have been my pastor... You choose your church."Ouch! It's getting bloody.
Who needs the RNC when you've got the Clinton's losing in a Democratic primary?
The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review (http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/breaking/s_558930.html) reported this from their interview with Hillary.

Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, in a wide-ranging interview today with Pittsburgh Tribune-Review reporters and editors, said she would have left her church if her pastor made the sort of inflammatory remarks Sen. Barack Obama's former pastor made.

"He would not have been my pastor," Clinton said. "You don't choose your family, but you choose what church you want to attend."

Obama's lead in national polls has slipped since clips of the retired Rev. Jeremiah Wright began being played on national news programs. The uproar prompted Obama to give a wide-ranging speech on race in America a week ago. The Clinton campaign has refrained from getting involved in the controversy, but Clinton herself, responding to a question, denounced what she said was "hate speech."

"You know, I spoke out against Don Imus (who was fired from his radio and television shows after making racially insensitive remarks), saying that hate speech was unacceptable in any setting, and I believe that," Clinton said. "I just think you have to speak out against that. You certainly have to do that, if not explicitly, then implicitly by getting up and moving."
Well, that's one way to get the press off your back for lying about sniper fire (http://gatewaypundit.blogspot.com/2008/03/shocker-hillary-gaffes-media-reacts.html).

Democrats might want to forget about that dream ticket (http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/election2008/2008-03-24-Dreamteam_N.htm)about now.

Thomas Sowell (http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/03/post_25.html), via Instapundit (http://instapundit.com/archives2/016928.php), was saying the same thing today- Funny how democrats use Republican arguments when battling it out, isn't it?

...Pass the popcorn, Nahanni.
http://gatewaypundit.blogspot.com/

[disrupter]

Glad to see Hillary & Frankg are on the same side of this.

Obama looks VERY good to me, this just reinforces it.

Hillary acting on principles & ideals? :lmao2:

next you'll be trying to argue Bush isn't psychotically deluded.

reality check time.

[LogicallyYours]

Frank has nothing to offer.

[LadyMod at scam.com]

This is Way too easy and way too much fun. :D

The Long Defeat (http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/03/25/opinion/edbrooks.php)
By DAVID BROOKS

Hillary Clinton may not realize it yet, but she's just endured one of the worst weeks of her campaign.

First, Barack Obama weathered the Rev. Jeremiah Wright affair without serious damage to his nomination prospects. Obama still holds a tiny lead among Democrats nationally in the Gallup tracking poll, just as he did before this whole affair blew up.




Second, Obama's lawyers successfully prevented re-votes in Florida and Michigan. That means it would be virtually impossible for Clinton to take a lead in either elected delegates or total primary votes.



Third, as Noam Scheiber of The New Republic has reported, most superdelegates have accepted Nancy Pelosi's judgment that the winner of the elected delegates should get the nomination. Instead of lining up behind Clinton, they're drifting away. Her lead among them has shrunk by about 60 in the past month, according to Avi Zenilman of Politico.com.




In short, Hillary Clinton's presidential prospects continue to dim. The door is closing. Night is coming. The end, however, is not near.




Last week, an important Clinton adviser told Jim VandeHei and Mike Allen (also of Politico) that Clinton had no more than a 10 percent chance of getting the nomination. Now, she's probably down to a 5 percent chance.




Five percent.




Let's take a look at what she's going to put her party through for the sake of that 5 percent chance: The Democratic Party is probably going to have to endure another three months of daily sniping. For another three months, we'll have the Carvilles likening the Obamaites to Judas and former generals accusing Clintonites of McCarthyism. For three months, we'll have the daily round of résumé padding and sulfurous conference calls. We'll have campaign aides blurting "blue dress" and only-because-he's-black references as they let slip their private contempt.




For three more months (maybe more!) the campaign will proceed along in its Verdun-like pattern. There will be a steady rifle fire of character assassination from the underlings, interrupted by the occasional firestorm of artillery when the contest touches upon race, gender or patriotism. The policy debates between the two have been long exhausted, so the only way to get the public really engaged is by poking some raw national wound.




For the sake of that 5 percent, this will be the sourest spring. About a fifth of Clinton and Obama supporters now say they wouldn't vote for the other candidate in the general election. Meanwhile, on the other side, voters get an unobstructed view of the Republican nominee. John McCain's approval ratings have soared 11 points. He is now viewed positively by 67 percent of Americans. A month ago, McCain was losing to Obama among independents by double digits in a general election matchup. Now McCain has a lead among this group.




For three more months, Clinton is likely to hurt Obama even more against McCain, without hurting him against herself. And all this is happening so she can preserve that 5 percent chance.




When you step back and think about it, she is amazing. She possesses the audacity of hopelessness.




Why does she go on like this? Does Clinton privately believe that Obama is so incompetent that only she can deliver the policies they both support? Is she simply selfish, and willing to put her party through agony for the sake of her slender chance? Are leading Democrats so narcissistic that they would create bitter stagnation even if they were granted one-party rule?




The better answer is that Clinton's long rear-guard action is the logical extension of her relentlessly political life.

For nearly 20 years, she has been encased in the apparatus of political celebrity. Look at her schedule as first lady and ever since. Think of the thousands of staged events, the tens of thousands of times she has pretended to be delighted to see someone she doesn't know, the hundreds of thousands times she has recited empty clichés and exhortatory banalities, the millions of photos she has posed for in which she is supposed to appear empathetic or tough, the billions of politically opportune half-truths that have bounced around her head.




No wonder the Clinton campaign feels impersonal. It's like a machine for the production of politics. It plows ahead from event to event following its own iron logic. The only question is whether Clinton herself can step outside the apparatus long enough to turn it off and withdraw voluntarily or whether she will force the rest of her party to intervene and jam the gears.

If she does the former, she would surprise everybody with a display of self-sacrifice. Her campaign would cruise along at a lower register until North Carolina, then use that as an occasion to withdraw.




If she does not, she would soldier on doggedly, taking down as many allies as necessary.

--


.

[LadyMod at scam.com]

Frank has nothing to offer.

Sure he does. Frankie is the gift that keeps on giving.


:lmao2:

[LadyMod at scam.com]

I have a news flash for Hillary.

You CHOOSE whether or not you are going to LIE about sniper fire too.



Red-faced Clinton stokes Obama pastor row
1 day ago

WASHINGTON (AFP) — Democrat Hillary Clinton on Tuesday revived the row over the fiery racial rhetoric of Barack Obama's former pastor, saying she, unlike her White House rival, would have left his church.

Clinton's decision to reignite the controversy came as she battled to shrug off her own embarrassment, after admitting that her claims that she dodged sniper fire during a trip to Bosnia in 1996 as first lady were untrue.

"I made a mistake, that happens. It proves I'm human, which, for some people, is a revelation," Clinton said, in a news conference in Pennsylvania in which she pointedly discussed Reverend Jeremiah Wright.

"I think, given all we have heard and seen, he would not have been my pastor," the New York senator said.

"We don't have a choice when it comes to our relatives. We have a choice when it comes to our pastors and the church we attend."

MORE (http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5hL0OOgPP3h9kym3LjiIO0FbqSGTQ)

------------------------------------------------------------

http://qna.live.com/ShowQuestion.aspx?qid=CC1D5335FB5E41ED9533A86F21A7 5E1B&ctx=%2FBrowse.aspx%3Ffilter%3D1

Did Hillary Clinton misspeak or lie about dodging sniper fire?
The following are excerpted from a NY Times article March 25, 2008; the full article is at:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/25/us/politics/25clinton.html?_r=1&​adxnnl=1&adxnnlx=1206446531-tHYJQqSg8mu7Qnqq3UU+1Q&oref=slogin

As part of her argument that she has the best experience and instincts to deal with a sudden crisis as president, Hillary Clinton recently offered a vivid description of having to run across a tarmac to avoid sniper fire after landing in Bosnia as first lady in 1996. That argument was behind her campaign’s “red phone” commercial, which cast her as best able to handle a crisis.

She said: “I remember landing under sniper fire. There was supposed to be some kind of a greeting ceremony at the airport, but instead we just ran with our heads down to get into the vehicles to get to our base.”

Yet on Monday, Mrs. Clinton admitted that she “misspoke” about the episode — a concession that came after CBS News showed footage of her walking calmly across the tarmac with her daughter, Chelsea, and being greeted by dignitaries and a child.

Maj. Gen. William Nash, then commander of United States troops in Bosnia and was at the Tuzla airport that day, said in an interview that there was no threat of sniper fire at the airport during Mrs. Clinton’s visit. “She never had her head down,” General Nash said. “There was no sniper threat that I know of.”

In interviews Monday, with aides to Mrs. Clinton at the time of the trip, as well as an Associated Press photographer who was on the trip, none of the aides remembered actual sniper fire. Nor did the photographer, Doug Mills, who now works for The New York Times. “...I don’t remember any commotion at the airport,” Mr. Mills said. “I don’t recall her running to cars. If that had happened, we would have made a picture of it.”

===========================================
We knew her husband could not be trusted; now we can see that Hillary distorts the truth as well, to try to convince us of her "experience" and bravery.


.

[Smurf-Herder]

The only thing that bothers me about the sideshow is, it takes time away from all the real news - of things happening around the world.

[LadyMod at scam.com]

The only thing that bothers me about the sideshow is, it takes time away from all the real news - of things happening around the world.

I agree. But maybe that was the point of the sideshows in the first place?



Lady Mod

[disrupter]

Maybe we want to be distracted because the real world is just too terrible to handle.

Hillary may not be able to win, but maybe she will manage to make sure Obama doesn't either.

Hillary & McCain are good friends,
what does that tell You?

It tells me terse, stupid cement heads see eye to eye.

Please, Barack, i hope you never see too similar to either one of these two,
if you do i will be compelled to vote Nader.

[Moby]

The only thing that bothers me about the sideshow is, it takes time away from all the real news - of things happening around the world.
The timing of the sideshow was to take away from things happening here in the USA.

[asroc]

dude, nobody actually wants "the dream ticket", the media just wanted to fantasize about it

richardson is at the top of obama's vp shortlist right now, along with guys like tim kaine and phil bredesen, who are more or less beloved party mavericks

[disrupter]

The sideshow doesn't have to be prescheduled but there may be those who lie in wait for expectations that some distracting side show will arise.

Like the crocodile they lie in wait for some unsuspecting prey to step in or near their still & open jaws.