PDA

View Full Version : So it's not so cruel to practice apartheid in Jerusalem?


soul
03-23-2008, 03:13 AM
It's just fine to take land away, keep people out of the way, of any place,
when you can. It's just something you have to do, just to finish them off, because finishing them off, is just fine.

That indeed, that, holy land was never theirs. Indeed, that land was not theirs,
and they are not apart of that land. And, they must be treated less than ordinary citizens should be, by people who never lived there in the first place,
but who did have thousands of years ago, the rightful claim, by far away in history, and long time dead, ancestry.

It's not apartheid, it's religious dogma, the sanctity, the obvious, first right,
that must now make people of different religions render this now dubious
history and motive.

Slowly turning the screws. Like a bunch of Hitler youth.
That one-sided approach stops for no one innocent.
It doesn't talk, it doesn't ever, negotiate.

disrupter
03-23-2008, 01:30 PM
Any claim of 'right' to any real estate is absurd.

it is about intimidation, threats of violence & lack of challenge.

Again, religious imperatives aka morality is a tactic of deceit,
pretense of ethics devoid of actual ethics.

How is it that Israelis are guaranteed a state that is Jewish?
Isn't that just totally, fundamentally undemocratic?
Doesn't that undermine all claims of inclusive government?

If they simply required that all religions were respected, but could not implement religion into secular laws wouldn't that be a whole lot fairer & equitable?

How can the US support a pre-determined ETHNIC EXCLUSIVE state?
Get over WWII guilt & start thinking real.