PDA

View Full Version : Really no reason to vote Republican in next election


kres24GT
02-18-2008, 04:41 PM
unless you just really hate gays.

Both parties love big government, and Democrats do big government better than Republicans. IF you want to vote for big government, might as well be Dem. If you want to vote for limited government, you should vote 3rd party, and certainly not Republican.

Either way America as we know it will soon be dead, let's do it the right way. There is 0 reason to vote republican other than hatred of fags.

Kinky Jones
02-18-2008, 05:36 PM
show me where republicans have ever been for limited gov't? certainly not in your lifetime...

start before you were born, with nixon:

multiplied the war on drugs 100 fold

started the war on porn (thats a goodie, even did a study that proved porn WASN'T bad for society so they buried the results)

then there was the whole ending Nam while secretly bombing more n more

oh and watergate, little abuse of power there but he wasn't a "crook" was he?

then you got reagan (the actor):

spent more than anybody except clinton (factor in inflation he spent more)

saved social security, taxed businesses up the ying yang, and gave us STAR WARS!!!!! that was money well spent...

furthered "the war on porn" really, really far

gave us "reagonomics" which fucked the economy up so bad that bush sr ran on "no new taxes" and had to raise taxes, again, another republican raising taxes :disbelief:

then you got bush sr: see above for starters

started using the US military to battle in "the war on drugs"

furthered "the war on porn" even further

passed out in his soup (that isn't big gov, just funny)

then you got dubya:

$600,000 indecency fines says it all pretty much...

you know the rest of the story story with him :thumbsup:

asroc
02-18-2008, 05:36 PM
i like how people were pushing romney as this great businessman who could therefore fix the economy, when he was basically a gordon gekko venture capitalist who bought companies, diced them up and sold them piecemeal. basically you can link thousands of lost jobs and destroyed middle class families directly to him.

Kinky Jones
02-18-2008, 06:06 PM
i like how people were pushing romney as this great businessman who could therefore fix the economy, when he was basically a gordon gekko venture capitalist who bought companies, diced them up and sold them piecemeal. basically you can link thousands of lost jobs and destroyed middle class families directly to him.


yeah the last hope for conservatism was classic, i guess people thought a venture capitalist would spend all his own money to "change washington" and not to quadruple his investment in his first year of office



and take mccain on big gov't, this guy hates freedom, tried his best to ban the sport of Mixed Martial Arts (now the fastest growing sport in the world) and wants to ban all betting on college sports too... he fuckin' hates freedom i tell ya, wants to control everything

Moby
02-18-2008, 06:32 PM
As the nation gets larger the size of government will continue to grow.

Reagan did cut the size of government as soon as he took office. That's were the entire concept came from. After that he continued to grow the government again at a pretty fast pace.

Bush's love big government far more then anyone else that's held office.

Clinton actually grew government at a slower pace then both Bush's and slower then Ronny's 2nd term.

Smurf-Herder
02-18-2008, 08:39 PM
This is the only reason I'm voting Republican:

http://www.mda.mil/mdalink/html/mdalink.html

I want to be sure that option stays open, if nothing else.

kres24GT
02-18-2008, 08:44 PM
show me where republicans have ever been for limited gov't? certainly not in your lifetime...

start before you were born, with nixon:

multiplied the war on drugs 100 fold

started the war on porn (thats a goodie, even did a study that proved porn WASN'T bad for society so they buried the results)

then there was the whole ending Nam while secretly bombing more n more

oh and watergate, little abuse of power there but he wasn't a "crook" was he?

then you got reagan (the actor):

spent more than anybody except clinton (factor in inflation he spent more)

saved social security, taxed businesses up the ying yang, and gave us STAR WARS!!!!! that was money well spent...

furthered "the war on porn" really, really far

gave us "reagonomics" which fucked the economy up so bad that bush sr ran on "no new taxes" and had to raise taxes, again, another republican raising taxes :disbelief:

then you got bush sr: see above for starters

started using the US military to battle in "the war on drugs"

furthered "the war on porn" even further

passed out in his soup (that isn't big gov, just funny)

then you got dubya:

$600,000 indecency fines says it all pretty much...

you know the rest of the story story with him :thumbsup:


They aren't, that was the point. Bush is obvious the worst offender.

Kinky Jones
02-18-2008, 08:59 PM
They aren't, that was the point. Bush is obvious the worst offender.

i was generalizing for all the people who think the republicans have a spot-free record of tax breaks and giving them their money back, and not intervening in people's personal lives :(