Sunnis take Ramadi - Shiites Take Al-Amarah

[Linkster]

Well - as posted earlier I mentioned that the Sunnis had taken over the city of Ramadi yesterday - now this morning the Shiite Militia has taken over another city - Al-Amarah
"a Shi'ite militia run by the radical cleric Muqtada al-Sadr, today seized control of the southern Iraqi city of Al-Amarah." (Very Anti-American group this one)
From http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1548704,00.html

[Moby]

This is just more liberal media writing facts about reality and not giving Dubya fair air coverage. Just because all the facts point to a civil war does not mean that they are actually falling into a civil war. :)

We should "Stay the course" :lmao2:

Americans can't remember more then 3 words and it's getting close to election time :)

[Moby]

Truthfully it's so sad that American won't look at the actual facts and understand that invading Iraq was one of the worst mistakes ever made in our history.

[Bill]

Amara is the future - as we pull out, warlords will move in.

This is going to happen many times in the next few years.

The Iraqis will force us out, by attrition, (oops, sorry, I meant to say, we'll 'turn over control to the local Iraqi authorities') and as we leave, warlords will move in behind us.

Then you get the cleansing. So we best get used to it.

I notice there are no death reports from Amara yet.

[Abnormalia]

Mets take the penant?

[Linkster]

Bill - according to the MSM - the ruling party has already taken back control there - of course no one is covering Ramadi (wonder why?)