PDA

View Full Version : Liberal Hypocrisies and Racism



doctordog
03-03-2012, 11:39 PM
Top 10 Liberal Hypocrisies

Have you ever wondered how Liberals can be pro-abortion and anti-capital punishment? I’ve identified ten such beliefs that liberals hold, which are self-contradictory. Afterwards, I will explain the underlying reason they fight tenaciously for these hypocritical beliefs.

Contradiction #1: Pro-Abortion vs. Anti-Capital Punishment
Liberals support the killing of unborn children in the name of convenience, choice, etc. These children have committed no crimes; however, if that child survives abortion and grows up to commit murder later in life, a Liberal will scream “injustice” if that person is sentenced to death.

Contradiction #2: Pro-Technology vs. Anti-Free Market
I love Apple products. I think Steve Jobs was a genius. I have a MacBook Pro, an iPad, and an iPhone 4s. Many liberals (especially Occupiers) love Apple products too. As a capitalist, I am consistent in purchasing Apple products. They are not. They build web sites to promote their socialist causes while using software and technology that is only made possible in a free market environment. Apple products would not (and could not) have been created in a socialist nation. There’s no way liberals could fight capitalism without the very tools capitalism provides!

Contradiction #3: Pro-Homosexual vs. Pro-Muslim
Muslims want to kill homosexuals. Yet, Liberals promote the Homosexual agenda and Shariah Law. If the Muslims take over the United States, they will start by expunging the land of Homosexuals and Liberals. (Please see my conclusion to explain why Liberals really hold to these two contradictory positions.)

Contradiction #4: Pro-Darwinian Evolution vs. Anti-Human DominationMost liberals believe in Darwinian evolution, as opposed to special Creation by God. They believe that all species arose naturally through a concept known as “survival of the fittest.” The weak die out and the strong survive. Yet, Liberals spend so much time (and other people’s money) fighting to protect endangered species, rare ecosystems, wet lands, etc. Isn’t this incredibly inconsistent? After all, evolutionists believe many species died out over millions of years because of natural selection. As consistent evolutionists, shouldn’t they be happy that humans are now dominating the planet and all sub-species? Incidentally, as a Christian, I believe God requires us to be good stewards of the environment (not tree huggers). But I can hold my position consistently.
Read an article on Christians and the Environment by Dr. Carl Wieland.

Contradiction #5: Christianity vs. All Other Religions
Liberals want religious freedom for all religions except Christianity. “Take down that cross… No nativity scenes on public property… No prayer at high school graduation ceremonies!” The list goes on, all in the name of “tolerance.” Isn’t it ironic that Christianity is the only religion that tolerates others? Our Lord Jesus Christ taught us to love our enemies, not to kill them. The Koran, however, teaches Muslims to kill the infidels!
Obama’s Thanksgiving Address Fails to Mention God.

Contradiction #6: Pro-Education vs. Anti-School Choice
Liberals like to pride themselves on being intellectuals and supporters of education. They claim that conservatives and Republicans are against education. Laughable. If education is so important, why do liberals force everyone to pay taxes to support the failing public education system when private and home-schooling are so much more effective? The answer is easy. They can only brainwash our children to become atheists and socialists in the public schools.
You must watch the documentary, Indoctrination: Public Schools and the Decline of Christianity in America.

Contradiction #7: Hateful vs. Anti-Hate
Liberals claim that anyone who disagrees with their lifestyle is promoting “hate.” Do you want to see real hate? Just read for yourself the hate-filled comments on our first episode of PolitiChicks.TV, where we discussed homosexuality in America. Not one hateful word was said against homosexuals on this show. Not one. In fact, Victoria Jackson stated, “I love gays!” The only hate I found was from the thousands of liberals who were commenting. 99% of all hate is spewed from the Left.
Read Are You a Member of a Hate Group on GodfatherPolitics.com

Contradiction #8: Pro-Women vs. Anti-Sarah Palin
The left says they’re for women’s rights. So why did they attempt to destroy Sarah Palin and her beautiful family in 2008 when she was chosen as John McCain’s running mate? The left says they’re pro-choice, but they are against educating a woman before she goes into an Abortion clinic. Liberals undermine the marriage, the very institution where women are honored by fidelity and womanhood is celebrated. And if a conservative women succeeds outside the home, they are told they should stay at home.

Contradiction #9: Racism
If Liberals aren’t racist, why do they evaluate and categorize everyone by the color of their skin? Why are they so angry when Blacks leave the Democrat plantation and achieve the American Dream? Why do they continue to promote abortion when far more blacks are killed by abortion than whites? Why do they continue to promote social programs that enslave blacks at poverty level?

Contradiction #10: Pro-Jew vs. Anti-Israel
Liberals say they are pro-Jew. So, why do they hate the nation of Israel? Why are so many Jews members and supporters of the Democrat Party? This is one of most mind-boggling of liberal contradictions.

Conclusion: There are many more liberal contradictions which could be listed. Why do liberals hold beliefs that appear to be self-contradictory? The answer is simple: All liberal positions are ultimately Anti-God to the core. Islam and homosexuality are not supported by the Bible. The Bible promotes personal responsibility, private property, and an ultimate standard for right and wrong.

Liberals hold positions that are counter to the Word of God or at best they twist the Word of God to support their positions. This is the only way one can explain the top ten Liberal contradictions.

http://notyrants.blogspot.com/2012/02/liberal-hypocrisies-and-racism.html

Warden
03-03-2012, 11:58 PM
The liberal meme is always about emotional rhetoric, they want to fix a problem without looking at why its a problem.


Just more money money money, they are creating my people in these demographics they say they are trying to help then the actual problem does.

Its all coming to an end soon.


I am ready, I know they are not.

Telos
03-03-2012, 11:59 PM
:lmao2: :lmao2: :lmao2:

more strawmen than Iowa has cornfields...

Citizen
03-04-2012, 01:22 AM
Most liberals refuse to believe the Klu Klux Klan was established by the very party they support. Ironic isn't it?

dsolo802
03-04-2012, 03:05 AM
For clarity sake, I will respond as though this was actually written by Dog.


Top 10 Liberal Hypocrisies

Have you ever wondered how Liberals can be pro-abortion and anti-capital punishment?

Pro liberty - as in choice - is not advocacy for any particular option. Pro choice means the government is not only ill-equipped to make decisions of conscience for people, it is constitutionally forbidden from doing so. Pro choice, is pro liberty, and pro constitution. Forcing women to act according to one sect's view of the world is neither.


I’ve identified ten such beliefs that liberals hold, which are self-contradictory.The hell you say!

They only appear contradictory to people with tiny little minds who are enemies of liberty.


Afterwards, I will explain the underlying reason they fight tenaciously for these hypocritical beliefs.That ought to be rich!!


Contradiction #1: Pro-Abortion vs. Anti-Capital Punishment[/B]
Liberals support the killing of unborn children in the name of convenience, choice, etc. These children have committed no crimes; however, if that child survives abortion and grows up to commit murder later in life, a Liberal will scream “injustice” if that person is sentenced to death. Unborn children aren't children. That's just you being a religious bigot and assuming we all must believe as you do. We don't. Deal with it.


Contradiction #2: Pro-Technology vs. Anti-Free Market
I love Apple products. I think Steve Jobs was a genius. I have a MacBook Pro, an iPad, and an iPhone 4s. Many liberals (especially Occupiers) love Apple products too. As a capitalist, I am consistent in purchasing Apple products. They are not. They build web sites to promote their socialist causes while using software and technology that is only made possible in a free market environment. Apple products would not (and could not) have been created in a socialist nation. There’s no way liberals could fight capitalism without the very tools capitalism provides! Conclusions that would be facts, and non sequiturs does not an argument make. Some progressives are socialist. Most are not. Even the lion's share of the "socialists" are not against free market - Just not for free market where optimum corporate profit is at war with the public interest.

Shipping jobs to countries that unfairly compete with American workers through child labor, exposure of workers to unsafe conditions and draconian labor practices, with costs of production further reduced by industrial policies that savage the environment, is far from free market capitalism. What you are calling free market capitalism is actually socialism: Our means of production are now owned by Communist China!


Contradiction #3: Pro-Homosexual vs. Pro-Muslim
Muslims want to kill homosexuals. Yet, Liberals promote the Homosexual agenda and Shariah Law.This is wrong on so many levels.

First, Some people who call themselves Muslim do. As so some people who call themselves Christian.
Second, there is no homosexual agenda, other than to be treated as human beings entitled to equal protection under the law
Third, liberals support treating all human beings as human beings, and everything that that implies.
Fourth, no liberal supports the institution of Shariah law in the United States - and there is zero basis for making such a retarded statement.


If the Muslims take over the United States, they will start by expunging the land of Homosexuals and Liberals. (Please see my conclusion to explain why Liberals really hold to these two contradictory positions.)Just plain idiotic.


Contradiction #4: Pro-Darwinian Evolution vs. Anti-Human DominationMost liberals believe in Darwinian evolution, as opposed to special Creation by God.You are off to a bad start here. Even Mitt Romney recognizes that Evolution and God as the instrument of creation through Evolution are not inconsistent. Try again.


They believe that all species arose naturally through a concept known as “survival of the fittest.” The weak die out and the strong survive. Yet, Liberals spend so much time (and other people’s money) fighting to protect endangered species, rare ecosystems, wet lands, etc. Isn’t this incredibly inconsistent?No. Respecting and protecting the ecosystems in nature are a part of any intelligent man's strategy for survival. Evolution produced the balance in nature which men blinded by the drive for private profit are only too willing to destroy. People with any understanding of ecosystems know that we all will pay a very heavy price for our arrogance. This is presuming to know more than "God."


After all, evolutionists believe many species died out over millions of years because of natural selection. As consistent evolutionists, shouldn’t they be happy that humans are now dominating the planet and all sub-species?Why would anybody be happy about man acting like an arrogant, dumb fuck? Just stupid.


Incidentally, as a Christian, I believe God requires us to be good stewards of the environment (not tree huggers). But I can hold my position consistently.
Read an article on Christians and the Environment by Dr. Carl Wieland.If you understand the concept of an ecosystem, you know that devastation of ecoysystems and being good stewards of the environment are mutually exclusive - sorry.


Contradiction #5: Christianity vs. All Other Religions
Liberals want religious freedom for all religions except Christianity.Not an ounce of truth in this statement.


“Take down that cross… No nativity scenes on public property… No prayer at high school graduation ceremonies!” The list goes on, all in the name of “tolerance.”You don't understand the Constitution - at all. Private people can do whatever they want on their properties. Erect a cross, a church, a mosque, a synagogue. Have at it! That's the religious liberty the Constitution promises to EACH of its citizens.

What it does not guarantee, what it expressly forbids, is for government as such to start erecting Crosses, or mosques, or synagogues on public property.


Isn’t it ironic that Christianity is the only religion that tolerates others? It is not the only religion that tolerates others. And there are many so-called Christian religious leaders and so-called Christian political leaders who are not tolerant in the least - not of other religions who see things differently, not of the civil rights of women, blacks, Latinos, or homosexuals. What is ironic is Christianity heaps judgment on others even though the man who inspired the religion plainly and repeatedly urged those who were alive when he was, Not to Judge. Ironic and pathetic all at the same time.


Our Lord Jesus Christ taught us to love our enemies, not to kill them. The Koran, however, teaches Muslims to kill the infidels!You don't know anything about the Koran.



Obama’s Thanksgiving Address Fails to Mention God.So what: He is our President - not our Pope.


Contradiction #6: Pro-Education vs. Anti-School Choice
Liberals like to pride themselves on being intellectuals and supporters of education. They claim that conservatives and Republicans are against education. Laughable. Intelligent people know that home schooling may work for some, but does not scale. It is not a national solution.


If education is so important, why do liberals force everyone to pay taxes to support the failing public education system when private and home-schooling are so much more effective?Private and home school are not more effective. The notion itself reflects deep anti-education bias. Education is not just a function of good curriculum. The skill of the teacher is also critical. Whether the teaching takes place at home or at a public school, the fact remains that good educational outcomes will depend upon well trained and highly skilled teachers. So first point, it is stupidity to think that parents who in general don't have training as teachers can produce better results than adults who do.

Second point, Republicans "starve the beast" strategies have resulted in steep reductions in public school teaching staffs and salaries. You are largely complaining about the the shadow Republicans themselves have cast. Your criticism is in fact a condemnation of the GOP.


The answer is easy. They can only brainwash our children to become atheists and socialists in the public schools.
You must watch the documentary, Indoctrination: Public Schools and the Decline of Christianity in America.The Christianity that has produced stupid statements like this one deserves to be on the decline. Whoa..this has quickly lurched from stupid to moronic.


Contradiction #7: Hateful vs. Anti-Hate
Liberals claim that anyone who disagrees with their lifestyle is promoting “hate.” Do you want to see real hate? Just read for yourself the hate-filled comments on our first episode of PolitiChicks.TV, where we discussed homosexuality in America. Not one hateful word was said against homosexuals on this show. Not one. In fact, Victoria Jackson stated, “I love gays!” The only hate I found was from the thousands of liberals who were commenting. 99% of all hate is spewed from the Left.
Read Are You a Member of a Hate Group on GodfatherPolitics.comI am not going to look at politicchicks.tv. By your own posting today, by your own hand and words, you are a racist.


Contradiction #8: Pro-Women vs. Anti-Sarah Palin
The left says they’re for women’s rights. So why did they attempt to destroy Sarah Palin and her beautiful family in 2008 when she was chosen as John McCain’s running mate? Because she is a hate mongering nincompoop.


The left says they’re pro-choice, but they are against educating a woman before she goes into an Abortion clinic.Planned Parenthood - the organization that "the Right" wants to destroy provides real education - about ALL OF HER CHOICES.


Liberals undermine the marriage, the very institution where women are honored by fidelity and womanhood is celebrated.Oh? Liberals are for more dedicated, life long unions. Bigots are against them.


And if a conservative women succeeds outside the home, they are told they should stay at home.Liberals are in favor of maximum choice for Women - the exact opposite stance of neo-cons and RW fundamentalists.


Contradiction #9: Racism
If Liberals aren’t racist, why do they evaluate and categorize everyone by the color of their skin? Why are they so angry when Blacks leave the Democrat plantation and achieve the American Dream?Why do Conservatives suck dogs?


Why do they continue to promote abortion when far more blacks are killed by abortion than whites?Choice means staying out of the promotion business - unlike so-called "Pro-life".


Why do they continue to promote social programs that enslave blacks at poverty level?Why do Conservatives sodomize pigs?


Contradiction #10: Pro-Jew vs. Anti-Israel
Liberals say they are pro-Jew. So, why do they hate the nation of Israel?They don't.


Why are so many Jews members and supporters of the Democrat Party?Because they can recognize which of the two parties is about promoting civil liberties, and which is about extinguishing them.


This is one of most mind-boggling of liberal contradictions.Jewish people living in Israel can be both good Jews and good Israeli citizens while criticising their own government. All Jewish people no more think alike, than do al non-Jewish people. Thinking that all Jews should think alike is again - another sign of the bigotry of the mind that produced this shitty post.


Conclusion: There are many more liberal contradictions which could be listed. Why do liberals hold beliefs that appear to be self-contradictory?They only appear contradictory

The rest of this retarded screed has been redacted to protect the rational faculties of people who might innocently take it in - and have their heads explode.

http://www.huge-entity.com/blogger3/scanners-exploding-head-2.jpg

EldonG
03-04-2012, 03:33 AM
The OP has so much projection and so much simply ignorant rhetoric that it's simply not worth wasting time on. Suffice to say, if you believe a quarter of this rubbish, the short bus is waiting for you, with a little idiot carrier on top, supplied by Mitt Romney.

poet
03-04-2012, 06:29 AM
Most liberals refuse to believe the Klu Klux Klan was established by the very party they support. Ironic isn't it?


Isn't, though? Even more ironic that the parties switched ideologies and platforms during the 60's through the 70's, and Democrats became the antithesis for what they once stood for. Most KKK'ers are Republicans, today. Isn't that ironic?
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/When_did_republicans_become_democrats_and_democrat s_become_republicans&altQ=When_did_republicans_become_democrats_and_dem ocrats_became_republicans

dsolo802
03-04-2012, 10:46 AM
The OP has so much projection and so much simply ignorant rhetoric that it's simply not worth wasting time on. Suffice to say, if you believe a quarter of this rubbish, the short bus is waiting for you, with a little idiot carrier on top, supplied by Mitt Romney.
Because the op has collected virtually every falsehood GOP zombies mouth almost every day, Dog has done us all a great favor. When you're in the mood, fire at will, it's like shooting canards in a barrel.

doctordog
03-04-2012, 01:30 PM
Because the op has collected virtually every falsehood GOP zombies mouth almost every day, Dog has done us all a great favor. When you're in the mood, fire at will, it's like shooting canards in a barrel.

In your case turds in a barrel, none of your replies hold water.

dsolo802
03-04-2012, 01:37 PM
. . .none of your replies hold water.

I realize you were just cutting and pasting what other people thought and had to say - and are overwhelmed by the immensity of actually having to think yourself, but let's give it a go - one at a time.


Contradiction #1: Pro-Abortion vs. Anti-Capital Punishment
Liberals support the killing of unborn children in the name of convenience, choice, etc. These children have committed no crimes; however, if that child survives abortion and grows up to commit murder later in life, a Liberal will scream “injustice” if that person is sentenced to death.



Pro liberty - as in choice - is not advocacy for any particular option. Pro choice means the government is not only ill-equipped to make decisions of conscience for people, it is constitutionally forbidden from doing so. Pro choice, is pro liberty, and pro constitution. Forcing women to act according to one sect's view of the world is neither.

So, your thoughts?

doctordog
03-04-2012, 02:34 PM
I realize you were just cutting and pasting what other people thought and had to say - and are overwhelmed by the immensity of actually having to think yourself, but let's give it a go - one at a time.






So, your thoughts?

Allowing one to choose murder when it comes to unborn children but being against the death of convicted criminals is asinine, innocent versus guilty.

dsolo802
03-04-2012, 03:33 PM
Allowing one to choose murder when it comes to unborn children but being against the death of convicted criminals is asinine, innocent versus guilty.Not responsive to what I wrote in the least. Try again.

I had written:

"Unborn children aren't children. That's just you being a religious bigot and assuming we all must believe as you do. We don't. Deal with it."

Of course, it may be that according to your religion unborn life is human life. What makes your religious beliefs any more deserving of being enshrined in law than any one else's? Why do you suppose that your religious beliefs trump every one else's - especially in a Country that protects everyone's right to religious liberty.

So respond to these questions if you can.

Mac McFadden
03-04-2012, 10:10 PM
Zygotes and fetuses are NOT "children".
They have the potential to become children if carried to term.
Even the Catholic Church believes (or at least they used to believe) that the fetus does not have a "soul" until "the quickening".

You are entitled to hold whatever religious beliefs you choose.
You are NOT entitled to enshrine your beliefs into secular law that must be followed by everyone.

Religion is like a penis.
It's fine to be proud of yours.
But don't go waving it in people's faces or try to force it down their throats.

Republikkklans/Conservaturds are the actual hypocrites.
They want "smaller government", but they also want to control women's wombs.


Mac

Environment Man
03-04-2012, 10:13 PM
Zygotes and fetuses are NOT "children".
They have the potential to become children if carried to term.
Even the Catholic Church believes (or at least they used to believe) that the fetus does not have a "soul" until "the quickening".

You are entitled to hold whatever religious beliefs you choose.
You are NOT entitled to enshrine your beliefs into secular law that must be followed by everyone.

Religion is like a penis.
It's fine to be proud of yours.
But don't go waving it in people's faces or try to force it down their throats.

Republikkklans/Conservaturds are the actual hypocrites.
They want "smaller government", but they also want to control women's wombs.


Mac

Conceived persons should have full Constitutional rights.

You misrepresent. The rights of the Conceived Person are just important as those of the host.

Those are women being aborted too.

Mac McFadden
03-04-2012, 10:31 PM
There is no mention of "conceived persons" in The Constitution.
They do not exist.


Mac

Environment Man
03-04-2012, 10:33 PM
There is no mention of "conceived persons" in The Constitution.
They do not exist.


Mac

Not yet.

We haven't passed the Constitutional Amendment yet.

Be patient.

Mac McFadden
03-04-2012, 10:41 PM
Send me a memo AFTER it happens.
(yawn)


Mac

doctordog
03-04-2012, 10:53 PM
Not responsive to what I wrote in the least. Try again.

I had written:

"Unborn children aren't children. That's just you being a religious bigot and assuming we all must believe as you do. We don't. Deal with it."

Of course, it may be that according to your religion unborn life is human life. What makes your religious beliefs any more deserving of being enshrined in law than any one else's? Why do you suppose that your religious beliefs trump every one else's - especially in a Country that protects everyone's right to religious liberty.

So respond to these questions if you can.

Unborn are still children, if they were not, there would be no double murder charges when a pregant woman is murdered. NEXT

dsolo802
03-04-2012, 11:06 PM
Unborn are still children, if they were not, there would be no double murder charges when a pregant woman is murdered. NEXTGood try, but no.

Yes, states can pass individual statutes to make killing unborn life a crime, but they haven't yet attempted to change the law around abortion. For abortion purposes, unborn life is not considered human life. http://articles.nydailynews.com/2012-02-16/news/31069300_1_personhood-usa-abortion-gay-marriage

The statute under which Scott Peterson was doubly held to account in fact specifically exempts abortion from its scope.

So, when you accuse women who abort unborn life of being murderers, you are wrong. No one knows when unborn life becomes human. You have people who believe in good faith that unborn life is human life - and that is real for them. And you have people who believe in good faith that unborn life is not human life - and that is as real for them.

As things stand right now, within the parameters of Roe v. Wade the decision is left up to the individual conscience of each pregnant woman. Women are neither commanded to have abortions, nor to take unborn life to term. That is why pro-choice is called pro-choice - and not pro-abortion or pro-murder as demagogues on the right would call it.

Long story short: no contradiction for someone who is pro-choice to also be against the death penalty. Born life is considered human life. Only human life can be murdered.