disrupter
12-09-2007, 02:10 PM
Yeap folks, Giuliani not shy,
of course with his past getting coy now would seem not believable.
On 'Meet the Press' he was asked if he would provide security for any mistresses.
Isn't he currently married? This can't be good for a marriage can it?
Asked by host Tim Russert whether it would be "appropriate for a president to provide police protection for a mistress," Giuliani said it would, provided "someone has threatened to do harm."
"The reality is, it all came about because of my public position," the ex-mayor remarked, "because of the fact the when people are public or celebrities these kinds of threats take place."
Giuliani was being quizzed about why, in office, his then-girlfriend Judith Nathan received taxpayer-funded security detail and police chauffeuring, even though New York City law restricts those protections to the mayor's family.
Giuliani claimed that everything done for Nathan was based on a professional "threat assessment." Russert didn't ask why, if nothing was improper, Giuliani chose to hide the costs by billing them to obscure city agencies. But he did press Giuliani if the logic would apply to a president's mistress.http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2007/12/09/giuliani-if-i-have-a-pre_n_75979.html
While we have candidates like these, we don't need quite as many comedy writers.
Especially after Hillary was challenging Obama's kindergarten record. lol.
'If i knew in kindergarten, what i know now . . . "
of course with his past getting coy now would seem not believable.
On 'Meet the Press' he was asked if he would provide security for any mistresses.
Isn't he currently married? This can't be good for a marriage can it?
Asked by host Tim Russert whether it would be "appropriate for a president to provide police protection for a mistress," Giuliani said it would, provided "someone has threatened to do harm."
"The reality is, it all came about because of my public position," the ex-mayor remarked, "because of the fact the when people are public or celebrities these kinds of threats take place."
Giuliani was being quizzed about why, in office, his then-girlfriend Judith Nathan received taxpayer-funded security detail and police chauffeuring, even though New York City law restricts those protections to the mayor's family.
Giuliani claimed that everything done for Nathan was based on a professional "threat assessment." Russert didn't ask why, if nothing was improper, Giuliani chose to hide the costs by billing them to obscure city agencies. But he did press Giuliani if the logic would apply to a president's mistress.http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2007/12/09/giuliani-if-i-have-a-pre_n_75979.html
While we have candidates like these, we don't need quite as many comedy writers.
Especially after Hillary was challenging Obama's kindergarten record. lol.
'If i knew in kindergarten, what i know now . . . "