PDA

View Full Version : Subprime: Could result in 2 trillion dollar shock


disrupter
11-16-2007, 01:14 PM
U.S. could face $2 trillion lending shock: Goldman

Fri Nov 16, 7:54 AM ET

LONDON (Reuters) - The impact of the U.S. mortgage market crisis on the underlying economy could be "dramatic" as leveraged investors may need to scale back lending by up to $2 trillion, according to investment bank Goldman Sachs (GS.N).

In a report dated November 15, Goldman's chief U.S. economist Jan Hatzius said a "back-of-the-envelope" estimate of credit losses on outstanding mortgages, based on past default experience, was around $400 billion.

But unlike stock market losses, which are typically absorbed by "long-only" investors, this mortgage-related hit is mostly borne by leveraged investors such as banks, broker-dealers, hedge funds and government-sponsored enterprises.

And leveraged investors react to losses by actively cutting back lending to keep capital ratios from falling -- A bank targeting a constant capital ratio of 10 percent, for example, would need to shrink its balance by $10 for every $1 in losses.

"The macroeconomic consequences could be quite dramatic," Hatzius said in the note to clients. "If leveraged investors see $200 billion of the $400 billion aggregate credit loss, they might need to scale back their lending by $2 trillion."

"This is a large shock," he said, adding the number equates to 7 percent of total debt owed by U.S. non-financial sectors.

Hatzius said such a shock could produce a "substantial recession" if it occurred over one year, or a long period of sluggish growth if it occurred over two-to-four years.

One of a number of caveats outlined in the report was that baseline economic forecasts may already include significant reductions in the pace of mortgage lending.

But the conclusion remained a gloomy one regardless.

"The likely mortgage credit losses pose a significantly bigger macroeconomic risk than generally recognized," he wrote. "While the uncertainty is large, the associated downward pressure on lending raises the risk of significant weakness in economic activity."http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20071116/bs_nm/economy_us_credit_dc;_ylt=AmdbPeq1qnWP5YidnjwDn.Wy BhIF??

Certainly a sobering assessment.

2 Trillion dollars is one estimate of the total Iraq War costs.

Misplaced priorities, anyone?

Moby
11-16-2007, 02:49 PM
Everyone had the chance to read the PNAC white papers, read Bush's resume and understand how his family came into money. Every one that took that time knew this was coming but I have to admit, $300 to $750 Billion was the most I was expecting.

It's so sad that the emotional non-reading people voted for this man

moonman
11-16-2007, 03:56 PM
That's alotta scratch. The shame is 4 trillion down the poop shoot between Iraq and CDO's. Imagine what would be accomplished if we just adjusted some 'tudes and changed some priorities.

Americanadian
11-16-2007, 05:23 PM
Let's not forget the missing 2.3 trillion prior to 9/11.

How many trillion pissed into a hole so far?

Moby
11-16-2007, 05:40 PM
What's interesting is that every time you mention something like this the wingers never show up. It's almost like they have no concept of the dollars being spent.

I think they can do math but maybe not.

moonman
11-16-2007, 06:21 PM
The whackos will get on it as soon as Coulter or O'Reilly give them the talking points.