Who would Americans never vote for?

[radioguy]

Who would Americans never vote for?

http://www.dontfuckingexistanymore/ladymodsbigfuckingmouth/sheisafuckingdumbbitch/whowontyouvotefor.jpg

The top three on the list are all Democrats, including the Dem front-runner, and a GOP front-runner doesn’t even make an appearance until Giuliani in 9th place. Also note the top Republican on the list is Ron Paul... No shock there either.

[LadyMod at scam.com]

Who would Americans never vote for?

http://www.santiagosoceanservices.com/grim/whowontyouvotefor.jpg

The top three on the list are all Democrats, including the Dem front-runner, and a GOP front-runner doesn’t even make an appearance until Giuliani in 9th place. Also note the top Republican on the list is Ron Paul... No shock there either.

Afraid to link your sources now?

www.santiagosoceanservices.com

Real scientific there Grim.


:lmao2:

[Leeguana]

I'm confused by a few things here.

Number one, if you were to read into that poll, then the people on the bottom of the list (with lower % saying they would NEVER vote for them) should be more likely to get elected, right? Or does it just mean they are less polarizing? Or maybe the people polled aren't even sure who the hell they are?

Plus I can't find this from the source LadyMod listed. The link just takes me to some charter boat service out of Mexico. Wud up ? ? ?

[Leeguana]

Nevermind, I found the link:

zogby poll on rawstory (http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Poll_Half_of_Americans_would_never_1021.html).

BTW, pretty interesting that the three most honest of the bunch (Kucinich, Gravel, and Paul) are 3 of the top 4. Pretty funny. God I love Americans . . .:talktothehand:

[radioguy]

Afraid to link your sources now?

www.santiagosoceanservices.com

Real scientific there Grim.


:lmao2:

You are such a dumb fuck!

That happens to be where I hosted the picture... JFC.

That comes from a recent Zogby poll.

[radioguy]

Well now that in your ignorence, you have publicly disclosed Santiago's, I just deleted the pic. Why don't you look up that URL now Lady mod, and link us to that site!

Go find it at Zogby's if you want to see it now.

[Leeguana]

Well now that in your ignorence, you have publicly disclosed Santiago's, I just deleted the pic. Why don't you look up that URL now Lady mod, and link us to that site!

Go find it at Zogby's if you want to see it now.
If you're going to call someone ignorant, at least spell the word right, LOL. Kind of defeats the impact of the insult, don't you think? :lmao2:

[LadyMod at scam.com]

Well now that in your ignorence, you have publicly disclosed Santiago's, I just deleted the pic. Why don't you look up that URL now Lady mod, and link us to that site!

Go find it at Zogby's if you want to see it now.

Grim, if you weren't afraid to post the link (when the RULES require you to, as you so generously told me once) then no one would know about your other obsessions.

http://www.santiagosoceanservices.com/grim/whowontyouvotefor.jpg

There is the link in full that you deleted it from. It's a "Public" website. Shall I call one of the numbers and rent a boat for you? Even for an old hippy your aren't very smart, Muffin. LOL


Here is the story at the link supplied by Leeguana.


Bad news for New York's junior senator.

While Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-NY) has won broad support in national tracking polls in her quest for the presidency, the former first lady is steeped in negative attitudes, according to a Zogby International poll released Sunday.

Half of likely voters nationwide said they would never vote for New York Sen. Hillary Clinton, in a poll Zogby conducted Oct. 11-15, 2007, with a margin of error of +/– 1.0 percentage point.

"This is up from 46% who said they could never vote for Clinton in a Zogby International telephone survey conducted in early March," the poll asserts. "Older voters are most resistant to Clinton – 59% of those age 65 and older said they would never vote for the New York senator, but she is much more acceptable to younger voters: 42% of those age 18–29 said they would never vote for Clinton for President."

Rep. Dennis Kucinich and former Sen. Mike Gravel rank second and third on the "who I'd never vote" for list, respectively.

Democratic New Mexico governor Bill Richardson, Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL) and former Republican Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee fared best, suggesting they could do better in national polls as voters get to know them better.

"Richardson was forever objectionable as President to 34%, while 35% said they could never vote for Huckabee and 37% said they would never cast a presidential ballot for Obama," the survey showed.

No word on Comedy Central's Stephen Colbert, who entered the race last week.

[LadyMod at scam.com]

http://www.haloscan.com/comments/rawstory/7995a/

OH fiddle de dee ......people won't vote for any democrat for president!! According to this poll? How in the hell in all the other polls is Clinton along with the democrats are handing up a bunch of whup ass to each and every one of the republican candidates. Well gee these polls they ought to get together on something shouldn't they.

Oh, wait, then that would mean they would be a irelavant as hell...you know like the pres-i-dent.
Marge | Email | Homepage | 10.21.07 - 12:58 pm
Direct link to this comment

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

BIG DEAL. HALF OF ALL AMERICANS NEVER VOTED FOR BUSH EITHER. ALL SHE HAS TO DO IS PLAY THE ODDS WITH THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE.
Anonymous | Email | Homepage | 10.21.07 - 1:09 pm
Direct link to this comment

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

How randomized is an internet survey that purports to track "older" internet users who happen to have a strong opinion on Pres. candidates...
What were the recruitment techniques, what was the verification, what a bunch of crap
Anonymous | Email | Homepage | 10.21.07 - 1:11 pm
Direct link to this comment

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Comments are much more fun to read. LOL

[LadyMod at scam.com]

If you're going to call someone ignorant, at least spell the word right, LOL. Kind of defeats the impact of the insult, don't you think? :lmao2:

ROFL, he's not the brightest crayon in the box.


:lmao2:

[Smurf-Herder]

Nevermind, I found the link:

zogby poll on rawstory (http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Poll_Half_of_Americans_would_never_1021.html).

BTW, pretty interesting that the three most honest of the bunch (Kucinich, Gravel, and Paul) are 3 of the top 4. Pretty funny. God I love Americans . . .:talktothehand:

Gravel?

Who's Gravel? Is he another nutty-buddy like Kucinich and Paul?

[Leeguana]

Gravel?

Who's Gravel? Is he another nutty-buddy like Kucinich and Paul?
You are attempting to be funny, right?

I think you need to put a little more effort into it.

[Smurf-Herder]

You are attempting to be funny, right?

I think you need to put a little more effort into it.

Okay.

So, who's Gravel?

Is he more well-known than the two trolls?

[Leeguana]

Okay.

So, who's Gravel?

Is he more well-known than the two trolls?
God I love America. It's all about being "well known", LOL. It does help in get elected though, doesn't it?

I just figured since this was a political forum you would know most of the candidates. At least the ones that have participated in the debates so far.

Oh well. He's a former Alaska senator.

Google him if you wish. You may not agree with him on much, but he's an honest, stand up guy, as are Kucinich and Paul.

[Moby]

Wow. A GOP propaganda web site won't vote for a woman.

This is news?

RadioGuy, just when I thought you didn't have a sense of humor :lmao2:

[Little Red Dog]

So, I don't know about you guys, but with when I hover my cursor over the thread titles, I get to read the first few lines of the post. It's a real time saver sometimes.

And when I hover my cursor over the title of this thread, this is the link I pick up for the "jpg" in radioguy's first post:

www.dontfuckingexistanymore/ladymodsbigfuckingmouth/sheisadumbfuckingbitch/whowontyouvotefor.jpg

Now, I'm as tired as anyone else of this stupid and immature little feud these two insist on dragging out in front of everyone, but I have to admit, this gives me pause.

Radioguy, you need help. Sincerely. I mean that. You really do. This kind of rage/obsession with someone on an Internet forum....? Someone you don't even know? Someone who should have zero impact on your life? This is unbalanced behavior stuff. Really.

I understand that she deliberately tries to piss you off. But you can take all the fun out of it if you just put her on "ignore".

Mods, heads up on this one.

[asroc]

Still too early to make hay out of public opinion polls, you don't know who's getting the noms in either party, honestly.

At this point in 2003 the dems thought Howard Dean was a sure thing. At this point in the 2000 election McCain was the sure bet for the Reps.

So you'll excuse me if I find all this blathering speculation and conjecture rather humorous.

[disrupter]

It doesn't matter much if they don't vote for one person as long as they don't cast a vote for anyone else to oppose them.

ie. only 45% of registered voters voted for candidate X, but since that was 100% of people who actually voted, candidate X won in a landslide.

If you can't even generate enough enthusiasm to get them to vote FOR a candidate, then the fact that they didn't vote for someone else means they have ZERO effect on the election.

A 'not vote' is not a vote.