PDA

View Full Version : Shockingly vile statedment by Democratic Rep. Pete Stark


Frankg
10-18-2007, 07:58 PM
Attack on President Bush Continues Past SCHIP Veto Override Vote

Thursday, October 18, 2007
http://www.foxnews.com/images/foxnews_story.gif
WASHINGTON — Democratic Rep. Pete Stark launched a shocking one-man assault on the Bush administration Thursday, interrupting floor debate before a failed attempt to override President Bush's veto of the so-called SCHIP bill to suggest that U.S. troops in Iraq are getting their heads "blown off for the president's amusement."
The vote to override the veto of the State Children's Health Insurance Program bill failed, 273-156, 14 votes shy of the number necessary.
But before the vote was taken, action on the failed measure screeched to a brief halt when Republicans asked that the 18-term congressman's remarks be "taken down," or challenged as against House rules that prohibit personal attacks on fellow lawmakers or the president.
The challenge came after Stark said: "I would just like to point out that under the Republican (http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,303119,00.html#) plan, by 2017 we probably will have killed 20,000 soldiers in Iraq, spending $200 billion."
The parliamentarian found that those remarks were not so inflammatory as to be outside the boundaries of House decorum. Rep. Ellen Tauscher, who was leading the floor debate, allowed them to stand as is in the congressional record.
While that particular sentence was found to be in order, Stark did not withhold his anger at Bush for both his veto and his leadership in the war in Iraq.
/**/
In a heated floor speech, Stark repeatedly made the charge that the president would rather use government revenues to send U.S. soldiers to war than to pay for low-income kids' health care. A longtime war critic, Stark said the president couldn't find $35 billion to expand SCHIP but at the same time had requested an extra $200 billion to pay for military operations in Iraq.
"Where are you going to get that money? Are you going to tell us lies like you're telling us today? Is that how you're going to fund the war? You don't have money to fund the war or children. But you're going to spend it to blow up innocent people if we can get enough kids to grow old, enough for you to send to Iraq to get their heads blown off for the president's amusement," Stark said.

"President Bush's (http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,303119,00.html#) statements about children's health shouldn't be taken any more seriously than his lies about the war in Iraq. The truth is that Bush just likes to blow things up in Iraq, in the United States, and in Congress. I urge my colleagues to vote to override his veto," he continued.

After that statement, Tauscher, D-Calif., gently reminded Stark that personal attacks are not permitted. But Rep. Kevin Brady, R-Texas, stood up and said the "general reminder" doesn't adequately chastise Stark.

"It is despicable to have a member of this Congress accuse the president, any president, of willfully blowing the heads, quote, 'blowing the heads off' our young men and women over in Iraq and Afghanistan," Brady said. "It is dead wrong, and it is beneath contempt as well that we will sit here silently and allow such a remark to be tolerated, accepted, if not embraced."
At the time, however, Brady did not challenge the remarks.

The fight came just before the House voted on whether to override the veto, an expected loss for Democrats who were unable — despite two weeks of cajoling lawmakers in both parties — to get any Republicans to switch their prior votes against the bill.

With 429 members of Congress at Thursday's vote — two seats are vacant as a result of members' deaths — Democrats needed 287 votes, or two-thirds of present members, to override the veto.

Democratic (http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,303119,00.html#) leaders swore in Massachusetts special election winner Niki Tsongas in order to get one more vote. Tsongas won the election on Tuesday to replace Democrat Marty Meehan.

Even after the vote was taken, the bickering continued. House Minority Leader John Boehner told reporters that Spark's outburst was merely symptomatic of Democratic knowledge of their impending loss.
"I always believe when your political opponents are committing suicide, there's no reason to murder them," Boehner, R-Ohio, said.
The Republican National Committee and Veterans For Freedom, a GOP-leaning group, also hit back at Stark.

"Pete Stark's out-of-control rant is an insult to every American, Democrat (http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,303119,00.html#) or Republican. It is one thing to disagree with the war in Iraq, but it is another to go to the floor of the U.S. House of Representatives and rave that the men and women of the United States Armed Forces are '[blowing] up innocent people.' The Democrats cannot stop playing partisan politics," said RNC Chairman Mike Duncan.

“This sort of rhetoric is simply beyond the bounds of civil discourse on the floor of the United States House of Representatives. Decency demands that Congressman Stark retract his remarks and apologize,” said Pete Hegseth, Executive Director of Vets for Freedom who condemned the comments.
Stark, however, isn't about to apologize.

"I have nothing but respect for our brave men and women in uniform and wish them the very best. But I respect neither the commander-in-chief who keeps them in harm's way nor the chickenhawks in Congress who vote to deny children health care," Stark said. "These brave men and women are in Iraq to protect our children — as should Republicans in Congress."

The 274 votes on the SCHIP bill were even less than a predicted 276 votes from a Democratic House aide on Wednesday. The total was 9 more than the original House vote of 265-159, in which 45 Republicans voted for the SCHIP bill, eight Democrats voted no and three Democrats missed the vote.
The nine-member difference suggests that Democrats were unable to get any Republicans to defect from their original vote.

The vote comes after millions were spent on ads by groups supporting Democrats, hundreds of "protests" and pro-SCHIP events.

With the veto sustained, lawmakers will have to enter into negotiations with the White House to cut a new deal with a president they have demonized for two weeks as something akin to a heartless tyrant.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said she spoke with President Bush about a potential compromise during a ceremony for the Dalai Lama.

"Every time I get a chance to talk to the president, I try to make the case for America's children," Pelosi said.

After the vote, House Minority Leader Steny Hoyer said Democrats plan to bring up new legislation in a couple weeks.

"We will not rest. We will not stop our efforts until we had 10 million children to health insurance," he said.

White House Press Secretary (http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,303119,00.html#) Dana Perino issued an olive branch after the vote, saying the administration wants to reauthorize the program that expired with the last fiscal year budget.

"We look forward to finding common ground on legislation that covers the more than 500,000 poor children who are eligible for SCHIP but have not yet been enrolled. If enrolling these children requires more than the 20 percent funding increase proposed by the president, we will work with Congress to find the necessary money," Perino said.

Bush has assigned three top advisers to try to negotiate a new deal. Leading the discussions for his administration are Mike Leavitt, the health and human services secretary; Al Hubbard, director of the National Economic Council; and Jim Nussle, the White House budget chief.

Bush has recommended a $5 billion increase, bringing total spending over five years to $30 billion — half the level called for in the bill that he vetoed. The president has said the measure that passed Congress encourages families with higher incomes to drop private coverage so that they can get their insurance paid for by the government.

radioguy
10-18-2007, 08:43 PM
Yikes!

That one is going to leave a mark.

Bill
10-18-2007, 08:44 PM
What's vile about that?

I didn't read the whole thing, maybe I missed it.

stefan segal
10-18-2007, 08:51 PM
frankg...I have two things to say:

1.) There isn't enough pointing out of the facts...to identify shit when one smells it... in congress...and everywhere else in this country.

2.) That you assume theres a bigger outrage than not covering children's health in preference to killing anybody and everybody in Iraq, says all there needs to say about your identity and that of your ilk.

Stefan

radioguy
10-18-2007, 09:14 PM
The man hit the "trifecta" of out of line comments.

"...But you're going to spend it to blow up innocent people if we can get enough kids to grow old, enough for you to send to Iraq to get their heads blown off for the president's amusement," Stark said.

1. He just summed up what he feels is the main thing the United States is doing/accomplishing in the war over in Iraq... The blowing up of innocent people.

2. The "get their heads blown off" comment he made, is probably the most insensitive and classless remark I've heard come from and elected American representative, since this war started. How do you think the husbands, wives, children and parents of our military members deployed over there feel right about now?

3. He just told the troops, their families and most importantly, our enemies over in the middle east that our president not only kills innocent people over there, but he gets a kick out of doing so.

Like I said, the democrats hit the trifecta with that one.

And you all on the left wonder how your patriotism could ever be questioned. :banghead:

LadyMod at scam.com
10-18-2007, 09:31 PM
He just told the troops, their families and most importantly, our enemies over in the middle east that our president not only kills innocent people over there, but he gets a kick out of doing so.

Like I said, the democrats hit the trifecta with that one.

And you all on the left wonder how your patriotism could ever be questioned. :banghead:


Well right now I'm wondering why telling the troops and their families (the enemy figured it out a long time ago) the truth about why Bush is insisting on keeping a full army in Iraq is supposed to be insensitive?

What's insensitive and cruel is the fact that Bush insists on keeping them there to make a name for himself. The only name he's gonna be remembered by will have to be censored so little children won't hear it.


:punchballs: :gossip: :censored:

radioguy
10-18-2007, 09:34 PM
Nobody was talking to you, so FUCK OFF YOU OLD HAG!

LadyMod at scam.com
10-18-2007, 10:02 PM
Nobody was talking to you, so FUCK OFF YOU OLD HAG!

You know? Large font isn't the only thing that looks like yelling and being threatening. It's long been known that All Caps is also considered yelling.

:taunt:

Bill
10-18-2007, 10:04 PM
1. He just summed up what he feels is the main thing the United States is doing/accomplishing in the war over in Iraq... The blowing up of innocent people.

2. The "get their heads blown off" comment he made, is probably the most insensitive and classless remark I've heard come from and elected American representative, since this war started. How do you think the husbands, wives, children and parents of our military members deployed over there feel right about now?

3. He just told the troops, their families and most importantly, our enemies over in the middle east that our president not only kills innocent people over there, but he gets a kick out of doing so.

And you all on the left wonder how your patriotism could ever be questioned. :banghead:

The Iraqis were innocent. They did nothing to us. We attacked them, and destroyed their country, and still constantly blow up innocents, women and children.

And like that msnbc article said, telling the story of those two old guys, the engineer and the contracter, they took up arms to drive out the american invaders and occupation. That makes them innocent too.

If I were a grunt, I'd rather get my head blown off than my brain just blown partly out.

I like how you like to hide behind "support the troops". It's funny.

If the president don't want to kill innocents, maybe he should stop.

Well, like you say, all the brave and stupid iraqis are dead, it's peaceful now, the soldiers are coming home.

UserName
10-18-2007, 10:12 PM
I'm still waiting for this feculent little liar to apologize for false accusations he made in another thread.

BTW frank.... That's the nicest thing I could think to call you. You know what the definition of Liar is? Someone who has lied or who lies repeatedly. So, when you say something about someone, then run away when confronted with your lies, I'm describing you, not calling you names.

LadyMod at scam.com
10-18-2007, 10:14 PM
If the president don't want to kill innocents, maybe he should stop.

Exactly. But so far, all I can see is that he doesn't care about veterans, doesn't care about blacks in Louisiana, doesn't care about children, doesn't care about the elderly. I can't think of one thing Bush has done that shows he gives a damn about anyone or anything beyond his oil buddies. Not one.

Well, like you say, all the brave and stupid iraqis are dead, it's peaceful now, the soldiers are coming home.

When? Don't hold out now. When are they coming home?


Lady Mod

LadyMod at scam.com
10-18-2007, 10:15 PM
I'm still waiting for this feculent little liar to apologize for false accusations he made in another thread.

BTW frank.... That's the nicest thing I could think to call you. You know what the definition of Liar is? Someone who has lied or who lies repeatedly. So, when you say something about someone, then run away when confronted with your lies, I'm describing you, not calling you names.

Go back and look at that thread. He did.


Lady Mod

Bill
10-18-2007, 10:16 PM
You know? Large font isn't the only thing that looks like yelling and being threatening. It's long been known that All Caps is also considered yelling.

:taunt:

It's not appropriate to try to provoke banning, ladymod.

Sometimes it looks an awful lot like you are trying to pick a fight.

If this breaks out into a fight, I will simply ban both of you.

Ignore each other, please. You could always choose not to post in each other's threads.

And radioguy, she's right about the all caps. It is traditionally considered yelling, so, don't do that.

Bold should do well enough for you.

UserName
10-18-2007, 10:31 PM
Go back and look at that thread. He did.


Lady Mod

I looked, didn't see anywhere where he said he was sorry for being a lying sack of...... well.... you know.:confused:
But I can accept the fact that he admitted he was wrong. That took some "backbone" I guess.;)

LadyMod at scam.com
10-18-2007, 10:36 PM
It's not appropriate to try to provoke banning, ladymod.

Sometimes it looks an awful lot like you are trying to pick a fight.

If this breaks out into a fight, I will simply ban both of you.

Ignore each other, please. You could always choose not to post in each other's threads.

And radioguy, she's right about the all caps. It is traditionally considered yelling, so, don't do that.

Bold should do well enough for you.


Then I suggest you go back and start reading all these messages again. I treat him no differently than I always have, nor any different than any other Neocon. You didn't have a problem with it before.

I simply responded to something he has said and he goes off. I didn't provoke, taunt or anything else. I am not going to alter my style of responding, that I've used with others, it's not like he's a special case here, simply because he can't control his temper. If he says something I wish to respond to, I'll respond, like I do with everyone else. AND I might add, in the same or similar manner I have witnessed You and others who respond to his posts. Did you really think that I am so stupid that I haven't observed how he is responded to? I have done no differently nor any worse.

He needs to get a grip on himself. Suddenly he's Mr. Sensitive. Tell him to grow up and we might get to continue some of these discussions without his vulgar outbursts. One last thing, Sugar, this was NOT his thread FrankG authored it.

Lady Mod

LadyMod at scam.com
10-18-2007, 10:39 PM
I looked, didn't see anywhere where he said he was sorry for being a lying sack of...... well.... you know.:confused:
But I can accept the fact that he admitted he was wrong. That took some "backbone" I guess.;)

From a Neocon, that WAS a bonified apology.


LOL

radioguy
10-19-2007, 03:54 AM
From a Neocon, that WAS a bonified apology.


LOL

Fuck Off Bitch!

LadyMod at scam.com
10-19-2007, 07:37 AM
Fuck Off Bitch!

Oh look, the great debater is back. Kind of SOS but he's back. Let's everyone grovel now. 1..2.......3! :bowdown:




Lady Mod


P.S. SOS = Stuck On Stupid

disrupter
10-19-2007, 08:10 AM
It is for war profiteering AND the president's amusement.

My God, the man mocked a woman on death row begging for her life.

Bush is psychopathic sadist.

Get real.

Make that an unelected, criminal, drug dealer user, alcoholic, military deserter, psychopathic sadist.

In short WARPED.

America, land of the psychopathic, warped mercenaries.

radioguy
10-19-2007, 08:52 AM
I have only two things to say here.

First, Lady mod is correct Bill.

I did in fact draw first blood on this thread. The truth is, I got sick and tired of her bullshit insults and innuendos she continued to write, on nearly every other thread I've posted on in the last 3 days, so I said "Fuck It".

Since it became clear that she had once again ignored requests to knock her shit off... and it became clear that once again, nobody seemed to give a damn that she has continued to try and bait me into a flame war... I felt there was no reason why I should put up with it any longer, so I decided that I would speak my mind whenever the mood strikes me. And since I had just read another one of her subtle little insults before jumping to this thread, the mood struck me.

The Second thing I wanted to say, I direct to the person here that defends Jew hating racist's, like Hal Turner...

Fuck Off Lady Mod!

disrupter
10-19-2007, 08:57 AM
that woman 'drove' him to do it.

hmmm, ever heard that one before?

LadyMod at scam.com
10-19-2007, 10:12 AM
I have only two things to say here.

First, Lady mod is correct Bill.

I did in fact draw first blood on this thread. The truth is, I got sick and tired of her bullshit insults and innuendos she continued to write, on nearly every other thread I've posted on in the last 3 days, so I said "Fuck It".

Since it became clear that she had once again ignored requests to knock her shit off... and it became clear that once again, nobody seemed to give a damn that she has continued to try and bait me into a flame war... I felt there was no reason why I should put up with it any longer, so I decided that I would speak my mind whenever the mood strikes me. And since I had just read another one of her subtle little insults before jumping to this thread, the mood struck me.

The Second thing I wanted to say, I direct to the person here that defends Jew hating racist's, like Hal Turner...

Fuck Off Lady Mod!

Love you too sweetie. ;)

You say the most insane things sometimes Muffin, I have to respond. However, nothing I've said should have elicited the kind of responses you are becomming known for. Remove the chip off your shoulder, Jim. And take off the dark glasses, you might find yourself seeing more clearly then.


Lady Mod

Cat slave
10-19-2007, 11:43 AM
What the low life politician said should be responded to by his peers. If there
was even a trace of class in the congress, you know, the one that has an 11%
approval rating, they would call him up on his statement as it was far over the
line and completely inappropriate.

Most of us, even those who trusted Bush before, now loathe him and hate this
war, but having a vicious little temper fit when his side didnt get its way is
beyond the pale, over the line and a sign of mental instability.

Giive us a break. We are not totally stupid. Medical care is never denied a
child. Does anyone know a child in need??? At the very least, saying that a
parent is too stupid or lazy to find more than this, they can access care at a public
health center. Then there is Medicaid, TNCare, and just flat out free health
care at ERs which those of us who have insurance are paying for increasingly
month by month.

And not increasisng is not eliminating. It is renewing at the current level. DUH!
Not is increasing is not a cut. If an empoloyer paid you at your current
wage would you say that your wages had been cut???? Leave out the COLA
and focus on the wage. If it stays the same has it been cut??? Cant have
it both ways.

I dont want government/socialized health care. Anyone ever take a good
look at Canada and the UK? Thats why so many come to the states.
Waiting in line for tests, procedures and life saving treatments is not a good
way to experience "health care". And the quality, good god!!!

My daughter lost her job/insurance and she now accesses care through our little ole
country town public health center. There is help out there, its just politically
expedient for buying votes.

Little Red Dog
10-19-2007, 01:21 PM
SCHIP is being confused with "public health care". It's not the same. SCHIP is for working families who DON'T qualify for public assistance.

So, using the example of your daughter, cat slave (nothing personal), when she lost her job she was eligible for Medicare, etc. However, if she had been working and her family was earning an income just over the poverty line, she would not be eligible.

The poverty line is generally so low that it's hard to see how someone making a couple hundred dollars over that is significantly better off. That's another discussion, however. What it effectively means, though, is that if you are working and are in that position, you are still barely getting by. Private insurance is almost certainly our of your reach.

And for families of children who have a pre-existing condition, private insurance is either prohibitively expensive, or not available at all.

There are millions of families who fall in this gap. (I'm not making a political agrument here; there just are).

Enter SCHIP to close the gap.

Little Red Dog
10-19-2007, 02:18 PM
To bring this thread back on track:

Stark did not attack the troops. He specifically directed his vitriol to Bush and his chickenhawk supporters who refuse to protect those troops.

Personally, I have no problem with someone finally saying, in plain language, they have no respect for a "commander-in-chief" who deserves none.

Bush is a disgrace to this country, the office he holds, and the honor bestowed upon him. This posturing draft-dodger not only plunged America into an illegal and unnecessary war, he keeps our troops bogged down in harm's way. And now he threatens to begin WWIII all by his little self.

This is beyond not funny. And finally someone had the balls to call this egomanical psychopath out. It's about time.

No. Rep. Stark's outburst may have been inappropriate for the setting, but if I were him, I wouldn't be apologizing either.

Cat slave
10-19-2007, 02:44 PM
I just think it was really ugly! His temper fit served no one at all and just
made himself look bad.

LRD, Bush deserves every foul word anyone could use toward him. He will
soon be gone and we need to think ahead....oh, what to do!!!

I know he directed nothing toward the troops but it probably was painful for
parents of soldiers to hear.

Many of us see SCHIP is baby steps to gov run health care.

I appreciate your civilized response!:thumbsup:

Cat slave
10-19-2007, 02:45 PM
Oh, my daughter would never lower herself to suck off the services for anything.

Americanadian
10-19-2007, 03:04 PM
Amazing isn't it? Someone in Congress sheds their "politically correct" facade "shoots from the hip", tells it like it is and everyone is scrambling with the PR patchup. How many other Americans feel likewise? I wager the majority of Americans feel likewise. Why should he apologize for speaking the obvious and blatant truth? Anyone with a conscience and upholds truth rather than tyranny would say likewise. Perhaps his courage will encourage others to do the same. It is time tyranny is purged from America.

kres24GT
10-19-2007, 03:11 PM
Why do people not understand they can rationally disagree with the war?

disrupter
10-19-2007, 03:46 PM
What about irrational support of the war?

How exactly do you counter that?

Fire with fire comes to my mind, unless you have a better answer?

kittens
10-19-2007, 04:07 PM
I think what Stark said is spot on. Bush, Cheney, et al are psychopaths when it comes to war. War is Peace for these Straussian liars.

They are not incompetent. No no no. You don't get where you are and stay there for being incompetent.

They've accomplished their aims. The War on Terror (the 9/11 Wars) are huge successes for the military-intellegence-surveillance industrial complex. They're virtually guaranteed budgets for the forseeable future. We've sown the seed for real retail terrorism after kicking the whole thing off with various false flag attacks.

Americanadian
10-19-2007, 04:44 PM
Fuck Off Bitch!


LOL...my, my....someone woke up on the wrong side of their cage this morning.

Or perhaps Radioguy was enrgaed with the discovery of an entire bunch of bananas which were squashed in his kitchen. I'm sure the local supermarket shares some of the blame when he found out they no longer stock his preferred brand of 10 ply toilet paper and has to tolerate the rough 1 ply "sandpaper" in the interim. Every day he uses his 1 ply replacement he feels justified spewing his venomous contributions here at DCJunkies because his anus is feeling a little tender. It's those damn libruls' fault!!

Perhaps he should try standing when typing his posts to alleviate the discomfort and spare all of us his apparent acrimonious bolded font rants.

Bill
10-19-2007, 05:00 PM
Fuck Off Bitch!

Thank you, radioguy, for modifying your behavior.

I respect that.

If Ladymod can't resist the urge to try picking a fight, you're allowed to harass her back, and neither you or her are allowed to be threatening.

And nobody is allowed to say things that can be reasonably thought to be slander and libel.

And Ladymod, I've already said that if this fight-picking devolves into a real fight, I'll ban you both. That's a formal warning.

So, it's a mutally assured destruction scenario.

I'm not interested in letting histories from other boards dominate everything that happens here.

UserName
10-19-2007, 05:02 PM
LOL...my, my....someone woke up on the wrong side of their cage this morning.

You know the routine AC, march in lockstep with the fascist neo-con doctrine or be subjected to "shockingly vile statements" from their followers. Seems kinda hypocritical that one would condemn someone for vile statements while making vile statements of their own don't you think?
I guess stupid is as stupid does.

disrupter
10-19-2007, 05:04 PM
radioguy only goes rabid on people who don't painfully adhere to his baseless viewpoint.

How very upstanding of him.

Don't forget your muzzle when you go out in public.

disrupter
10-19-2007, 05:06 PM
Talk about shockingly vile, have you heard about the smear campaigns the Neoslimes have done on the children featured in defense of SCHIP?

These people are an all new lowest form of life. Lying, even about children for their mass murder political agenda. They are just scum.

LadyMod at scam.com
10-19-2007, 05:11 PM
Thank you, radioguy, for modifying your behavior.

I respect that.

If Ladymod can't resist the urge to try picking a fight, you're allowed to harass her back, and neither you or her are allowed to be threatening.

And nobody is allowed to say things that can be reasonably thought to be slander and libel.

And Ladymod, I've already said that if this fight-picking devolves into a real fight, I'll ban you both. That's a formal warning.

So, it's a mutally assured destruction scenario.

I'm not interested in letting histories from other boards dominate everything that happens here.

I didn't bring up any history from any other board. And I'm not picking fights. Like it or not, I'm not the one trying to pick a fight. Give him a hard time over his posts, yes, but not pick a fight. If I wanted a fight, you would know it and it would be over in short order whether you stepped in or not.

I never asked that he not be allowed to "harass" me back. What I do say is that I shouldn't have to tolerate him dogging me on every thread with the same bitch about how people were or were not treated on the forum that I moderate. Not only is it not on topic here but it has nothing to do with any kind of treatment he gets here.

That is the one bit of truth even YOU managed to overlook.

Lady Mod

moonman
10-19-2007, 05:56 PM
Finally a Democrat with a spine and passion. Stark's comments are long overdue.

Americanadian
10-19-2007, 08:36 PM
You know the routine AC, march in lockstep with the fascist neo-con doctrine or be subjected to "shockingly vile statements" from their followers. Seems kinda hypocritical that one would condemn someone for vile statements while making vile statements of their own don't you think?
I guess stupid is as stupid does.

Only the willfully clueless slavering morons who lavish praise on their Neocon war criminal leaders would be blind enough not to see the obvious. The bullshit they've been subjected to for countless years requires more than windex to clean their eyes with. Sulphuric acid may be the last resort.

Right Wing attitude: We'll find a way to raise money for the abattoir in Iraq but when it comes to Americans and their chilren, "fuck 'em" is the message every time.

I say fuck the right wing and any politician who puts foreign interests above American needs.

Americanadian
10-19-2007, 08:44 PM
Finally a Democrat with a spine and passion. Stark's comments are long overdue.

It's always the case. Anyone who is brazen enough to step out of line with the goosestepping regiment is villified and slandered. When someone exudes such courage to merely voice what the majority of America already believes in addition to possibly jeopardizing their career, they need support. If people fail to support those whom are brave enough to speak out against the status quo, less will be willing to stand up next time.

LadyMod at scam.com
10-19-2007, 08:56 PM
Finally a Democrat with a spine and passion. Stark's comments are long overdue.


Let's hope more of them find one.


:D