Pro-War Thugs Attack Veteran's dad

[disrupter]

Pro-War Protesters Assault Father Of Soldier Killed in Iraq
A counter-demonstration was also held by supporters of the war. One prominent peace activist Carlos Arredondo was beaten by pro-war activists. Arredondo's son Alex died in Iraq three years ago. To honor Alex's memory, Carlos has been crisscrossing the country pulling a flag-draped coffin. He marched with the coffin on Saturday and then left the march to return the coffin to his truck. That's when a pro-war supporter tried to rip a photo of Carlos' son from the coffin. When Carlos tried to save the photograph, he said a group of pro-war activists attacked him.

* Carlos Arredondo: "I was assaulted by a group of pro-war people. They come into the ground, and they kicked me and punched me. As a citizen of this country, it’s my duty and my responsibility to participate. As a father, who I lost my son in Iraq, I got to honor my son."http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=07/09/17/1411227

[Smurf-Herder]

Air Force Airman Shot By Anti-war Protestor on July 4, Media Mum
http://www.newsbusters.org/node/14130

[Linkster]

Fortunately that little "anti-war" part has been disproven and it was also proved that M Malkin lied - as she didnt have the suicide notes and the prosecuter has never released the contents - although they do say that the right-wing blogs had it all wrong:
http://www.philly.com/inquirer/local/20070718_Airmans_shooting__Antiwar_passion_.html

[disrupter]

another right wing smurf-turd.

what a stinking piece of shit.

[Smurf-Herder]

Okay then ............

So?

So that proves all pro-war people are violent, but no anti-war people can be?

Is that your point?

[Linkster]

I dont think anyone was trying to make a real point - both sides tend to throw up all kinds of noise when they are trying to sway opinion - and neither side works it very well

[disrupter]

Left wingers are about people,

right wingers are about corporations & organizations.

Democrats govern for people,

Republicans govern in spite of them.

[asroc]

pretty naive

[Smurf-Herder]

Left wingers are about people,

right wingers are about corporations & organizations.

Democrats govern for people,

Republicans govern in spite of them.

Now that's probably the most simplistic, ignorant, biased thing I think I've ever heard.

Did you get that from a Code Pink religious tract?

[disrupter]

that should be small 'd' democrats.

The Democratic party is only spottily & marginally better than the Republicans.

I still think it holds truth.

aim for people who govern for you,
rather than those who govern in spite of you.

the neocons govern for corruption & corporations, & in spite of both the American people & people around the world.

they get pretty close to being unmitigated evil.

[Smurf-Herder]

that should be small 'd' democrats.

The Democratic party is only spottily & marginally better than the Republicans.

I still think it holds truth.

aim for people who govern for you,
rather than those who govern in spite of you.

the neocons govern for corruption & corporations, & in spite of both the American people & people around the world.

they get pretty close to being unmitigated evil.

Look, the way I see it, everybody is a unique individual, with their own unique view on everything.

And there are just as many things you can point to on the Democrats as the Republicans. They just keep it covered better, by it being under-reported in the MSM.

[disrupter]

But we should be in lock step behind generals & people who get installed in the whitehouse without question?

The reason the republicans have committed more corruption is because they are in power, & haven't even been seriously challenged for years.

Luckily with the democrats they will have to keep it cleaner when they probably take over, because of unrelenting critics like you.

For that i thank you.

[Smurf-Herder]

But we should be in lock step behind generals & people who get installed in the whitehouse without question?

The reason the republicans have committed more corruption is because they are in power, & haven't even been seriously challenged for years.

Luckily with the democrats they will have to keep it cleaner when they probably take over, because of unrelenting critics like you.

For that i thank you.


And now that the Democrats have taken over Congress, the Congress has the lowest approval rating in history.

[disrupter]

the republicans are slicker liars.

[Smurf-Herder]

the republicans are slicker liars.

Great comeback :lmao2:

[disrupter]

its true.

look at Craig, he still can't get past the fact he is at the very least bi-sexual.

Self-delusion must be a real boon to pathological liars.

[Smurf-Herder]

its true.

look at Craig, he still can't get past the fact he is at the very least bi-sexual.

Self-delusion must be a real boon to pathological liars.

Like John Kerry, Bill Clinton, William Jefferson, etc.?

[disrupter]

no they are mentally coherent enough to know when they are lying.

Neocons operate in a state of confusion/delusion.
God's mystic program that isn't required to make one iota of sense in reality.

In short they are crazy.

meat puppets for god knows what.
aliens, brain amoebas, brain tumors, who knows what makes that insanity operate.

[Smurf-Herder]

no they are mentally coherent enough to know when they are lying.

Neocons operate in a state of confusion/delusion.
God's mystic program that isn't required to make one iota of sense in reality.

In short they are crazy.

meat puppets for god knows what.
aliens, brain amoebas, brain tumors, who knows what makes that insanity operate.

That's your crazy opinion - that all Republicans are delusional, but no Democrats are.

You prove my point about you.

[disrupter]

well i accept that neoconmen could be wickedly excellent actors.

maybe they flip flop back & forth.

One day they are maniacally wicked
the next they are just confused servants of a psychotic god.

you haven't made a point about me.
difficult to prove a point you haven't actually made isn't it?

you said 'i am not a neocon, i am a libertarian', but you seem to reflexively defend them?
are you the mother, father, son, daughter of a neocon?

obviously you have a deep emotional attachment to the neocons.

[Smurf-Herder]

well i accept that neoconmen could be wickedly excellent actors.

maybe they flip flop back & forth.

One day they are maniacally wicked
the next they are just confused servants of a psychotic god.

you haven't made a point about me.
difficult to prove a point you haven't actually made isn't it?

you said 'i am not a neocon, i am a libertarian', but you seem to reflexively defend them?
are you the mother, father, son, daughter of a neocon?

obviously you have a deep emotional attachment to the neocons.

I defend principles. Not conservatives on everything.

You really come across as a totally brainwashed wacko.

[disrupter]

what a cutting intellectual acid 'brainwashed wacko'.

gee, can i borrow that profoundly original phrase.

maybe you should get a patent or copyright on that.

Let's see, you don't even know if you are a libertarian or not,
i certainly hope you keep better track of those principles you claim to have.

I won't bother to ask what the heck they are, because i am sure you are busy still throwing darts at a board to figure out which ones they are.