FOX NEWS/entertainment is #1.... [Archive] - DC Junkies Political Message Board

View Full Version : FOX NEWS/entertainment is #1....

Bill Cosby

06-25-2010, 12:00 PM

Is this why????? :lmao2:

Fox News
panty flash (http://www.playboy.com/arts-entertainment/playboy-list/panty_flash/01.html)

Fox News
panty flash
Extra! Extra! Fox News’ panties now captured!

Fox News may claim it’s “fair and balanced,” but we know they stack the deck with their hot anchor-babes. Often wearing the shortest skirts, occasionally these sexy reporters will cross their legs, offering us a great human interest story. The flashes are quick, so you may have to replay these clips a few times to be sure. They flashed, we reported, now you decide.

Moby

06-25-2010, 05:08 PM

This has been well known and documented before. Of course programming and NLP has nothing to do with the subconscious or subliminal messages :lmao2:

Should we move this to the main board since it is about a source of political misinformation?

Bill Cosby

06-25-2010, 05:19 PM

Sure...............

Frankg

06-26-2010, 04:59 AM

Dale escondido

06-26-2010, 08:59 AM

Yeah Fox is Hot.
Don't even need sound to be entertained:lmao2:

Get over it guys. Till the man pulls the plug on all contrary views it will be there.

Bill Cosby

06-26-2010, 11:54 AM

I didn't see anything.

What didn't you see Frank??

Did it play??

It worked for everyone else.......

Frankg

06-26-2010, 12:47 PM

I got the video but all I saw were 3 news commentators talking .

What is so special about that ?

You calling it "panty flash" just demonstrates you have a filthy mind.

If all you do all day is check out news programs for beaver shots than you need to get a life.

T-Cat

06-26-2010, 12:51 PM

MintJulep

06-26-2010, 01:00 PM

If all you do all day is check out news programs for beaver shots than you need to get a life.LOL. For real. :lmao2:

T-Cat

06-26-2010, 01:04 PM

MintJulep

06-26-2010, 01:14 PM

FOX & Friends is a news program????????? :lmao2:The highest rated, most watched cable network around - regardless of what Obama and the 40%-ers say. :thumbsup:

T-Cat

06-26-2010, 01:16 PM

The highest rated, most watched cable network around - regardless of what Obama and the 40%-ers say. :thumbsup:That doesn't make FOX & Friends a news program.

I bet it would have been a lot more interesting if Gretchen was wrestling BJ Penn instead of Kilmeade.

<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/hFbSLFfL_go&hl=en_GB&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/hFbSLFfL_go&hl=en_GB&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>

Moby

06-26-2010, 01:23 PM

The highest rated, most watched cable network around - regardless of what Obama and the 40%-ers say. :thumbsup:
And yet again you make the point that misinformation is far more popular with the right wing than possible any other group in America. Thank you for pointing this out again :thumbsup:

MintJulep

06-26-2010, 01:29 PM

That doesn't make FOX & Friends a news program.

It's already a news program, and a very successful one. Those who prefer propaganda written by the WH have many options to get it from. That's what so great about America and our first amendment. We can tune in to whatever we choose as individuals, and others can do the same. I don't understand why anyone obsesses over FOX news. If you don't like it, turn the channel. Easy peasy.....:)

MintJulep

06-26-2010, 01:36 PM

And yet again you make the point that misinformation is far more popular with the right wing than possible any other group in America. Thank you for pointing this out again :thumbsup:IMO, FOX having the highest ratings has more to do with this:

http://www.dcjunkies.com/showthread.php?t=14661

Having two sides to a story seems to resonate more with viewers than constant shilling for this administration and continual lies of omission.

T-Cat

06-26-2010, 01:38 PM

It's already a news program, and a very successful one.LOL yes, I am sure that you consider it a news program. :lmao2:

Those who prefer propaganda written by the WH have many options to get it from. That's what so great about America and our first amendment. We can tune in to whatever we choose as individuals, and others can do the same. I don't understand why anyone obsesses over FOX news. If you don't like it, turn the channel. Easy peasy.....:)If I don't like it, it still doesn't mean that FOX & Friends is a news program. :banghead:

Here is a great clip of Brian Klimeade getting to the bottom of that study on marriage and mental health and why apparently it isn't applicable to Americans:

<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/DF6N2v7aZaQ&hl=en_GB&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/DF6N2v7aZaQ&hl=en_GB&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>

...

KILMEADE: Because that's a -- we are -- we're -- we're a -- we're -- we keep marrying other species and other ethnics and other --

CARLSON: Are you sure they're not suffering from some of the --

KILMEADE: I mean, the Swedes --

CARLSON: -- causes of dementia right now?

BRIGGS: What are you getting at?

KILMEADE: See, the problem is, the Swedes have pure genes.

BRIGGS: OK.

KILMEADE: Because they marry other Swedes. Because that's the rule. Finland -- Finns marry other Finns, so they have a pure society. In America, we marry everybody.

BRIGGS: OK.

KILMEADE: So, we'll marry Italians and Irish.

BRIGGS: So, this study does not apply?

KILMEADE: Does not apply to us.

BRIGGS: Huh. You are a scientist.

CARLSON: Amazing deduction, Kilmeade.

...That's the problem in America, Americans marry other species! Or the Irish and Italians. :lmao2:

MintJulep

06-26-2010, 01:49 PM

LOL yes, I am sure that you consider it a news program. :lmao2:

If I don't like it, it still doesn't mean that FOX & Friends is a news program. :banghead: Hey, that's great. You're entitled to your opinion as am I. We call that 'live and let live' in America. FOX is the only TV channel I watch besides occasionally watching Larry King or Anderson if they have an interesting story. I get the majority of information from the Internet. The great thing about the Internet is, there is no way to control it, and it levels the field completely unlike the past decades of limited, biased information.

Here is a great clip of Brian Klimeade getting to the bottom of that study on marriage and mental health and why apparently it isn't applicable to Americans:
That's the problem in America, Americans marry other species! Or the Irish and Italians. :lmao2: When did that happen, like a year ago? I don't need to watch clips. My TV stays tuned to FOX. I love it! Admittedly, knowing the left obsessively froths-at-the-mouth over it makes it even more attractive to me.

T-Cat

06-26-2010, 02:11 PM

Hey, that's great. You're entitled to your opinion as am I.Yes and it is telling that your opinion is that FOX & Friends is a news program.

We call that 'live and let live' in America. FOX is the only TV channel I watch besides occasionally watching Larry King or Anderson if they have an interesting story. I get the majority of information from the Internet.Oh yes I have seen how you get your information from the internet. By cutting and pasting headlines from Drudge without bothering to see if that headline is supported by the facts of the story.

The great thing about the Internet is, there is no way to control it, and it levels the field completely unlike the past decades of limited, biased information.By levels the field completely, you mean it allows a pile of ridiculous bullshit to spread quickly and easily.

When did that happen, like a year ago? I don't need to watch clips. My TV stays tuned to FOX. I love it! Admittedly, knowing the left obsessively froths-at-the-mouth over it makes it even more attractive to me.And it shows. That's why you so often repeat rightwing lies like "4 billion of our "stimulus" tax dollars are going to fund ACORN" and "12 trillion dollars later and barely a private sector job has been created." etc. And why you believe posts made by others who source horribly slanted rightwing websites without, again, checking any of the facts.

MintJulep

06-26-2010, 02:24 PM

Yes and it is telling that your opinion is that FOX & Friends is a news program. FOX and Friends is the morning show, and yes, they do report the news.

Oh yes I have seen how you get your information from the internet. By cutting and pasting headlines from Drudge without bothering to see if that headline is supported by the facts of the story. Actually, you have no idea what sites I visit on the Internet. I don't post every source and everything I read here, so you've made a false assumption -- yet again.

By levels the field completely, you mean it allows a pile of ridiculous bullshit to spread quickly and easily. No, I mean having access to all the information. Not just the cherry-picked, whitewashed propaganda the "MSM" and their masters fill the "MSM" troughs with each day.

And it shows. That's why you so often repeat rightwing lies like "4 billion of our "stimulus" tax dollars are going to fund ACORN" and "12 trillion dollars later and barely a private sector job has been created." etc. And why you believe posts made by others who source horribly slanted rightwing websites without, again, checking any of the facts.ACORN was eligible for 4 billion dollars under the earmark "Neighborhood Restabilization". The debt clock has passed 13 trillion dollars, and climbing.

It's a good thing you don't live in the US because you'd have a hard time adjusting to the freedom of speech and press we have here. Me? I couldn't imagine having it any other way. Looks like we both wound up in the right place. :)

T-Cat

06-26-2010, 02:34 PM

FOX and Friends is the morning show, and yes, they do report the news.Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert report the news as well. They aren't news programs either.

Actually, you have no idea what sites I visit on the Internet. I don't post every source and everything I read here, so you've made a false assumption -- yet again.LOL, you mean you don't visit Drudge and other similar sites?

No, I mean having access to all the information. Not just the cherry-picked, whitewashed propaganda the "MSM" and their masters fill the "MSM" troughs with each day.LOL, for having access to "all the information", you do a good job of ignoring most of it.

ACORN was eligible for 4 billion dollars under the earmark "Neighborhood Restabilization".But you lied and said that 4 billion dollars were going to ACORN when in fact none of the stimulus funding actually did. Nor had ACORN attempted to get any of those NR funds.

The debt clock has passed 13 trillion dollars, and climbing.Oh my, how dishonest. You weren't referring to the debt when you repeatedly made the 12 trillion dollar claim, you were referring to money you thought had been spent over the year or so to stop the recession. Tch tch.

It's a good thing you don't live in the US because you'd have a hard time adjusting to the freedom of speech and press we have here. Me? I couldn't imagine having it any other way. Looks like we both wound up in the right place. :)LOL, my freedom of speech is sooooooooooooooo restricted. :lmao2:

MintJulep

06-26-2010, 03:06 PM

Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert report the news as well. They aren't news programs either. Well then, you are free to change the channel. Isn't that wonderful? LOL. You simply can't tell others what to watch.

LOL, you mean you don't visit Drudge and other similar sites? Is that what I wrote? No, I don't think so. I said you don't know every site I visit, and -- you don't.

LOL, for having access to "all the information", you do a good job of ignoring most of it. You have no idea what I read, what I 'ignore' or anything else. Try to stick to something you can support.

But you lied and said that 4 billion dollars were going to ACORN when in fact none of the stimulus funding actually did. Nor had ACORN attempted to get any of those NR funds. Fact: ACORN was eligible for 4 billion dollar under the earmark "Neighborhood restabilization".

Oh my, how dishonest. You weren't referring to the debt when you repeatedly made the 12 trillion dollar claim, you were referring to money you thought had been spent over the year or so to stop the recession. Tch tch. The debt has passed 13 trillion. What I wrote on another board, months ago is irrelevant here and now. Try to find something current and relevant.

LOL, my freedom of speech is sooooooooooooooo restricted. :lmao2: I've noticed those who complain about bias and obsess over what others watch are usually the ones who'd prefer those opposing voices be shut down and censored.

You appear to fall into that category.

T-Cat

06-26-2010, 03:18 PM

Well then, you are free to change the channel. Isn't that wonderful? LOL. You simply can't tell others what to watch.My how Minty likes to change the subject. Never did I say who could watch what. What I said is that FOX & Friends isn't a news program.

Is that what I wrote? No, I don't think so. I said you don't know every site I visit, and -- you don't.LOL, is that what I wrote? Did I say I knew every site you had visited? Could you possibly create any more strawman arguments?

You have no idea what I read, what I 'ignore' or anything else. Try to stick to something you can support.But in fact I do have an idea of what you read. For example, you read Drudge. I bet I could list several more that I know you read.

Fact: ACORN was eligible for 4 billion dollar under the earmark "Neighborhood restabilization". Fact: MintJulep claimed 4 billion dollars of stimulus money was going to ACORN, not that ACORN was possibly eligible for it.
Fact: What Mintjulep posted was false.
Fact: Various FOXNews program hosts and guests had falsely said or implied the same thing.

The debt has passed 13 trillion. What I wrote on another board, months ago is irrelevant here and now. Try to find something current and relevant.:lmao2: In fact it is very relevant. It is solid evidence of how you repeat bullshit! And it is a wonderful example of how you try to morph what you wrote into something else which is dramatically different from what you originally claimed. And the reason you have to try to morph it is because what you originally claimed was bullshit.

I've noticed those who complain about bias and obsess over what others watch are usually the ones who'd prefer those opposing voices be shut down and censored.

You appear to fall into that category.Really? Please explain how labelling FOX & Friends as not being a news program and giving a couple of examples of how it isn't has anything to do with censorship.

MintJulep

06-26-2010, 04:12 PM

My how Minty likes to change the subject. Never did I say who could watch what. What I said is that FOX & Friends isn't a news program. Then, wouldn't changing the channel be the solution for you? I'm not quite sure how repeating your opinion here will get FOX off your TV set. :confused:
LOL, is that what I wrote? Did I say I knew every site you had visited? Could you possibly create any more strawman arguments?
This is what you said:
LOL, you mean you don't visit Drudge and other similar sites? No where did I state or imply "I don't visit Drudge". Those are your words.
But in fact I do have an idea of what you read. For example, you read Drudge. I bet I could list several more that I know you read. And, that means what, you like to guess and speculate?

Fact: MintJulep claimed 4 billion dollars of stimulus money was going to ACORN, not that ACORN was possibly eligible for it.
Fact: What Mintjulep posted was false.
Fact: Various FOXNews program hosts and guests had falsely said or implied the same thing. I have some bad news for you. I don't account to anyone for I wrote on another board. I realize you're accustomed to boards where people are banned for and made to "account" for their postings on other boards, but that fourth reich, control freak structure fortunately doesn't exist here. The only thing I'm accountable for here, is what I post here -- as it should be.

In fact it is very relevant. It is solid evidence of how you repeat bullshit! And it is a wonderful example of how you try to morph what you wrote into something else which is dramatically different from what you originally claimed. And the reason you have to try to morph it is because what you originally claimed was bullshit. Yet, everything I've stated in regards to the debt here today are correct facts. That seems to frustrate you to the point you're reduced to floundering around repeating "but, but....you said this on another board then!!". :lmao2:
Really? Please explain how labelling FOX & Friends as not being a news program and giving a couple of examples of how it isn't has anything to do with censorship.I've observed an obsession with a news network and what others watch is usually someone incredibly frustrated by freedom of speech and their powerlessness to stop it.

T-Cat

06-26-2010, 05:30 PM

[SIZE=2][FONT=Arial][SIZE=2][FONT=Verdana] Then, wouldn't changing the channel be the solution for you?When have I said anything about needing a solution to FOX & Friends? I don't even get FNC. It's in a extra channel group along with CNBC, Bloomberg and a few others which I don't subscribe to.

I'm not quite sure how repeating your opinion here will get FOX off your TV set. :confused:What could you possibly be confused about? When have I stated or implied that FOX was on my TV set or it was a problem? How could you get that from "FOX & Friends is not a news program"?

No where did I state or imply "I don't visit Drudge". Those are your words.LOL, I never said that you said you didn't visit Drudge. How could you be so daft? You said:

you have no idea what sites I visit on the InternetAnd that isn't true, I do have an idea what sites you visit on internet. Ones like Drudge, or realclearpolitics, or various other sites you link to.

And, that means what, you like to guess and speculate?LOL, how is it guess or speculating what websites you visit when

a) you admit to visiting certain sites like Drudge
b) you link to various sites, some multiple times

How is that just guessing or speculating?

I have some bad news for you. I don't account to anyone for I wrote on another board.I have some bad news for you. I don't give a shit what you think you have to account for. However what you wrote, and what you did, on this board or another, is in fact how you have behaved, regardless of whether or not you think that you can dismiss it.

I realize you're accustomed to boards where people are banned for and made to "account" for their postings on other boards, but that fourth reich, control freak structure fortunately doesn't exist here. The only thing I'm accountable for here, is what I post here -- as it should be.I realize you have no defense for your actions so you have to try to somehow twist this into what boards I'm accustomed to as opposed to what you have actually posted. And also an example of even more bullshit from you since I have been posting far more on this board for quite some time now than I have on either Rumble or PG.

Yet, everything I've stated in regards to the debt here today are correct facts.Stating something different which is true doesn't change the fact that you previously made wildly false statements about spending in a different argument. It is your m.o. to morph what you said rather than admitting that what you claimed was false.

That seems to frustrate you to the point you're reduced to floundering around repeating "but, but....you said this on another board then!!". :lmao2: Oh no, your pathetic attempts to deflect from your dishonesty amuses me.

I've observed an obsession with a news network and what others watch is usually someone incredibly frustrated by freedom of speech and their powerlessness to stop it.Yet you haven't observed that with me despite your repeated attempts to change the topic from "FOX & Friends isn't a news program" into an issue of censorship.

Kanadesaga

06-26-2010, 06:08 PM

:lmao2: gee I guess someone was in a real tizzy! changing fonts! and sizes!! Mike, I think you pushed a button. :lmao2:

Citizen

06-26-2010, 07:55 PM

Even you liberals have to enjoy this.
5NQ_bE4xujs

MintJulep

06-26-2010, 08:08 PM

When have I said anything about needing a solution to FOX & Friends? I don't even get FNC. It's in a extra channel group along with CNBC, Bloomberg and a few others which I don't subscribe to.

What could you possibly be confused about? When have I stated or implied that FOX was on my TV set or it was a problem? How could you get that from "FOX & Friends is not a news program"? For what reason would you continually repeat your opinion of FOX? If you don't like FOX, don't watch it. MSNBC, CBS, et. al. aren't "news programs" and their "reporters" are nothing more than propaganda ministers for the gangsters in the WH. That's my opinion, therefore I watch none of those networks. Easy peasy.........

LOL, I never said that you said you didn't visit Drudge. How could you be so daft? You said:

And that isn't true, I do have an idea what sites you visit on internet. Ones like Drudge, or realclearpolitics, or various other sites you link to. I never said I don't visit Drudge. I visit Drudge several times a day. What you don't know, is every other site I visit on the Internet.

LOL, how is it guess or speculating what websites you visit when

a) you admit to visiting certain sites like Drudge
b) you link to various sites, some multiple times

How is that just guessing or speculating?

a.) I admit to visiting Drudge.
b.) Patently false. The majority of sites I link to are either national or local "MSM" sources, a long list of diverse sources. It is a rare occasion I link to a source more than once (other than polls like Gallup or Rasmussen) or link "blogs", because they're not credible sources of information when attempting to prove something. I prefer to remove the "source" diversion before it can ever commence.

I have some bad news for you. I don't give a shit what you think you have to account for. However what you wrote, and what you did, on this board or another, is in fact how you have behaved, regardless of whether or not you think that you can dismiss it. The only thing relevant here is what I've written on this board. What I wrote a year ago on some other remote board has zero significance here. Why is that so hard for you to understand?

I realize you have no defense for your actions so you have to try to somehow twist this into what boards I'm accustomed to as opposed to what you have actually posted. I don't have to 'defend my actions' from another board here, nor will I be banned for them. Deal with it. :lmao2:

And also an example of even more bullshit from you since I have been posting far more on this board for quite some time now than I have on either Rumble or PG. Yeah but, before recently, you were accustomed to a fully-controlled circle jerk, where speech was silenced instantly and those voices were made to "account" for all Internet postings, which is, pathetically ricidulous. Now, I'm not saying you have that mindset, because you were one of the only ones who didn't act like a full-diapered crybaby. You didn't. Instead, you used your brain. Most of your compadres there didn't possess the intelligence and logic you do, so their arguments were always predictably reduced to screeching personal attacks and crying for mods to 'save' their stupid asses. :lmao2:

Stating something different which is true doesn't change the fact that you previously made wildly false statements about spending in a different argument. It is your m.o. to morph what you said rather than admitting that what you claimed was false. How was the statement wrong if ACORN is eligible for 4 billion in "stimulus" money? They were and they are. I can't remember what I posted a year ago on some other board, and to be frank, I don't really care.

Oh no, your pathetic attempts to deflect from your dishonesty amuses me.

Yet you haven't observed that with me despite your repeated attempts to change the topic from "FOX & Friends isn't a news program" into an issue of censorship. That you continually repeat it indicates (to me) it bothers you a majority of people choose FOX. I can't speak for those people, but personally I want the whole story instead of settling for the "half truths" the "MSM" feeds their scant number of viewers. The majority of information produced by the "MSM" is whitewashed information with pertinent facts omitted. Lies of omission are still lies.

T-Cat

06-26-2010, 09:22 PM

For what reason would you continually repeat your opinion of FOX?You mean because I sometimes make fun of FOX, some of its shows in particular? Especially in a thread started to poke fun at FOX? Gee wow, how crazy is that? :lmao2:
If you don't like FOX, don't watch it. MSNBC, CBS, et. al. aren't "news programs"I don’t watch FOX, and I never said other networks were all news programs. Once again, all you are doing is make strawman arguments.

and their "reporters" are nothing more than propaganda ministers for the gangsters in the WH. That's my opinion, therefore I watch none of those networks. Easy peasy......... Yet you often repeat your opinion about those networks and then for some reason you feel it necessary to ask why I would repeat my opinion of FOX. Are you that clueless?

I never said I don't visit Drudge. I visit Drudge several times a day. What you don't know, is every other site I visit on the Internet.Minty, once again and in classic strawman fashion, states something I never claimed, that I know every site she visits. I said I had some idea of what sites you visit. You already tried this tactic in a post above. Repeating a strawman doesn’t make it true.

a.) I admit to visiting Drudge.Yes, so you could blame Drudge for the headline that you cut and pasted that wasn’t supported by the actual article you linked. :lmao2:

b.) Patently false. The majority of sites I link to are either national or local "MSM" sources, a long list of diverse sources. It is a rare occasion I link to a source more than once (other than polls like Gallup or Rasmussen) or link "blogs", because they're not credible sources of information when attempting to prove something.Yet you’ve linked to biggovernment, realclearpolitics, newsbusters, etc. all rightwing sites that link to other sites. So no, not patently false, one can most certainly know something about the sites you visit.

I prefer to remove the "source" diversion before it can ever commence.You mean like pretend you actually read those sites instead of getting your info from Drudge? :lmao2:

The only thing relevant here is what I've written on this board. What I wrote a year ago on some other remote board has zero significance here. Why is that so hard for you to understand?Oh it is easy to understand, all you are trying to do is dismiss what you have written on other boards because you can’t defend it. You don’t get to declare what is significant and what isn’t. And you have no problem referring to the activity of other posters on other boards, somehow thinking that it is relevant but then magically declare what you have done on other boards has zero significance.

I don't have to 'defend my actions' from another board here, nor will I be banned for them. Deal with it. You don’t have to do anything and I never said you had to defend your actions. Nor did I say or imply you should be banned for failing to do so, you can keep spinning your bs as long as you want. But I will repeat it as long as I want to. Deal with it.

Yeah but, before recently, you were accustomed to a fully-controlled circle jerk, where speech was silenced instantly and those voices were made to "account" for all Internet postings, which is, pathetically ricidulous.First of all it has been quite some time since I have posted at PG, other than a couple of posts bugging Chris or something of that effect. You were posting at PG then more or less at the same time I was. Second, most of my posts there were shooting the shit with eman, especially towards the end.

Now, I'm not saying you have that mindset, because you were one of the only ones who didn't act like a full-diapered crybaby. You didn't. Instead, you used your brain. Most of your compadres there didn't possess the intelligence and logic you do, so their arguments were always predictably reduced to screeching personal attacks and crying for mods to 'save' their stupid asses. So then what was the relevance of bringing up me being accustomed to posting there when in fact I never once complained to an admin or mod, and in fact defended eman a couple of times when people would complain about him.

How was the statement wrong if ACORN is eligible for 4 billion in "stimulus" money?How is it wrong? LOL, you claimed 4 billion stimulus dollars were going to fund ACORN when in fact they weren’t receiving any of that money. A whole bunch of organizations were eligible, that doesn’t mean they got any or would have gotten any had they even applied. AND as I pointed out in that thread, the deadline to apply for NSP funds allocated by the stimulus packaged had already passed almost two months prior to your post. So in fact ACORN wasn’t even eligible to apply for those funds anymore.

They were and they are.FALSE. See above.

I can't remember what I posted a year ago on some other board, and to be frank, I don't really care.And I don’t really care that you don’t really care.

That you continually repeat it indicates (to me) it bothers you a majority of people choose FOX.The fact that so many people love Rupert Murdoch’s media toy(s) is rather sad but predictable.

I can't speak for those people, but personally I want the whole story instead of settling for the "half truths" the "MSM" feeds their scant number of viewers. The majority of information produced by the "MSM" is whitewashed information with pertinent facts omitted. Lies of omission are still lies.You want the whole story???? :lmao2: Too funny.

Dale escondido

06-27-2010, 06:55 AM

All this chit-chat and all it adds up to is don't say anything bad about our guy.

SortofLiberal

06-28-2010, 06:37 AM

Yeah Fox is Hot.
Don't even need sound to be entertained:lmao2:

Get over it guys. Till the man pulls the plug on all contrary views it will be there.

I have always found it interesting that the same people that want to censure what Hollywood shows on the big screen own the tv station that shows the most obscene and violent programs. There is FOX News with this mess and then there is FOX entertainment showing programs like The Shield (which ran for years) and 24. They preach family values, but produce smut.

Can any of you conservatives out there say hypocracy?

Anything for a BUCK.

These people make whores and strippers seem wholesome. At least those women don't pretend to be holy and then live that kind of lifestyle.

FOX lies in its news programming and shows smut on its entertainment stations, but tells everyone that others are trying to deny CHRIST. Now that is rich. The funny thing is that the same people that claim their is too much sex and violence on TV are the ones that give them their ratings. Go figure.

Dale escondido

06-28-2010, 07:16 AM

I have always found it interesting that the same people that want to censure what Hollywood shows on the big screen own the tv station that shows the most obscene and violent programs. There is FOX News with this mess and then there is FOX entertainment showing programs like The Shield (which ran for years) and 24. They preach family values, but produce smut.

Can any of you conservatives out there say hypocracy?

Anything for a BUCK.

These people make whores and strippers seem wholesome. At least those women don't pretend to be holy and then live that kind of lifestyle.

FOX lies in its news programming and shows smut on its entertainment stations, but tells everyone that others are trying to deny CHRIST. Now that is rich. The funny thing is that the same people that claim their is too much sex and violence on TV are the ones that give them their ratings. Go figure.

Anything for a buck is absolutly right
I watch no shows except some news, sports and movies mostly turner classics.
We as a society seem to have no principals when it comes to the pursuit of wealth.

Bill Cosby

06-28-2010, 09:56 PM

Anything for a buck is absolutly right
I watch no shows except some news, sports and movies mostly turner classics.
We as a society seem to have no principals when it comes to the pursuit of wealth.

Getting caught is frowned upon...........:o

Do you see the recent BP extortion BS as @ play here??

All the "little ppl" splitting the 20 billion is seen negatively by many- essentially the big fish should suffer no economic repercussions for the damage they caused to those little ppl & their little businesses.......

I don't recall: http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/cartoons/2010/1/28/1264694379950/BP-chief-Tony-Hayward-at--001.jpg

SortofLiberal

06-29-2010, 07:08 AM

Getting caught is frowned upon...........:o

Do you see the recent BP extortion BS as @ play here??

All the "little ppl" splitting the 20 billion is seen negatively by many- essentially the big fish should suffer no economic repercussions for the damage they caused to those little ppl & their little businesses.......

I don't recall: http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/cartoons/2010/1/28/1264694379950/BP-chief-Tony-Hayward-at--001.jpg

OK . . . I'll bite. What does this have to do with FOX selling smut on their entertainment side and lying on their news side, but waving around the Bible?

foxbaron

06-29-2010, 11:32 AM

Evidently all you guys who hate FOX so much must spend a lot of time watching FOX to form the opinions you have.

SO once again FOX RULES.

Smurf-Herder

06-29-2010, 11:38 AM

I found it interesting during the campaign that Hillary said that Fox gave her the most fair interviews.

Bill Cosby

06-29-2010, 12:35 PM

Evidently all you guys who hate FOX so much must spend a lot of time watching FOX to form the opinions you have.

SO once again FOX RULES.

Only thing I watch on fox is "the Simpson's" reruns now & then.......

Bill Cosby

06-29-2010, 12:39 PM

OK . . . I'll bite. What does this have to do with FOX selling smut on their entertainment side and lying on their news side, but waving around the Bible?

I was referencing Dale's take on greed, ppl doing anything for money........

IMO many folks were willing to side w/ BP against the small ppl because in some respects they seem to worship wealth & those w/ it............ While they themselves are petit-bourgeois @ best & sadly rooting against their own self/class interest............ :banghead:

Citizen

06-29-2010, 12:44 PM

Only thing I watch on fox is "the Simpson's" reruns now & then.......

Be careful Bill. Rupert could have implanted subliminal Republican messages. Yvan eht nioj!

Bill Cosby

06-29-2010, 12:50 PM

Be careful Bill. Rupert could have implanted subliminal Republican messages. Yvan eht nioj!

Having been a conservative most of my life I believe I have built up anti-bodies to thwart anything the old man can throw my way..........:lmao2:

GetAClue

06-29-2010, 03:58 PM

I was referencing Dale's take on greed, ppl doing anything for money........

IMO many folks were willing to side w/ BP against the small ppl because in some respects they seem to worship wealth & those w/ it............ While they themselves are petit-bourgeois @ best & sadly rooting against their own self/class interest............ :banghead:
I am not necessarily siding with BP, but I do NOT agree with the strong arm tactics used by Obama. There was a $75 Million dollar cap imposed by Congress to entice oil companies to drill in deeper water AFTER they were pushed there by the same Fed Gov't. My problem with it all is that if the gov didn't want to foot the bill in the first place, don't pass some stupid legislation. They are asking these companies to play by a set of rules and then changing them in the middle of the game. I don't care who it is, that is just dishonest.

Bill Cosby

06-29-2010, 04:09 PM

So if that is the case then all the oil companies should just close their deep drills?? That has not happened, nor will it.....

Remember it is about risk, they took the risk & here is the result.........

I don't wish to get into the fault & letter of the law crap like exxon did in Alaska but there is a larger picture that needs to be addressed in the gulf......... Those ppl w/out a livelihood.... This was caused by BP... The guVment did not tell them or force them to drill there......

Were bad decisions made by the guVment as well as BP.?? You bet there were but I believe the administration & BP have taken steps to help reconcile some of the damages...

GetAClue

06-29-2010, 04:16 PM

You are right, the gov't did not force them there, but they did attempt to remove some if not most of the risk. And that is the problem. The gov't inticed them to deep water with a liability cap. Then once the accident occured, they basically changed their minds. That would be like buying auto insurance and then when you have an accident the insurance company saying "Sorry, but we changed our minds". I have seen a lot of people on this board claiming that happens all the time, but if the gov't does it, it's justified?

Bill Cosby

06-29-2010, 04:22 PM

GetAClue

06-29-2010, 04:27 PM

Insurance companies do it all the time.........

If this cap was wrong, & I think everyone agrees it was, then IMHO they are doing the right thing........

The alternative is the tax payers take the hit & BP keeps all of the 20 some billion a year in profit........... THey take the risks & we pick up the tab......

Ppl want tax cuts............. They going to get them if we have to pick the tab??
But you are missing my point. When government is allowed to change the rules in the middle of the game, who will be their next target? Is this something that we want our government doing? Did they demand the $20 billion from BP because it was the right thing to do, or just to sway public opinion and oh by the way, yea maybe it was the right thing to do also.

How about the next disaster? Who will they villify next? Seems to me that the government should quit picking sides in these things to begin with and we wouldn't be in this mess. If they had allowed the oil companies to drill in shallow water and this accident occured, do you think it would have been fixed by now?

Bill Cosby

06-29-2010, 04:49 PM

But you are missing my point. When government is allowed to change the rules in the middle of the game, who will be their next target? Is this something that we want our government doing? Did they demand the $20 billion from BP because it was the right thing to do, or just to sway public opinion and oh by the way, yea maybe it was the right thing to do also.

How about the next disaster? Who will they villify next? Seems to me that the government should quit picking sides in these things to begin with and we wouldn't be in this mess. If they had allowed the oil companies to drill in shallow water and this accident occured, do you think it would have been fixed by now?

I get your point............. As I stated, the letter of the law......

BP has agreed.......... I think they believe it is in their best interest & I believe it is in their as well as the countries best interest.......

T-Cat

06-29-2010, 05:44 PM

But you are missing my point. When government is allowed to change the rules in the middle of the game, who will be their next target? Is this something that we want our government doing? Did they demand the $20 billion from BP because it was the right thing to do, or just to sway public opinion and oh by the way, yea maybe it was the right thing to do also.

How about the next disaster? Who will they villify next?BP is responsible for the mess they made, they are not being villified.

Seems to me that the government should quit picking sides in these things to begin with and we wouldn't be in this mess.The government has been picking the oil companies side for decades. They have specifically given them tax breaks and incentives to drill in such locations in the first place. Who screams the loudest when politicians start talking about taking away such breaks?

If they had allowed the oil companies to drill in shallow water and this accident occured, do you think it would have been fixed by now?Are you somehow claiming that oil companies haven't been drilling in shallow water? Or that even if they could drill in other areas that they wouldn't still want to drill in deep water locations of the Gulf?

SortofLiberal

06-30-2010, 09:25 AM

I found it interesting during the campaign that Hillary said that Fox gave her the most fair interviews.

Do you have any documentation of that? I followed Hillary pretty closely and never heard anything even close to that.

Bill Cosby

09-28-2010, 06:58 PM

The highest rated, most watched cable network around - regardless of what Obama and the 40%-ers say. :thumbsup:

Could that be in part a result of the girls they have on their news???

http://adamthinks.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/blond_women_of_fox.jpg

MintJulep

09-28-2010, 07:19 PM

Could that be in part a result of the girls they have on their news???

http://adamthinks.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/blond_women_of_fox.jpgI don't think that's the reason. FOX just has a higher quality product. It's never dull and there are all different types of people there, from Shepherd Smith to Geraldo. The other networks are boring and slow-moving, IMO.

I only recognize 3 of those women in the pic. The rest must be from a long time ago.

Bill Cosby

09-28-2010, 07:24 PM

I don't think that's the reason. FOX just has a higher quality product. It's never dull and there are all different types of people there, from Shepherd Smith to Geraldo. The other networks are boring and slow-moving, IMO.

I only recognize 3 of those women in the pic. The rest must be from a long time ago.

Who is their token lefty?? Juan Williams?? :lmao2:

MintJulep

09-28-2010, 07:28 PM

Who is their token lefty?? Juan Williams?? :lmao2:He's one. Then there's Shepard Smith, Geraldo, Kristen Powers and a couple of others. There are so many I can't keep up with them all. My favorite news anchors are Brett Baier, Steve Doocy and Megyn Kelly. Of course, Glenn Beck is my favorite of all favorites. :lmao2:

Bill Cosby

09-28-2010, 07:34 PM

MintJulep

09-28-2010, 07:54 PM

Why is glenn beck afraid to go on the Stewart show??I didn't know he was?

dsolo802

09-28-2010, 10:00 PM

The highest rated, most watched cable network around - regardless of what Obama and the 40%-ers say. :thumbsup:Holy smokin' vaginas, Batman - now my ratings are up too!

http://www.hyperborea.org/flash/images/grayson3.gif

How is it poling with you?

MintJulep

09-28-2010, 10:04 PM

Holy smokin' vaginas, Batman - now my ratings are up too!

http://www.hyperborea.org/flash/images/grayson3.gif

How is it poling with you?It's the only channel I watch. :thumbsup:

Moby

09-29-2010, 08:31 AM

He's one. Then there's Shepard Smith, Geraldo, Kristen Powers and a couple of others. There are so many I can't keep up with them all. My favorite news anchors are Brett Baier, Steve Doocy and Megyn Kelly. Of course, Glenn Beck is my favorite of all favorites. :lmao2:
Minty, I think that you've just shown that you've lost all touch with reality. You've claimed that you have favorite news anchors and mention both Megan Kelly and Glenn Beck. Even Wayers and Frank think that you're an idiot (or fool or something like that) because they even know these people have nothing to do with news and are not news anchors.

They're paid entertainers and they're paid to fool you.

Minty, you've lost it. It's like watching a soap opera and thinking the characters are real. You're nuts. You need help badly.

Trinnity

09-29-2010, 08:43 AM

Minty, I think that you've just shown that you've lost all touch with reality. You've claimed that you have favorite news anchors and mention both Megan Kelly and Glenn Beck. Even Wayers and Frank think that you're an idiot (or fool or something like that) because they even know these people have nothing to do with news and are not news anchors.

They're paid entertainers and they're paid to fool you.

Minty, you've lost it. It's like watching a soap opera and thinking the characters are real. You're nuts. You need help badly.She can watch anything she wants, Moby. If she needs any help, it won't be from a condescending lefty shill like you.

Moby

09-29-2010, 08:48 AM

She can watch anything she wants, Moby. If she needs any help, it won't be from a condescending lefty shill like you.
Of course she can watch what ever she wants. Just like you can watch a soap opera. But to not understand the difference between truth and reality is a form of insanity. Believing that a soap opera is real is just as insane as believe that Beck is a news anchor.

In the past she's even stated that he's not. Yet today she has forgotten that and she has lost touch with reality.

MintJulep

09-29-2010, 09:21 AM

Minty, I think that you've just shown that you've lost all touch with reality. You've claimed that you have favorite news anchors and mention both Megan Kelly and Glenn Beck. Even Wayers and Frank think that you're an idiot (or fool or something like that) because they even know these people have nothing to do with news and are not news anchors.

They're paid entertainers and they're paid to fool you.

Minty, you've lost it. It's like watching a soap opera and thinking the characters are real. You're nuts. You need help badly.You need to re-read my post. Steve, Megyn and Brett are news anchors. Beck has his own show for 1 hour a day. I put the two in separate sentences for a reason. FOX is certainly no worse than the ranting raving loons on MSNBC.

Trinnity

09-29-2010, 09:32 AM

Of course she can watch what ever she wants. Just like you can watch a soap opera. But to not understand the difference between truth and reality is a form of insanity. Believing that a soap opera is real is just as insane as believe that Beck is a news anchor.

In the past she's even stated that he's not. Yet today she has forgotten that and she has lost touch with reality.I'm not gonna take your word for what is insane. You throw it around too lightly. Same with that phrase "lost touch with reality".
I don't think Minty has lost touch with reality in any way. You assume too much.
You are so quick to be condescendingly critical of others; you should do some self assessment.

"You ain't all that."

MintJulep

09-29-2010, 09:51 AM

nondual

09-29-2010, 09:55 AM

Stop the Insanity

hSLFeJYIw4E

We humans have outsheeped the sheep!

Moby

09-29-2010, 09:56 AM

No, I haven't forgotten. You have misinterpreted what I've written.

My favorite news anchors are Brett Baier, Steve Doocy and Megyn Kelly. Of course, Glenn Beck is my favorite of all favorites.

Here's where you referred to these people as news anchors. What did you actually mean? Where you being sarcastic and admitting that all these people have nothing to do with news?

MintJulep

09-29-2010, 10:08 AM

Here's where you referred to these people as news anchors. What did you actually mean? Where you being sarcastic and admitting that all these people have nothing to do with news?Excuse me? The three I mentioned ARE news anchors.

The only person not reporting the news is Glenn Beck, who plainly states, "I'm not a journalist, I'm a dad and a guy with an opinion".

nondual

09-29-2010, 10:12 AM

"Network" 1976 -- Turn off your TV! [combined with today's news]

g9wCAQz73tA

MintJulep

09-29-2010, 10:22 AM

If you feed from the propaganda troughs of the state-run media, perhaps it is you who needs to turn off the TV.

nondual

09-29-2010, 10:25 AM

If you feed from the propaganda troughs of the state-run media, perhaps it is you who needs to turn off the TV.
If, but I don't. :)

MintJulep

09-29-2010, 10:26 AM

If, but I don't. :)What do you watch?

nondual

09-29-2010, 10:45 AM

What do you watch?
I never watch Fox News. :)

MintJulep

09-29-2010, 10:49 AM

I never watch Fox News. :)What do you watch?

Moby

09-29-2010, 02:31 PM

Excuse me? The three I mentioned ARE news anchors.

The only person not reporting the news is Glenn Beck, who plainly states, "I'm not a journalist, I'm a dad and a guy with an opinion".
You were naming your favorite news anchors and you mentioned Kelly? You claim that you don't have an issue with reality?

She was one the pundits making the claim about the high speed train to the bunny ranch.

Then you did follow up with Beck.

Neither one is a news anchor. They may pretend as that's their job but they're not news anchors.

I think you need to seek some serious help as reality is slipping past you very quickly now.

Moby

09-29-2010, 02:32 PM

BTW - Steve Doocy is a pundit too and not a news anchor. I've never watched the other guy mentioned.

Trinnity

09-29-2010, 02:48 PM

Fuss all you want about Fox, Moby. It's obvious you can't stand the one conservative network on the air, because it tops all the other lib ones combined. It just burns you up. Don't even bother to deny it. It just burns you up. :rant:

Ridiculing others by calling them mentally ill and such is just an Alinsky tactic that lots of people know about now, thanks to......wait for it............FOX.

Of course, I knew about him in the 1980s. Back then most people didn't know who he was.

MintJulep

09-29-2010, 02:52 PM

You were naming your favorite news anchors and you mentioned Kelly? You claim that you don't have an issue with reality?

She was one the pundits making the claim about the high speed train to the bunny ranch.

Then you did follow up with Beck.

Neither one is a news anchor. They may pretend as that's their job but they're not news anchors.

I think you need to seek some serious help as reality is slipping past you very quickly now.
Their job titles are anchors.

http://www.foxnews.com/bios/talent/megyn-kelly/
http://www.foxnews.com/bios/talent/steve-doocy/
http://www.foxnews.com/bios/talent/bret-baier

Glenn Beck is listed as host.

http://www.foxnews.com/bios/talent/glenn-beck

Perhaps you have evidence to the contrary?

MarkMiller

09-29-2010, 02:54 PM

I suggest everyone rent the movie "Shock Treatment".

It it EXACTLY what FOX News and Murdock are up to. LOL! Seriously. Get rid of the intelligent commentators and move in the handsome and pretty blonde talking heads...and make everyone eat, sleep and live in your studio! LOL!

EsPn4Ka2UAQ

MarkMiller

09-29-2010, 02:57 PM

The Fox News new theme! LOL!
c5v-jYWukhw&feature=related

MarkMiller

09-29-2010, 03:04 PM

And of Course Fox News Healthcare specials!
DnvVtCC-nsw&feature=related

"Macabre isn't it......the blind leading the blind."

MarkMiller

09-29-2010, 03:15 PM

...and finaly (last one I promise) this is what Fox news wants their audience to be....

M7BP2Gclzj0

Moby

09-29-2010, 03:28 PM

Their job titles are anchors.

http://www.foxnews.com/bios/talent/megyn-kelly/
http://www.foxnews.com/bios/talent/steve-doocy/
http://www.foxnews.com/bios/talent/bret-baier

Glenn Beck is listed as host.

http://www.foxnews.com/bios/talent/glenn-beck

Perhaps you have evidence to the contrary?
So because Rupert Murdoch tells you that they're news anchors than you blindly believe him? Hasn't he played you the fool enough already?

Moby

09-29-2010, 03:29 PM

Fuss all you want about Fox, Moby. It's obvious you can't stand the one conservative network on the air, because it tops all the other lib ones combined. It just burns you up. Don't even bother to deny it. It just burns you up. :rant:
You're wrong again but you should be used to that by now.

My only concern is that people are following people that are paid to manipulate them. I take the same stance on all pundits and if you were basing your beliefs on facts, you would know that.

What do you base your beliefs on any way?

MintJulep

09-29-2010, 03:47 PM

So because Rupert Murdoch tells you that they're news anchors than you blindly believe him? Hasn't he played you the fool enough already?No, I'm asking you to prove otherwise. So far, all you've provided is your opinion.

Trinnity

09-29-2010, 04:11 PM

You're wrong again Suuuuuure...but you should be used to that by nowIs that how you win converts? By repeatedly insulting others?

My only concern is that people are following people that are paid to manipulate them. I take the same stance on all pundits and if you were basing your beliefs on facts, you would know that.

What do you base your beliefs on any way?Nag, nag, nag. :lmao2:

Keep on wagging your tail for the left, but don't be surprised I don't ignore your BS.