The Democrats receive their inheritance 16 months early

[Jesse Hemingway]

George W. Bush most likely the worst president ever in the United States bequest his failures on to the democrats over a year before he must leave. The democrats now have total control of Iraq, only Dennis Kucinich has said he would end this failed policy yesterday. Now how will the rest of the democratic presidential hopefuls handle their inheritances? Only Dennis Kucinich is leading with new ideas and his actions while the rest of the heard of Democrats are trying to convince the republican base to give them a try. The heard is trying to remold, repaint, and reinvent bush’s failed policies you can not do anything with failures of this magnitude.

[Jennifer]

Uh, in case you were not aware, Congress ALWAYS HAD CONTROL. Since we are not out yet, the Democrats have FAILED. Which probably explains why 90% of the nation hates the Democrat party right now and views them as a bunch of failures and losers.

The hell do you think you got elected for? Bunch of nitwits in my opinion. Couldn't vote on lunch, let alone any military policy.


Of course, it worked out, because it meant the Generals actually started running the war the RIGHT way and have seen amazing turn-around results in Iraq. :disbelief: The war that could not be won looks to almost be won now. It's so good that the generals are talking about the LOWEST TROOP LEVELS SINCE THE INVASION!

What the democrats FAILED to do, the Generals will do for them.

[mwillman]

Jennifer WAKE UP

your dreaming and or lieing again.

[Jennifer]

Lieing? Dreaming?

Who has the power to declare war?
Who has the power to fund the military?
Who has the power to de-fund a war?
Who has the power to sign surrender terms?
Who has the power to create or terminate alliances?


Give you a hint, you'll find that information in the US Constitution under the Legislative Branch, not the Executive Branch.


Congress declared this war, not Bush. Bush asked for it, Bush is prosecuting it to the best he is allowed by the surrender-crats, but it is ultimately Congress' war to continue or end as they see fit.

[Linkster]

Congress did not declare a war - they gave authorization to the president to follow the UN resolutions - that Bush then used to start an undeclared war - same as vietnam which was also a non-declared war - get your facts straight

Funding is definitely under congresses pervue which is why they will be de-funding it next month - of course they will be called out saying they "dont support the troops" - but thats an excuse from people that are sore losers

[Jesse Hemingway]

Of course, it worked out, because it meant the Generals actually started running the war the RIGHT way and have seen amazing turn-around results in Iraq. :disbelief: The war that could not be won looks to almost be won now. It's so good that the generals are talking about the LOWEST TROOP LEVELS SINCE THE INVASION!

Total Bull Cht

Why are we in Iraq?

A.) Because Saddam all most killed as many Iraqis as George W. Bush

B.) How about them WMD’s

C.) Democracy 70% of Iraqis want us to leave

D.) Fight them their rather then here

E.) 9/11 Saddam was behind it

F.) Terrorists are against us because terrorists like to kill

G.) Al-CIA-DA AL-CIA-DA AL-CIA-DA AL-CIA-DA

H.) Americans are so F$KKKING stupid because jesus talks to george w. bush

I.) All of above

[Jennifer]

So you agree! Congress authorized it, and it is up to Congress to withdraw authorization thus, the failure to surrender in Iraq is Congress' fault, not the Presidents, thanks.


Next!


Why are we in Iraq:

We invaded to remove Saddam Hussein and the Baath Party.
We succeeded in removing Saddam Hussein and the Baath Party.
We succeeded in securing the nation so that the people could try Saddam for crimes against Humanity.

We are now there, by invitation of the elected government of Iraq, to assist them in getting rid of Syrians, Iranians and Terrorists.

But we accomplished OUR missions. Now we're just there for humanitarian reasons just like we were in Croatia, Serbia, Bosnia, and hundreds of other places that Clinton put is and Bush/Reagan before him and Carter, Ford, Nixon, Truman, Kennedy, Eisenhower, etc.

[Linkster]

Jennifer - a declaration of war is a very serious part of the congresses pervue - and has nothing to do with giving authorizations for UN resolutions - its about time some in this country started thinking about the ramifications of war a little more seriously than something to be politically bantered around as talking points
Second - you cant have a surrender without a war - and since Bush already declared victory - thats kind of a mute point especially since you yourself say that we are there by invitation to help out - there is nothing to surrender - kinda stupid term to keep using
We did not remove the Baath party - they removed part of it from running the central government - what party do you think these Sunnis in Anbar are in? Every one of them is Baathist - and proud of it

[Independent Harry]

Lieing? Dreaming?

Who has the power to declare war?
Who has the power to fund the military?
Who has the power to de-fund a war?
Who has the power to sign surrender terms?
Who has the power to create or terminate alliances?


Give you a hint, you'll find that information in the US Constitution under the Legislative Branch, not the Executive Branch.


Congress declared this war, not Bush. Bush asked for it, Bush is prosecuting it to the best he is allowed by the surrender-crats, but it is ultimately Congress' war to continue or end as they see fit.

Wow, you can't get much more deluded. Have you stopped taking your meds?

[Independent Harry]

So you agree! Congress authorized it, and it is up to Congress to withdraw authorization thus, the failure to surrender in Iraq is Congress' fault, not the Presidents, thanks.


Next!


Why are we in Iraq:

We invaded to remove Saddam Hussein and the Baath Party.
We succeeded in removing Saddam Hussein and the Baath Party.
We succeeded in securing the nation so that the people could try Saddam for crimes against Humanity.

We are now there, by invitation of the elected government of Iraq, to assist them in getting rid of Syrians, Iranians and Terrorists.

But we accomplished OUR missions. Now we're just there for humanitarian reasons just like we were in Croatia, Serbia, Bosnia, and hundreds of other places that Clinton put is and Bush/Reagan before him and Carter, Ford, Nixon, Truman, Kennedy, Eisenhower, etc.

Except Clinton managed to go into those countries while giving us a national surplus, Bush has raised our national debt to 22 trillion...

[TheCenturion]

So you agree! Congress authorized it, and it is up to Congress to withdraw authorization thus, the failure to surrender in Iraq is Congress' fault, not the Presidents, thanks.


Next!


Why are we in Iraq:

We invaded to remove Saddam Hussein and the Baath Party.
We succeeded in removing Saddam Hussein and the Baath Party.
We succeeded in securing the nation so that the people could try Saddam for crimes against Humanity.

We are now there, by invitation of the elected government of Iraq, to assist them in getting rid of Syrians, Iranians and Terrorists.

But we accomplished OUR missions. Now we're just there for humanitarian reasons just like we were in Croatia, Serbia, Bosnia, and hundreds of other places that Clinton put is and Bush/Reagan before him and Carter, Ford, Nixon, Truman, Kennedy, Eisenhower, etc.

You know, My Dear, you really should seek professional psychiatric care ..and soon.

You've obviously overdosed on so much BushCo Brand X Kool-Aid, that it's more than likely they will just have to declare you terminally brain dead and pull the plug.

Bush and Cheney lied to Congress and cooked the intelligence to sucker us into Iraq. That simply makes us all victims of a premeditated fraud. Congress acted in good faith to authorize Bush's illegal invasion - but only as a last resort. That was in response to Bush's lies about the threat of 'Mushroom Clouds" from an imminent attack by Iraq. And then Bush engaged in fraudulent and criminal malfeasance to deploy our troops away from Al Qaeda HQ in Afghanistan so they could become pinned down in Iraq. We know that now because those, unlike yourself, who prefer to live in the Real World acknowledge there were no WMDs in Iraq, just like there were no Al Qaeda in Iraq before Bush turned the place into an Al Qaeda recruitment and training center.

We didn't succeed in removing the Ba'athists. We only succeeded in removing the only guy in the Middle East who was successful at keeping Al Qaeda out of Iraq. That was Saddam Hussein. And now we're arming the Sunni Ba'athists
and playing footsie with them in the hopes of using them to keep Al Qaeda at bay. That could have easily been accomplished without invading Iraq and sending hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians and thousands of US troops to their deaths ..for nothing.

Tell us. Are you really as stupid as you appear..or is this just a put on?

[Jesse Hemingway]

So you agree! Congress authorized it, and it is up to Congress to withdraw authorization thus, the failure to surrender in Iraq is Congress' fault, not the Presidents, thanks.


Next!


Why are we in Iraq:

We invaded to remove Saddam Hussein and the Baath Party.
We succeeded in removing Saddam Hussein and the Baath Party.
We succeeded in securing the nation so that the people could try Saddam for crimes against Humanity.

We are now there, by invitation of the elected government of Iraq, to assist them in getting rid of Syrians, Iranians and Terrorists.

But we accomplished OUR missions. Now we're just there for humanitarian reasons just like we were in Croatia, Serbia, Bosnia, and hundreds of other places that Clinton put is and Bush/Reagan before him and Carter, Ford, Nixon, Truman, Kennedy, Eisenhower, etc.

Play nice with Jennifer it is to good to read this stuff.

If Exxon, British Petroleum, Shell, Hunt oil, Halliburton and the rest want to over throw Iraq, Afghanistan, and Iran to steal their resources then they should pay for it; isn’t that the republicans mantra. How could any true republican stand to take welfare in the form of the United States Military in their business plan. So please spare us the bull cht and nobody is that stupid to think this group could really give a F$KKK about anything but greed.