PDA

View Full Version : Bubble of methane triggered rig blast


Moby
05-08-2010, 08:55 AM
Is this still a deliberate act that the administration is covering up?

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100508/ap_on_bi_ge/us_gulf_oil_spill
ON THE GULF OF MEXICO – The deadly blowout of an oil rig in the Gulf of Mexico was triggered by a bubble of methane gas that escaped from the well and shot up the drill column, expanding quickly as it burst through several seals and barriers before exploding, according to interviews with rig workers conducted during BP's internal investigation.

While the cause of the explosion is still under investigation, the sequence of events described in the interviews provides the most detailed account of the April 20 blast that killed 11 workers and touched off the underwater gusher that has poured more than 3 million gallons of crude into the Gulf.

Portions of the interviews, two written and one taped, were described in detail to an Associated Press reporter by Robert Bea, a University of California Berkeley engineering professor who serves on a National Academy of Engineering panel on oil pipeline safety and worked for BP PLC as a risk assessment consultant during the 1990s. He received them from industry friends seeking his expert opinion.

A group of BP executives were on board the Deepwater Horizon rig celebrating the project's safety record, according to the transcripts. Meanwhile, far below, the rig was being converted from an exploration well to a production well.

Based on the interviews, Bea believes that the workers set and then tested a cement seal at the bottom of the well. Then they reduced the pressure in the drill column and attempted to set a second seal below the sea floor. A chemical reaction caused by the setting cement created heat and a gas bubble which destroyed the seal.

Deep beneath the seafloor, methane is in a slushy, crystalline form. Deep sea oil drillers often encounter pockets of methane crystals as they dig into the earth.

As the bubble rose up the drill column from the high-pressure environs of the deep to the less pressurized shallows, it intensified and grew, breaking through various safety barriers, Bea said.

"A small bubble becomes a really big bubble," Bea said. "So the expanding bubble becomes like a cannon shooting the gas into your face."

Up on the rig, the first thing workers noticed was the sea water in the drill column suddenly shooting back at them, rocketing 240 feet in the air, he said. Then, gas surfaced. Then oil.

"What we had learned when I worked as a drill rig laborer was swoosh, boom, run," Bea said. "The swoosh is the gas, boom is the explosion and run is what you better be doing."

The gas flooded into an adjoining room with exposed ignition sources, he said.

"That's where the first explosion happened," said Bea, who worked for Shell Oil in the 1960s during the last big northern Gulf of Mexico oil well blowout. "The mud room was next to the quarters where the party was. Then there was a series of explosions that subsequently ignited the oil that was coming from below."

According to one interview transcript, a gas cloud covered the rig, causing giant engines on the drill floor to run too fast and explode. The engines blew off the rig and set "everything on fire," the account said. Another explosion below blew more equipment overboard.

BP spokesman John Curry would not comment Friday night on whether methane gas or the series of events described in the internal documents caused the accident.

"Clearly, what happened on the Deepwater Horizon was a tragic accident," said Curry, who is based at an oil spill command center in Robert, La. "We anticipate all the facts will come out in a full investigation."

The BP executives were injured but survived, according to one account. Nine rig crew on the rig floor and two engineers died.

"The furniture and walls trapped some and broke some bones but they managed to get in the life boats with assistance from others," said the transcript.

The reports made Bea, the 73-year-old industry veteran, cry.

"It sure as hell is painful," he said. "Tears of frustration and anger."

On Friday, a BP-chartered vessel lowered a 100-ton concrete-and-steel vault onto the ruptured well, an important step in a delicate and unprecedented attempt to stop most of the gushing crude fouling the sea.

"We are essentially taking a four-story building and lowering it 5,000 feet and setting it on the head of a pin," BP spokesman Bill Salvin told The Associated Press.

Underwater robots guided the 40-foot-tall box into place in a slow-moving drama. Now that the contraption is on the seafloor, workers will need at least 12 hours to let it settle and make sure it's stable before the robots can hook up a pipe and hose that will funnel the oil up to a tanker.

"It appears to be going exactly as we hoped," Salvin said on Friday afternoon, shortly after the four-story device hit the seafloor. "Still lots of challenges ahead, but this is very good progress."

By Sunday, the box the size of a house could be capturing up to 85 percent of the oil.

The task became increasingly urgent as toxic oil crept deeper into the bays and marshes of the Mississippi Delta.

A sheen of oil began arriving on land last week, and crews have been laying booms, spraying chemical dispersants and setting fire to the slick to try to keep it from coming ashore. But now the thicker, stickier goo — arrayed in vivid, brick-colored ribbons — is drawing ever closer to Louisiana's coastal communities.

There are still untold risks and unknowns with the containment box: The approach has never been tried at such depths, where the water pressure is enough to crush a submarine, and any wrong move could damage the leaking pipe and make the problem worse. The seafloor is pitch black and the water murky, though lights on the robots illuminate the area where they are working.

If the box works, another one will be dropped onto a second, smaller leak at the bottom of the Gulf.

At the same time, crews are drilling sideways into the well in hopes of plugging it up with mud and concrete, and they are working on other ways to cap it.

Investigators looking into the cause of the explosion have been focusing on the so-called blowout preventer. Federal regulators told The Associated Press Friday that they are going to examine whether these last-resort cutoff valves on offshore oil wells are reliable.

Blowouts are infrequent, because well holes are blocked by piping and pumped-in materials like synthetic mud, cement and even sea water. The pipes are plugged with cement, so fluid and gas can't typically push up inside the pipes.

Instead, a typical blowout surges up a channel around the piping. The narrow space between the well walls and the piping is usually filled with cement, so there is no pathway for a blowout. But if the cement or broken piping leaves enough space, a surge can rise to the surface.

There, at the wellhead of exploratory wells, sits the massive steel contraption known as a blowout preventer. It can snuff a blowout by squeezing rubber seals tightly around the pipes with up to 1 million pounds of force. If the seals fail, the blowout preventer deploys a last line of defense: a set of rams that can slice right through the pipes and cap the blowout.

Deepwater Horizon was also equipped with an automated backup system called a Deadman. It should have activated the blowout preventer even if workers could not.

Based on the interviews with rig workers, none of those safeguards worked.

Scottbrown2012
05-08-2010, 12:49 PM
Is this still a deliberate act that the administration is covering up?

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100508/ap_on_bi_ge/us_gulf_oil_spill
Its still some conspiracy hatched up by far left enviromentalist tree huggers to stop off shore drilling...Obama probably planted them in the crew to set things in motion!!!:lmao2:

Smurf-Herder
05-08-2010, 01:55 PM
Is this still a deliberate act that the administration is covering up?



I don't know.

The only person who accused the right of saying that refuses to post links to his sources.

slowhand
05-08-2010, 02:26 PM
Same thing that happened to that oil rig in Australia


Cementing Becomes One Focus In Gulf Oil Probe

by Elizabeth Shogren (http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4566209)


Gerald Herbert/AP

May 5, 2010

A cementing job done by a Halliburton crew just hours before the oil accident in the Gulf of Mexico has emerged as a central focus of the investigation.

Bad cementing work has triggered leaks in the past, and some experts say it's hard to imagine a scenario where it was not part of the problem at the Deepwater Horizon well, too.

"That will certainly be a central part of the investigation," says Elmer "Bud" Danenberger, who recently retired as the chief of offshore oil regulations for the U.S. Minerals Management Service.

Still, experts say that even if cementing contributed, it was only one of a series of failures that resulted in an explosion that killed 11 people and sent millions of gallons of oil spewing into the Gulf of Mexico.

Halliburton, the company responsible for the cementing, told members of Congress that it did its job correctly.

And it probably will take a long time before investigators know what, if anything, went wrong with the cementing, but experts and lawmakers have a lot of questions.

"I am suspicious that the cementing job played a role in this," says Rep. Ed Markey (D-MA), who heads the House Energy and Environment Subcommittee.

But he says he will withhold judgment pending a government inquiry.

"This is going be the biggest investigation that's taken place since Three Mile Island," Markey adds, referring to the 1979 nuclear plant meltdown. "We will have to go back and ensure that whatever happened never happens again."

Cementing Before The Explosion

Just 20 hours before the accident, a team from Halliburton was pumping cement into the Deepwater Horizon well.

There was already a pipe in the well for the oil to flow through, but no oil was supposed to flow yet. Cementing, one of the last steps in well construction, seals the crack between the pipe and the wall of rock. Crews pump the cement through the pipe, but it ends up on the outside of the pipe, in the space between the pipe and the rock wall. The cement also caps the bottom of the pipe.

Experts say there are several ways to botch a cement job. For instance, you could mix it incorrectly or not pump enough of it into the well.

If oil and gas are pushing through the rock into the drill hole anywhere along the length of the pipe, it might create a pocket that the cement would not fill in.

If that was the case, operators should have known about it because they would have had cement left over. It is kind of like baking — if the batter doesn't fit in the pan, it's a clue that something is amiss.

When drilling a well, the presence of leftover cement is a signal that pressure is rising back up the hole, probably from a mixture of oil, gas and other stuff.

"If some oil and gas were to invade the well, kind of get around the cement, if you will, before it dried, and then work its way up the well, then you could have a problem," says oil industry veteran Bruce Bullock, the director of the Maguire Energy Institute at Southern Methodist University.

If there are gaps in the cement or it does not set correctly, oil and gas could surge up and out of the well. And if there's enough of it, it will explode, like Deepwater Horizon did.

A blowout preventer should stop a surge from causing a leak, but in this case it did not.

Cementing Implicated In Other Accidents

Still, Danenberger, the former regulator, says a cementing job should not create such a problem to begin with, because cementing is a standard part of drilling a well, and not even one of the riskiest steps.

"It's pretty established technology, and if you follow the right precautions and you monitor your information, it should be straightforward," Danenberger says.

But in recent years, cementing problems have become more prevalent.

Cementing contributed to half of the 39 U.S. blowouts between 1992 and 2006, according to a report that Danenberger co-authored in 2007.

After that, the government pushed to change cementing standards, but let the industry write them.

A cementing job done by Halliburton is also implicated in an Australian oil rig disaster last year that gushed oil into the Timor Sea for 74 days

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=126536457

Boogie man
05-08-2010, 03:37 PM
Methane? Isn't methane gas made from shit?

mrmeangenes
05-08-2010, 05:59 PM
C3H4 + Hot Air = Boogeyman : a methane derivative with a characteristic foul (or is that fowl?) odor.

Boogie man
05-08-2010, 06:08 PM
C3H4 + Hot Air = Boogeyman : a methane derivative with a characteristic foul (or is that fowl?) odor.

It would only be fowl if it was chicken shit. Like you.

Moby
05-08-2010, 11:56 PM
I don't know.

The only person who accused the right of saying that refuses to post links to his sources.
If it was a deliberate act, it could have been done by someone on their own, who died in the blast. And the only acknowledgement could be a single letter to a newspaper, that the administration has asked to be kept quiet for national security reasons.

Or it could have been a simple accident, or faulty equipment.
Didn't you post this? :lmao2:

Smurf-Herder
05-09-2010, 07:37 AM
Didn't you post this? :lmao2:

Boy you really reach, don't you. Maybe you should actually read the whole thing in context (clue - it's right there because you posted the whole thing), instead of only picking out the words you chose to understand and highlight.

Yeah, I gave multiple possibilities. But I didn't quote talk show hosts accusing the administration of sabotaging the rig, then refuse to link to what I quoted to back it up.

Who did I quote?

The really sad part is, you really think you've made a point, by purposely misrepresenting something a five year old can understand at face value.

CommonCents
05-09-2010, 08:41 AM
I knew this a week ago, because I heard an interview with one of the workers on that rig on conservative talk radio.

Glad the rest of you are finally catching up.

lesminora
05-09-2010, 10:38 AM
Boy you really reach, don't you. Maybe you should actually read the whole thing in context (clue - it's right there because you posted the whole thing), instead of only picking out the words you chose to understand and highlight.

Yeah, I gave multiple possibilities. But I didn't quote talk show hosts accusing the administration of sabotaging the rig, then refuse to link to what I quoted to back it up.

Who did I quote?

The really sad part is, you really think you've made a point, by purposely misrepresenting something a five year old can understand at face value.
Sorry,smurfherder.I did not refuse to link anything.I am new to the board and have not figured out how it works yet.The transcript is on Rush's site if you are really interested.---http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_042910/content/01125113.guest.html

CommonCents
05-09-2010, 12:16 PM
Sorry,smurfherder.I did not refuse to link anything.I am new to the board and have not figured out how it works yet.The transcript is on Rush's site if you are really interested.---http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_042910/content/01125113.guest.html

You needed to post the link to where you copied it from. You did not get that from Rush Limbaugh's site.

lesminora
05-09-2010, 01:15 PM
You needed to post the link to where you copied it from. You did not get that from Rush Limbaugh's site.
I understand. .I believe it was you that posted the source, of the Fox/Rush article.It was not that I was trying to hide anything. I wanted to point out that the transcript is on Rush's website also because some doubted [to put it kindly] the quote.