PDA

View Full Version : The Great Iraq Swindle - Rolling Stone Article


Bill
08-27-2007, 02:47 AM
Pretty juicy stuff - how the republicans gave out no-bid contracts to other republicans and ripped off america.

"The Great Iraq Swindle
How Bush Allowed an Army of For-Profit Contractors to Invade the U.S. Treasury --From Issue 1034

"Operation Iraqi Freedom, it turns out, was never a war against Saddam *Hussein's Iraq. It was an invasion of the federal budget, and no occupying force in history has ever been this efficient. George W. Bush's war in the Mesopotamian desert was an experiment of sorts, a crude first take at his vision of a fully privatized American government. In Iraq the lines between essential government services and for-profit enterprises have been blurred to the point of absurdity -- to the point where wounded soldiers have to pay retail prices for fresh underwear, where modern-day chattel are imported from the Third World at slave wages to peel the potatoes we once assigned to grunts in KP, where private companies are guaranteed huge profits no matter how badly they fuck things up.

And just maybe, reviewing this appalling history of invoicing orgies and million-dollar boondoggles, it's not so far-fetched to think that this is the way someone up there would like things run all over -- not just in Iraq but in Iowa, too, with the state police working for Corrections Corporation of America, and DHL with the contract to deliver every Christmas card. And why not? What the Bush administration has created in Iraq is a sort of paradise of perverted capitalism, where revenues are forcibly extracted from the customer by the state, and obscene profits are handed out not by the market but by an unaccountable government bureauc*racy. This is the triumphant culmination of two centuries of flawed white-people thinking, a preposterous mix of authoritarian socialism and laissez-faire profit*eering, with all the worst aspects of both ideologies rolled up into one pointless, supremely idiotic military adventure -- American men and women dying by the thousands, so that Karl Marx and Adam Smith can blow each other in a Middle Eastern glory hole.

It was an awful idea, perhaps the worst America has ever tried on foreign soil. But if you were in on it, it was great work while it lasted. Since time immemorial, the distribution of government largesse had followed a staid, paper-laden procedure in which the federal government would post the details of a contract in periodicals like Commerce Business Daily or, more *recently, on the FedBizOpps Web site. Competitive bids were solicited and contracts were awarded in accordance with the labyrinthine print of the U.S. Code, a straightforward system that worked well enough before the Bush years that, as one lawyer puts it, you could "count the number of cases of criminal fraud on the fingers of one hand."

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/16076312/the_great_iraq_swindle/print

"... What no one knew at the beginning of the war was that the Bush administration had essentially decided to treat the entire Iraqi theater as an exception to the rules. All you had to do was get to Iraq and the game was on.

But getting there wasn't easy. To travel to Iraq, would-be contractors needed permission from the Bush administration, which was far from blind in its appraisal of applicants. In a much-ballyhooed example of favoritism, the White House originally installed a clown named Jim O'Beirne at the relevant evaluation desk in the Department of Defense. O'Beirne proved to be a classic Bush villain, a moron's moron who judged applicants not on their Arabic skills or their relevant expertise but on their Republican bona fides; he sent a twenty-four-year-old who had never worked in finance to manage the reopening of the Iraqi stock exchange, and appointed a recent graduate of an evangelical university for home-schooled kids who had no accounting experience to manage Iraq's $13 billion budget. James K. Haveman, who had served as Michigan's community-health director under a GOP governor, was put in charge of rehabilitating Iraq's health-care system and decided that what this war-ravaged, malnourished, sanitation-deficient country most urgently needed was . . . an anti-smoking campaign. "

Krome
08-27-2007, 09:36 PM
The main reason for America to go to war has usually been money. JFK had a public brain removal operation to ensure that America went to war in Vietnam.

Linkster
08-28-2007, 01:06 AM
Krome - the US didnt enter any troops into the Vietnam war till 2 years after Kennedy was dead - we had CIA and "military" advisers there since 1954 at the request of the French (since this conflict/war had been going on since the 1800s) after they lost their battle with the Vietnamese and lost their colonial control in 1954.
We entered after the N Vietnamese attacked a US Navy ship in the gulf of Tonkin giving President Johnson the basic provacation he needed.

Kennedy had tried to avoid getting into the conflict and instead followed the advice of the Rostow-Taylor report which was to sit back and wait and see if the So Vietnamese could hold their own and if the Diem regieme could handle itself (which obviously it didnt)

On a side note, Johnson really didnt want to get into the conflict either as he had his own agendas left over from his congressional days that he wanted to get passed through that he thought were a lot more important than a little spread of communism to another domino in the SE Asian arena - fortunately he took the time to press those issues which resulted in the Civil Rights Act against a lot of powerful people that didnt want to see him get that through.

Krome
08-28-2007, 01:15 AM
I need to stop watching conspiracy theory movies.

Linkster
08-28-2007, 07:48 AM
Krome - the Gulf of Tonkin incident is one of the best theories out there - since it was used to justify sending troops to Vietnam and passing the authorization bill in congress.
Most reports of the incident these days pretty much say that the US destroyer that was attacked actually was not attacked and was just firing its guns at shadows (this was later confirmed by Stockdale who was flying overhead - you may remember him as Perots running mate a few years back - when he saw the firing below him and saw no gunboats attacking) The president even commented a year later that the intelligence he based his call on was probably flawed and that they were probably firing at whales. That said, it was the incident that conspiricy theorists say now was planned and made up well in advance to ensure the US would get involved - and since it was a lie fed to the US through the newspapers - eventually led to the protests and general populations dissatisfaction of the war - especially after the pentagon papers were released by the NY Times showing that the citizens had been lied to on many occasions.

disrupter
08-29-2007, 04:25 AM
My understanding is that Bechtel profited from the Vietnam war too.

Some things just never change.

Whether America gets it's arse caught in a bear trap or not,
they come out of it fat & well larded on blood profits.

Don't you just love how during war time the confusion will cover up any number of ruthless profiteering schemes & crimes?

Bechtel, Halliburton both loved Iraq & Katrina,
Blackwater & big oil love Iraq,
although the oil sector is using refinery shutdowns of various sorts to cause distribution bottlenecks & jack up prices & profits even further.

Linkster
08-29-2007, 08:11 AM
I dont believe Bechtel was involved in anything in Vietnam - I could be mistaken, but we didnt have any reconstruction or construction projects over there and bechtel had plenty to do here at home with the building of all of the US's nuclear power plants during that time as well as the Bart transportation system in California (which is really their forte since they started out as railroad builders). They were also the company that built the Hoover dam.
Remember back then the defense department was doing all of their own construction and didnt outsource it - most people making money off the pentagon at the time were generals getting "advisory fees" from the defense contractors for hardware (there were many scandals about that back then) and we werent outsourcing anything in the way of military support like we do these days (didnt need to - we had a draft)

disrupter
08-29-2007, 09:15 PM
Linkster, i believe you are correct,

I guess Bechtel had longterm connections in Iraq, which on a pundit show was being discussed with Vietnam, i guess i misunderstood.

The report also documents Bechtel's history in Iraq, where the company was pushing for an oil pipeline deal in the 1980s at the same time that Saddam Hussein was committing his worst atrocities against the Iraqi people. Bechtel was named by Hussein's government as one of the U.S. companies that provided it with materials that could be used to make weaponry.

''Bechtel has demonstrated brazen moral corruption by first contributing to the development of Iraq's weapons, then pushing for a war against Iraq, and finally profiting from the tragedy and destruction wrought by that war,'' said Andrea Buffa, peace campaign coordinator at Global Exchange. ''It is a textbook example of what war profiteering looks like. This report answers the question - 'What's wrong with Bechtel?' ''http://www.corpwatch.org/article.php?id=6968

I guess they have been on both sides of Saddam is what they were saying.

Linkster
08-29-2007, 09:28 PM
You would be amazed at the involvement of American companies in Iraq long before either of these wars - when Reagan was in office, his middle east envoy went to Iraq and offered weapons to Saddam (BTW - his name was Donald Rumsfeld) - and we sold Saddam 60 helicopters with "crop-spraying" technology installed - which was used later that year to disperse the mustard gas on the Kurds who were fighting with Iran against Iraq. This gas was made using technology and raw materials we supplied him with
This happened right after Reagan took Iraq off the terrorist watch list in 1982 - when we saw Iran starting to turn the tide in the war against Iraq. Several companies in the US made a ton of money off technology sold to Saddam including his nuclear and biological weapons technology.

Interestingly, you hear all the talk about Iran and its nuclear power plant technology these days (of course everyone makes it into weapons which its not - but thats another discussion) and they forget that we as a country supplied all of this nuclear technology and the materials to Iran - from companies like GE and Westinghouse - we even arranged for their engineers to be trained in the US at our universities to learn the nuclear field.