PDA

View Full Version : Top conservative and liberal both call for DOJ investigation of Rahm Emanuel


Smurf-Herder
12-25-2009, 09:25 AM
This appears to involve a conspiracy, on the part of the Treasusury Dept., Justice Dept. and the White House to block any investigation of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae; and slip another $800 billion into TARP as a slush fund, avoiding any Congressional oversight.


Odd Couple Of Norquist, Hamsher Call For Investigation, Rahm's Resignation

Grover Norquist and Jane Hamsher are not often on the same side of anything, beyond both usually being in the Western Hemisphere. Norquist is a leading voice of fiscal conservatism as head of the anti-tax group Americans for Tax Reform; Hamsher is a leading voice of the digital left, whose blog Firedoglake has taken on influence in speaking up for progressives during the health care debate and in pressuring lawmakers through its activist arm, FDL Action.

But the two have united to level serious allegations at White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel and demand his resignation.


Hamsher and Norquist coauthored a letter to Attorney General Eric Holder today calling for a Department of Justice investigation of Emanuel for his role on the board of Freddie Mac, alleging that the White House, since Emanuel arrived there, has blocked an investigation of the government-sponsored mortgage lender.

Emanuel served on Freddie Mac's board in 2000-2001, when he quit to run (successfully) for Congress. He has also recently sparked the ire of liberals like Hamsher after it was reported that he pushed for Senate Democratic leaders to compromise with Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-CT) on health care reform and jettison an expansion of Medicare from the Senate bill.

See their letter below:


Attorney General of the United States of America

U.S. Department of Justice

950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20530-0001


Dear Attorney General Holder:

We write to demand an immediate investigation into the activities of White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel. We believe there is an abundant public record which establishes that the actions of the White House have blocked any investigation into his activities while on the board of Freddie Mac from 2000-2001, and facilitated the cover up of potentially malfeasance until the 10-year statute of limitations has run out.

The purpose of this letter is to connect the dots to establish both the conduct of Mr. Emanuel and those working with him to thwart inquiry, and to support your acting speedily so that the statute of limitations does not run out before the Justice Department is able to empanel a grand jury.

The New York Times reports that the administration is negotiating to double the commitments to Fannie and Freddie for a total of $800 billion by December 31, in order to avoid the congressional approval that would be needed after that date. But there currently is no Inspector General exercising independent oversight of these entities. Acting Inspector General Ed Kelly was stripped of his authority earlier this year by the Justice Department, relying on a loophole in a bill Mr. Emanuel cosponsored and pushed through Congress shortly before he left for the White House. This effectively ended Mr. Kelly's investigation into what happened at Fannie and Freddie.

Since that time, despite multiple warnings by Congress that having no independent Inspector General for a federal agency that oversees $6 trillion in mortgages is a serious oversight, the White House has not appointed one.

We recognize that these are extremely serious accusations, but the stonewalling by Mr. Emanuel and the White House has left us with no other redress. A 2003 report by Freddie Mac's regulator indicated that Freddie Mac executives had informed the board of their intention to misstate the earnings to insure their own bonuses during the time Mr. Emanuel was a director. But the White House refused to comply with a Freedom of Information Act request from the Chicago Tribune for those board minutes on the grounds that Freddie Mac was a "commercial" entity, even though it was wholly owned by the government at the time the request was made.

If the Treasury approves the $800 billion commitment to Fannie and Freddie by the end of the year, it will mean that under the influence of Rahm Emanuel, the White House is moving a trillion-dollar slush fund into corruption-riddled companies with no oversight in place. This will allow Fannie and Freddie to continue to purchase more toxic assets from banks, acting as a back-door increase of the TARP without congressional approval.

Before the White House commits any more money to Fannie and Freddie, we call on the Public Integrity Section in the Justice Department to begin an investigation into the cause of Fannie and Freddie's conservatorship, into Rahm Emanuel's activities on the board of Freddie Mac (including any violations of his fiduciary duties to shareholders), into the decision-making behind the continued vacancy of Fannie and Freddie's Inspector General post, and into potential public corruption by Rahm Emanuel in connection with his time in Congress, in the White House, and on the board of Freddie Mac.

We also call for the immediate appointment of an Inspector General with a complete remit to go after this information.

We both come from differing political ideologies. One of us is the conservative head of a transparency foundation, and the other is the publisher of a liberal political blog. But we make common cause today out of grave concern for the future of our country in the wake of corruption-riddled bailouts. These bailouts continue to rob Main Street to benefit Wall Street, and because that, we together demand the resignation of Mr. Emanuel, a man who has steadfastly worked to obstruct both oversight and inquiry into the matter. Rahm Emanuel's conflicts of interest render him far too compromised to serve as gatekeeper to the President of the United States.

We will lay out the details further below, and are available at your earliest convenience to meet with you directly.

Sincerely,


Jane Hamsher Grover Norquist

Firedoglake.com Americans for Tax Reform

Norquist and Hamsher cite a Chicago Tribune story from March reporting that, while Emanuel was there, Freddie Mac's board was encouraged to misstate earnings and that Emanuel benefited from a Freddie Mac fundraiser after he left the board to run for Congress (Freddie Mac was fined by the FEC for illegally hosting fundraisers for politicians, the Tribune reported). The Justice Department possesses board minutes and correspondence from Emanuel's time there, the two say; they also cite the removal of the former Inspector General in charge of overseeing Freddie Mac during the transfer of oversight authorities after Freddie Mac was taken into conservatorship as part of its government bailout.

http://politics.theatlantic.com/2009/12/odd_couple_of_norquist_hamsher_call_for_investigat ion_rahms_resignation.php

Smurf-Herder
12-25-2009, 10:05 AM
For those who really care, the petition for a full investigation to be sent to Attorney General Eric Holder can be signed here:

Tell Attorney General Holder: Investigate Rahm Emanuel

Sign our Petition to Attorney General Eric Holder:

"We write to demand an immediate investigation into the activities of White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel. We believe there is an abundant public record which establishes that the actions of the White House have blocked any investigation into his activities while on the board of Freddie Mac from 2000-2001, and facilitated the coverup of potentially criminal actions until the 10 year statute of limitations has run out."

Jane Hamsher and Grover Norquist wrote to Attorney General Eric Holder requesting an investigation Rahm Emanuel’s role on Freddie Mac’s board during years when executives laid out a plan to defraud investors, and the White House's subsequent role in preventing an investigation.

To make matters worse, the administration is pushing for an $800 billion bailout of Fannie and Freddie while the organizations lack an Inspector General and basic oversight.

Before the White House commits any more money to Fannie and Freddie, the Justice Department should begin an investigation into the cause Fannie and Freddie's conservatorship, into Rahm Emanuel's activities on the board of Freddie Mac (including any violations of his fiduciary duties to shareholders), into the decision making behind the vacancy of Fannie and Freddie's Inspector General, and into potential public corruption by Rahm Emanuel in connection with his time in Congress, in the White House and on the board of Freddie Mac. We also call for the immediate appointment of an Inspector General with a complete remit to go after this information.


http://action.firedoglake.com/page/s/investigaterahm?source=web&subsource=side

Smurf-Herder
12-26-2009, 10:41 AM
I hope some liberals have the balls to address this. Because I'm going to refer to it every time somebody brings up TARP.

The first time around, everything happened so fast it got through without much debate. But nearly everybody was against it afterwards, when they saw how it went down. In this case, it looks like outright corruption and a conspiracy, with foreknowledge of how it's going down.

John Galt
12-26-2009, 11:14 AM
I hope some liberals have the balls to address this. Because I'm going to refer to it every time somebody brings up TARP.

The first time around, everything happened so fast it got through without much debate. But nearly everybody was against it afterwards, when they saw how it went down. In this case, it looks like outright corruption and a conspiracy, with foreknowledge of how it's going down.
I'm no fan of Emanuel, nor any other Wall St. insiders.

TARP amounted to Xmas bonuses for a bunch of wealthy bankers/AIG execs..

I'm not much of a conspiracy theorist, although I don't trust any of the crooks that run our govt..

That said, the banks didn't live up to their end of the TARP agreement. They took the money, and used it to invest in the same risky ventures that got us into the mess in the first place.

Or, they gave out big bonuses. Whatever the reason, they still aren't lending money. Perhaps this proposed money is to go directly for small business lending?

There's a lot of negative speculation in your article...perhaps well founded. But, if there was some guaranteed oversight, this proposition wouldn't be as bad as it sounds.


I'd still rather see Obama pressure the banks to start holding up their end of the original agreement.

Smurf-Herder
12-26-2009, 11:37 AM
I'm no fan of Emanuel, nor any other Wall St. insiders.

TARP amounted to Xmas bonuses for a bunch of wealthy bankers/AIG execs..

I'm not much of a conspiracy theorist, although I don't trust any of the crooks that run our govt..

That said, the banks didn't live up to their end of the TARP agreement. They took the money, and used it to invest in the same risky ventures that got us into the mess in the first place.

Or, they gave out big bonuses. Whatever the reason, they still aren't lending money. Perhaps this proposed money is to go directly for small business lending?

There's a lot of negative speculation in your article...perhaps well founded. But, if there was some guaranteed oversight, this proposition wouldn't be as bad as it sounds.


I'd still rather see Obama pressure the banks to start holding up their end of the original agreement.


This is the thing - these are the facts:

1) Emanuel recieved $18 million for a couple years work at Freddie Mac

2) Geithner was head of the NY Fed, while the mortgage crisis came to a head; then wrote the TARP Program to bail out the banks

3) Emanuel was a director at Freddie Mac, when figures were to be knowingly falsified

4) Emanuel was given fundraisers by the bank to run for Congress; which they were fined heavily for

5) Emanuel helped write legislation that made it easier to legally remove TARP's Inspector General, before he left for the White House

6) Holder removed the Inspector General, removing all oversight and accountability on how the money's spent

7) Geithner, as Treasury Secretary, is helping Obama rush through another $800 Billion+ to the banks; to beat a deadline that would allow Congress to have any say in it.

Smurf-Herder
12-26-2009, 11:40 AM
Don't you get it John?

All these budget-busting programs are only going to be slush-funds for the Uber-rich; totally controlled by all the key people pre-positioned in the executive branch.

The very ultra-capitalist robber barrons you fear, are the ones who are working with the leadership, which use all the social rhetoric to get what they need to take the money. Redistribution of the wealth is correct ... but it looks more like it's going in the other direction.

Pat
12-26-2009, 01:42 PM
Funny thing about stories like this........
Mr Obama will claim that he knew nothing about it.
For a guy that is supposedly so smart, there seems to be an awful lot of "stuff" that he is clueless about when it comes to his friends and advisers.

MintJulep
12-26-2009, 01:59 PM
^ No, he's just a liar.

Pat
12-26-2009, 02:02 PM
There is that. :)

Southernman
12-26-2009, 10:58 PM
When I see Geithner or Rahm Emanuel on TV for any reason, I feel like I need to take a shower. These two just ooze sleeze.

Bill Cosby
12-26-2009, 11:39 PM
I'm no fan of Emanuel, nor any other Wall St. insiders.

TARP amounted to Xmas bonuses for a bunch of wealthy bankers/AIG execs..

I'm not much of a conspiracy theorist, although I don't trust any of the crooks that run our govt..

That said, the banks didn't live up to their end of the TARP agreement. They took the money, and used it to invest in the same risky ventures that got us into the mess in the first place.

Or, they gave out big bonuses. Whatever the reason, they still aren't lending money. Perhaps this proposed money is to go directly for small business lending?

There's a lot of negative speculation in your article...perhaps well founded. But, if there was some guaranteed oversight, this proposition wouldn't be as bad as it sounds.


I'd still rather see Obama pressure the banks to start holding up their end of the original agreement.
Stop........... Stop John stop...........

You are betraying your liberal oath to keep eyes shut & shout down the neO-cons.............. We, like they :lmao2: are mere mouth pieces for the entertainers & pundits......... No independent thinking is condoned or allowed........:lmao2:

LOL...........................

I agree............... I am signing up to run him through the ringer..........

I have been disappointed one appointment after another, after another...

I think he should toss geitners ass under the bus just to make it look good...... Or any other reason, my bad or no reason what so ever... His tax evasion was enough for me.......

xav8terx
12-28-2009, 09:35 AM
Stop........... Stop John stop...........

You are betraying your liberal oath to keep eyes shut & shout down the neO-cons.............. We, like they :lmao2: are mere mouth pieces for the entertainers & pundits......... No independent thinking is condoned or allowed........:lmao2:

LOL...........................

I agree............... I am signing up to run him through the ringer..........

I have been disappointed one appointment after another, after another...

I think he should toss geitners ass under the bus just to make it look good...... Or any other reason, my bad or no reason what so ever... His tax evasion was enough for me.......



But at least we have the honor and integrity to recognize the problem and take steps to make sure it doesn’t happen again.

Like Obama for instance, you don’t see many of us who voted for him standing behind him 100%. We see that he is not living up to his campaign promises and we have called him out on it every time....just wish the right could do the same....but instead they keep re-electing the same criminals into office (and blindly supporting them, blaming every possible person and or situation) making the situation far worse then what it was before...they will never wake up and learn anything.

Bill Cosby
12-28-2009, 12:48 PM
But at least we have the honor and integrity to recognize the problem and take steps to make sure it doesn’t happen again.

Like Obama for instance, you don’t see many of us who voted for him standing behind him 100%. We see that he is not living up to his campaign promises and we have called him out on it every time....just wish the right could do the same....

I agree.............. & I was not being hard on my homie there.. That was sarcasm & some satire.......lol

I think some of them are honest about it but I agree certainly not everyone... Nor is everyone affiliated w/ the dem's......

There is nothing that can be done about it............. It is universal I believe...

It is what I refer to as homerism... My side, my team, my country, my region......... Ppl can find the stupidest of reasons to fight & separate themselves from others...

If someone on my team or in my party fucks up.... They fucked up....... I am not going to deny it or defend it.... tuff shit... Most ppl would look for ways to rationalize it, justify it, excuse it or say someone else did it so it aint so bad.......... That seems to be human nature.........

That is why I try to deal w/ absolutes as much as I can...........

Lets deal w/ what they did or did not do, not what team they are on... I find most folks wishing to stay clear of that.... I am lucky if I can bait anyone anymore w/ that............:lmao2:

Example torture............. You think during the time or Ronnie or NiXon, Ford or Carter any republican or democrat had a problem or even a hesitation responding to the question "is torture wrong".............

Now try it......... But, if, depends etc........ They have to justify it.....

& the reason is, we are doing........... So is it wrong to torture Americans, of course, absolutely...... Is it wrong to torture non-Americans, see line above..

& that is one of the very reasons I no longer which to be identified w/ that movement.............

Hopefully some of them will find the sac to move up & beyond all that... & I don't mean just conservatives neither............:thumbsup: