View Full Version : I wonder why right wingers and republicans are such cowardly weaklings?
They just don't seem to have the balls to stick around and defend their positions.
Or maybe it's it's brains they lack?
Nah, the answer is clear. They never had a brain, and they gave their balls to the rnc. Now they got neither.
They used to have the threat of violence. Now they just hide.
Poor widdle wight-wingers...
Kinky Jones
07-20-2007, 05:42 PM
they are all a bunch of johnny come latelys who have cut and run from their party and the tiny few that have the balls to speak in public have no brains and say things like "bush is a liberal republican" and they really believe just getting rid of him and plugging another mindless red stater in the white house will solve everything... they are pretty brilliant... and all a bunch of lewinskis too, they all wanna get down on their knees and blow the man with the most power :punchballs:
it's funny how they label the dumb dumb do gooders known as democrats as pussies when less than a handful of republicans have enough balls to stand up to the president and they won't stop hiding behind party lines becasue they are all a bunch of weak fools when cut of from thier political herd, the dems really are just too nice and pretty dumb but republicans are really the pussies :thumbsup:
Here's a good example - this video is busting up the charts at youtube -
GENERATION CHICKENHAWK
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-QcQg4LBmU
It seems the college republicans have a curiously high level of "Health Problems" and "Medical Reasons" that would "prevent them" from serving.
kres24GT
07-21-2007, 10:47 AM
Here's a good example - this video is busting up the charts at youtube -
GENERATION CHICKENHAWK
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-QcQg4LBmU
It seems the college republicans have a curiously high level of "Health Problems" and "Medical Reasons" that would "prevent them" from serving.
The Chickenhawk argument is a ridiculous one and partisan nonsense. Everyone supports policies and political goals without donating their time, efforts, or life. I support my local fire department, but I don't join their efforts. I support my local police force but again am not joining the force.
I don't like the war, but those who do, I see no reason why they should join the effort by enlisting. I loathe the war on drugs, but don't think everyone who agrees with it should join the DEA.
To claim and American individual must give himself in government servitude to every program or policy he/she supports is beyond ridiculous. Makes for great talking points and rhetoric though. Good demogaugery as well. Accomplishes little else.
I will say those these guys are pussies for making up excuses. The better course of action would to have pointed out the level of idiocy in the Chickenhawk argument.
kres24GT
07-21-2007, 10:49 AM
They just don't seem to have the balls to stick around and defend their positions.
Or maybe it's it's brains they lack?
Nah, the answer is clear. They never had a brain, and they gave their balls to the rnc. Now they got neither.
They used to have the threat of violence. Now they just hide.
Poor widdle wight-wingers...
Do you want an honest answer, or just to hear right wingers are weak and stupid?
Linkster
07-21-2007, 04:51 PM
I would say that most Americans would never give of themselves the time or service that "should be" (my opinion) instilled in each of us as required.
Actually when I was growing up we still had citizenship classes in school where you were presented all different types of services that would love to have volunteers ranging from the Peace Corps to military to firefighting to you name it - and Id say that 90% of us chose our options and those in my generation still do - either through our military service and support of families of active duty military - to many of my friends who chose to serve in different countries provinding peaceful services to other friends who are still active in their local fire departments as volunteers - or even going out and teaching scouts or other youth groups volunteerism and numerous different subjects.
I still do presentations to cub scouts on the proper display and handling of the flag - as well as volunteer as a first responder and whatever else Im asked to if I have the time available.
As far as avoiding the military for consience reasons - I fully support those that chose that option and have had many friends that did leave the country - for other reasons - I dont remember anyone really trying to avoid service other than the rich kids who always got the deferments for medical or other silly reasons and yes they were all a bunch of pussies - unfortunately they also belong to that class of people that become politicians which is why there is such a high rate of idiots running the country - from the president on down
Do you want an honest answer, or just to hear right wingers are weak and stupid?
Since I'm trying to pick a fight, what I want is for a right winger to stand up for his beliefs and argue them out.
In this case, the perfect op will have to do. ;-}
Southern Man
07-23-2007, 08:13 PM
They just don't seem to have the balls to stick around and defend their positions.
Or maybe it's it's brains they lack?
Nah, the answer is clear. They never had a brain, and they gave their balls to the rnc. Now they got neither.
They used to have the threat of violence. Now they just hide.
Poor widdle wight-wingers...
Aren't you taking about libs?
What wit!
I'm humbled in the presence of a master. How could I ever have imagined a simple substitution of perjorative nouns could be so devastating?
Southern Man
07-23-2007, 08:20 PM
What wit!
I'm humbled in the presence of a master. How could I ever have imagined a simple substitution of perjorative nouns could be so devastating? At least you know your place, grasshopper.
You amuse me mildly, neocon cur.
Stick around, and market your services. I would say goods and services, but we've ceased to be a productive goods economy as a nation, so statistically it's just more likely that you are the services sector kind of neocon.
Freely pursue your worship of the scrotal sacs of the rich, with much greasy osculation and frottage, and vigorously urinate upon the pallid faces of the rapidly declining middle class, adding to the unpleasant burning sensation they experience as their real income dissipates and their debt load increases.
Pour the secondhand thoughts of your handlers into america's ear!
Southern Man
07-23-2007, 09:12 PM
Neocon? What is that?
What's a cur?
Southern Man
07-23-2007, 10:25 PM
Is that crickets chirping, or y'alls knees shaking? :D
Southern Man
07-26-2007, 01:37 PM
It's been 5 days since Bill wanted to pick a fight and he's still cowering. Pitiful.
Politicz
07-27-2007, 06:27 AM
They just don't seem to have the balls to stick around and defend their positions.
Or maybe it's it's brains they lack?
Nah, the answer is clear. They never had a brain, and they gave their balls to the rnc. Now they got neither.
They used to have the threat of violence. Now they just hide.
Poor widdle wight-wingers...
I think the republicans lost what little masculine persona they might have had when Duke Cunningham stood before the news media cameras and the world crying like a little b*2tch because he was getting ready to go to jail, instead of just standing up like a man, admitting his wrongs and apologizing, and then strolling off to jail. And, let's not forget republican crongressman, Mark Foley, who was publically exposed for chasing johnsons on Capitol Hill. Hell, he must of had a flashback about Duke Cunningham bawling before the news media cameras, because he ran like a coward to rehab in order to keep from going to jail-pink shirt and all. What a freakin' tragedy-it's no wonder the republicans lost the last elecitons by a landslide.:lmao2: ,:p ,:lmao2:
Southern Man
07-27-2007, 08:59 AM
I think the republicans lost what little masculine persona they might have had when Duke Cunningham stood before the news media cameras and the world crying like a little b*2tch because he was getting ready to go to jail, instead of just standing up like a man, admitting his wrongs and apologizing, and then strolling off to jail. And, let's not forget republican crongressman, Mark Foley, who was publically exposed for chasing johnsons on Capitol Hill. Hell, he must of had a flashback about Duke Cunningham bawling before the news media cameras, because he ran like a coward to rehab in order to keep from going to jail-pink shirt and all. What a freakin' tragedy-it's no wonder the republicans lost the last elecitons by a landslide.:lmao2: ,:p ,:lmao2:
Wow. What incredibly sexist, homophobic and judgemental comments.
Southern Man
07-27-2007, 09:05 AM
BTW, for all you libs who use those bouncing smilies, some they look real silly with my browser animation turned off. For example the lmao2 looks like you’re in the midst of a proctology exam.
It's been 5 days since Bill wanted to pick a fight and he's still cowering. Pitiful.
I'll explain this once.
You have negative credibility with me.
If you ever start communicating effectively, and offering reasoned arguments, your credibility will rise to zero.
Once your credibility rises above zero, which will take at least two instances of reasoned argument, I will be in a position to debate with you.
Untill that point, I regard you as non compus mentis, and I am not qualified to assist a person with such a problem.
I do want to thank you for providing such a good example of neocon rudeness. You are an excellent reminder of why debate is important.
If I hurt you by experimenting with a challenge to right-wingers, to get them to debate, I apologise. I don't always understand neocon culture.
Southern Man
07-27-2007, 07:26 PM
I'll explain this once.
You have negative credibility with me.
If you ever start communicating effectively, and offering reasoned arguments, your credibility will rise to zero.
Once your credibility rises above zero, which will take at least two instances of reasoned argument, I will be in a position to debate with you.
Untill that point, I regard you as non compus mentis, and I am not qualified to assist a person with such a problem.
I do want to thank you for providing such a good example of neocon rudeness. You are an excellent reminder of why debate is important.
If I hurt you by experimenting with a challenge to right-wingers, to get them to debate, I apologise. I don't always understand neocon culture.
The fact is that you have never entered into a discussion of issues with me, instead deflecting discussion as above, claiming that I have "zero credibility" and such nonsense. It is quite obvious to any rational person that you are unable to back up your beliefs.
Southern Man
07-28-2007, 12:38 PM
Borrowed from another thread:
How to Debate a Liberal
First, when you debate a liberal, you have to realize something: you’re not going to “win.” Sure, you will have common sense, experience, facts, realistic knowledge, and the very universe in your favor, but that won’t be enough. You see, in order to “win” an argument against a liberal, a liberal has to have the capacity to learn. And a liberal that can learn is a rare thing, indeed. You’ve heard it said “if you’re not a liberal at 16 you don’t have a heart, and if you’re not a conservative at 30, you don’t have a brain.” That’s because liberals tend to “reason” with emotion, like teenagers, while conservatives have learned life lessons and don’t perpetually wear rose-colored glasses all their lives.
So, when arguing with a liberal, the best you can hope for is that a third party reading the debate will look at the differences between you and the liberal and will wise up and join the right side, and that’s not the left.
During the debate, however, you’ll no doubt run into many of the same characteristics others have seen, depending on how long the debate is. Many of these I’ve had the amusing pleasure to see here at Blogster, so there are readily available examples around.
But, you have to be prepared. Here’s a short list of what you should bring with you to a debate:
1) Waders. With liberals, the BS can get awfully deep. The more they talk, the deeper it gets, and they hope to drown their opponents in a sea of sh*t. Come prepared.
2) A pillow or cushion. In a long debate with a liberal, there will be many opportunities to bang your head into something hard as you see your words twisted to mean something else, then attacked. If you type something like “abortions hurt women, and that’s wrong,” and see the liberal reply with “oh, so you’re saying abortions should be illegal because you think raping and incest are just fine and dandy, huh, racist??!!” you may be tempted to run your head into the nearest set of bricks. It’s natural. Being frustrated with arrogant stupidity is something everyone with a brain cell has to endure at times. Just make sure your pillow is nice and soft and you should make it through. Liberals tend to purposely twist words into other meanings so that they can argue against those new meanings. It’s far easier for them than actually debating what you said.
3) A copy of 1984. At some point, if you suggest any limit on any activity liberals like (except campaign contributions to Democrats), you will be compared to something in 1984. I think this is the only book liberals have ever read, and that’s because the title doesn’t have any words in it. As such, despite the fact that they act more like the government in the book, they like accusing their opponents of such behaviors. A Christian meekly stating his view that homosexuals shouldn’t marry is a member of the “thought police,” and everything Bush does us leading us down the path in 1984. On a side note, they may refer to you as a Nazi as well, as in “so you think parents are actually responsible for how they raise their kids? You NAZI from 1984!!” (It doesn’t matter that Nazis weren’t in 1984…a liberal’s grip on reality is tenuous at best, so cut ‘em some slack.)
4) Prepare beforehand. In order to desensitize yourself to a debate with a liberal, you will have to request the assistance of a friend. Have your friend come over before you reply or start a debate, and have him spend no less than one hour screaming obscenities at you. This will ready you for a typical liberal “dialogue” once they are backed into an intellectual corner (which doesn’t take long). If you want to be really prepared, have your friend repeatedly call you the following: bigot, racist, homophobe, islamophobe, war-mongerer, redneck, close-minded, intolerant, and fascist. These make up the core of liberal arguments, even if used improperly. “You conservatives! You’re always wanting people to have to take responsibility for themselves! Homophobes!” Or, “you don’t think Ann Coulter’s latest book should be banned? Racist!!” You get the idea…
5) A scorecard. Just for fun, you may want to write down how often the liberal you’re debating calls you any of the names listed above, or worse. It’s amusing to see how many times a “tolerant,” “open-minded” liberal can use the word bigot or Islamophobe in a debate about school choice. Heck, a liberal could use the word “racist” fifteen times just ordering lunch.
6) A neck brace. If you’re not careful, you could end up with whiplash trying to follow the speedy zips and flips a liberal uses to avoid being pinned down when he knows he’s losing. You think certain cockroaches speed around trying to avoid being caught? Try watching a liberal with nothing he can say. In one sentence he’s arguing against something you didn’t even say, and in the next calling your parentage into question while screaming about how great Clinton was and why you’re a redneck Nazi homophobe for wanting to let Americans vote on abortion. Even quoting a liberal and replying directly to that quote doesn’t help. Apparently, they don’t see what they’ve written afterwards. Selective blindness seems to inflict liberals at a nearly 100% rate. Someone should collect donations to have scientists try to cure it.
7) Another friend. You’ll need someone you can trust to be there with you during some of the longer debates with liberals. This friend should never, under any circumstances, read or listen to the liberal you’re debating. His entire job is just to be there to jump-start your brain when it locks up, stunned into unresponsiveness by the sheer depths of stupidity that the liberal spews out. As a reasonable, thinking person, you may not be prepared to deal with the intellectual black-hole that a liberal can create when they convince themselves of their arguments to the point where they mentally implode and their minds and words become intellectual vacuums. Reading or hearing this level of liberalism can jeopardize your mental capacity, so when your friend sees your eyes glaze over, a trickle of drool coming out of your mouth, and you don’t coherently respond to external stimuli (in essence, you “become” a liberal), he has to be there to start reading to you. Any book above a second grade level should be enough to snap you out of it, seeing as how even that is light-years beyond ultimate liberalism, but the higher the grade, the better. Just don’t use that copy of 1984, or you may find yourself imaging yourself as a Nazi, in keeping with the liberal thought-pattern. In a spot, even “Dick and Jane” will work, but someone has to be there to read it to you.
8) Another cushion. If you’re sitting at a desk, it would be a good idea to put something under your chin, so that when it drops it doesn’t strike the desk and cause pain. This often happens when a conservative sees a liberal accuse him of something that liberals do. A liberal may complain about a person saying something at a graduation ceremony, for example, and states that the person should never have spoken. But, when you reply that they had that right, the liberal can come back with “you conservatives just want to stifle free speech for everyone but who you agree with!” (Usually followed by either “racist,” or “homophobe,” generally.) Having your chin drop all the way into your crotch after reading something this inane not only dries out your mouth, but also can leave you stunned until the pain in your groin fades away. Sometimes, the liberal may say something like this but combine it with Ultimate Liberalism, and leave you writhing on the floor a drooling, slobbering mess. So make sure your friend reads to you and gets you some ice. Or better yet, just have two cushions in advance, and save yourself a little pain.
Politicz
07-29-2007, 06:56 AM
I'll explain this once.
You have negative credibility with me.
If you ever start communicating effectively, and offering reasoned arguments, your credibility will rise to zero.
Once your credibility rises above zero, which will take at least two instances of reasoned argument, I will be in a position to debate with you.
Untill that point, I regard you as non compus mentis, and I am not qualified to assist a person with such a problem.
I do want to thank you for providing such a good example of neocon rudeness. You are an excellent reminder of why debate is important.
If I hurt you by experimenting with a challenge to right-wingers, to get them to debate, I apologise. I don't always understand neocon culture.
I agree with you, and a lot of neocons are politically stiff too, and take everything way too seriously-especially when dems, and indenpendents make fun of the neocon jailbirds like Duke Cunningham. Hee, hee, hee,...:lmao2: ...hee, hee!:D
Southern Man
07-29-2007, 02:06 PM
I agree with you, .... Looks like Bill picked a fight then ran away with his tail between his legs.
vBulletin v3.5.4, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.