PDA

View Full Version : Keep Your Eye on the Target


LadyMod at scam.com
07-17-2007, 11:09 PM
Keep Your Eye on the Target
by Congressman Ron Paul

House of Representatives
203 Cannon H.O.B.
Washington, D.C. 20515


The other day, I made a huge "gaffe" on national TV:
I told the truth about the crimes of the U.S. government.

As you can imagine, the ceiling fell in, and a couple of walls too.
Congressman are supposed to support the government, I was told. Oh, it's okay to criticize around the edges, but there are certain subjects a member of the House of Representatives is not supposed to bring up. But I touched the real "third-rail" of American politics, and the sparks sure flew.

I was interviewed on C-SPAN's morning "Washington Journal, and I used the opportunity, as I do all such media appearances, to point out how many of our liberties have been stolen by the federal government. We must take them back.

The Constitution, after all, has a very limited role for Washington, D.C.
If we stuck to the Constitution as written, we would have: No federal meddling in our schools; no Federal Reserve; no U.S. membership in the UN; no gun control; and no foreign aid.

We would have no welfare for big corporations, or the "poor"; no American troops in 100 foreign countries; no Nafta, Gatt, or "fast-track" ; no arrogant federal judges usurping states rights; no attacks on private property; and no income tax.

We could get rid of most of the cabinet departments, most of the agencies, and most of the budget. The government would be small, frugal, and limited.

That system is called liberty. It's what the Founding Fathers gave us.
Under liberty, we built the greatest, freest, most prosperous, most decent country on earth. It's no coincidence that the monstrous growth of the federal government has been accompanied by a sickening decline in living standards and moral standards. The feds want us to be hamsters on a treadmill working hard, all day long, to pay high taxes, but otherwise entirely docile and controlled. The huge, expensive, and out of control leviathan that we call the federal government wants to run every single aspect of our lives.

Well, I'm sorry, but that's not America. It's not what the Founders gave us. It's not the country you believe in. It's not the country I believe in.
So, on that TV interview, I emphasized not only the attacks on our property, but also the decline of our civil liberties, at the hands of the federal police.

There are not supposed to be any federal police, according to the Constitution.

Then I really went over the line. I talked about the Waco massacre. Bill Clinton and Janet Reno claim those 81 church members, including 19 children, burned down their own church and killed themselves, and good riddance. So they put few survivors on trial, and threw them in prison for 40 years.

We're not supposed to remember that the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms talk about an unconstitutional Agency rather than arrest David Koresh on his regular morning jog, called in the TV stations for big publicity bonanza, and sent a swat team in black masks and black uniforms to break down his front door, guns blazing. They also sent in a helicopter gunship, to shoot at the roof of a church full of innocents.

The Branch Dravidian's resisted, and after a heartless siege of almost two months, and after cutting off food, water, and electricity, and playing horrible rock and roll through huge speakers 24 hours a day, the feds sent in the tanks to crush the walls of the church, and inject poisonous CS gas.

Now, CS gas is banned under the Paris Convention on Chemical Warfare. The U.S. could not use it in a war.
But it could and did use it against American civilians.

After the tanks did their work on the church, the place burst into flame, and all 81 people -- men, women, children, and babies -- were incinerated in a screaming horror.

Did some feds set the fire?

Did the flammable CS gas ignite, since without electricity, the parishioners were using lanterns? Did a tank knock over a lantern, striking one of the bales of hay being used against the thin walls as a "defense"
against bullets? Or did the Dravidian's, as Clinton and Reno claim, kill themselves?

A new documentary Waco: The Rules of Engagement may show, through FLIR infrared photography, FBI snipers killing the Dravidian's by shooting through the back of the church, where no media cameras were allowed. This film won a prize at the famed Sundance Film Festival. It was made by people who took the government's side, until they investigated.

Whatever the truth, there's no question that an irresponsible federal government has innocent blood on its hands, and not only from Waco. And the refusal of corrupt and perverse liberals to admit it means nothing.

In my interview, in answer to a caller's question, I pointed out that Waco, and the federal murders at Ruby Ridge especially the FBI sniper's shot that blasted apart the head of a young mother holding her baby caused many Americans to live in fear of federal power.

Then I uttered the sentiment that caused the media hysteria: I said that a lot of Americans fear that they too might be attacked by federal swat teams for exercising their constitutional rights, or merely for wanting to be left alone.

Whoa! You've never seen anything like it. For days, in an all out assault, I was attacked by Democrats, unions, big business, establishment Republicans, and of course the media, in Washington and my home state of Texas.

Newspapers foamed at the mouth, calling me a "right-wing extremist." (Say, isn't that what George III called Thomas Jefferson?)

I was even blamed for the Oklahoma City bombing! And by the way, I don't believe we've gotten the full truth on that either.

All my many opponents were outraged that a Congressman would criticize big government. "If you don't like Washington, resign!" said a typical big-city newspaper editorial.

But the media, as usual, were all wet. (Do they ever get anything right?) The average Congressman may go to Washington to wallow in power, and line his pockets with a big lobbying job for a special interest (so he can keep ripping off the taxpayers). But that's not why I'm in Congress. It's not why I left my medical practice as a physician. It's not why I put up with all the abuse. It's not why I refuse a plush Congressional pension.

I'm in this fight for a reason. I want to hand on to my children and grandchildren, and to you and your family, a great and free America, an America true to her Constitution, an America worthy of her history.
I will not let the crooks and clowns and criminals have their way.

I'm in Congress to represent the ideas of liberty, the ideas that you and I share, for the people of my district, for the people of Texas, for the people of America. That's why I'm working to stop federal abuses, and to cut the government: its taxes, its bureaucrats, its paramilitary police, its spending, its meddling overseas, and every single unconstitutional action it takes. And not with a pair of nail scissors, but with a hammer and chisel.
Won't you help me do this work?

Not much of the federal leviathan would be left, if I had my way. But you'd be able to keep the money you earn, your privacy would be secure, your dollar would be sound, your local school would be tops, and your kids wouldn't be sent off to some useless or vicious foreign war to fight for the UN.

But Jefferson and the other Founders would recognize our government, and our descendants would bless us. By the way, when I say cut taxes, I don't mean fiddle with the code.

I mean abolish the income tax and the IRS, and replace them with nothing.

Recently, I asked a famous Republican committee chairman who's always talking about getting rid of IRS- why he engineered a secret $580 million raise for the tax collectors. "They need it for their computers," this guy told me. So the IRS can't extract enough from us as it is! The National Taxpayers Union says I have the highest pro-taxpayer rating in Congressional history, that I am the top "Taxpayer's Best Friend." You know I won't play the Capitol Hill games with the Capitol Hill gang, denouncing the IRS while giving the Gestapo more of your money. Or figuring out some other federal tax for them to squeeze out of you. I also want to abolish the Federal Reserve, and send Alan Greenspan out to get a job.

The value of our dollar and the level of our interest rates are not supposed to be manipulated by a few members of the power elite meeting secretly in a marble palace. The Federal Reserve is unconstitutional, pure and simple. The only Constitutional money is gold and silver, not notes redeemable in them. Not fed funny money. Without the Federal Reserve, our money could not be inflated at the behest of big government or big banks.
Your income and savings would not lose their value. Just as important, we wouldn't have this endless string of booms and busts, recessions and depressions, with each bust getting worse.

They aren't natural to the free market; they're caused by the schemers at the Fed. President Andrew Jackson called the 19th century Fed "The Monster"
because it was a vehicle for inflation and all sorts of special interest corruption.

Let me tell you, things haven't changed a bit.

I also work to save our schools from D.C. interference. Thanks to the feds, new curriculums not only smear the Founders as "racist, slave-owning elitists," they seek to dumb down our students so they will all be equal.

"Look-say" reading and the abolition of phonics has the same purpose, and so does the new "fuzzy" math, in which there are no right and no wrong answers. That must be what they use in the U.S. Treasury! It's certainly what they use in the U.S. Congress.

But ever since the beginning of federal aid to education and accelerating with the establishment of the rotten Department of Education, SAT scores have been dropping. Schools, with few exceptions, are getting worse every year. To save our kids, we must get the sticky fingers of the feds off our local schools, and let parents rule. That's what the Constitution says, and the Bible too.

And then there's my least favorite topic, the UN. World government is obviously unconstitutional. It undermines our country's sovereignty in the worst way possible. That's why I want us out of the UN, and the UN itself taking a hike.

After all, the UN is socialist and corrupt (many votes can be bought with a "blonde and a case of scotch," one UN ambassador once said). It costs many billions, and it puts our soldiers in UN uniforms under foreign commanders, and sends them off to unconstitutional, undeclared wars. When Michael New, one of the finest young men I've ever met, objected to wearing UN blue, he was kicked out of the American Army. What an outrage! Not one dime for the UN, and not one American soldier! Not in Haiti, not in Bosnia, not in Somalia, not in Rwanda. I know it's radical, but how about devoting American military efforts to defending America, and only America?

Such ideas, said one newspaper reporter, make me a maverick who will never go far because he won't go along to get along.

Darn right! What does "go far" mean? Get a big government job? To heck with that. And I won't sell my vote for pork either.

When I walked through the U.S. Capitol this morning, I got angry. The building is filled with statues and painting of Jefferson, Madison, and the other Founders. Those great men sacrificed everything to give us a free country, and a Constitution to keep it that way.

When I was first elected, I placed my hand on the Bible and swore an oath to uphold the Constitution. That's exactly what I'm fighting for. But such ideas drive the liberals crazy.

That's why I badly need your help. I've been targeted nationally for defeat. The Democrats, the AFL-CIO, the teachers union, big business PACs, the trial lawyers, the big bankers, the foreign-aid lobbyists, the big media, and the establishment Republicans want to dance on my political grave. The Fed, the Education Department, and the UN are anxious to join in.

They can't stand even one person telling the truth. And they're terrified when that truth gains the people's support.

Right now, four well-funded Democrats are competing to try to beat me, and a Republican is rumored to have been offered money at a secret meeting in
Mexico(!) if he would try to knock me off in a primary. Won't you help me stay up here to fight?

Frankly, I am in trouble if you don't. My Texas district has 22,000 square
miles (not a misprint). I've got to travel all over it, set up small
offices to be manned by volunteers, advertise, pay phone bills, and distribute video and audio tapes to the people to get around the big-media lies. As I know from my last election, which I won by the skin of my teeth, the media will carry any smear, repeat any libel, throw any piece of mud, no matter how untrue. In fact, the less true, the more they like it. They are determined to silence me.

But you can help me overcome all this.

Together, we can beat the bad guys arrayed against our country and our freedom. We can support the Constitution. We can win. Your generous contribution of $25 or $50 would be great ...$100, $250, or even $500 or $1,000 would be magnificent.

Of course, any amount would help, and in return, I will keep you up to date on this fight as a member of my "kitchen cabinet."

What great men founded this country! What great people have carried on their fight! That fight is not lost, not if you will join it. Washington, D.C. is a loser, but among the people, our ideas are gaining every single day.

Keep the tide turning in our direction. Please make your most generous contribution. Join this fight for the Constitution, and stop those who want to rip it up, and throw it in the Potomac.

Together, we can join the Founders' fight. Together, we can make history.


Sincerely,

Ron Paul
U. S. Congressman
203 Cannon House Office Building
Washington D.C. 20515

Committee to Re-elect Ron Paul
837 W. Plantation
Clute, Texas 77531


.

kres24GT
07-18-2007, 10:17 AM
Hopefully he will run as the Libertarian candidate. No chance to win though, Americans do not want freedom, they way an unconstitutional big government.

LadyMod at scam.com
07-18-2007, 11:12 AM
Hopefully he will run as the Libertarian candidate. No chance to win though, Americans do not want freedom, they way an unconstitutional big government.

Oh, they want freedom, they just don't want to get serious about getting it or retaining what they have. That might require REAL sacrifice.


:banghead:

.

kres24GT
07-18-2007, 11:20 AM
Oh, they want freedom, they just don't want to get serious about getting it or retaining what they have. That might require REAL sacrifice.


:banghead:

.


As I said before Americans will always trade freedom for safety and comfort, they do not want to be free, and they certainly do not want a constitutional government.

If Americans wanted this Libertarians would win every election.

nofear
07-18-2007, 12:22 PM
As I said before Americans will always trade freedom for safety and comfort, they do not want to be free, and they certainly do not want a constitutional government.

If Americans wanted this Libertarians would win every election.

elections..you think that makes a difference.?? as Stalin so perfectly stated:
its not who votes,but who counts the votes..when both of are last so called canindates were skull and bones alumni,do you really think it would matter anyways..Kerry-Bush..same flavor different fluffy outside filling..

LadyMod at scam.com
07-18-2007, 03:26 PM
elections..you think that makes a difference.?? as Stalin so perfectly stated:
its not who votes,but who counts the votes..when both of are last so called canindates were skull and bones alumni,do you really think it would matter anyways..Kerry-Bush..same flavor different fluffy outside filling..

LOL, you have a point. It certainly didn't make a difference in 2000 when the Supreme Court handed the presidency over to Bush :disbelief: instead of the candidate the people wanted. :mad:


LM

kres24GT
07-18-2007, 03:44 PM
LOL, you have a point. It certainly didn't make a difference in 2000 when the Supreme Court handed the presidency over to Bush :disbelief: instead of the candidate the people wanted. :mad:


LM


It would have made do difference if Gore had won. Dems and Reps are no different. The only plus is Gore would have meant gridlock.

Bill
07-18-2007, 06:41 PM
It would have made do difference if Gore had won. Dems and Reps are no different. The only plus is Gore would have meant gridlock.

Bullshit.

But, since you're self-marginalized, nothing you say matters anyway.

As you yourself have said many times.

kres24GT
07-18-2007, 08:45 PM
Bullshit.

But, since you're self-marginalized, nothing you say matters anyway.

As you yourself have said many times.



Yes, let us delude ourselves into thinking their is a difference between Republicans and Democrats.

LadyMod at scam.com
07-19-2007, 08:56 AM
It would have made do difference if Gore had won. Dems and Reps are no different. The only plus is Gore would have meant gridlock.


It would have made a difference. That difference would have been that American voters still had a voice in the choice of their leaders. The day the Supreme court took that away from the people was historical and far reaching on more than just one level.

And we've reaped the consequences of it ever since.


LM

Bill
07-19-2007, 05:37 PM
Yes, let us delude ourselves into thinking their is a difference between Republicans and Democrats.

You're both self-marginalized, and a rightwing apologist, so what you think effectively makes no difference in the cxurrent climate anyway.

kres24GT
07-19-2007, 07:50 PM
You're both self-marginalized, and a rightwing apologist, so what you think effectively makes no difference in the cxurrent climate anyway.


LMAO @ a rightwing apologist

If you notice the few right wing nuts that poster here (all two of them) I give them just as much shit about their partisan BS. I will always play devils advocate to anyone who criticizes one party over the other, both are worthless.

Both parties want big government, more restriction of freedom, are corrupt and have horrible foreign policies.

kres24GT
07-19-2007, 08:09 PM
Bill,

I post on another board frequently. It's a college football board mainly but we have all been posting together for a long time and talk about other subjects, including politics frequently. There is a more even distribution of right/left, Rep/Dem there. You'd get a better idea about me if you saw how I bash both sides there.

Seriously, I have to laugh at the right wing apologist comments because I get called a lib all the time as well.

My friends are mostly Republican and they all call me a dirty liberal. In the most recent election for Governor we got pretty heated in discussions because I told any of them who voted for Sonny Perdue (R) a moron.


If you want the link for that site let me know, however the mod is a real Nazi and if you aren't a college football fan he will probably ban you quickly.

Bill
07-19-2007, 08:22 PM
If you notice the few right wing nuts that poster here (all two of them) I give them just as much shit about their partisan BS. I will always play devils advocate to anyone who criticizes one party over the other, both are worthless.

Both parties want big government, more restriction of freedom, are corrupt and have horrible foreign policies.

I know Kres, that's part of why I like you.

You may not even be conscious of your right wing apologies.

Which makes you an even more effective right wing op. ;-}

Bill
07-19-2007, 08:24 PM
It's a shame we can't keep a really committed rightwinger here.

I don't think they are used to being challenged. Mostly they only talk to people who agree with them.

LadyMod at scam.com
07-19-2007, 09:09 PM
It's a shame we can't keep a really committed rightwinger here.

I don't think they are used to being challenged. Mostly they only talk to people who agree with them.


LOL, check out the political forum at scam.com. Look for posts by Grim17 or pwrone. They are both committed rightwingers (needing to be commited, literally) and have been there a couple of years that I have been moderating the site. Grim especially has "staying power" and he's abused something fierce.

I've invited both to come to this forum and post. We need some different viewpoints and I think people here are more intune with real issues and less inclined to become total assholes because someone doesn't agree with them.

LM

.

Independent Harry
07-20-2007, 04:46 PM
lol lady mod, it will be interesting to see how grim acts with our DC to provoke the shit out of him all the time.

LadyMod at scam.com
07-20-2007, 05:51 PM
lol lady mod, it will be interesting to see how grim acts with our DC to provoke the shit out of him all the time.

I don't think grim will come over here. He doesn't have anyone but me to hate here. :lmao2:

And he doesn't really hate me, just hates it that I don't jump to do his bidding and denounce and ban DC, LOL.


LM

Independent Harry
07-20-2007, 06:17 PM
I do find DC somewhat distasteful because of the sources he uses for his postings. But I find a lot of what he says to be on target. The rest, well the rest is usually lost in translation like most things. Grim is just as fanatical as DC is except he's dead wrong 90% of the time.

LadyMod at scam.com
07-20-2007, 08:00 PM
Grim is just as fanatical as DC is except he's dead wrong 90% of the time.

At least he is consistent. :D :lmao2:


LM

nofear
07-21-2007, 09:16 AM
dems and reps are just another seperator,another dividing tool..if there was truly a difference wouldnt the people notice..HUGE SHIFTS in policy thru different administrations...i love it when people i met say "so you are a dem or hey you are a rep..i just look at them like yes right thats what i am..i sell myself that short always by putting some ridiculous label on myself..or even better is when someone offers that information freely..like "yea im a rep" or "oh thats because im a dem"..lost souls not knowing that if there labeled,or they labeled themselves its the matrix..

caught..stuck..owned..controlled..suppressed...man ipulated...lost..sheep..