PDA

View Full Version : Outsider Ron Paul finds support for Fed audit


Moby
09-04-2009, 03:08 PM
I don't think that we could go back to the gold standard now but I would like to see more over sight.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20090904/pl_nm/us_usa_congress_paul_1

By Andy Sullivan Andy Sullivan – Fri Sep 4, 10:10 am ET
WASHINGTON (Reuters) – After decades of pushing long-shot causes like abolishing the income tax and reinstating the gold standard, Republican Representative Ron Paul finds himself in an unaccustomed spot: on the cusp of legislative victory.

A majority of the libertarian-leaning Texan's colleagues in the House of Representatives support his proposal to increase congressional scrutiny of the Federal Reserve, and the measure could be included in a broader banking overhaul this fall.

But don't expect the House to take up Paul's other pet causes, such as pulling out of the United Nations.

Experts say the success of his Federal Reserve Scrutiny Act reflects rising unease with the central bank's dramatic actions over the past year, rather than any increased influence stemming from Paul's quixotic 2008 presidential bid.

"He's finally found the right moment," said Sarah Binder of the liberal-leaning Brookings Institution.

Paul's spokeswoman Rachel Mills agrees: "His bill happens to be in the right place at the right time."

The former obstetrician has pursued unpopular causes in a political career that has earned him the nickname "Dr. No."

He's proposed abolishing an alphabet soup of government agencies and repealing federal drug laws. He has called for withdrawing from trade pacts and military alliances like NATO and pulling U.S. troops back from overseas bases.

He was the only member to vote against awarding congressional medals to Pope John Paul II and civil rights leader Rosa Parks. He has defied his party by opposing the Iraq war and speaking out against a proposed ban on gay marriage.

Paul's 2008 presidential bid attracted a grass-roots following that hired blimps and swamped Web message boards.

Many have continued their activism this year -- visitors to RonPaul.com can enjoy songs like "Audit the Fed" written and performed by supporters. His latest book, "End the Fed," is ranked #22 on Amazon.com's bestseller list.

UNEXPECTED CLOUT

As a renegade member of a political party that controls neither house of Congress, Paul would seem to have little legislative clout. None of the 57 bills he's introduced this year have attracted more than 12 co-sponsors.

The exception is his Federal Reserve Transparency Act, which would allow congressional investigators greater access to the Federal Reserve's records. All 178 House Republicans and 104 Democrats have signed on.

The chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, Democratic Representative Barney Frank, plans to work with Paul to include a Fed audit in broader legislation to revamp financial regulation that could come up for a vote in October.

It faces a rockier road in the Senate, where a companion bill offered by his ideological opposite, self-described socialist Bernie Sanders, has drawn 23 co-sponsors.

Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke has warned that if the legislation allows an outside agency to audit the Fed's monetary policy decisions -- raising or lowering benchmark interest rates or pumping cash into the financial system -- it could create the perception that the central bank's independence could be compromised.

Economists say the Fed blunted the impact of the worst downturn since the 1930s by bailing out financial giants like American International Group, reducing interest rates effectively to zero and flooding financial markets with hundreds of billions of dollars.

But some lawmakers worry the Fed may have gone too far.

"We picked up some political support because the Fed has played such a big role," Frank said in an interview.

Voters also have their suspicions. A Gallup poll in July found that only 30 percent thought the Fed was doing a good job, the worst of all government agencies measured.

"I think it's tapped into a very general deep suspicion about the secrecy of government," said Mark Calabria of the libertarian Cato Institute.

disrupter
09-04-2009, 04:18 PM
I may not agree with everything he poses & proposes, but a couple of things he is spot on.

No more Socialist Nanny state drug prohibitions.

While i support an independent Fed i also support some kind of better scrutiny of it.
It can not become a law unto itself.
I am sure there is some range that fulfills a delicate balance point between scrutiny & accountability as well as practical functional, sometimes non-disclosed [at least on a temporary basis] operations.

The Fed should serve the currency, such that a sound currency serves the nation,
But they can not be benefiting banks at the economic sacrifice of millions of Americans, either as homeowners, shareholders, taxpayers, or citizens.

Citizen
09-04-2009, 05:00 PM
I may not agree with everything he poses & proposes, but a couple of things he is spot on.

No more Socialist Nanny state drug prohibitions.

While i support an independent Fed i also support some kind of better scrutiny of it.
It can not become a law unto itself.
I am sure there is some range that fulfills a delicate balance point between scrutiny & accountability as well as practical functional, sometimes non-disclosed [at least on a temporary basis] operations.

The Fed should serve the currency, such that a sound currency serves the nation,
But they can not be benefiting banks at the economic sacrifice of millions of Americans, either as homeowners, shareholders, taxpayers, or citizens.

"I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around [the banks] will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered. The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs."
-Thomas Jefferson

disrupter
09-04-2009, 05:16 PM
Zimbabwe has no federal reserve.

They have multi-million percent inflation.

Our whole system of government is based on separations of functions,
Judiciary, Legislative, Executive.

Keeping a somewhat independent Fed seems both consistent & advisable to me.
It should however be accountable to economic sanity, based on historically, reasonably expectable norms, not on some flash in the pan, neocon-artist,
thievery as a replacement for actual capitalism where people have assets & treat them with respect.

It should not be subject to the whims of facile & vapidly changing public opinion. It should be a vehicle for stability & prudent, perhaps inspired foresight. It should not operate oblivious to centuries of economic experience.

Neocons use our gullibility to rob us of OUR assets.
Snake oil salesmen are calling themselves 'capitalists' & 'conservatives' when they are neither.
They are con-artists, smooth talking away all economic sanity of judgment.
We are partly to blame for being so gullible.
Our government is partly to blame for lying down so completely in bed with them.

And yes, Greenspan is partly to blame, for being such a proponent of outlaw, unethical, unregulated thievery, that called itself capitalism.

How can you call yourself a capitalist when you are busy burning down & destroying the economic universe for a quick, egotistical buck?
That is raping & looting, not capitalism. Those are the actions of madmen, not real bankers who preserve as well as attempt to grow wealth.
Capitalism includes the exercise of reason, because you actually start out with something you could lose.

Smurf-Herder
09-05-2009, 09:34 AM
This is an idea whose time has surely come. :thumbsup: