PDA

View Full Version : Microsoft pushes for single global patent system


Moby
09-02-2009, 11:16 PM
There is the advantage of a court system that could keep the cheap knock offs from being manufactured in countries that have no copy write laws. It's also very close to pushing the One World Government advocated by Bill Kristol and The PNAC.

Thoughts?

http://news.cnet.com/8301-1001_3-10334285-92.html?part=rss&subj=news&tag=2547-1_3-0-5
A senior lawyer at Microsoft is calling for the creation of a global patent system to make it easier and faster for corporations to enforce their intellectual property rights around the world.

In a blog posting on Tuesday, Microsoft's Deputy General Counsel Horacio Gutierrez said that a backlog of patent applications internationally was needed to tackle the 3.5 million pending patent applications around the world--including around 750,000 in the US.

"In today's world of universal connectivity, global business and collaborative innovation, it is time for a world patent that is derived from a single patent application, examined and prosecuted by a single examining authority and litigated before a single judicial body," said Guiterrez. "A harmonized, global patent system would resolve many of the criticisms leveled at national patent systems over unmanageable backlogs and interminable pendency periods."

Guiterrez went on to praise efforts to harmonize international patent systems through projects such ad the Patent Prosecution Highway and the "IP5" partnership but said more needed to be done to allow corporations to protect their intellectual property.

"By facing the challenges, realizing a vision, overcoming political barriers, and removing procedural obstacles we can build a global patent system that will promote innovation, enrich public knowledge, encourage competition and drive economic growth and employment," he added. "The time is now--the solutions are in reach."

Microsoft's calls to speed up the issuing of patents come shortly after the company was prosecuted in Texas for patent infringement concerning its Word application. In August, US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas issued a permanent injunction that "prohibits Microsoft from selling or importing to the United States any Microsoft Word products that have the capability of opening .XML, .DOCX or DOCM files (XML files) containing custom XML", according to a statement released by attorneys for the plaintiff, i4i.

Commenting on Microsoft's appeal of the ruling late last month. i4i chairman Loudon Owen told ZDNet UK's sister site, CNET News, that the software giant's attitude was "extraordinary." "It captures the hostile attitude of Microsoft toward inventors who dare to enforce patents against them," Owen said. "It is also blatantly derogatory about the court system."

Microsoft's stance on stronger software patents has attracted opposition from the open-source community and other antipatent campaigners.

The founder of the GNU Linux project Richard Stallman, recently warned against the use of Mono software tools as they exposed users to potential patent violation accusations from Microsoft. In an article published by the Free Software Foundation, Stallman said that "only fools would ignore" the threat poised by Microsoft's patents.

The UK Pirate Party, which was registered by the electoral commission last month, is also opposed to the current patent system--especially in the area of health care--and has put reform of the process at the center of its campaign for the next election. "Monopolies maintained by companies producing life-saving drugs mean people are dying, as they can't afford (treatment)," the party's leader Andrew Robinson told ZDNet UK last month.

Microsoft's backing for greater cooperation on the issue has the backing of other organizations. The World Intellectual Property Organization is planning to hold a conference on global enforcement of intellectual property rights in Geneva on the 17th and 18th of September. "IP systems need to keep pace with globalizing trends in innovation and business practices," the organization said in a statement. "The symposium offers stakeholders an opportunity to explore how existing highly diverse national and regional IP infrastructures can be developed to support the dynamics of innovation which is increasingly transnational and borderless."

FSF Europe and the UK Pirate Party were approached for comment but did not reply in time for this story.

Andrew Donoghue of ZDNet UK reported from London.

Smurf-Herder
09-02-2009, 11:21 PM
It reminded me that Gates' wife had attended a Bilderberg conference. Makes you wonder.

Bill Cosby
09-02-2009, 11:24 PM
IF microSUX is for it how can it be good for anyone else????

doctordog
09-02-2009, 11:49 PM
Reminds me of Obama wanting to to control the airwaves and internet.

Bill Cosby
09-03-2009, 12:06 AM
Not so fast..........>>>> you know you wanna bash microsux....

Go head take a swing...http://www.electriqueboutique.com/shop/images/1446-350b.jpgWe won't tell no body......

Smurf-Herder
09-03-2009, 12:11 AM
Reminds me of Obama wanting to to control the airwaves and internet.

Wayers, it's both sides.

Bush was into the North American Trade thing; as well as flaking out on border security. Now it's Barry in the cat-bird seat, going for broke (literally).

Why do you think the Bilderbergs include leaders from both the Left and Right at their conferences?

CosmicRocker
09-03-2009, 12:55 AM
The US Patent and Trademark Office sets the most stringent standard for utilitarian patent protection.

Vigourous searches, legal opinons of patentability.

How could you unify the various different systems; when previous patents files in different countires,
only searched in their existing patents? What if an accpeted patent or trademark in Germany, might infringe on a previous US patent?

One would have to go back and unify everything under a world patent, so all countries patent claims would be equal.

Better to use treatys, of reciprocity.

Moby
09-03-2009, 07:33 AM
Reminds me of Obama wanting to to control the airwaves and internet.
When was that happening?

Captain Obvious
09-04-2009, 02:46 PM
I don't understand why the fucking feds don't go after Microsoft for operating a fucking monopoly.

The fix is in somewhere.

As a side note, not many know this but it is uncommonly understood that Bill Gates named the company after his cock.

Micro... soft.

HURRR!!

disrupter
09-04-2009, 04:37 PM
I have mixed thoughts on it.

The US patent system as of late has become a stream of non-sense garbage, due to bonus incentives for each patent a patent official sponsors.

Also our collective, public domain, genetic code [DNA/RNA], the heritage of billions of years of ancestry [not original creations or innovations] is being patented out of our property. What happens when you get charged royalties simply because of the genetic code you were born with?

So there would have to be some kind of broad shared thinking about what was patentable or not.

Considering what garbage the US patent office has become of late, maybe for the US it is an improvement.

I do worry about global government, but at the same time maybe that is the only viable path for human survival. I would hope that as long the primary function of our survival was served we would have representation as well as stipulated, protected civil liberties beyond that.

CosmicRocker
09-04-2009, 05:47 PM
I have mixed thoughts on it.

The US patent system as of late has become a stream of non-sense garbage, due to bonus incentives for each patent a patent official sponsors.

Also our collective, public domain, genetic code [DNA/RNA], the heritage of billions of years of ancestry [not original creations or innovations] is being patented out of our property. What happens when you get charged royalties simply because of the genetic code you were born with?

So there would have to be some kind of broad shared thinking about what was patentable or not.

Considering what garbage the US patent office has become of late, maybe for the US it is an improvement.

I do worry about global government, but at the same time maybe that is the only viable path for human survival. I would hope that as long the primary function of our survival was served we would have representation as well as stipulated, protected civil liberties beyond that.
Patent officials - do you mean the Examiners?
I thought they've actually clean up a bit, with requirements of provisional patents, instead of that silly disclosure document program.

disrupter
09-05-2009, 12:55 AM
There was some bonus system where the more patents they got through the system they got bonuses for. There was stuff that was Marvel comics cartoon crap, with no prototype, just fantasy non-sense with no relationship to anything real. Worsley-Twist FTL warp drive?

The definition of what is patentable has slowly evolved to include business practices and broad ideas. The fact that the Smucker's company went to court over patents on peanut butter and jelly sandwiches might have provoked chuckles. But it became a symbol of a system gone awry.

Technological advances raise new questions with each passing year. Should genes be patentable? What about life forms? The high-tech and pharmaceutical industries find themselves at odds on reform because patents affect their businesses so differently. The understaffed Patent and Trademark Office needs to draw the line between a real innovation and an obvious concept that should be freely available as a building block for future generations of creative thinkers.

Meanwhile,
profiteers, including lawyers and hedge funds, have turned the very purpose of patent rights — to encourage people to invent and produce —
on its head, using them to tax, blackmail and even shut down productive companies unless they pay high enough ransoms. These so-called patent trolls have emerged as the villains in this intellectual property debate.http://www.nytimes.com/2006/03/22/opinion/22wed1.html

I also believe there should be a use it or lose it clause with patents.

The whole point of the patent system was to encourage innovation & invention by rewarding originators.

But when corporations buy patents specifically just to sit on them, they are stifling & killing innovation & enterprise instead.

Also when corporations ban people from doing research on something because they expect researchers to pay patent royalties again they are slowing progress & innovation.

I think we need to revisit & rethink the entire patent process so it has a viability threshold for ideas,
accepts that once something is in the public domain it can not be patented out from under people. [.zip compression of computer files comes to my mind]

It should encourage innovation & maximum easy opportunity for someone to be using &/or researching new ideas.

It should not be a feeding frenzy for lawyers, patent trolls or ways corporations block progress by sitting on without using patents.