View Full Version : RadiGuys banned changed from 5 days to Permanent - for 'Too much drama'
Smurf-Herder
07-26-2009, 02:43 PM
WTF, SM?
You're a goddamned mental case.
It's all yours now. I've had it with your bullshit.
You can have your circle-jerk little kingdom - because I'm not only quitting as moderator - I'm leaving the board for good.
doctordog
07-26-2009, 02:45 PM
WTF, SM?
You're a goddamned mental case.
It's all yours now. I've had it with your bullshit.
You can have your circle-jerk little kingdom - because I'm not only quitting as moderator - I'm leaving the board for good.
Smurf, check your mail before you leave.
Smurf-Herder
07-26-2009, 02:47 PM
Smurf, check your mail before you leave.
You better hurry, because I can't stand the smell of this place much longer.
Zebulon0351
07-26-2009, 02:48 PM
Why is Radio leaving? I think it should be made public. As much as I disagree with him and think he goes off the deep end sometimes there is no reason to ban him permanently from the board.
Life_Long_Dem!
07-26-2009, 02:48 PM
boo friggin who smurf....radio guy was a sheep that brought nothing to this board but drama, copy and pasted pundunts crap on a daily basis and was unintelligent with his liberal is as liberal does mantra that he way over used like he couldnt think of anything better to say. I am getting away from copying and pasting so much and posting original thoughts...something he could never do so I say good riddance to him and to you go home and cry to mommy :lmao2:
Smurf-Herder
07-26-2009, 02:50 PM
Why is Radio leaving? I think it should be made public. As much as I disagree with him and think he goes off the deep end sometimes there is no reason to ban him permanently from the board.
Moby changed his 5 day ban to a Permanent ban.
Just because he's an asshole that can't even keep his own rules.
Life_Long_Dem!
07-26-2009, 02:52 PM
if radio guy is banned then why is his name listed as being online on the board right now?
Zebulon0351
07-26-2009, 02:59 PM
Im sure you can still read the posts even if you are banned.. you just can't post.
mwillman
07-26-2009, 03:01 PM
Nope, not if you are logged in as your user account.
You can read them as a guest but your name wont show up.
bairdi
07-26-2009, 10:16 PM
rg was banned once before but ladymod at scam.com interceded on his behalf and told sirmoby that rg had turned over a new leaf. I don't know the reason for the first ban but my guess would be that rg threw one of his little temper tantrums to piss of sirmoby or another mod. rg knew he was on double secret probation, but he threw another little temper fit again by flooding the thread with youtube videos with the express intent of pissing sirmoby off. I understand why sirmoby would choose to ban rg 5 days. I don't necessarily agree with the permanent ban but I can also understand why sirmoby would chose it and not want to bother again with someone he had permanently banned before.
RG has been banned many times and all reasons go back to drama and immaturity.
The first time I banned him was for calling a woman a cunt. So we made a rule about it.
Then he was banned for bumping 20+ of his own threads so that no new threads appeared on the front page. I think all of threads came from bloggers instead of news sources.
Then he was banned for posting basically the same article coming from multiple bloggers about a dozen times so that, no one else could post on the front page again.
The pattern continued until he was banned permanently.
The rules for slurs, bumping and spam are for RG alone. Everyone else has been mature enough to not need such rules.
When I recommended Smurf to be a mod he asked if RG could come back. I agreed even though he has tried to keep all opinions out that aren't supported by the people that he follows and I think he's emotionally unstable. Smurf agreed to keep a close eye on him but also admitted that he would treat him special.
In a week I saw that RG was up to the same old shit so I offered two warnings (which is two more then he deserved) and Smurf was allowing it. Third times a charm. I felt that a 5 day ban was more then acceptable with RG's history.
Looking at Smurf's response and the response of a small select following, I realize that I never should have agreed to allow RG back. Some people are just not capable of rational thought and we don't need Drama Queens here or any where else.
Would anyone else have been banned for it? No way. Three strikes you're out. A dozen strikes is too silly. I should have known better.
Normally when people have problems with such things they would just move on. Watch the Drama Queens in the near future. I'm sure that they will take emotional instability to a new level.
rg was banned once before but ladymod at scam.com interceded on his behalf and told sirmoby that rg had turned over a new leaf. I don't know the reason for the first ban but my guess would be that rg threw one of his little temper tantrums to piss of sirmoby or another mod. rg knew he was on double secret probation, but he threw another little temper fit again by flooding the thread with youtube videos with the express intent of pissing sirmoby off. I understand why sirmoby would choose to ban rg 5 days. I don't necessarily agree with the permanent ban but I can also understand why sirmoby would chose it and not want to bother again with someone he had permanently banned before.
If a normal and ration response to the issue occurred it would have stayed at 5 days and everyone would move on. As you can see, some people aren't capable of that.
We went through this many times before. History shows that RG will push the limits until he's banned again. There's no need to go through this stupid and immature emotional bull shit again. He's done. If people don't like then they can just move on, try and discuss it rationally or prove my point.
I bet they're going to prove my point.
CONFLICTS
07-26-2009, 10:45 PM
"drama" is way too fucking vague of a term for you to be throwing around like it's a real reason for anything
for all we know drama could mean "disagreeing with sirmoby"
"drama" is way too fucking vague of a term for you to be throwing around like it's a real reason for anything
for all we know drama could mean "disagreeing with sirmoby"
It means being banned many time before and the last time was permanent.
He was back on trial purposes only and blew it.
bairdi
07-26-2009, 11:03 PM
If a normal and ration response to the issue occurred it would have stayed at 5 days and everyone would move on. As you can see, some people aren't capable of that.
We went through this many times before. History shows that RG will push the limits until he's banned again. There's no need to go through this stupid and immature emotional bull shit again. He's done. If people don't like then they can just move on, try and discuss it rationally or prove my point.
I bet they're going to prove my point.
I understand where you are coming from SirMoby and I support your decision. I thought the whole youtube thing was really immature, but it was a typical response from rg.
Cat slave
07-26-2009, 11:47 PM
Hey guys, lets let the libs have this place. Its sure not the forum it used to
be....and thats sad because it used to rock.
And I dont see RGs so called "drama"...and the copy and pasting.....SM was
always wanting a link....c&p is a short cut to the links, eh???
Gee, when all us conservatives are banned it will be just one big ***ster ***k!
Enjoy!
Smurf please be sure to let me know when you find a good place. You have
my email and so does HT and Prof and Binky. Im very selective and dont give it to just
anybody!:thumbsup:
Hog Trash
07-26-2009, 11:55 PM
Ha Ha Ha!...One hysterical pussy liberal displays more drama in one post than all the conservatives put together do in an entire year...LOL!
That Moby is one funny fella! :lmao2:
CONFLICTS
07-27-2009, 12:28 AM
this place was always fucking terrible and populated almost entirely by complete retards
i would love to see it get much dumber so please try and get some sort of "quitters" movement together
maybe you guys can all go back to scam.com!
doctordog
07-27-2009, 01:06 PM
this place was always fucking terrible and populated almost entirely by complete retards
i would love to see it get much dumber so please try and get some sort of "quitters" movement together
maybe you guys can all go back to scam.com!
is recess over with with kid?:disbelief:
Zebulon0351
07-27-2009, 01:10 PM
this place was always fucking terrible and populated almost entirely by complete retards
i would love to see it get much dumber so please try and get some sort of "quitters" movement together
maybe you guys can all go back to scam.com!
I think we can all reach an agreement that you are the biggest retard in here brother.
Maybe you should skip scam.com and go right to disney.com.. im sure they have something for you that you can excel in.
Bill Cosby
07-27-2009, 06:20 PM
I think we can all reach an agreement that you are the biggest retard in here brother.
Maybe you should skip scam.com and go right to disney.com.. im sure they have something for you that you can excel in.
I second that............. :thumbsup:
Bill Cosby
07-27-2009, 06:25 PM
this place was always fucking terrible and populated almost entirely by complete retards
!
Well we know there is differently @ least one............ YOU!!!
Now I guess you are referring to some of the clones you were talking about??
Not sure why you are doing this but my guess is your just a little attention whore finding yourself the center of attention for once in your life.........
hog loves analyzing ppl maybe he can give his unprofessional opinion on your diagnosis...........
Hopefully it will be more then attentionwhore deficit disorder....... But there is a lot of that going around untreated do to lack of antiquate healthcare in America...
Smurf-Herder
07-27-2009, 10:00 PM
In a week I saw that RG was up to the same old shit so I offered two warnings (which is two more then he deserved) and Smurf was allowing it. Third times a charm. I felt that a 5 day ban was more then acceptable with RG's history.
This is the first I've ever heard of you warning him two previous times, or of him doing anything previously, since he's been back.
Smurf-Herder
07-27-2009, 10:02 PM
If a normal and ration response to the issue occurred it would have stayed at 5 days and everyone would move on. As you can see, some people aren't capable of that.
We went through this many times before. History shows that RG will push the limits until he's banned again. There's no need to go through this stupid and immature emotional bull shit again. He's done. If people don't like then they can just move on, try and discuss it rationally or prove my point.
I bet they're going to prove my point.
It's a personal thing with you.
You're the one creating the drama.
This is the first I've ever heard of you warning him two previous times, or of him doing anything previously, since he's been back.
Maybe you should have tried to work with me and answered your PMs. You know, like a rational partner might do instead of acting like a Drama Queen.
Smurf-Herder
07-27-2009, 10:12 PM
Maybe you should have tried to work with me and answered your PMs. You know, like a rational partner might do instead of acting like a Drama Queen.
You never PM-ed me about RadioGuy until you banned him a couple days ago. I never heard a peep from you about him until then.
If he had been doing something and I had talked to him, he would have listened to me. He has no respect for you, the way you treat people.
And stop calling me Drama Queen, you Mockingbird.
Independent Harry
07-27-2009, 10:36 PM
The reality is, he does just spam the bored with right wing blogs or websites that much of it is outright lies or has no basis in society. Then whenever anyone discredits the information he simply points to another right wing site parroting the same bullshit and uses the catchphrase, liberal is as liberal does. It's like the same formula over and over again. While I don't care either way anymore. It's kinda a retarded way to act...
Smurf-Herder
07-27-2009, 10:49 PM
The reality is, he does just spam the bored with right wing blogs or websites that much of it is outright lies or has no basis in society. Then whenever anyone discredits the information he simply points to another right wing site parroting the same bullshit and uses the catchphrase, liberal is as liberal does. It's like the same formula over and over again. While I don't care either way anymore. It's kinda a retarded way to act...
All people do is try to discredit the source, without responding to the content. That's why he resonds with Liberal is as liberal does. I've read those threads. Nobody responds to the information in the actual content. They just insult the source and him for using the source.
Also, I didn't notice the "spamming" part. Only posting like everybody else. Are you saying a member is limited to a certain number of overall posts? I didn't see a huge number from him. Just a few more than usual Glenn Beck videos. Do you have a count for me to judge how "spammy" they were?
Independent Harry
07-27-2009, 11:00 PM
All people do is try to discredit the source, without responding to the content. That's why he resonds with Liberal is as liberal does. I've read those threads. Nobody responds to the information in the actual content. They just insult the source and him for using the source.
I've tried many times refuting the information with RG, he simply quotes information from another right wing source spouting the same lies. Then he simply discredits the source as liberal biased if it's not worldnews daily or faux news or whatever the neo con driven site he's using is. That's why rational discussion is impossible with him. Sometimes, he's right, and he can pull facts from government sources or other things, but most of the time he can't see the forest for the trees.
Bill Cosby
07-27-2009, 11:09 PM
The reality is, he does just spam the bored with right wing blogs or websites that much of it is outright lies or has no basis in society. Then whenever anyone discredits the information he simply points to another right wing site parroting the same bullshit and uses the catchphrase, liberal is as liberal does. It's like the same formula over and over again. While I don't care either way anymore. It's kinda a retarded way to act...
He can have a tendency for that now & then.......... Not like he is the only one doing that........
I don't read all his posts or pretend to know his history here but I look @ those, @ least the ones that interest me, as opportunities not affronts or attacks....
A few weeks ago I started a thread I think on heath care... I posted the original post supporting it. My second post in response was debunking/attacking the first argument... (I don't think anyone has ever done this that I am aware of...)
Needlesstosay I only got a few hits. I posted it on 4 sites...... The few that I got were asking me if I realized what I had done...... I think had I posted either of them I would have gotten several replies........ Perhaps there is something to learn in that...????
Ppl (like attorneys) layout their best arguments (even if they are not very good) & challenge others to discuss/debunk it...... I wish ppl would be more upfront/honest about the short comings in their arguments but that is rarely the case......
vBulletin v3.5.4, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.